Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/01/21

Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Year	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2004	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2005	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2006	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2007	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2008	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2009	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2010	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2011	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2012	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2013	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12

Year	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2014	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2015	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2016	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2017	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2018	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2019	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2020	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2021	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2022	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2023	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2024	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12

Archive January 21^st, 2018

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rubén Ayala Ferreira (móvil de exteriores).jpg

Requested By Uploader (me) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Regions (talk • contribs) 2018-01-22T12:10:25‎ (UTC)

Deleted, historical photo, no publication data. Taivo (talk) 18:28, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rubén Ayala Ferreira (en la cancha de fútbol).jpg

Requested By Uploader -Regions (talk) 12:04, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, historical photo, no publication data. Taivo (talk) 18:32, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:3 captured YPG fighters.jpg

Copyrighted image, no evidence it's under a free license. Editor abcdef (talk) 13:12, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is actually no evidence it is copyrighted. The photo is placed on social media by soldiers TheMuurtje (talk) 13:49, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: clear copyright violation. --Ju Ta 16:25, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Voragonema tatsunoko.jpeg

Found elsewhere (https://www.mbari.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/DSC_0042.jpg), © MBARI 2017 Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:03, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 18:09, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seals of counties in Michigan

Accidentally created a page instead of a category. Xeror (talk) 16:49, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: housekeeping. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:18, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Discomedusa.jpeg

copy of http://www.bokanews.me/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Discomedusa-lobata.jpg. Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:00, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvio. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 18:07, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Crossota alba.jpeg

Copy of https://78.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m2l52pzi1g1rtz7n5o1_1280.jpg. Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:06, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 18:09, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Crosotta millsae.jpeg

Copy of https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Lucio_Loman_Ramos/publication/257231645/figure/fig2/AS:270008639029252@1441386484650/Hydromedusa-Crossota-millsae-Thuesen-2003-recolectada-en-aguas-profundas-del-golfo-de.png Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:08, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 18:11, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pelagia benovici.jpeg

Copy of https://jellybiologist.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/screen-shot-2014-05-30-at-2-15-04-pm.png?w=700 Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:09, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 18:12, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chrysaora fulgida.jpeg

Copy of https://www.omahazoofoundation.org/_resources/e30d:o8x55k-l/files/75557289z92c0a38b/_fn/namibiaJelly_01_sm.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:13, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 18:17, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Colobonema.jpeg

Copy of https://www.montereybayaquarium.org/-/m/images/animal-guide/invertebrates/midwater-jelly.jpg?bc=white&h=1190&mh=738&mw=1312&w=2106&usecustomfunctions=1&cropx=292&cropy=9. Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:01, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Dyolf77 at 18:04, 21 Januar 2018 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Colobonema.jpeg: Copy of https://www.montereybayaquarium.org/-/m/images/animal-guide/invertebrates/midwater-jelly.jpg?bc=white&h=1190&mh=738&mw=1312&w=2106&usecustomfunctions=1&cropx=292&cropy=9. --Krdbot 19:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hunter kirua (talk · contribs)

Copyrighted artworks; COM:NETCOPYRIGHT

Lacrymocéphale (talk) 20:18, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: speedy deleted. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 20:47, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Crosotta alba.jpeg

Copy of https://78.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m2l52pzi1g1rtz7n5o1_1280.jpg. Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:06, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Crossota alba.jpeg. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:48, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alexschool.jpg

Delete Yakudza (talk) 18:00, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 20:15, 21 Januar 2018 UTC: source is not free - --Krdbot 01:42, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:DATE COFFE.png

Probable coyvio of http://pfkco.ir/دمنوش-ها/ Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:59, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Ronhjones at 00:57, 22 Januar 2018 UTC: re-uploaded --Krdbot 07:41, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Test picture, so sorry.jpg

I needed to upload this to test the app that I am working on. So sorry! Misaochan (talk) 07:21, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete (CSD G1) @Misaochan: You can mark test uploads with {{SD|G1}} to have them deleted quickly. --bjh21 (talk) 17:01, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 08:27, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:دایره رنگی.png

unused, useless, no cat, no encyclopedic value, etc F (talk) 08:12, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 08:30, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:بني-توزين.jpg

a free source must be provided for this map Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 09:28, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 08:31, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fat Boloss en interview fictive sur TF1.jpg

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 12:45, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 07:54, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:File May 14, 10 55 57 PM.jpg

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 12:48, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 08:32, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pile-of-poo 1f4a9 (1).png

This image is made and copyrighted by Apple. Robin van der Vliet (talk) 13:48, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 07:53, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ANClogo2014.svg

This file was initially tagged by ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Unhelpful: Not found anywhere else online (sounds wrong) The correct logo is already used Ras67 (talk) 14:03, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This 2014 variant is used v, i see no reason for deletion! --Ras67 (talk) 14:06, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is a useful & free (not copyvio) file.--√Jæ√ 15:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep used on en:ABS-CBN News Channel. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:15, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: file in use. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 08:00, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:09183713060 - panoramio - sanndaj

Low quality files most of which lack EXIF data and many other have been taken with different cameras. Apart from the file names, all files contain a watermark that explicitly advertises for a cell phone store in Sanandaj, Iran. There are some outright copyright violations among them such as File:تصاویری از سنندج کاری از زاگرس 09183713060 - panoramio - sanndaj (16).jpg (from Mehr News Agency). I think that we cannot trust this Panoramio account, and this is a case of COM:LL.

4nn1l2 (talk) 14:12, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 08:08, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Wiki Love Villages

Empty & wrong title category. — TBhagat (talk) 14:24, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: empty. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 08:10, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Faisal Quraishi.jpg

Copyvio image. Störm (talk) 14:32, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio https://www.dawn.com/news/1158923. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 08:12, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Umar Farooq Khanpur (talk · contribs)

Copyright issue.

Wikicology (talk) 18:10, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Umar Farooq Khanpur (talk · contribs)

Copyright issue.

Wikicology (talk) 18:11, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: most, deleted only one, all others were ineligible for copyright. --Jcb (talk) 21:07, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Umar Farooq Khanpur (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 08:17, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:كتاب كل الطرق تؤدي ل60 داهية – رواياتي.pdf

published book - ISBN number 987-977-6549-13-5 showing Ronhjones ^(Talk) 15:48, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 08:20, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Yasir Ali G.jpg

Looks to me fairly out of scope. Ju Ta 16:09, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 08:21, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Yasir Ali G.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:55, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chrysaora kynthia.jpeg

Copy of http://museum.wa.gov.au/sites/default/files/att-images/2013/sea-nettle.png Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:14, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 13:44, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rosa - panoramio (1).jpg

Part of mass upload; random photo with little use or educational value, out of scope. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pedro Felipe (talk • contribs) 2018-01-18T03:47:47‎ (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 08:08, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:敦化地下美食街 - panoramio - Tianmu peter (13).jpg

Just personal portraits. Random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.137.10.215 (talk • contribs) 2018-01-19T12:23:23‎ (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 08:10, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pirkanmaa, Finland - panoramio (60).jpg

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:03, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 08:11, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:RKAL.png

Unlikely own work cropped version preexisting and used by Karia himself Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 16:31, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Unlikely" isn't enough. It is likely, as no other file found of this, and the google link stated has cropped versions OF THIS FILE and so this is original, has not been copied! THIS IS A BETTER QUALITY IMAGE AND BIGGER FILE, SO CAN'T BE CROPPED OR COPIED AS COPYRIGHT BREACH. NO COPYRIGHT BREACH. CONSENSUS REACHED (please archive) 176.24.32.204

Unlikely is enough as per COM:PCP. The closing admin will determine the consensus, also no need to archive just close. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 20:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also no EXIF data is present. Furthermore this is similar to File:Riyen Karia and Philip May at CCHQ.PNG from the English Wikipedia, which was deleted as a result of en:Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2018_January_11#File:Philip_May_CCHQ.PNG. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:20, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also see en:Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2018_January_5#File:RKAL_CCHQ_campaigning_phone-bank.PNG. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:27, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

no evidence of similarity, you can't just bring up random articles. Base it on the evidence provided. 176.24.32.204

Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 21:56, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Congressman Gregorio Sablan logo1.png

empty image SecretName101 (talk) 08:14, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, corrupt or empty file. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:14, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Spansub.png

not likely own work - maybe from a book FOX 52 (talk) 00:19, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 05:25, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:E1000.png

copyright violation taken from this forum FOX 52 (talk) 00:24, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 05:25, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:DaxatR.png

copyright violation taken from this forum FOX 52 (talk) 00:24, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agree clearly not the work of the uploader (who has uploaded other copyright violation) also appears at [1] MilborneOne (talk) 00:49, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 05:25, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Leberiyaforaivatin.png

copyright violation taken from this forum FOX 52 (talk) 00:25, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 05:25, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:廈門地鐵1號線開通列車紀念模型.jpg

I doubt that the given license {{PD-PRC-exempt}} is valid here. Ju Ta 16:12, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 05:23, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sectsy.png

Clearly not the work of the uploader (with a history of copyright violations) refer http://smallairforces.blogspot.co.uk/2011_02_18_archive.html MilborneOne (talk) 01:05, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:13, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nhzbxghsb.png

Clearly not the work of the uploader (with a history of copyright violations) MilborneOne (talk) 01:16, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:14, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:My Pic.jpg

very old personal photo Aboulhassan2 (talk) 01:26, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:My Pic.jpg

very old personal photo Aboulhassan2 (talk) 01:30, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:18, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:My Pic.jpg

personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Mark Trainor (talk) 05:20, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 04:58, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by কাঠপিপঁড়ে (talk · contribs)

Copyright problem, other source

Afifa Afrin (talk) 02:29, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Tagged with no permission! — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 16:32, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:19, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:राजेश कुमार गुर्जर.jpg

out of scope Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 09:43, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 15:33, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:20, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:Unknown1243

There are better pics from the same. Some of theese are out of focus, low quality or not clear. --Ganímedes (talk) 12:38, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nomination, images are of such quality as to be unusable. Tabercil (talk) 16:12, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Poor quality duplicates of very common object of which Commons has many much superior photos. (Also note uploader's dubious statement "Source=computer".) I would support speedy deletion as appropriate. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:39, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:21, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Due to the extreme length of this page the previous four DR requests under this title have been archived to Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photos from Panoramio ID 2875355/Archive.

Files in Category:Photos from Panoramio ID 2875355

Low quality, unusable, many alternatives available

Mitte27 (talk) 16:28, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strongly oppose and Keep This files and undelete the thousands of reasonable or good quality images deleted by a sloppy job of the nominator that nominate thousand of images and deletionist administrator, that deletes the same files less than the required 7 days. If fact there were several deleted files that were of low or very low quality, that fact is that there were several thousand files of good quality. Such a shotgun approach to deletion requests, if copied to all Commons, would leave only the FP and QI and not much else. Tm (talk) 23:09, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Tm: you miss the point. There was no “less than the required 7 days”, there were four previous mass delreqs on the same page. See the page history. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 05:32, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Commons:Deletion requests states clearly "Anything older than 7 days may be closed. Obvious closures (e.g. speedy deletions) may be done earlier". And as this DR were not obvious, as seen by the opinions below and above, two of this four DR should been left opened more than 2 days, in a case, and 4 days, in another case. DR should be left open 7 or more days when is not an obvious case, such as this. So what is here to affirme that i miss the point? Tm (talk) 06:06, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As in previous case, at least partially Keep. While they are probably not QIs, they don't seem useless. For instance, File:Автовокзал - panoramio (19).jpg is the only photo of the entrance of Bakhchysarai bus station we have on Commons. Surely entrance of Bakhcysarai bus station is not the sexiest topic and will never be a FP, but the photo may be useful for some purpose. Given how Panoramio upload bot works it would be very hard to identify the images to undelete if we ever need them as information such as location or coordinates is only visible on description page and is not in the file name. I would support deleting files where we have a clearly superior alternative but looking at a few examples like File:Автовокзал - panoramio (19).jpg I don't think this is the case — NickK (talk) 01:16, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep all and block Mitte27 for attempted vandalism and misuse of others’ volunteer time. Also investigate how could Jcb be duped into deleting all the many files in the other DRs with the same title. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 04:37, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Basically over 99% of these files were useless. Till now only very few files out of several thousands were identified as usefull. These files were criticlessly mass uploaded, apparently without any human review. The DR is so large that it e.g. makes the day page hardly accessible. That's why I closed the 3rd DR a few hours early (not after 4 days as Tm somehow wrongly calculated, but after six and a half days). In the fourth DR I saw that all the files were uploaded by User:Panoramio upload bot, so that any comment on individual files was not to be expected. In e.g. the 1st DR, two manual transfers by NickK were involved, which I kept. Flooding Commons with thousands of useless files in the hope that a handful of usefull files will be between them is disruptive rather than helpful. Individual usefull files can be identified and kept (or undeleted), but they are like a needle in a haystack. Calling for a blcok of Mitte27, who spends so much time in cleaning up after mass uploads of useless files, is ridiculous of course. Jcb (talk) 16:15, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  @Jcb: The issue for me is that the files I transferred were neither better nor worse than other files nominated for deletion, just for some reason they were not transferred automatically. The only difference was that they were clearly identified and described, while those transferred automatically are poorly identified and described. The latter issue is easy to resolve for existing files but much harder to resolve for already deleted ones. Looking at a few examples I can see that in most cases there are alternatives by the same uploader but from a different angle (this Panoramio photographer took a dozen of photos in each place he visited). For instance, for File:Автовокзал - panoramio (19).jpg there is no more photo of the main entrance of Bakhcysarai bus station, although there is still a photo of exit from the building towards buses File:Вход - panoramio (15).jpg which was not nominated for deletion. This is better than nothing but still bad given that the image we need is (was) already on Commons. I don't think Mitte27's actions are vandalism, but I would ask not to delete photos where there is no exact alternative — NickK (talk) 21:51, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - "The only difference was that they were clearly identified and described" - that's a major difference IMHO. It's the difference between 'filling our disk space' and 'forming part of our collection'. Jcb (talk) 22:06, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    @Jcb: It might be a major difference now, but this problem can be solved. For instance, I am regularly using tools visualising Commons images on the map and categorising and possibly describing the ones I find in areas I am interested in, I am pretty sure other people do this as well. Adding an image to a relevant category already significantly increases chances of its use and of getting a meaningful description. Of course this cannot be easily done in a few days but it will never be done for deleted images. For instance if I were to find an image of a ru:Самострой in Simferopol I would hardly find that it is File:Notitle - panoramio (1385).jpg — NickK (talk) 22:35, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jcb: You said that «over 99% of these files were useless». This DR affects 2682 files so you need to explain why are you allowing Mitte27 to vandalize 27 photos. Either way, I so far clicked at random items from this huge, untractable list (any serious admin would have closed immediately the DR as all-keep for that reason only) and I only hit good images: None of them being «Low quality, unusable, many alternatives available». It seems to me that either I’m incredibly lucky or your 1% estimate is too low. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 09:12, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Some examples of false DR claims

-- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 09:12, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I did not yet take a big sample of this batch (for the other batches I did a 200 file check before closure), so it may as well be e.g. 98% here. The point is that it's disruptive to flood us with mainly useless files. If flooding us with those files with a robot is no big deal, then flushing the files should not be a big deal either. Regarding your selection: 1. may be in scope but has a different problem: there's no FOP in Russia. 3. and 4. are out of scope. 2. is not high quality, but in use so in scope. Jcb (talk) 10:52, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment File:Zapadnyy okrug, Krasnodar, Krasnodarskiy kray, Russia - panoramio (68).jpg = File:Zapadnyy okrug, Krasnodar, Krasnodarskiy kray, Russia - panoramio (71).jpg (this file not delete). —Mitte27 (talk) 11:36, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Translation from Simferopolean to English: “deletion is not requested for this latter file”. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:13, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and restore. Some are in scope IMO such as File:Valday, Novgorod Oblast, Russia - panoramio (274).jpg or File:Valday, Novgorod Oblast, Russia - panoramio (272).jpg and many others too. And very likely, a signifiant numbers in the deleted images may be in scope too. So much big DRs are not a good idea for this kind of case. Especially in our case where there are not a lot of active administrators in DRs topics, and I don't think to "delete all" because we have not the time to sort the images, is a good idea. It is much much easier to sort the images before the deletion, and this should be also done before the nomination IMO. And if there are too much images for individual nominations then create Category:Photos from Panoramio ID 2875355 (potentially out of scope), move the "bad" images into this, and then ask further opinions, in the village pump or even in the admin noticeboard, before to create the DR. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 17:26, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and restore [2], [3], [4] & [5] that were deleted incorrectly by Jcb. These files are not low quality and are not out of scope. Yes, it takes some sorting, but that's no reason for deletion. Multichill (talk) 11:47, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and restore all the wrong deletions. -- Geagea (talk) 12:00, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral, in this nomination there are lot of bad photos, but there are also useful photos in scope with acceptable quality. Also restore File:Notitle_-_panoramio_(1385).jpg. It's was nominated first separately by Mitte27 in 8 November 2017, and kept by Ellin Beltz. Howewer it's was nominated second in group by Mitte27 in 27 December 2017, and deleted by Jcb. The file was in use: see diff. --Insider (talk) 12:27, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - if a discussion at the appropriate place - COM:UDR would lead to a consensus for undeletion of the whole series, then I am willing to assist in the undeletion. Jcb (talk) 15:51, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:28, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Photos from Panoramio ID 2875355

Low quality, unusable, many alternatives available

Mitte27 (talk) 03:55, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete photo 2761 which is really unsalvageable, not even good to illustrate bad photography, but
Keep photo 2758, as it depicts a type of asymmetric high-tension pylon that seems absent under Category:Electricity pylons in Russia by region; I cropped off the distracting eyesore on the right.

-- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 09:50, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: one and one per discussion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:47, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:JZX.png

low quality image clearly not the work of the uploader (with a history of copyright violations) MilborneOne (talk) 21:03, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:13, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Babolsar mazandaran 2016(2).jpg

https://www.google.com/search?source=lnt&tbs=sbi%3AAMhZZiu67CyI43Ehsi8_1A-nm7T4aAkYFyqUSOWSfQcS1rQW63UR-mdqoAy5B2JiLfiYu6NYrOa1myd6junZaRfz6Z6eWh8NzkKDnPMkaxWuo2kwYUokefGHQI7ph7DtqApgM966T_1MfmUGhNr4F8pMcrdpHdW7JSHD8_1E-npEFA2g5HQzCLHoTt3AJ7ZuHMe3BT-1zFcY1aO2w1Z5tHKzZJzVnI5TfO8Wd3yfYvfzquWARZi3IW3TyDddEPf0bojy998Q6n4qIngX6nPWln68qtLOi_1exbpRfFViUxhHjzJAkuO255ONO-o5VBViOQfWrjFdSAjwtULp_1yK0Y5V-OVDo0fxHzvaUVQ%2Ccdr%3A1%2Ccd_min%3A%2Ccd_max%3A12%2F18%2F2017&tbm= 4nn1l2 (talk) 13:15, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please close this DR speedily. I waned to report copyvio, but instead started this DR by accident. This is basic copyright violation. 4nn1l2 (talk) 13:18, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 07:09, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Monumenta 2012

This is an artistic exhibition by Daniel Buren. But Daniel Buren is still alive and there is no COM:FOP#France : it is not allowed to publish photos whose the main subject is an original creation until 70 years after the death of its author.

Civa (talk) 14:24, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 07:10, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Quarez1 (talk · contribs)

Unused personal photos. Out of scope.

~Cybularny ^Speak? 15:54, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 07:11, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Onan peyon (talk · contribs)

Per COM:NOTHOST: personal photos

Takeaway (talk) 19:06, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:56, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Onan peyon (talk · contribs)

Images not in use, out of project scope, advertising content.

— D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 14:13, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 09:18, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Onan peyon (talk · contribs)

Personal images. Out of project scope.

— D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 18:01, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 07:17, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Onan peyon (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:05, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Onan peyon (talk · contribs)

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 06:40, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:17, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Raymond9Santos (talk · contribs)

Definitely copyvios, no Metadata. Copies from other sites. Like the other deleted images.

— D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 18:16, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Deepstaria enigmatica (here) is a copyright violation (all rights reserved). Chrysaora lactea (here) is an explicit Copyright violation. Chrysaora southcotti (here) has no free license indicated. I have not yet located the source of Chrysaora plocamia.jpeg, but given this user's history, there is every reason to be suspicious. Animalparty (talk) 20:36, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 07:16, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chrysaora lactea.jpeg

Copy of https://c2.staticflickr.com/2/1163/990737809_fa9e6f78ba_z.jpg?zz=1 Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:17, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 07:17, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KralArsla10 (talk · contribs)

Software screenshots, probable copyright violations

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:43, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 07:11, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Peyman.ramhormoz (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded as a test

jdx ^Re: 19:03, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 07:13, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Oxidation Agaricon.svg

Partly cut at the bottom; replaced by File:Agaricon Formation V1.svg. Leyo 23:57, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 07:14, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:TWDC Logo.svg

Per description it's too simple for copyright, but Walt Disney signature doesn't look like simple geomentry, vice versa its design is rather complex. 90.190.114.172 18:23, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This is an obvious keep. Letterforms (used as letters) carry no copyright protection in the U.S. (unless there is some separable artistic element involved). Powers (talk) 00:53, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Disney Channel wordmark.svg Tbhotch™ 21:17, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Keep is just a simple logo, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Disney Channel wordmark.svg. Truu (talk) 18:43, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So, if it is not copyrighted, anyone can use it in their magazine covers etc.? Haven't seen it used that way, so it seems to be somehow protected, or what? 85.217.36.130 06:58, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This logo is protected by trademark law, not copyright law. (You can tell because Template:Trademarked is present on the image description page.) See Commons:Non-copyright restrictions. Powers (talk) 18:20, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Simple cursive-like logo. Longbyte1 (talk) 02:02, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Too simple to be copyrighted. Fma12 (talk) 13:48, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per discussion. MBisanz ^talk 23:31, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:TWDC Logo.svg

the "Walt Disney" part is not "simple geometric shapes or text". Because the cursive font that recognizes Disney cannot be generated using a font, the middle part of the logo is protected by copyright. Upload this image on Wikipedia and wherever this image is used, not here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by UpsandDowns1234 (talk • contribs) 2018-01-17T05:48:13‎ (UTC)

Keep See Waltograph for font --Elisfkc (talk) 03:59, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It is not complex to make and font used is not eligible for copyright, as it can be installed in any PC. --Bankster (talk) 04:10, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:52, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ely2.jpg

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 12:32, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:59, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ENELIO.15.jpg

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 12:33, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:59, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Engr Md Saiful Islam.jpg

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 12:35, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:00, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ERCILIO VELOZ BURGOS.jpg

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 12:35, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:00, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Engr.sujon.jpg

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 12:36, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:00, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ezaj Hossain 00.jpg

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 12:37, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:00, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fadølleren & vidvinsminister .jpg

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 12:38, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:01, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Faizan ul hassan.jpg

FBMD shows that this image was in and out of Facebook prior to upload here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:33, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Faizan ul hassan.jpg

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 12:39, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:01, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Familia flores soto 01.jpg

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 12:40, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:02, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Familia flores soto 02.jpg

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 12:41, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:02, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Familia flores soto 03.jpg

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 12:41, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:02, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Familia flores soto 04.jpg

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 12:41, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:03, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Familia flores soto 05.jpg

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 12:42, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:03, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Familia flores soto 06.jpg

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 12:42, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:03, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Famous Detective In India.jpg

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 12:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:03, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fatboy Bizzle.jpg

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 12:45, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:04, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Father.png

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 12:46, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:04, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:FAYROTHEDON.jpg

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 12:46, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:04, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:FC - FAGNER CARVALHO.jpg

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 12:46, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:04, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Federico Acosta Moreira.jpg

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 12:47, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:04, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fernandez.png

Self-made claim contradicted by the URL on the photo. Ytoyoda (talk) 02:28, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. OTRS required. ZooFari 00:31, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fernandez.png

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 12:48, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:04, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:FilipchenkoYuA.jpg

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 12:49, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:05, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:CSC 0237.jpg

Unused private image, out of scope. Achim (talk) 13:37, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:05, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sunil Bhardwaj.jpg

promotional usage, out of scope Triplecaña (talk) 16:00, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:05, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Florencia 11.jpg

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 12:49, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:07, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:இனிய புத்தாண்டு வாழ்த்துக்கள் -2018.jpg

Unused private Happy New Year Greetings, in addition DW. Achim (talk) 12:50, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per COM:ADVERT -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:45, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:06, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:죽빵맞은 노알라.jpg

Unused offending "artwork". Achim (talk) 12:52, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: Consider a user block because of havig added it to page en:Roh Moo-hyun which is vandalized heavily. --Achim (talk) 12:57, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:08, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:For Love Album by Danny Roy.png

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 12:54, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:06, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rsz dsc 0005.jpg

poor quality, small, blurry, watermark, distorted Hiddenhauser (talk) 15:16, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:08, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sophia Kimber.png

poor quality, foggy, small, unused Hiddenhauser (talk) 15:26, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:09, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vance comwdian.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:15, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:09, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NatSauvage433.jpg

Per COM:SCOPE -> Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality Takeaway (talk) 16:27, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:09, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Shoaib Xhabi.jpg

Selfies. Out of scope. See [6] Kalbbes (talk) 17:43, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:10, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:الشهر الأول من السنة الهجرية.gif

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:53, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:11, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SBmade.gif

Advertisement, out of scope (en:User:SBmade28/sandbox) Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:55, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:11, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Beyondxtyle online store.png

Advertisement, out of scope. (en:User:Beyondxtyle) Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:55, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:11, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sultan Ali Aslam.jpg

Selfie. Out of scope. Kalbbes (talk) 18:07, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:12, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bandicam 2014-11-21 16-26-20-331.jpg

Not useful. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:34, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:12, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mahtab.jpg

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:36, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:12, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Zast-ita-deu.JPG

unused? unclear encyclopedic value Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:43, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:12, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bandicam 2016-04-12 18-33-23-994.jpg

CV in JPG format, out of scope Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:45, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:16, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SeuJorge20177.png

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:46, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:16, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SeuJorge201778.png

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:47, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:16, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tush Dayo 3.jpg

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:49, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:16, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tush Dayo 1.jpg

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:53, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:15, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wasted.gif

unused personal video, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:57, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:15, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Freeminds band.jpg

unused personal image / no quite notable music band : out of scope Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 21:21, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:14, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:JackM Vlogs.jpg

Promotional image of a non-notable YouTuber. Uploaded to accompany a now-deleted article. Blythwood (talk) 21:59, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:13, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PAK-DA model.jpg

Unlikely to be the work of the uploader - image has visible copyright statement MilborneOne (talk) 23:07, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cannot understand The data are correct: Source http://otvaga2004.ru/armiya-i-vpk/armiya-i-vpk-concept/perspektivnyj-transp-samolet/ Author © Дениса Передриенко The copyrigtrh in the image is the same added in Commons (In russian characters)--Elquerieelultimo (talk) 12:46, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no evidence of free license. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:46, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tupolev Tu-160M2.jpg

No evidence of claimed release on source page MilborneOne (talk) 23:10, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WhY? are you chech the link?, the webpage is in Russian and the autor of photos are listed in the web Source http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/16175/russia-rolls-out-new-tu-160m2-but-are-moscows-bomber-ambitions-realistic Author (с) "Вперед" (via БИЗНЕС Online)--Elquerieelultimo (talk) 12:49, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no evidence of free license. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:47, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MiG-31B Nº01 Kazakhstan.jpg

Sorry to say but you are mistaken,you confuse the webpage with the author of the photo Maybe you did not use the translator correctly Have you read what he says just under the photo?: Фото Григория Беденко (Translated to Latin characters:Photo by Grigory Bedenko) The page is a blog with photos taken (linked) from a photographer who is mentioned both at the beginning of the page and under the photo If you think you know Russian better than me, just tell me which is the author of the photo and I will change the information There are thousands of pictures of Russian airplanes in raised commons mentioning the website and the author of the photo, I am new in commons but it seems the logical way to do it--Elquerieelultimo (talk) 12:44, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no evidence of free license. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:48, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MiG-31LL Nº79.jpg

No evidence of claimed release - source credits photographer as Valdimir Karnozov MilborneOne (talk) 23:19, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence? Did you read information I write in the file?

Source https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/defense/2012-02-24/russian-air-force-describes-mig-31-upgrade Author Photo: Vladimir Karnozov

This is exactly the same that say the webpage.--Elquerieelultimo (talk) 12:55, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no evidence of free license. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:48, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MIG-31 , MiG-25PM 1975.png

Like other uploads by this user unlikely to be the work of the uploader MilborneOne (talk) 23:23, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:49, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MiG-31M nº057.jpg

Like other uploads from this user it is unlikely to be the work of the uploader MilborneOne (talk) 23:24, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:49, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Monument Elena Mukhina.jpg

Per COM:FOP#Russia. Leyo 23:33, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Leyo, Is the Mukhina.jpg not licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license? Do I have to add something? It is not a work of art but it is a tombstone.

Deleted: no Freedom of Panorama in Russia for non-architectural artworks. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:52, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lagos - 004 (3466403539).jpg

delete Very poor quality out of focus photograph Kolforn (talk) 10:16, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:20, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Circumcised.jpg

Low quality penis photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:04, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want this on the internet anymore Nicho001 (talk) 17:25, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: User requested deletion of own file uploaded recently. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:38, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Circumcised.jpg

Low quality penis photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:58, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please check: Commons:Deletion requests/User:Unknown1243 --Ganímedes (talk) 12:45, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Materialscientist 28 Jan 2018. --Achim (talk) 16:39, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Circumcised.jpg

{{speedy deletion Shxahxh (talk) 13:24, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Circumcised or not,

Delete. --E4024 (talk) 14:28, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Circumcised.jpg

speedydelete, 1=[7].-- Shxahxh (talk) 13:26, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -speedy or not. --E4024 (talk) 14:29, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. --Sealle (talk) 19:39, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Yoo seung.jpg

Image is sourced as 'own work' however the image is clearly not their own work. Image looks to be a picture taken of a computer screen. Struggled to find original source, but image can be seen in use on other websites using reverse image search — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexanderlee (talk • contribs) 18:40, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: This photo has indeed been published before and it is unlikely to be the own work by the uploader as claimed. --AFBorchert (talk) 22:45, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AB&SB (cropped).jpg

File:AB&SB.jpg was deleted as a copyright violation, so therefore this crop of it should be. Prosfilaes (talk) 01:08, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: This is indeed a crop of another file which was deleted as copyvio. --AFBorchert (talk) 22:48, 28 January 2018 (UTC). --AFBorchert (talk) 22:48, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Audrey Heburn and Gregory Peck in Roman Holiday trailer 2.jpg

This redirect is not necessary anymore. KWiki (talk) 01:21, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept and original redirect restored: This file was available for more than 10 years under the misnamed title. It was correct to rename it but we keep the redirect such that reusers of that picture continue to be able to find the source image. --AFBorchert (talk) 22:54, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Boeing 747-8F render in flight.jpg

No Source or Licence Information - The Source and licensing is not accurate - sourced images used in composite are not related to the image as displayed MilborneOne (talk) 01:27, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This image has been derived as described in the {{RetouchedPicture}} template, i.e. it was reflected over the y axis and the sky in the background was taken from another photograph. Both source images are CC-BY-SA licenses and these licenses allow to use a newer revision of the same license for a derived work. --AFBorchert (talk) 23:16, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NIK-LIGHTNING.jpg

Photographed by Joseph Sinclair available on Twitter https://mobile.twitter.com/homotography/status/867865730263523328/photo/1 and Billboard https://www.billboard.com/photos/7825733/pride-month-LGBTQ-artists-trump-political-climate - does not seem to be a free image SeraphWiki (talk) 01:43, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Has been published before as indicated, needs a permission through OTRS. Unlikely to be the own work by the uploader as claimed. --AFBorchert (talk) 23:18, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Shanghai Pudong Logo.png

False licensing Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:03, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Dyolf77 at 22:30, 28 Januar 2018 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Shanghai Pudong Logo.png: False licensing --Krdbot 01:27, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Riyen Karia Philip May - CCHQ.png

Recreation of image deleted at en:Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2018_January_11#File:Philip_May_CCHQ.PNG. - Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:21, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Question what is the URL (The URL is not specific enough) mentioned in the linked Wikipedia discussion? Ankry (talk) 18:58, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The image was an identical or near identical image of this image. I can't see the file on Wikipedia anymore as it has been deleted, but it seemed like the uploader had the mistaken idea it was "open-source" which is not an image license. The uploader was blocked for that amongst other copyright violations. I noticed this image as it was added to the article Philip May, and considering that the uploader has engaged in sockpuppetry as mentioned at en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thepoliticsexpert I am severely skeptical that this images license has somehow changed since the deletion at the English Wikipedia by Fastily [8] --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 22:53, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: created by abuser. See also Category:Sockpuppets of Thepoliticsexpert. --Ankry (talk) 06:48, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Riyen Karia and Baroness Neville-Rolfe campaigning at CCHQ.png

Uploader hasn't shown any evidence that they have permission from "Richard" to license under CC. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:23, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Info "Richard" is clearly linked to uploader user page, so it can be interpreted as uploader pseudonyme here. ~~Unless there is another reason for deletion I suggest Keep here~~ (however using PNG format for a photo makes me doubt a bit). Ankry (talk) 18:54, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for the uther upload by this user, I suspect it is uploaded by a sock. Ankry (talk) 19:16, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect that the uploader is the sock described at en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thepoliticsexpert. That user was blocked for copyright violations, and I suspect they may have had the mistaken view that by stating the name of the photographer that they would be able to upload this image under CC. Furthermore the IP who has edited the filepage as shown in the history was blocked on the English Wikipedia as the above mentioned sockpuppet. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 22:57, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: created by abuser. See also Category:Sockpuppets of Thepoliticsexpert. --Ankry (talk) 06:48, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Graperain (talk · contribs)

Files seem to be taken from https://www.graperain.com, such as [9] or [10]. That site doesn't use free licenses, so license should be provided using COM:OTRS.

--ghouston (talk) 06:06, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:37, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Salnidal (talk · contribs)

Movie poster and still. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:22, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:38, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Psantasabia (talk · contribs)

Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:24, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:38, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rafaelcurra (talk · contribs)

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:25, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:38, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files by Mbazri

Not a Tasnim photo. Does Tasnim have photographers in people's car and home? It's clear that these photos are personal.

Derivative work

No FOP in Iran

sorry for the long nominaton. --MasoodHA (talk) 22:41, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:41, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:CV Luis Moreno (castellano)(10Ene2018).pdf

Also File:CV Luis Moreno (English numbered)(10Jan2018).pdf ‎

This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no permission (No permission since). It doesn't seem to need permission, but it is spam and out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:22, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola _talk 19:04, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A Short film Poster.jpg

Out-of-scope, unused image advertising the author's per en:A Short Cabayi (talk) 09:02, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, only use was on a self-promotional page on EN wiki. RA0808 (talk) 19:39, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 01:47, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Photo laurent wetzel.jpeg

auteur réél inconnu - can be a selfie ; contributor, subject of picture, and photographe : not the same. Besoin de l'autorisation du photographe Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 09:12, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP: subject has released the copyrights himself Shrikanthv (talk) 08:41, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If so, a permission is needed! — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 01:54, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 01:55, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nikaramba (talk · contribs)

Low resolution images without exif files. Likely copied from the internet but uploaded as "own work".

Takeaway (talk) 12:21, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 01:45, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Stage of Autumn Show 2013.jpg

EXIF data says "copyright: Anniespider20". Own work by uploader? -- Túrelio (talk) 13:33, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 01:46, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Paijowijaya (talk · contribs)

Advertisements for antenna company. There is even their URL!

Civa (talk) 13:53, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 01:46, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Asian Age, May 26, 2004.jpg

copyvio: Scan from a newspaper Karsten11 (talk) 13:57, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 01:47, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Photo-thumb.jpg

low quality, copyvio image. Störm (talk) 14:26, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 01:48, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Goldozi,ahmad tayefeh,embroidery,گالری گلدوزی احمد طایفه٫گلدوزی٫برودری دوزی٫ (3).jpg

Unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. Ju Ta 15:57, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 01:58, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Goldozi,ahmad tayefeh,embroidery,گالری گلدوزی احمد طایفه٫گلدوزی٫برودری دوزی٫ (5).jpg

Unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. Ju Ta 15:58, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 01:57, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jyazumah (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:16, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 01:57, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mariashub (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://www.pinterest.ie/maria305sara/indian-naked-milf/.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:18, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 02:01, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Devin Cheng Heng.png

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.tetzms.abcusd.k12.ca.us/RCMF/ArchiveRCMF/2017/RCMF17c.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:20, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 02:03, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:Ly Lyxandre

Commons is not facebook, out of project scope. Page fr:Ly Lyxandre has been deleted several times. Achim (talk) 09:17, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:55, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Crucifixión - panoramio.jpg

Part of mass upload; random photo with little use or educational value, out of scope. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pedro Felipe (talk • contribs) 2018-01-18T12:38:09‎ (UTC)

Kept: in scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:31, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Facultad de Química UNAL - panoramio.jpg

Part of mass upload; random photo with little use or educational value, out of scope. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pedro Felipe (talk • contribs) 2018-01-20T00:43:23‎ (UTC)

Kept: in scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:36, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Brockhaus-Efron-Buchrücken.jpg

Completely unusable, practically unrecognizable, at the current size. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The ed17 (talk • contribs) 2018-01-17T02:31:18‎ (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:36, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jaques 02 (5989074894).jpg

Part of mass upload; random photo with little use or educational value, out of scope. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pedro Felipe (talk • contribs) 2018-01-20T00:42:53‎ (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:37, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Torres de San Carlos PL2.1 - panoramio.jpg

Part of mass upload; random photo with little use or educational value, out of scope. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pedro Felipe (talk • contribs) 2018-01-20T00:44:21‎ (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:37, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Danish hussain award.jpg

Out of scope and no educational value. Also not WP:GNG. This is not the actor/artist Danish Hussain — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamgerber80 (talk • contribs) 2018-01-18T16:08:02‎ (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:37, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sunset with Reflection.jpg

Out of Scope — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dipayan Choudhury (talk • contribs) 2018-01-17T19:09:12‎ (UTC)

Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:38, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Royal Bird.jpg

Out of scope — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dipayan Choudhury (talk • contribs) 2018-01-17T19:08:50‎ (UTC)

Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:38, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:"Mr Jhon EMaldonado-Dic 2015-Chicago Il.jpg" .jpg

Out of Scope: Non-educational Material Xeror (talk) 07:16, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:39, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Skabdulraheman2.jpg

Out of COM:SCOPE, unused personal image of likely non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:49, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:39, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Aryacell Network 29 1.jpg

Out of COM:PS: advertisement 4nn1l2 (talk) 12:04, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:40, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ABHISHEK BHARDWAJ.jpg

poor quality, blurry Hiddenhauser (talk) 12:09, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:41, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Openarenasq.png

It is very blur!! while there is one high quality version: File:OpenArena-Rocket.jpg Editor-1 (talk) 12:15, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree, the second picture covers the same content much better. --GRuban (talk) 15:39, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:42, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:WaseeTheGreat.jpg

poor quality, blurry, heads cut off Hiddenhauser (talk) 12:26, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:42, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Floricanto Grupo Cultural 02.jpg

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 12:50, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:42, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:St peach.png

poor quality, blurry Hiddenhauser (talk) 15:26, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:43, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Public figures.Wikipedia.jpg

poor quality, blurry, small, unused Hiddenhauser (talk) 15:39, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:43, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rabia Zulfiqar.jpg

poor quality, blurry Hiddenhauser (talk) 15:40, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:43, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:B.F.F Cover 3.jpg

out of scope Ronhjones ^(Talk) 15:47, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:44, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Renato Ronner.jpg

Renato Ronner is not mentioned in en. or de.wiki. Out of project scope. Hiddenhauser (talk) 15:57, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:44, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wp pox Polabische Grammatik – Wikimedia Incubator.pdf

Out of Commons:Project scope: Copy of Wikipedia article used in itself. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:44, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vicuy10 (talk · contribs)

Per COM:SCOPE -> Advertising or self-promotion (bypassing restrictions on self-written biographies)

Takeaway (talk) 16:40, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; not an active and meaningful contributor. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:46, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Achille P. Mabengo.png

Out of scope - Not educationally useful; personal image of uploader uploaded solely for the purpose of self-promotion. hiàn 19:20, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:47, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Srinivas164 (talk · contribs)

Out of scope - Files are not educationally useful - Personal images of uploader used only in userspace, user has no significant contributions to Wikimedia projects.

hiàn 19:39, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:48, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Waseem amir (talk · contribs)

User is subject of images - cannot be author.

hiàn 19:43, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:49, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Black hole .png

Hand-drawn image - no possible way this could be useful. hiàn 19:54, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:48, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tony Tollet Thémistocle.jpg

Tony Tollet (French painter) died in 1953. Benoît Prieur (d) 07:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support Sorry for this mistake ! Indeed, this file must be deleted. --VladoubidoOo (talk) 09:41, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--- Deleted: per nomination. --Benoît Prieur (d) 17:58, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rue de la République - Lyon.jpg

Public modern art in France (no FOP) Benoît Prieur (d) 09:41, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the goal of this picture is to illustrate an exemple of city branding. This is not a work of modern art but an ephemeral logo for the "Rue de la République" brand that was used during a marketing event (like this "Onlylyon" picture for example). Do not confuse, please, it's not like a piece of art that we can find in a museum or street. --Micka13 (talk) 15:06, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The ephemeral logo for the "Rue de la République" was copyrighted. Ruthven (msg) 07:37, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Clintons button (2269850441).jpg

possible copyright issues with artwork SecretName101 (talk) 13:12, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 07:38, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:JR train in Lupin III livery.jpg

The Lupin III author Monkey Punch is alive and the copyright is still in effect. See also the previous DRs. Yasu (talk) 14:56, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Any decision regarding copyright will be accepted. / The photographer Kitayama (talk) 15:04, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per {{NoFoP-Japan}}. Ruthven (msg) 07:40, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Freaksville Record Logo 2014.png

if the author is Sophie Galet, then we can accept a license coming from Marc Wathieu flickr account Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 21:05, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 07:42, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Freaksville Record button.jpg

Derivative work, the drawing/logo is above ToO IMO Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 21:06, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 07:42, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nac.png

Looks like a screen shot from TV or an online stream Sreejith K (talk) 21:06, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 07:42, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pirkanmaa, Finland - panoramio (87).jpg

Probably no education value. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:06, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 07:42, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sebastian viera con Atlético Junior en Monteria.png

Looks like sceenshot from TV or an online stream. Sreejith K (talk) 21:06, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 07:42, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cesar Carrillo con Jaguares de cordoba.png

Screenshot from TV Sreejith K (talk) 21:09, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 07:42, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Capitan de Jaguares Wilmer Díaz.png

Screenshot from TV Sreejith K (talk) 21:09, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 07:42, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kuvassa on ERITTÄIN lihava poika - panoramio.jpg

The object is probably too blurred to be usable. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:13, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 07:42, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:StJohann-05b.jpg

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 21:57, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 07:45, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:StJohann-05c.jpg

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 21:58, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 07:45, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Emma von Lesum (head).jpg

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 21:58, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 07:45, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Emma von Lesum.jpg

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 21:59, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 07:45, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:StJohann-05a.jpg

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 22:01, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 07:46, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Våbenskjold tilhørende Danneskiold-Samsøe.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Urbandweller as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This is obviously a photograph of a book page. There is a signature in the lower right corner, B.A.O. ? and the year 2000 — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 22:02, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 07:48, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bandicam 2015-07-20 15-28-47-953.jpg

Screenshot, copyvio Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:36, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:57, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bandicam 2016-03-05 22-14-16-159.jpg

Screenshot, copyright violation Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:39, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:57, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bandicam 2016-07-28 23-15-25-207.jpg

Screenshot copyright violation Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:41, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:57, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bandicam 2016-07-01 03-19-56-669.jpg

Suspicious copyright Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:41, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:57, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bandicam 2017-06-20 14-45-07-051.jpg

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:43, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments - Looks like a Soviet-style parody of an existing flag. Any clue what it was intended to be used for? ----DanTD (talk) 18:14, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:58, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bandicam 2017-07-10 18-28-16-448.jpg

Music video screenshot, copyright violation Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:43, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:58, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images from Solkka

The main issue here is whether or not Solkka has the right to license these images under a Creative Commons license. I did try to start a thread at VPC regarding my suspicions but nobody answered. That thread can be found here: Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2018/01#Solkka/News In Star images.

Primarily it comes down the differing watermarks from past Solkka images and newer images from the website. All of the images here have the NewsInStar watermark. Personal investigation does not show any link between the NewsInStar website and this Tistory site and images from Tistory are listed under an All Rights Reserved type license on NewsInStar. A post on my talk page by Nyantatata indicates that the person behind the Tistory site is a photographer working for NewsInStar which would be a work for hire type contract and would make these images under a corporate copyright. Therefore, Solkka does not have the right to release them unilaterally. I hate to bring so many images to DR at once but it appears like these images were license laundered through Tistory.

Majora (talk) 22:40, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In November I spoke with a person who works at News in Star, whtjdeka@gmail.com, who confirmed to me by Gmail that he is Solkka. This was my message on November 1, 2017:

"Good afternoon! I am a user of Wikipedia in Spanish and I would like to know if a user named Solkka in Tistory is part of News in Star, since it uploads the same photos of the page under the CC-BY-SA-4.0 license. The photos that Solkka uploads are commonly uploaded to Wikimedia Commons with that license, but a few days ago a user told me that he was possibly not part of News in Star and that he possibly uploaded the photos illegally. I would appreciate your help. (sorry for my bad english)". This was his response the next day: "Hello! Thank you for Attention of our pictures. :)

And the answer is 'Yes' Both websites are got same uploader. (me of course)

Newsinstar is more like "NEWS" stuffs and solkka is more like personal feeling about Celebrity.

Again, thank you for watching our stuffs and sorry for my really bad english."

PS: I found the e-mail in a News in Star publication. SuZumiya (talk) 22:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

But you see SuZumiya, that is my whole point. Working for a company is a de facto work for hire contract. That means that the photographer gives up their right to the images and surrenders them to the company. If this is true then these images are corporately owned. If the email you received is accurate then this DR would be valid. Solkka does not have the right to release these images. --Majora (talk) 22:52, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Then you are absolutely right. Right now I will change all those photos that are in the articles by others. SuZumiya (talk) 22:53, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

More then somewhat related. It is directly related. I'm going to have to go through all Solkka related images now. Great. --Majora (talk) 21:13, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fully aware this is 'directly' related. It was just... eeek type comment. — regards, Revi 00:35, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for making this. I actively went through a few days ago using google, restricting the domain to commons.wikimedia.org, and I attempted to find every single picture from Solkka's tistory. Ther are 149 of them. Thank you for starting this DR. I think what we need is someone who can speak Korean to reach out to NewsInStar and see if Solkka owns NewsInStar or if he is just a photographer for hire. Alternatively, if NewsInStar themselves are knowledgeable and okay with about the CC licenses. I looked through his tistory and could not find any information on the topic, unfortunately. Since SuZumiya contacted them originally, I wonder if they are able to do it again? On a different note, there are four files that are sourced from NewsInStar's YouTube channel: 1, 2, 3, & 4. I didn't put them under the "Images from Solkka" category because the channel is labelled as "NewsInStar" and not "Solkka", as well as that the videos (which are under CC) are linked officially by the NewsInStar domain itself so I'm not sure if they're an issue. You seem more knowledgeable on the topic than me. ~ Nyantatata (talk) 21:57, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What an enormous mess this website has made. They can't decide on a license. They use Creative Commons on their YouTube page, which appears fine, but a non-CC license on their main page. As for the Solkka images I'm sticking by my original analysis. This is a work for hire between Solkka (the photographer) and NewsInStar (the organization). So Solkka does not have the right to unilaterally release these images under a Creative Commons license. --Majora (talk) 23:23, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

但是您怎麼知道他們之間是聘用的關係?我認為在不知道的任何情況下，不應該刪除這些圖片，因為在來源上他確實是自由的圖片的不是嗎?以自己的想法來推斷並提出刪除，我認為不妥當，以上是我的想法，希望管理員可以參考。218.48.44.32 22:36, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Google translate: But how do you know the relationship between them? I do not think these pictures should be removed without any knowledge of the source, because he is really a free picture on the source. Delete, I think inappropriate, the above is my idea, I hope administrators can refer to.

How do I know? Because of the messages posted above. I'm fully aware of the source. Unless you can provide proof that these images are licensed correctly it doesn't matter what you hope. They have to be removed. --Majora (talk) 23:33, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

還有我也有發現到，這個來源作者在部分的圖片設定為非自由許可，因此我認為作者知道哪些圖片允許自由提供。我希望可以慎重的看待此問題。218.48.44.32 22:41, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Google translate: And I also found out that the author of this source set some of the pictures as non-free licenses, so I think the authors know which pictures are free to offer. I hope this question can be treated with caution.

Knowing how to change licenses to non-Commons acceptable versions does not change the fact that I highly doubt Solkka has any right to change the license at all. That is what a work for hire contract means. As a side note, do not remove images from a DR. That is not how this works. --Majora (talk) 23:33, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As I did in such case in the past, I was thinking of asking the solkka blog owner directly about this. What information do we need? If they are making this under 'work for hire'? If yes, 'do 'solkka' have relevant right to license them'?

I can think of few possible main deletion scenarios (for chinese speaker's understanding):

Solkka was making this under Work For Hire (WFH hereinafter).
Solkka wasn't making this under WFH, but didn't know about consequences of CCL.
Solkka was making this under WFH, but has clearance for posting on tistory, but didn't know about consequences of CCL. (This and above are valid deletion rationale per PCP. For example Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Images from toto1024.tistory.com.)

Hope this helps, — regards, Revi 00:35, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not the person who started the DR but I figure what we need to know is if Solkka owns NewsInStar or if he is simply a contributor to it. I was under the impression he owns the site and thus does have the right to put the images under CC, but we've found no definitive proof of that. If he is not the ownder of the site we'd then need to know if this is under WFH or not. ~ Nyantatata (talk) 03:47, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I got this message from the person who works for News in Star: "Hello, how are you :)

My Boss is owner of newsinstar and Solkka.

and I am the photographer of Newsinstar. and upload to Solkka.

I took those pics.

I hope this answer is enough to you :)".

I do not know if it serves as something for discussion. SuZumiya (talk) 01:17, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Only to confirm what I originally thought. The photographer who uploaded them to Solkka was an employee of NewsInStar so did not own the copyright to the images and could not release them under a free license unilaterially. We also don't know if there was any prior authorization or even if the owner knew that they were releasing the images under a free license. In order to keep these images we would need their boss's permission to relicense them under a free license. Specifically, an COM:OTRS release using one of the various release templates. --Majora (talk) 02:08, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:00, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Freeiris logo.png

No evidence that the chiken logo is published under the "Free Art License" Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 21:18, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:43, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cyril Collard.jpg

Delete many copies of this image are found with tineye and Google image searches, so it is highly unlikely the Flickr user is the copyright holder. That user appears to have several copyright images in their stream. Perhaps they should be blacklisted. Ww2censor (talk) 21:23, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:44, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Super man africain.jpg

The right image is probably copied from [11]. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:55, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:44, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fuster Valldeperes Carnaval.jpg

ca:Antoni Fuster Valldeperes died in 1942. According to Spanish laws, his work won't enter into the public domain until 2022 (80 years pma). To be undeleted in 2022 Discasto _talk 22:58, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:45, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Talkhandak Paintings

I see no original work. All these paintings are DW without permission.(see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sheikh Nemer Baqir Al-Nemer by Talkhandak.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Morteza Avini.jpg)

Ayatollah Abolghasem Khazali File:Ayatollah Abolghasem Khazali.jpg (http://reme.ir/356)

Nader Mahdavi File:Nader Mahdavi by talkhandak.jpg (http://khateratshohada.mihanblog.com/post/11652)

Ibrahim zakzaky File:Ibrahim zakzaky. by Mbazri.jpg (http://qudsonline.ir/news/328280/)

Mahmud Saremi File:Mahmud Saremi by Mbazri.jpg (https://www.tasnimnews.com/fa/news/1393/05/17/)

Majid Majidi File:Majid Majidi by Mbazri.jpg (http://banifilm.ir/%D9%85%D8%AC%DB%8C%D8%AF-%D9%85%D8%AC%DB%8C%D8%AF%DB%8C-%D9%BE%D8%B4%D8%AA-%D8%A7%D8%A8%D8%B1%D9%87%D8%A7-%D8%A7%D8%AF%D8%A7%D9%85%D9%87%E2%80%8C%D8%A7%DB%8C-%D8%A8%D8%B1-%D9%81%DB%8C/)

Abdulmalik Alhouthi File:Abdulmalik Alhouthi by Mbazri.jpg (https://www.mashreghnews.ir/news/420012)

Jihad Imad Mughniyah File:Jihad Imad Mughniyah by Mbazri.jpg (http://www.shafaf.ir/fa/news/302638/)

Sheykh Ali Salman File:Sheykh Ali Salman by Mbazri.jpg (http://fa.alkawthartv.com/news/101605)

Mostafa Ahmadi Roshan (File:Mostafa Ahmadi Roshan by Mbazri.jpg)

Hosein Hamedani (File:Hosein Hamedani by Mbazri.jpg)

Mohammad mofatteh File:Mohammad mofatteh by talkhandak.jpg (http://asheghanekhamosh.blogfa.com/tag/%D8%B2%D9%86%D8%AF%DA%AF%DB%8C-%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%85%D9%87-%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%AA-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%84%D9%87-%D8%B4%D9%87%DB%8C%D8%AF-%D9%85%D9%81%D8%AA%D8%AD http://hamedan.navideshahed.com/fa/news/400669/)

Majid Shahriari File:Majid Shahriari.jpg (http://zanjan.navideshahed.com/fa/news/415576/)

Imad Mughniyah File:Portrait of Imad Mughniyah.jpg (http://security-forces.blogfa.com/post/8)

Mohammad-Taqi Bahjat File:Portrait of Mohammad-Taqi Bahjat.jpg (http://www.hawzah.net/fa/article/view/93054)

--MasoodHA (talk) 22:59, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:44, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pakistani Actress Sanam Saeed.jpg

Copyvio image, see metadata Störm (talk) 15:37, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, the exif data do not say that this is a copyright violation, in fact exif data say very little at all. Thuresson (talk) 14:31, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Plegamiento de Campodola.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Apocheir as no permission, but I cant find an external source to doubt own work as claimed. Ju Ta 22:35, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But I wonder why all the uploads were made by different cameras, i.e. this photo was taken by a Kodak Easyshare M853, File:Los Peares.jpg by Huawei ALE-L21, File:Aperos antiguos del lagar.jpg by a ZTE Blade L2, File:Chicho Lee.jpg by a Nikon D60, and File:Polyporus-squamosus boj.jpg by a Samsung SM-G900F. --AFBorchert (talk) 23:30, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 08:00, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Raju dai shooting Photo.jpg

Seems like screenshoot and totally retouched photographs. Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 09:32, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. — TBhagat (talk) 15:37, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, uploader should submit an email to OTRS if he is the author. --Jianhui67^T★C 10:07, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:GillianDuceMadell-205.png

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/bookreadermag/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/14190806/GillianDuceMadell-205x300.png. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:10, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 10:09, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lawler in 2017.png

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:14, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 10:09, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chrysaora pentastoma.jpeg

Copy of http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-fRX2bal1Vlc/T-PlQi5-abI/AAAAAAAAAUs/q0kmDGKQIwE/s1600/Vancouver+Aquarium+2-22-07+S414+256.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:11, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The image comes from http://myzoo22.blogspot.com/ (near the bottom of the page), with no free license indicated. Animalparty (talk) 22:37, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 10:07, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chrysaora africana.jpeg

Copy of http://ak4.picdn.net/shutterstock/videos/11306804/thumb/1.jpg?i10c=img.resize(height:160) Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:12, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Source (Shutterstock) is copyrighted. Animalparty (talk) 22:41, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 10:07, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Reino Ragnar Lehto Offical Protrait.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no license. Well, there is a CC license. But thats unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. Ju Ta 15:18, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Likely copied from http://www.blf.fi/artikel.php?id=1768, where the image is credited to: Lehto, Reino R. Museiverket.

Delete --Túrelio (talk) 11:31, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: speedy deleted. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 06:46, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Suica(表面).jpg

Piracy. Penguins of a logo aren't the contents which can be used freely. The actual author isn't User:市原 113.32.16.18 14:53, 21 January 2018 (UTC) edit113.32.16.18 15:25, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:22, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ueno st jiyuu.jpg

Piracy (Copyright violation). The actual author isn't User:kei365. The actual author, Genichiro Inokuma(ja:猪熊弦一郎), died in 1993, so this picture should not be dealt as a free content. 113.32.16.18 16:17, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:22, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Escudo-riano.jpg

uncopyright — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parair (talk • contribs) 2018-01-16T20:55:07‎ (UTC)

Kept: unclear nomination; renominate if necessary with better deletion rationale. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:23, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:GeneralNo6PR.png

uncopyright — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parair (talk • contribs) 2018-01-16T20:54:12‎ (UTC)

Kept: unclear nomination; renominate if necessary with better deletion rationale. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:23, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rodrigo tagle mariquez.JPG

legal no autorisada Cultura de la basura (talk) 13:14, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Split these two images and delete the bald guy. The one with "pescadito" is good, let's keep it. No legal problems here. E4024 (talk) 13:17, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per E4024. Ruthven (msg) 15:49, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rodrigo tagle mariquez.JPG

motivos legale imagen no autorisada Cultura de la basura (talk) 06:21, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You (yourself) authorized Commons to use this file. Therefore please do not insist. --E4024 (talk) 09:00, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BTW if we keep File:Woman displaying her fishing catch (a Rainbow trout).jpg we will keep your huge catch without doubt, "lejos"... --E4024 (talk) 14:22, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:24, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rodrigo tagle mariquez.JPG

por motivos legales y permiso de uso Cultura de la basura (talk) 00:56, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Nice fish(er) pic in scope. Congratulations for the huge catch! Note to the closing admin: This file is duplicate due to multi-updates. You may delete one, keep the other and make everyone happy. --E4024 (talk) 06:48, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 07:35, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:صورة لمسجد Le Mahomet حوالي عام 1200.jpg

COM:REDUNDANT: low-res, hardly readable, and oddly tilted version of File:صورة للمسجد .jpg. HyperGaruda (talk) 07:55, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:25, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hyperloop Makers UPV.jpg

The source link states that images are under a non commercial license Tobias (talk) 09:34, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Noncommercial. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎ Animalparty (talk • contribs) 17:43, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: incompatible license. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:27, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The ottoman empire and its successors (1923) - Ottoman Empire in 1856.png

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 13:35, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:29, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The ottoman empire and its successors (1923) - san stefano.png

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 13:36, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:28, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The ottoman empire and its successors (1923) - treaty of berlin.png

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 13:36, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:28, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Benediktiner-Abtei.jpg

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 13:50, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:28, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SalmanNew.jpg

downloaded image. Störm (talk) 14:27, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:30, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nora Ruoti (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:32, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gregorio Ortega Hernández.jpg

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:20, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:35, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dancing girl in Peru.jpg

Imagen repetida File:Black young female dancing in Peru .jpg Miguel Alan Córdova Silva (talk) 16:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as duplicate. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:36, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Château de Chantilly 12.jpg

Already published here without CC licence Mel22 (talk) 16:47, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:37, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Man and woman with a sling to their waists.jpg

Repetida File:Couple of Indian female and man Peru.jpg Miguel Alan Córdova Silva (talk) 16:48, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as duplicate. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:38, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dancing women with slings in Peru..jpg

Repetida File:Indian female with slingweapon on her neck Peru.jpg Miguel Alan Córdova Silva (talk) 16:49, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as duplicate. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:38, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Emiliano Garcia.png

While we allow a limited number of personal images for the user pages of active contributors, "active" and "contributor" must come first. Commons is not Facebook. See COM:SCOPE. This users only other contribution is probably out of scope or a copyvio or both. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:16, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:45, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo omen.png

Possibly a copyvio, but certainly out of scope -- Google shows no hits for this company. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:17, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:45, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Royston club 2018 6773.jpg

I uploaded a very similar image already BeckenhamBear (talk) 17:19, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per self-nomination. Superseded by File:The Royston club 2018 6772.jpg. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:47, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Parroquia Luz de america.jpg

Image uploaded in 2012 - This file was initially tagged by Berposen as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: U1 — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 18:26, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think we're going to use this file in the future for something special, I got this one of better quality, better format, and with border corrections. This one here is the file. Parroquia Luz de america.svg --Berposen (talk) 19:31, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Dyolf77: , I would like to extend the criticism and the consultation to these archives, the limits are completely wrong, I raised them when I was 18 years old, from tracing in only canvas of the province, and the approximations to the parishes. The limits of La Concordia, Santa Maria del Toachi, and El Esfuerzo, were wrong. To more of not being the parishes, Pedernales, Pichincha ... bad quality, and incorrect limits between the provinces of Esmeraldas, and Los Rios. Llamo también a @Túrelio: , @Wdwd: . (I also call)... Este si ya se borró..

--Berposen (talk) 22:06, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Berposen, Thank you for your explanations, another colleague will do the necessary with these files. Cordially. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 22:12, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:48, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Le transport à Antananarivo.pdf

Essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:01, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:50, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:EF1.jpg

Not own work - not simple enough to be in public domain. hiàn 19:26, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused promotional logo. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:57, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Makati City lights Skyline.jpg

No mention of file being licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 in source - likely copyrighted. hiàn 19:29, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:58, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alexandrion - Karte der Kampagne Alexanders.jpg

the map is ulikely to be an own work Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 20:20, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: DW. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:59, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tberdal (talk · contribs)

My answer to you Christian Ferrer: This is my first article on wikipedia and i understand i've not fully understood the copyright laws with the use of pictures. i've done comments to each picture you have nominated to be deleted

Nearly all pictures nominated are for the my article "tunnel rock recycling" this is mainly based on my master thesis which i wrote in the spring of 2017 at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU). The Thesis is open for anyone to read and can be acessed from this link

File:Point load measurement .png correct , not my picture
File:Part of the processing facility at Koralm tunnel project.jpg correct , not my picture
File:Flow diagram of tunnel rock recycling .jpg I made this flow chart in Microsoft Visio, with pictures i took at the Follo line tunnel project
File:Classifier .png Three pictures from three different sources which i have combined into one , added the label below and the blue color to symoblize water
File:Classifiers .png It's a duplicate , delete it
File:Crushers.jpg I've combined this picture into one , with Adobe Photoshop . but its not mine , so delete
File:Plant processing tunnel rock.jpg This is correct , not my picture, so delete
File:Sikteprøve .jpg This is correct , not my picture, so delete
File:Siktekurve.jpg I took this picture during my master at the laboratory of NTNU, Trondheim, Norway . The quality of this picture is high
File:Austad sentrum eldre bilde.jpg Picture taken from Austad Local history organization (link). I've taked to the organization and they have allowed for me to use it for wikipedia
File:Bilde av Austad i nyere tid .jpg Picture taken from Austad Local history organization (link). I've taked to the organization and they have allowed for me to use it for wikipedia
File:Zdzisław Beksiński Painting studio.jpg My picture, took at the historical museum of Sanok , link

Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 20:41, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Ferrer : Unlikely to be own works, small size without EXIFs, technical drawings, photomontages... I already speedy deleted the obvious copyright violations.

File:Point load measurement .png
File:Part of the processing facility at Koralm tunnel project.jpg
File:Flow diagram of tunnel rock recycling .jpg I wrote my master degree in this field, and made thos flow chart in Microsoft Visio
File:Classifier .png
File:Classifiers .png
File:Crushers.jpg
File:Plant processing tunnel rock.jpg
File:Sikteprøve .jpg This is correct , not my picture
File:Siktekurve.jpg I took this picture during my master at the laboratory of NTNU, Trondheim, Norway
File:Austad sentrum eldre bilde.jpg
File:Bilde av Austad i nyere tid .jpg
File:Zdzisław Beksiński Painting studio.jpg My picture, took at the historical museum of Sanok , link

Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 20:41, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per comments above, kept 3 claimed as own work. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:07, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mekelle.jpg

The map is unlikely to be an own work, a free source must be provided Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 20:50, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:13, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Amy Jackson attends press conference for 'Thaandavam' at London 05 Chiyaan Vikram, Lakshmi Rai.jpg

BH images of events outside India are not free; this was taken in London. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:05, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:12, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jože Karlovšek - portret Božidarja Jakca.jpg

drawn by Božidar Jakac (1899-1989). Sporti (talk) 10:21, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, will be restored in 2060 (70+1 years after death). Taivo (talk) 09:28, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Marielle 20-01-18.png

Some doubt about ownership in this photo by uploader, as the same portrait is used on website of depicted woman: http://www.marielleberger.com/?p=1054&lang=fr and http://www.marielleberger.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Bannière-WEB-signature-Marielle3.png . -- Túrelio (talk) 10:24, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:19, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Giorgi Danibegashvili.jpg

self promotion Cabayi (talk) 11:45, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If he's a notable artist, it would be in scope, and would not fall under the "self promotion" deletion reason. It would still be a useful image. The initial upload was marked cc-by-sa-4.0, but looks like it was deleted when the uploader replaced the Information template with an Infobox template, rather oddly. The image does exist on the net at the uploaded size at http://netgazeti.ge/news/189869/ however. And then we have the question of the contract between the photographer and the artist, whether that assigns all rights, or just enough to allow the artist to promote himself, but not enough to legally put a free license on it. For the above reasons, we should probably require some sort of validation using the COM:OTRS process, to verify that the uploader is indeed the artist, and that the copyrights were transferred in full from the photographer such that the artist can license it (or otherwise we get a free license directly from the photographer). Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:11, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:27, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pants mesh.png

Uploaded as "own work", but by the uploader's own admission, it's a screenshot of someone else's work. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:51, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All the images on that page (geometry processing) are in the same position. Most images in computer graphics are not entirely made by one person. I found the mesh, and ran code to render it to the screen. It is demonstrating a mathematical concept. Should I also credit the people at Dell and Intel for making the computer parts to render it? —Psarahdactyl (talk, contribs)

Deleted, OTRS-permission from co-authors (from Dell and Intel?) is needed to restore the file. Taivo (talk) 10:29, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Radio Swammerdam Logo.png

File is used on the website of the radio show (https://www.salto.nl/programma/radio-swammerdam/), but that doesn't say who made the logo. So we need proof who made the logo. That information should be provided throught OTRS. Mbch331 (talk) 12:01, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, OTRS-permission from radio station representative is needed to restore the logo. Taivo (talk) 10:31, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flêchage, cimetière St-Lazare.jpg

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. — TBhagat (talk) 12:53, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:32, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ashar.jpg

Copyvio image. Störm (talk) 14:45, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Question @Störm: From where? Can you provide a link please? --Ruthven (msg) 07:39, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:35, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Benjamin 2 CV.jpeg

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1948. Jcb (talk) 15:00, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It is clearly published material from France from 1920s. There is no author information, so I would just use {{PD-anon-70-EU}} template. I agree that {{PD-old}} is not adequate, but that was all we had in 2005 when this image was uploaded. --Jarekt (talk) 13:55, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- To use {{PD-anon-70-EU}}, there must be evidence that e.g. the illustration of the motorcycle would be anonymous work (rather than that we at Commons just don't know who the author was). Such evidence is absent. Jcb (talk) 16:36, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, obviously anonymously published. This is not a postcard, where you can ask: what is written on other side of postcard? Maybe author's name? Adverts in newspapers are almost all anonymous and their copyright usually belongs to company, which pays for the advert. That case 70 years from publishing is enough. Taivo (talk) 10:41, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Naveed Raza.jpg

Copyvio image. Störm (talk) 15:25, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:50, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Antoni Długosz.jpg

Most likely a photo of someone else's work. Wiktoryn (talk) 15:34, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, that's probably correct. Derivative work. Taivo (talk) 10:59, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Coca-Cola, Fanta and Sprite plastic bottles from Indonesia.jpg

Copyrighted logo. Arthur Crbz (talk) 16:18, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, Coca-Cola isn't, but Fanta and Sprite are. Taivo (talk) 11:07, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Auk (talk · contribs)

I really hate to nom these, but the claim is that they're the work of another, who has authorized their uploading... and they were evidently previously published elsewhere. I don't think this is good enough, but given the files are pretty old I'm not sure they're eligible for speedy.

—/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 16:18, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, the first file has clear copyright notice "© 2006 Dave Wheeler". Both files have uploader's claim, that the author published it under GFDL, but no evidence for that exists. OTRS-permission from Dave Wheeler is needed to restore the files. Taivo (talk) 11:14, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Donald Trump Cabinet meeting 2017-03-13 01 (cropped).jpg

From the personal account of Donald Trump and not the presidential one. Consensus at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Donald Trump- 'Modern Day Presidential'.png was that these are not public domain. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 16:47, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment At first I thought would think this would be Keep. This is a photo of an obvious government function (what appears to be a bill signing) with Cabinet officials surrounding him in the oval office. Then it dawned on me; we have no idea if this was a taken by a government official, some random passerby or someone from the press pool. I review a lot of various types of PD-US images and one of the things I look for other then the obvious things such as is this account a .gov or .mil account, does the account attribute the actual photographer who took the photo. It's not always a requirement such as {{PD-author|the North Dakota Department of Transportation}} but with images for the federal US gov it does help establish consistency with how a lot of US images released in the PD are actually done.

As I was reading the linked previous DR discussion I came across this and it sums up how I feel about this:

The Foundation is based in the United States and accordingly governed by United States copyright law (Public Law 94-553). That means OTRS and administrators here at Commons are required to enforce it, lest the Foundation receive lawsuits from the owners of the copyright. I suggest you read Commons:Licensing to refresh your memory on this. Furthermore, just because this is Donald Trump it doesn't mean we throw out our entire book of rules just to spite him. Until you can provide us with an actual statement from Donald Trump signed in his position as the President of the United States that his tweets on his personal twitter account are all released from copyright, and/or the comments given are in his official duties as President, this decision is not going to change. (OTRS) — Coffee // have a cup // 11:21, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is why I don't approve images from Twitter. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 19:16, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, source – Twitter. If you have more information about the photographer, then present it and the file can be restored. Taivo (talk) 11:27, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Donald Trump Cabinet meeting 2017-03-13 01.jpg

From the personal account of Donald Trump and not the presidential one. Consensus at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Donald Trump- 'Modern Day Presidential'.png was that these are not public domain. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 16:48, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, source – Twitter. If you have more information about the photographer, then present it and the file can be restored. Taivo (talk) 11:25, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Proyectob.png

This is not a simple logo. Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 15:38, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:10, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vwin logo.png

copyviol, not a free/CC license file. Danyele (talk) 16:57, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:12, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tide pods variation.jpg

Arguably copyrightable artwork (does this fall above threshold of originality in US at least?) of which this is a derivative. Ubcule (talk) 17:41, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:PACKAGING. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:13, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tehran Museum Of Contemporary Art-scrupture.jpg

No COM:FOP in Iran. The creator, Parviz Tanavoli, is still alive. 4nn1l2 (talk) 17:51, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:13, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hrvatska Zastava-Flagge.jpg

possible copyright violation, see here (2010). uploader is most probably not the author. j.budissin^+/- 18:31, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Corrected author, source, and license. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:18, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BII 2009.svg

Not all simple shapes - complex animal head is part of logo Ronhjones ^(Talk) 18:50, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:18, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:R160 N Interior.jpg

Deletion requested by author Davidng913 (talk) 17:04, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, uploader's request is valid reason only during first week after upload. Here half of year has passed. The photo is enough big, has EXIF data and obvious educational value. Taivo (talk) 08:56, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:R160 N Interior.jpg

I, the uploader of this file, want this file deleted due to its poor quality. And I have have been dishontest because I have taken this file from Pacific Coast Highway and have claimed it as my own work. It's from here (look at it carefully!) (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/:File:R160 Interior.jpg)

I'm being serious! This is really not my own. Pacific Coast Highway was the original uploader of this file before it got overwritten. The original file is here: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/5/52/20100421222502%21R160_Interior.jpg

Before it became this: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/52/R160_Interior.jpg

And thanks to the fact that I uploaded the file without permission, I therefore believe that this file should 100% be deleted with no exceptions whatsoever. Therefore, I would like this file deleted as soon as possible.

Davidng913 (talk) 19:03, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I've corrected the file description to have the correct author and licence. While we have many pictures of R160 cars, I think this may be the only one looking along the centre of a car with people for scale, so it doesn't seem redundant to me. --bjh21 (talk) 20:40, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete We should ask the author for permission first. Otherwise, this should be deleted. Whether the license allows me to use it or not, and despite the fact that you changed the information, I stole this file nevertheless, and therefore it deserves to be deleted. Besides, the quality is extremely crappy.—Davidng913 (talk) 03:51, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete At least I'll give David credit for admitting his mistakes. But he really shouldn't upload the file without Pacific Coast Highway's permission. Besides, while Pacific Coast Highway did indeed overwrite the original file, David shouldn't have uploaded the file without PCH’s permission.--107.0.69.23 13:15, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I will have to agree with the delete part. PCH literally overwrited the original file for a reason. Why should it be reuploaded by a different person without asking for permission? Whether the license says you can reuse it or not, asking permission is the first step to reusing someone else’s work. --173.54.1.60 03:20, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You know, you could have just requested a split of File:R160 Interior.jpg, used this name for the older version and given Pacific Coast Highway credit for both. ----DanTD (talk) 04:56, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@DanTD It should be deleted anyway. PCH should have been notified about this first.--Davidng913 (talk) 19:03, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: correct attribution now. Permission not needed because PCH released it as PD. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:56, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ķemeri National Park Bog, Latvia - Jēkabs Andrušaitis.jpg

Author: Jēkabs Andrušaitis. Source (?): http://www.latvia.travel/de/sehenswurdigkeit/wanderpfad-im-grossen-kemeri-moor, © Investment and Development Agency of Latvia.Copyright-violation? ....HMS (talk) 19:17, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:20, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Romain Coppet - Juraj Plesko.jpg

Perhaps a copyright-violation. Described as Cover without permission ba the right-holder. Author of the pica. Ania Winkler:http://aniawinkler.com/portraits.html ....HMS (talk) 19:49, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:20, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MoniquePINCON-CHARLOT.jpg

The photography on the sign is copyrighted Léna (talk) 19:54, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:22, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Perry Anderson.jpg

This image had been speedy-tagged as Flickrvio by User:LX with the rationale "The Flickr user is not the copyright holder and therefore cannot issue a valid license", as the EXIF data state "Foto: Tor Erik H. Mathiesen / SCANPIX".
I've converted the speedy to regular DR to allow for a discussion, as the image is on Commons since 2012 and as the Flickr-source page states "Foto: Tor Erik H. Mathiesen / SCANPIX / Holbergprisen", which suggests that the photographer may have transferred his copyright to "Holbergprisen". -- Túrelio (talk) 20:07, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That will, of course, require confirmation from Scanpix. They're typically not in the business of releasing their content under a free license any more than Getty, Reuters or AFP. —LX (talk, contribs) 21:33, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Only two out of a series of similar photos are licensed under CC on the Flickr page. PRP. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:25, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Manuel Castells.jpg

This image had been speedy-tagged as Flickrvio by User:LX with the rationale "The Flickr user is not the copyright holder and therefore cannot issue a valid license", as the EXIF data state "Foto: Tor Erik H. Mathiesen / SCANPIX".
I've converted the speedy to regular DR to allow for a discussion, as the image is on Commons since 2012 and as the Flickr-source page states "Foto: Holbergprisen / Marit Hommedal / NTB scanpix", which suggests that the photographer may have transferred his copyright to "Holbergprisen". -- Túrelio (talk) 20:11, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The same camera used by several photographers (see other images from flickr). And in my opinion, the copyright holder is "The Holberg Prize". — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 20:36, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All this will, of course, require confirmation from Scanpix. They're typically not in the business of releasing their content under a free license any more than Getty, Reuters or AFP. —LX (talk, contribs) 21:34, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Only one out of a series of similar photos are licensed under CC on the Flickr page. PRP. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:26, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wang Hui.jpg

This image had been speedy-tagged as Flickrvio by User:LX with the rationale "The Flickr user is not the copyright holder and therefore cannot issue a valid license", as the EXIF data state "Foto: Tor Erik H. Mathiesen / SCANPIX".
I've converted the speedy to regular DR to allow for a discussion, as the image is on Commons since 2012 and as the Flickr-source page states "Foto: Tor Erik H. Mathiesen / SCANPIX / Holbergprisen.", which suggests that the photographer may have transferred his copyright to "Holbergprisen". -- Túrelio (talk) 20:13, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That will, of course, require confirmation from Scanpix. They're typically not in the business of releasing their content under a free license any more than Getty, Reuters or AFP. —LX (talk, contribs) 21:34, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with: File:Fredric Jameson.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 08:16, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Only two out of a series of similar photos are licensed under CC on the Flickr page. PRP. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:27, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Thu Phương a moment of sublime on stage 2017.jpg

small size without EXIFs, unlikely to be own works, the uploder already uploded copyvios Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 20:45, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:27, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Слава Машкарин (talk · contribs)

Various derivative works

Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 21:02, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:28, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Forest Live logo.png

I disagree with the both license tags, firt UK has a very low ToO therefore this is not a PD text logo. Secondly the OGL license don't apply to the logo https://www.forestry.gov.uk/forestry/hcou-4ubejz Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 21:28, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:28, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Blason du cardinal Francois-Marie-Benjamin Richard de la Vergne.svg

Une meilleure version du fichier existe (avec devise, pallium et double croix). Kingsjester41 (talk) 21:31, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Probably this file: File:Blason_du_cardinal_Francois_Richard_de_la_Vergne.svg. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:30, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:30, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dipprasad Pun.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Fourthords as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This FDP itself says, "All images remain crown copyright." The source page caption reads, "[Picture: Sergeant Ian Forsyth RLC, Crown Copyright/MOD 2011]"|source=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/the-outstanding-examples-of-a-generation-the-op-honours-recipients — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 22:00, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:31, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Rape of Ganymede by Jupiter's Eagle with satyrs - Annibale Carracci - 1597 - Farnese Gallery, Rome.jpg

No information on the photographer of this 3D situation, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:03, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:32, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Essex Drury (later Viscountess Monsell) with daughter Romayne.png

Found the picture with date 1933 with no copyright, but later found the photographer is died less than 70 years ago Elisa Rolle 23:29, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

@Elisa.rolle: …and who's the photographer? When has he died? --Ruthven (msg) 07:50, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ruthven: actually it's a almost sure assumption, there is this record at NPG [12] which preview is not available, but by the description of the file, I'm almost sure it's the same photo. And Dorothy Wilding (1893-1976), Photographer, is died less than 70 years ago. --Elisa Rolle 10:24, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:33, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Closed discussions from Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by SecretName101

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SecretName101 (talk · contribs)

These photos are out of scope.

Mhhossein ^talk 14:43, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:38, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SecretName101 (talk · contribs)

These are low-resolution screenshots of copyrighted content. While the text is hard to read due to low resolution, the site layout, images, browser software, etc. are still generally eligible for copyright. If only a small part of the screenshot were non-free, we could claim de minimis, but that isn't the case here.

Note that on Wikipedia, low resolutions are used to improve a claim of fair use, but fair use claims are explicitly rejected here. On Commons, lower resolution simply means lower quality.

Guanaco (talk) 00:47, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete , Aside from the quality issue, a number of these image contain logo elements to which something like PD-textlogo would be clearly inapplicable.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:01, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:47, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SecretName101 (talk · contribs)

Delete None of these image are so simple to comply with the {{Pd-text}} and {{Pd-shape}} that have been added by the uploader. They are all more complex designs with graded backgrounds and/or shadowed text plus various button with highlights that certainly make then exceed COM:TOO and required some creative design decisions. They also have no evidence any were released into the public domain or under a free license by the Huckabee campaign. I've excluded those that consist only of simple text and/or shapes against plain backgrounds.

Ww2censor (talk) 16:50, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I can certainly see the argument to discuss a number of these. However many of these are overkill. For instance, graphics like File:Huckabee DoorHanger.pdf, File:I like mike button1.png, File:Banner forpresidentblue.png, File:Banner forpresidentred.png are pretty certainly BENEATH the threshold of originality. SecretName101 (talk) 17:01, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll grant you that File:Huckabee DoorHanger.pdf may be ok. The others have graduated highlights that I think keeps them above the threshold of originality because they are not just simple text on a plain background. Ww2censor (talk) 17:48, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Users should provide separate nominations for works that have different attributes.

Another nomination with different classes of files in the same nomination. In the order nominated:
- Weak delete File:Banner tn huckabee.gif and also al ak az ar co dc nh: I think these are probably above the threshold of originality; there are enough differences in each one, such as whether some have gradient backgrounds and some don't, indicate that individual thought went into each one, rather than just autogeneration from some tool. (I don't put much weight on the shiny oval at the top of each circle, though: That's a bog-standard shape of reflective shine on round icons now, easily available from autogeneration tools. And the actual content of most buttons are crops of state flags and other symbols long out of copyright.)
- Delete File:Way you can help Huckabee.png: A couple of the icons, at least, are above COM:TOO. Perhaps the overall layout is too simple to meet COM:TOO in the U.S., but for it to pass on Commons, the icons would also have to be freely licensed. This is a blurry zoom-in of https://web.archive.org/web/20080227195913im_/http://www.mikehuckabee.com/_images/hqs/ways2help.gif by the way. I cropped (without removing the blue background along the top) and searched for the phone, envelope "send", and notepad icons on Google Images Search and TinEye and can't find them anywhere, let alone in freely-licensed icon sets.
- Keep File:Logo tilt small 1.gif: Very common two-stripe nametag, with "Meetup" written in one of the dozens or hundreds of ways it's been written. "Meetup" as a word is not copyrightable, and the visual display of mere text is uncopyrightable in the United States: en:Wikipedia:Public domain#Fonts and typefaces. (We have 9 or so other examples in Category:Meetup (website) in the United States presidential election, 2004.)
- Delete File:Watchmike billboard.jpg: The balloons of unknown origin are just important enough to the message to not be de minimis. --Closeapple (talk) 22:17, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep File:Huckabee DoorHanger.pdf: Every election season has masses of bumper stickers, yard signs, and hangers with basically this same stars and ribbon stripe theme. Some websites that have these kinds of things as examples, roughly most-like to least-like this door hanger:
- Weak delete File:Iowa iowaforhuckabee.gif: same theory as the two-letter "Banner" files
- Weak delete File:John McCain Myspacebanner.jpg and File:John McCain Myspace banner.jpg: background might be de minimis, but I guess not obviously so.
- Weak keep File:Mike Huckabee Myspace L 1afd16f88ecf4a171d1cc83fa8001783.jpg: probably nothing original here; background flag is de minimis and wouldn't have much different effect regardless of how it was flapping
- Delete File:Dy badge.jpg: Declare Yourself logo is artistic.
- Weak delete File:Huckabee sticker 300x325.png: The background fade might be above the threshold of originality. (Then again, maybe not.)
- Keep File:Huckabee myspace.png: Just some stars and words; nothing unique there. (The bottom stripe is just the same image repeating again.) The real file does not have the repeating strip at the bottom, but the stupid MySpace layout (which makes it a "background" image for no good reason) makes it appear strangely on modern browsers.
- Keep File:New Hampshire for Huckabee.gif: Clearly doesn't meet the threshold of originality for the United States.
- Keep File:Huckabee banner 05.gif: Same as the doorhanger above, and the background fade here is definitely unoriginal.
- Weak keep File:Banner nh huckabee.gif, File:Banner forpresidentred.png, File:Banner forpresidentblue.png: Backgrounds aren't original (but choice is marginal: see other state banners above, which I said "weak delete" to), and the round buttons are pretty standard election campaign design.
- Keep File:I like mike button1.png: Common standard campaign button design with the oval light I pointed out as unoriginal before, then tilted slightly. It should be re-uploaded at original size from the source though: This version is ridiculously enlarged.

--Closeapple (talk) 22:17, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Most deleted, some kept per Closeapple, although I disagreed on the graded background buttons. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:20, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SecretName101 (talk · contribs)

The YouTube uploader is neither the copyright holder of this nor the original author. As of right now these are license laundered by MyTake.org

Majora (talk) 00:21, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:38, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SecretName101 (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How is it out of scope?? SecretName101 (talk) 05:03, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep not out of scope at all. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:48, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: They're clearly the logos for U.S. presidential campaigns (or at least so-called "exploratory committees"), so they're in COM:SCOPE and U.S. publications below the threshold of originality unless someone has evidence otherwise, even (in this particular case) without useful author or source information. --Closeapple (talk) 23:17, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:45, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SecretName101 (talk · contribs)

Too low quality to be useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 06:31, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Commons:Project scope#Examples ("Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality.") These files are blurry even at thumbnail size, and there are lots of photos in Category:Rod Blagojevich, all better quality. --Closeapple (talk) 23:23, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:45, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SecretName101 (talk · contribs)

These are all images of individuals posing with this two dimensional work, the poster of Warren, which represents a proportionately large and thematically central role in the images. We would need evidence that this other image, of which these are derivative, is itself freely licensed.

GMG ^talk 18:21, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Poster of Warren is created by Edward Kimmel utilizing a photo he took. He has released this work into the public domain. See File:Warren Banner w Attri2 (33674856728).jpg. @GreenMeansGo: , the proof we would need exists there. SecretName101 (talk) 00:41, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough.

I withdraw my nomination GMG ^talk 12:19, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Mhhossein ^talk 11:47, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SecretName101 (talk · contribs)

COM:COPYVIOs PART ONE: All images from Flickr, passed mechanical review. However each file is from a political candidate's flickr page, and each flickr page credits a different photographer for the images. Therefore, the flickr page does not have rights, and the mechanical review is incorrect. There will be a second nomination, I got to too many files and have to do this in two parts.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:48, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is it not possible that the campaign hired multiple photographers? SecretName101 (talk) 04:31, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:35, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SecretName101 (talk · contribs)

COM:COPYVIOs PART TWO: All images from Flickr, passed mechanical review. However each file is from a political candidate's flickr page, and each flickr page credits a different photographer for the images. Therefore, the flickr page does not have rights, and the mechanical review is incorrect. The remainder of the uploads by this user also need review. I did several hundred, and have run out of time.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:00, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ellin Beltz: These are all from the Flickr account of Olivia Chow? Then

Delete and we should add the account to the bad accounts list. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:02, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Srittau: As far as I can tell, they are all from the Olivia Chow flickr account. The uniformity of file names, etc. The actual "author" is sometimes credited by the Chow account, sometimes not. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Uhm, different photographers can be comissioned by a campaign. SecretName101 (talk) 11:00, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The following DR may be relevant - Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Charles, Prince of Wales in 2018 - the NIO flickr account licensed them as free when they had no right to do so. I would be inclined to say delete unless Olivia Chow can prove that they have permission Gbawden (talk) 14:00, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:35, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SecretName101 (talk · contribs)

Commons:Derivative works from video projection, presentations, posters.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The DIG14657... pictures are from the LBJ Presidential Library, which is operated by the National Archives and Records Administration, which is an independent agency of the United States government. They're almost all easily cropped to remove the presentation screens, but it's arguable that the images depicted on those screens are themselves public domain as works of the LBJ library. I also cropped out the offending content on the other two photos. clpo13_(talk) 05:34, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've cropped them all to remove any DW issues, so Keep the latest versions. clpo13_(talk) 05:42, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Now cropped, old versions deleted. Sealle (talk) 12:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SecretName101 (talk · contribs)

impossible to review. impossible to determine if this video was shot for voa or in his personal capacity.

RZuo (talk) 15:25, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Easy review. He was attending as a press personal credentialed with/by VOA to cover the Super Bowl, therefore media of of the game they captured was as part of that assignment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SecretName101 (talk • contribs) 16:26, 25 May 2023 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 16:45, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]