Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/09/01

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 1st, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image outside project scope Poliocretes (talk) 05:38, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:29, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this photo a long time ago as a school project. I would like this photo of me removed because it affects my personal life.

Thank you Augustaeonsworth (talk) 01:14, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Wait a minute, if you uploaded it, then how did this happen?: [1]--It's Kong of Lazers 你好 01:17, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment As I said already, I uploaded this photo back in 2009 for a school project myself and now I would like it removed.
 Delete At the original uploader's request.--It's Kong of Lazers 你好 01:30, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:20, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Watford tube station 038.jpg. Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:13, 1 September 2017 (UTC) @Pkbwcgs: if you find similar files to this, please just tag with {{Duplicate}} and do not nominate for deletion. Duplicate is a speedy deletion, and doesn't need an additional nomination - makes the admin easier. Thanks.--Nilfanion (talk) 09:27, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Nilfanion (talk) 09:25, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Category --TeleD (Diskussion) 19:33, 30 August 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: Empty, should have been a category. --Achim (talk) 11:52, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded just to test maps.wikilovesmonuments.org Geraki TLG 17:36, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yarl 💭  18:07, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ruuuuwrwuhuhuhuhuhuh@ 206.83.24.126 18:31, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept (good faith non-admin closure) - I'm the creator of the page, but given it's a highly-visible WLM project page, and the nominator put nonsense as the deletion rationale, I'm closing the discussion as vandalism. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 18:51, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality, Gruna, Dresden, Germany - panoramio (571).jpg is much better Derbrauni (talk) 11:07, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, my mistake. This is the good picture. Please delete Gruna, Dresden, Germany - panoramio (571).jpg --Derbrauni (talk) 11:09, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion (mistake). -- Darwin Ahoy! 21:33, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of File:Elodie et Eloise - Compagnie Rions Noir.jpg, deleted by lack of permission. Yann (talk) 20:24, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I created this derivative work before the original was deleted, and only became aware of the original's deletion today. Lambtron (talk) 21:30, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:35, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

different licenses of the used files 185.183.107.167 11:00, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All of the images used in this collage are noted on the detail page and published under a CC-BY-SA or CC-BY-License. Each of this licenses allows editing and publication under a compatible license. CC-BY-SA 4.0 is compatible to the licenses mentioned above. There neither is a problem nor a reason for such a deletion request.
Anyway: This image is in use in the current wide-reaching WikiLovesMonuments campaign. So please be careful. // Martin K. (talk) 11:48, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No problem here. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:56, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cage Cage2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Songs. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:01, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Wiki Zero abuse. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:29, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 18:45, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:52, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User's curriculum vitae, out of scope. Commons is no private web host. Achim (talk) 11:27, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In the meantime just another upload of this: File:JordiReina-CV.pdf. --Achim (talk) 11:59, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

exact duplicate Usamasaad 21:20, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

one is jpg, one is png. Both within scope.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:36, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
But the JPG version is the correct one. That is what it was uploaded to Flickr as. --Elisfkc (talk) 19:20, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Duplicate in the works. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:03, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be uploader's own work. An uncropped version of the image has appeared (with photo credit) at http://missosology.org/miss-universe/44395-cailin-aine-ni-toibin-crowned-miss-universe-ireland-2017/ NewYorkActuary (talk) 14:30, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:15, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal pictures, self-promotion. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 18:30, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:28, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal pictures, self-promotion. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 18:30, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:30, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal pictures, self-promotion. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 18:31, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:43, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal pictures, self-promotion. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 18:31, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:46, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal pictures, self-promotion. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 18:31, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:45, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal pictures, self-promotion. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 18:32, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:44, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private photo, kind of blurry. It's Kong of Lazers 你好 00:15, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:12, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corrupted upload, not useful. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:25, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:14, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corrupted upload, not useful. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:25, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:24, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 15:51, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:28, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, low-quality picture of a bra: we have much better pics in e.g. Brassiere Apocheir (talk) 15:57, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:28, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I wanted to put it on wikipedia article, but the deleted the article so this picture is useles Borivojgrujicic (talk) 21:13, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

because is unusefull in article that I wrote Borivojgrujicic (talk) 08:59, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:38, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 18:14, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:33, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 18:14, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:33, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Commons is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 18:15, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:33, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. Flickr user deadflowerfromaheaven seems not the original owner. ~Moheen (keep talking) 18:16, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:33, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, likely self-promotion Apocheir (talk) 18:16, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:33, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 18:20, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:32, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 18:20, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:32, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, probable self-promotion Apocheir (talk) 18:21, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:32, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 18:22, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:32, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pure text, out of scope for Commons Apocheir (talk) 18:23, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:31, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo/personal photo Apocheir (talk) 18:24, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:30, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 18:25, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:31, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 18:25, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:31, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 18:25, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:30, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 18:26, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:30, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal pictures, self-promotion. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 18:29, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:30, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo with no EXIF data. Possibly a copyvio. Wikicology (talk) 18:29, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:30, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anaghababy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Incomplete images: unlikely to be used in a project

Takeaway (talk) 18:30, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:30, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo with no EXIF data. Possibly a copyvio. Wikicology (talk) 18:31, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:29, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo with no EXIF data. Possibly a copyvio. Wikicology (talk) 18:31, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:29, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image used only by page deleted off enwiki DS (talk) 18:31, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:29, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal pictures, self-promotion. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 18:32, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:29, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo with no EXIF data. Possibly a copyvio. Wikicology (talk) 18:32, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:29, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope personal image. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:02, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:05, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Still an out-of-scope personal image. Apocheir (talk) 18:33, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:29, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 18:34, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:29, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 18:34, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:29, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal/self-promotional image Apocheir (talk) 18:35, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:28, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Commons is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 18:36, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:28, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Commons is not a personal photo album Wikicology (talk) 18:38, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:28, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Saleem Maibal

[edit]

Unused personal photos, mostly of the uploader. --Apocheir (talk) 18:38, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:28, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 18:44, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:28, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 18:48, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:28, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo/self-promotion Apocheir (talk) 18:51, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:28, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 18:51, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:27, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright holder of this work is "AMUZUPHOTOGRAPHY". OTRS permission is required. Wikicology (talk) 18:52, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:27, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright holder of this work is "AMUZUPHOTOGRAPHY". OTRS permission is required. Wikicology (talk) 18:53, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:27, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright holder of this work is "AMUZUPHOTOGRAPHY". OTRS permission is required. Wikicology (talk) 18:54, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:27, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright holder of this work is "AMUZUPHOTOGRAPHY". OTRS permission is required. Wikicology (talk) 18:54, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:27, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright holder of this work is "AMUZUPHOTOGRAPHY". OTRS permission is required. Wikicology (talk) 18:55, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:27, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright holder of this work is "AMUZUPHOTOGRAPHY". OTRS permission is required. Wikicology (talk) 18:56, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:27, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image, probably self-promotion. Was on a page on en.wiki that was speedied for spam. Apocheir (talk) 18:58, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:27, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 19:00, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:27, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 19:01, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:26, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation (no freedom of panorama in the US); see Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Martin_Luther_King,_Jr._National_Memorial ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 19:01, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:26, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation (no freedom of panorama in the US); see Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Martin_Luther_King,_Jr._National_Memorial ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 19:01, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:26, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kwameghana (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The copyright holder of this work is "AMUZUPHOTOGRAPHY". OTRS permission is required.

Wikicology (talk) 19:03, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:26, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably out of project scope. Leyo 19:26, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:25, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Man on image should be the photographer. Unlikely. Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:39, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:24, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no own work, non-notable person, probably copyvio Vysotsky (talk) 19:42, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-notable; not used; link to hack website Vysotsky (talk) 21:33, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:19, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OH group is incorrectly aligned to the bond. Replaced by File:Alpha-Naphthol.svg anyway. Leyo 21:50, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:15, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source for the base map. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:52, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Part of a 2007 bulk upload of Maps from Wikipedia made by "Catbar". The others in the category had valid sources, so I copied over that information to this file template and marked "kept.". --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:14, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo appears to date from 1977; according to http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0075630/mediaviewer/rm1104292864 it is a still or promo shot from Acto de posesión, a film she made that year. The image is therefore highly unlikely to be the uploader's own work. Diannaa (talk) 22:11, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:13, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Professional headshot of the uploader, metadata states "Author: "David Roth", Copyright holder: "David Roth Photography"." Needs permission to license and distribute a copyrighted photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 23:15, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:12, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently professional photo of a performer, the metadata lists the author as "Omar Guerra Photography", name does not seem to match the uploader; needs clarification of authorship and permission to use the picture. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 23:17, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:05, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Meme using copyrighted animation. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 23:19, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:05, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The metadata states "Author:Horst Jahn, Copyright holder: All_Rights_Reserved." Assume it's copyrighted "all rights reserved" unless there is evidence otherwise; needs permission from the author listed. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 23:40, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:05, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Why is this under a free license? Discasto talk 23:41, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I was unable to find any reason why this image had a free license, so deleted. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:05, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The individual author is not listed on the photo description; in this article and this article the photo is attributed to "Scott Lowden". Need clarification that the uploader is that person or has his permission to license the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 23:51, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:00, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False claims about date, source, authorship, licensing. Older and better versions on the internet. See [2]. -- Asclepias (talk) 00:57, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proceed as requested simple as that. I'm definitely not going to make a federal case with this, it's just a pressure cooker photograph after all, period. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phylyp (talk • contribs) 11:16, 1 September 2017‎ (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:42, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:41, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:42, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:42, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:42, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely own work, small resolution and EXIF data indicates possible grabbed from Facebook NinjaStrikers «» 02:42, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:43, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brittney Tun (talk · contribs)

[edit]

contain watermark, small resolution and EXIF data indicates possible grabbed from Facebook, suspected copyvio

NinjaStrikers «» 02:49, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Source of Photos

The watermark is that of my own company, YMT Productions. Yes, I got it from my Facebook page. I own multiple devices, and the one I created the article on does not hold the original file. If I am correct, I have a right to use my own photos... correct? I am willing to relinquish all rights to these photos and submit them to Wiki Commons. Brittney Tun (talk

@Brittney Tun: If you created these photos entirely by yourself, please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. NinjaStrikers «» 06:51, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be best to just upload the originals. Delete it if you wish.Brittney Tun


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:44, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No CC-BY-SA license at the original source: http://diocajazeiras.com.br/bispo-diocesano/ Py4nf (talk) 03:36, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:46, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is dubious that this work was actually prepared by an employee of the US government. More likely it was retrieved from his computer during the investigation and hence the copyright likely belongs to Ross Ulbricht. Sizeofint (talk) 03:40, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:47, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image non libre de droit (erreur de ma part). Antoineets (talk) 10:05, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image soumise au copyright (erreur de ma part). Antoineets (talk) 09:00, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:37, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:37, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aaronmarkusgraf (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images - out of scope

Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:57, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:42, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:36, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Google searching revealed that author died in 1878. It's old enough to  Keep. http://www.pontualarte.com.br/portfolio/imperatriz-teresa-cristina/ Keeping administrator may wish to overwrite current version with image at site cited. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:22, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks! Then it's fine. I have updated the information template accordingly. Jcb (talk) 09:25, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 09:26, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is from MSNBC, a major news organization who owns the copyright Heyyouoverthere (talk) 04:03, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't Wikipedia or Wikimedia have an option, like it has for flickr images, to make use of creative commons published videos from YouTube? Is it allowed to upload YT CC items to WP? Prokaryotes (talk) 10:34, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes they own the copyright and they released it CC-by. Victorgrigas (talk) 11:47, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Also look here:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Media_from_YouTube There are 11 thousand video that haver been migrated form Youtube so far Victorgrigas (talk) 17:08, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No. While MSNBC might release files from their network, the content within this particular file is not 100% MSNBCs. This video is filled with copyright protect files made by other providers, MSNBC might be freely allowed to use it as they see fit, Wiki is not. Heyyouoverthere (talk) 16:16, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:53, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright file from MSNBC Heyyouoverthere (talk) 04:05, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ITS RELEASED CC-BY ON THEIR YOUTUBE CHANNEL Victorgrigas (talk) 11:49, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
While MSNBC released it on their Youtube page, that is on them. As a news agency, they have a wide swatch regarding copyrights in using content that they themselves did not create, pay for and own outright. Many of MSNBC files contain content that are owned by other content providers who retain their copyright protections, despite what MSNBC does with them. This does not mean that Wiki can actually use them. Please learn about Copyright laws, especially in the United States. Heyyouoverthere (talk) 16:20, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:56, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a whole produced file via VOA, filled with footage from other copyright holders. Heyyouoverthere (talk) 04:08, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:56, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope Asklēpiós (talk) 04:56, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:59, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Project_scope Asklēpiós (talk) 04:58, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:59, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file should be uploaded as text to an appropriate project, if the material is needed at all. Commons:Project_scope Asklēpiós (talk) 05:02, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:59, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Project_scope Asklēpiós (talk) 05:03, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 10:00, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious year of publication; color photography did not start to get mainstream until after the 1950s. Unknown year, unknown author... I'm invoking COM:PRP on this. HyperGaruda (talk) 05:04, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 10:01, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and File:SUBIR.pdf

Commons:Project_scope Copyright also seems questionable Asklēpiós (talk) 05:06, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 10:01, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:44, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 10:10, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - pure advertising, no educational value Optimist on the run (talk) 06:52, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 10:10, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - pure advertising, no educational value. Optimist on the run (talk) 06:54, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 10:11, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - pure advertising, no educational value. Optimist on the run (talk) 06:54, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 10:11, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - pure advertising, no educational value. Optimist on the run (talk) 06:54, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 10:11, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - pure advertising, no educational value. Optimist on the run (talk) 06:55, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 10:11, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - pure advertising, no educational value. Optimist on the run (talk) 06:55, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 10:11, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:MUSICOS INTERNACIONALES

[edit]

Personal artwork, music promotion, the files are not in use and not usable for articles; out of Project scope. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 12:57, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 10:13, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cf com:PENIS, and com:IDENT Pippobuono (talk) 13:04, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 10:13, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fedebolso (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 10:13, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 10:14, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from historical photos. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 10:14, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of a rotated text string which could easily be re-made if needed. Created by user:MiewEN who also created the similar one deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/File:2011to2015.JPG Fayenatic london (talk) 14:21, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 10:15, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by D.parra97 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://www.boletomachupicchu.com/gutblt/wp-content/images/templo-sol-ollantaytambo.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 10:15, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:42, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:42, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mahmoudzidane (talk · contribs)

[edit]

There are either unused personal images, either logos/images of Mahmoud Zidane uploaded without authorisation (and out of scope anyways).

Ruthven (msg) 15:21, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 10:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 프랭클린 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I do not think that we need all these photos of asses. Per Commons:Nudity.

Ruthven (msg) 15:27, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 10:27, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it's nobodies business what I look up 24.225.110.55 04:19, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 12:31, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Perfect self promotion 141.196.208.110 07:10, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:32, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo of indefinitely blocked user, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 07:56, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:32, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion, out of scope. Achim (talk) 10:49, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:34, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused filter selfie. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 12:14, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:33, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:IDENT Pippobuono (talk) 12:50, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest to delete the other files (20) of this new user for the same reason.--Tobias "ToMar" Maier (talk) 04:57, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 14:15, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image - out of scope Pkbwcgs (talk) 12:56, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:15, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality image of com:PENIS Pippobuono (talk) 13:01, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:15, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal logo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 13:09, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:14, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Jonogrant

[edit]

Photos of the uploader, author and copyright holder is listed in the metadata; needs their permission to license and distribute the photos. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 13:14, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:14, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Patzguerrerord (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:15, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Verginiee (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:16, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unusable / low quality, out of COM:SCOPE A.Savin 12:38, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:53, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Jez3 Official

[edit]

Unused selfie and personal logo, contains no educational value. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 12:40, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:52, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:53, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maria Miranda11 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Songs. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:01, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:53, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Romelbluok (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:53, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DizzinessOfFreedom (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by DizzinessOfFreedom (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://i2.wp.com/www.frame-poythress.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Frame.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have permission to use the file of John Frame, the others I found them to be free to use. After all they are being used in GoodReads.DizzinessOfFreedom (talk) 20:02, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - permission can be sent to OTRS. --Jcb (talk) 20:54, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TNSE MANIKANDAN PDK (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All the images seem to be taken from a book (cf. the caption), and thus, without authorization from the authors.

Ruthven (msg) 15:23, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:55, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 15:23, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:55, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused tiny photo of user who uploaded it Apocheir (talk) 15:24, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:55, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 17:53, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:56, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused blurry personal photo Apocheir (talk) 17:53, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:56, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 17:56, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:56, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Dakota23445

[edit]

Commons is not a personal photo site. --Apocheir (talk) 17:58, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that Dakota Elder is a quasi-notable person, so either a) User:Dakota23445 is Dakota Elder and these are personal photos, or b) User:Dakota23445 is a Dakota Elder fan, in which case the licensing is a lie. Many of these photos can be found on Google Images. All are unused. --Apocheir (talk) 18:10, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 20:56, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, spam / self-promotion. Apocheir (talk) 18:11, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:57, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lo subi por error Dafeig (talk) 16:46, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

this file was uploaded by error Dafeig (talk) 19:29, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:04, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced by SVG Nothingserious (talk) 13:48, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 18:09, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced by SVG Nothingserious (talk) 13:50, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 18:09, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falsche Datei hochgeladen Petra S. Schröck (talk) 11:59, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Petra S. Schröck

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image non pertinente pour Wikimedia Commons. Antoineets (talk) 08:58, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyrighted logos appear in the image. Ruthven (msg) 10:42, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image non pertinente pour Wikimedia Commons. Antoineets (talk) 08:59, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyrighted logos appear in the image. Ruthven (msg) 10:42, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image non pertinente pour Wikimedia Commons. Antoineets (talk) 08:59, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyrighted logos appear in the image. Ruthven (msg) 10:42, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image non pertinente pour Wikimedia Commons. Antoineets (talk) 09:00, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyrighted logos appear in the image. Ruthven (msg) 10:42, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image non pertinente pour Wikimedia Commons. Antoineets (talk) 09:00, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyrighted logos appear in the image. Ruthven (msg) 10:42, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Gaurav Nanda is a male actor. Unknown women 141.196.208.110 09:06, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 10:42, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails COM:FOP IndianBio (talk) 09:25, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: DW. Ruthven (msg) 10:43, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Benjamin Sung 14.202.64.48 13:22, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seems non-bona fide nomination. No reasons provided. Effeietsanders (talk) 14:26, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 10:45, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Focused on recent architecture. No FoP in France. Can be transfered to French WP where fair use is accepted for architecture. Same problem with File:L'Isle-d'Abeau-Isère-gare-09.JPG (from the same uploader). TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 20:06, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:46, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Focused on something that may be considered as recent architecture. If that's the case, there's no FoP in France. Can be transfered to French WP where fair use is accepted for architecture. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 20:07, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:46, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mainly focused on a map that may be copyrighted. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 20:09, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok pour la suppression, il s'agit certainement d'une œuvre sous droits d'auteur. Fandepanda (talk) 16:14, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:47, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious derivative work. Stuff exhibited in a museum is not covered by Freedom of panorama in Argentina Discasto talk 20:48, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:47, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Oeuvre d'un artiste toujours vivant (donc sous droits d'auteurs), il faut donc une autorisation (voir Commons:OTRS/fr) Shev123 (talk) 21:21, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Shev123, je sais qu'il est pour ma diffusion d'une image d'oeuvre avec laquelle je vis depuis près de 25 ans. J'apprécie son art depuis 30 ans, nous sommes amis. Il y a relativement peu d'images de ses oeuvres sur le net, aussi l'ai je fait comme un hommage. A suivre et à très bientôt, --Fm THUILLIER (talk) 08:57, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. @Fm THUILLIER: Image effacée pour le moment. On a besoin d'une autorisation OTRS de la part de l'auteur pour publier. Ruthven (msg) 10:48, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. L'architecte (Auguste Perret) est mort en 1954, ses œuvres n'entreront dans le domaine public qu'en 2025 (pas de liberté de panorama en France). Jvillafruela (talk) 21:42, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:48, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. L'architecte (Auguste Perret) est mort en 1954, ses œuvres n'entreront dans le domaine public qu'en 2025 (pas de liberté de panorama en France). Jvillafruela (talk) 21:43, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:48, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
English: Architect (Auguste Perret) died in 1954, his works will not be in public domain before 2025 (and no COM:FOP in France).
Français : L'architecte (Auguste Perret) est mort en 1954, ses œuvres n'entreront dans le domaine public qu'en 2025 (pas de liberté de panorama en France).
VIGNERON (talk) 17:39, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Bonsoir VIGNERON, j'avais effectivement remarqué que les œuvres de l' architecte Auguste Perret n'étainet pas dans le domaine public. Toutefois compte tenu du fait qu'il existe plus de vingt fichiers de la Tour Perret (Amiens) dans les "Commons" je pensais que liberté de panorama étaient maintenant acquise pour ce bâtiment pris dans un ensemble paysager. Je ne formule aucune objection à ce que mon fichier soit supprimé. Cdlt. --Pierre André (talk) 20:19, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]




Deleted: per nomination. On s'occupe des autres fichiers aussi. Ruthven (msg) 10:50, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. That may be copyrighted (no proof that it isn't). TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 20:10, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok pour la suppression, il s'agit certainement d'une œuvre sous droits d'auteur. Fandepanda (talk) 16:14, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Fandepanda. Ruthven (msg) 11:01, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Forbes died in 1947, so this needs to be undeleted in 2018. Andy Mabbett (talk) 20:51, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:01, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bonjour, j'avais créé cet image sous mon ancien compte que je n'arrive plus à récupérer depuis fort longtemps... J'étais jeune (13-14 ans je crois) et j'avais pris le fond d'une carte où je n'avais pas le droit d'auteur et j'ignore si elle était libre d'accès. Pouvez-vous la supprimer j'en créerai une autre par la suite ? Cordialement, Jejesga06. Jejesga06 (talk) 22:45, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:02, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused duplicate of File:ELID Basic.JPG (with huge margins). Mikhail Ryazanov (talk) 06:33, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:50, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 09:43, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jcb: There's a ticket at dewiki, ticket:2009010710009881. Does that tell us anything useful? Guanaco (talk) 09:54, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The ticket contains a statement (in German) from somebody who declares to be not the copyright holder. So unfortunately the ticket contains nothing usefull. Jcb (talk) 11:49, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
My view has been that, per Commons:Copyright rules by territory#European copyright law, this is a "collective, pseudonymous or anonymous work", so the copyright would expire 70 years following publication. Guanaco (talk) 22:59, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No, it isn't, neither of the three. Anonymous-EU can only be used if there is some evidence that this would indeed be an anonymous work. This work is from Germany, where copyright regulations make it practically impossible to use Anonymous-EU. Jcb (talk) 23:06, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
My understanding of German copyright idiosyncrasies is lacking, I'm afraid. Could you elaborate? Generally speaking, we know that this is an advertisement from around 1910, and the publication itself would not have included authorship information. It's also extremely unlikely that some individual came forward and claimed authorship. So unlikely that the chance of an author being publicly known doesn't amount to significant doubt. This appears to be the stance that was taken at dewiki. Guanaco (talk) 08:38, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A photographer has taken the picture of the locomotive. Although not credited in the advertisement, it's very unlikely that they took this picture anonymously. That means that the picture will still be copyrighted, unless the photographer would have died before 1947. As a community, we recently had a comprehensive discussion about how old a picture must be in a PM+70 country to no longer have significant doubt about the copyright situation, for cases where we don't know when the author died. We drew that line at 120 years. So if this picture would have been from before 1897, we would no longer have significant doubt. Unfortunately, this picture is from around 1910, which is 14 years too recent for {{PD-old-assumed}}. Jcb (talk) 09:00, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I think I understand now. I had taken "anonymous" to include cases where the author's identity has not been publicly disclosed, and is unlikely to be publicly available. It seems that it only includes images where there is specific intent of anonymity. In countries other than Germany, it is likely this would be a "collective work" under corporate copyright. However, German law states that certain rights remain with the individual author, despite any state of employment. Jcb, is this right? Guanaco (talk) 20:38, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Also in other countries in most cases the photographer remains the copyright holder. There are often provisions in the law for corporate copyright, but for most of the cases I have seen in the past years, the conditions for corporate copyright were not met. Jcb (talk) 21:22, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:53, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality. Gruna, Dresden, Germany - panoramio (571).jpg is much better. Derbrauni (talk) 11:09, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, per nom.-- Darwin Ahoy! 21:34, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:54, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

foto con scarsa risoluzione VENET01 (talk) 11:39, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: la possiamo tenere ed è in uso. Ruthven (msg) 16:54, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio of stock image from 123RF; not user's own work. Yunshui (talk) 12:37, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:55, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

[edit]

Posted diagram is my own creation to illustrate the way in which the Golden Spiral can be geometrically constructed - with a ruler and a compass. As for notability it falls in the scope the following similar topic of Constructing a Golden Rectangle. NG (talk)


Kept: in scope for sure. Added {{Convert to SVG}}. Ruthven (msg) 16:58, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What is that??? 2A02:810D:FC0:794:443D:847C:1311:3ED6 15:43, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: it's a map. Ruthven (msg) 16:59, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fantasy map of fictional Armenian nation within Spain Enyavar (talk) 22:00, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:02, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion, unused, blurry Apocheir (talk) 15:45, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:59, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Also probably out of scope. Jcb (talk) 17:02, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:59, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Project scope. This ain't a social network here. Images of users who just come here for self promotion will be deleted. Zaccarias (talk) 17:27, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above no matter the snazzy hairdo Heyyouoverthere (talk) 00:00, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:59, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown guy, unknown author "profile picture" uploaded by an account with just one global edit. Out of project scope. Zaccarias (talk) 17:40, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused personal image. Ruthven (msg) 17:00, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a social network here. Out of Project scope, global edit count: 3 edits Zaccarias (talk) 17:43, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused personal image + missing permission from Santosriram. Ruthven (msg) 17:00, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wikipedistard (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Project scope. Appears to be self-promotional stuff. Websearch of this persons name gives no relevance for keeping. Global edit count: +3 edits on es.wikipedia -

Zaccarias (talk) 17:50, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:00, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality personal photo, unused except on a rejected en.wikipedia draft where user was trying to create an autobiographical page. Apocheir (talk) 18:12, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: self promotion + OTRS needed. Ruthven (msg) 17:01, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality personal photo, unused except on a rejected en.wikipedia draft where user was trying to create an autobiographical page. Apocheir (talk) 18:12, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Farooq-ahmad.jpg. Ruthven (msg) 17:01, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a non-free work. This is not "Own work" . Wikicology (talk) 18:18, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How do you know? It is possible it's really the persons work. Look at the metadata. Not found on Google Images either. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 19:20, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: work of Eugene Francis Savage (March 29, 1883 – October 19, 1978). Ruthven (msg) 17:04, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marilyn Engwall (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative work of a non-free work. This is not "Own work" .

Wikicology (talk) 18:22, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Neutral Ceiling painting is nominated twice. It's possible it is own work. There is Metadata. How do you know for sure? - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 19:22, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The artwork pictured was installed prior to 1978 and there appears to be no visible copyright notice. Unless there is one or if the creators of the work prevented anyone from photographing the work, it is in the public domain in the United States. The photographs appear to be those of Marilyn Engwall, and therefore, they are her work. I'm not certain this deletion request has merit. Farragutful (talk) 19:42, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Works from E. Savage are still copyrighted, and the stained glass was made by Paris & Wiley (too recent to be pd-old). Ruthven (msg) 17:33, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fan art using multiple photos, derivative work; would require permission to use each one; a copyright violation. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:39, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:18, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The metadata states "Author: ANETA_JODAROVAA, Copyright holder: ANETA_JODAROVA", this doesn't seem to be the uploader, requires permission to distribute the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:57, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS authorisation needed from author. Ruthven (msg) 11:19, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The metadata states "Author: RODRIGO SANTOS, Copyright holder: RODRIGO SANTOS." Requires permission to license and distribute the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 12:02, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS authorisation needed from author. Ruthven (msg) 11:19, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The metadata states "Author: RODRIGO SANTOS, Copyright holder: RODRIGO SANTOS." Requires permission to license and distribute the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 12:03, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS authorisation needed from author. Ruthven (msg) 11:19, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from author and copyright holder Ed Ace is needed. Taivo (talk) 12:24, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:19, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:20, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient authorship information, unknown copyright situation. When did this Wolf Schneider die? Jcb (talk) 15:40, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:24, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Project scope. This ain't a social network here. Images of users who just come here for self promotion will be deleted.

--- Zaccarias (talk) 16:58, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination + COM:ADVERT. Ruthven (msg) 11:26, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, Meyer Homolka died 1962 Alinea (talk) 08:38, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:21, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work from black and white photography era 141.196.208.110 09:27, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:22, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not copyright free/cc Heyyouoverthere (talk) 10:11, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is an easy mistake to make - click the 'more' button on the page, you'll see a cc-by license. Vimeo buries it but it's there. Victorgrigas (talk) 12:16, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Victorgrigas. Ruthven (msg) 06:51, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While this video was uploaded to Vimeo, it is a product of KVUE and protected by copyright. Heyyouoverthere (talk) 10:16, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: CC by 3.0. Ruthven (msg) 06:52, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While this file was uploaded by the reporter featured in it, Shawn Clynch, the actual video product belongs to KVUE news. A broadcast television company who holds the copyright on the material. Neither Vimeo nor Wiki has obtained the clearances from KVUE. The file not only has the KVUE mike flag in the video, it was originally posted here: http://www.kvue.com/sports/high-school/football/anderson-trojans-protecting-house-park-from-harvey/467491858 Heyyouoverthere (talk) 03:43, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:17, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of copyright free status. Product is made by Nick LaFleur who seems to be engaged in professional video production work. Heyyouoverthere (talk) 10:20, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is an easy mistake to make - click the 'more' button on the page, you'll see a cc-by license. Vimeo buries it but it's there. Victorgrigas (talk) 12:15, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
They do bury the license really well. Even knowing that it is supposed to be there, it takes some detective skill to find the correct button and then to spot the almost invisible logo. -- Asclepias (talk) 19:25, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Victorgrigas. Ruthven (msg) 06:45, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of copyright free status. Product is made by Nick LaFleur who seems to be engaged in professional video production work. Heyyouoverthere (talk) 10:20, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is an easy mistake to make - click the 'more' button on the page, you'll see a cc-by license. Vimeo buries it but it's there. Victorgrigas (talk) 12:14, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Victorgrigas. Ruthven (msg) 06:45, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of copyright free status. Product is made by Nick LaFleur who seems to be engaged in professional video production work. Heyyouoverthere (talk) 10:21, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is an easy mistake to make - click the 'more' button on the page, you'll see a cc-by license. Vimeo buries it but it's there. Victorgrigas (talk) 12:13, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Victorgrigas. Ruthven (msg) 06:45, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of copyright free status. Product is made by Nick LaFleur who seems to be engaged in professional video production work. Heyyouoverthere (talk) 10:21, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is an easy mistake to make - click the 'more' button on the page, you'll see a cc-by license. Vimeo buries it but it's there. Victorgrigas (talk) 12:14, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Victorgrigas. Ruthven (msg) 06:45, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of the photo here: http://www.sahmat.org/aboutsafdar.html Guanaco (talk) 10:30, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:45, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FoP in India does not apply because this is a 2D drawing, not a sculpture or architecture. Guanaco (talk) 10:33, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:45, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably this is not logo of en:Campus Special Investigator Hikaruon. Unused logo of non-notable site, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:40, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: might be PD-text, but it's out of scope. Ruthven (msg) 06:46, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Professional musician photo, metadata states "Author: Gareth Gatrell Copyright holder: Gareth Gatrell 2014." Needs permission to license and distribute a copyrighted photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 12:35, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:46, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The metadata states "Copyright holder: Omnifoto - J. Alberto Mariñas." Assume it's actually copyrighted, the name doesn't match the uploader, need permission. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 12:45, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:46, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-YO4xz_r9dvg/ULZzaF5YgUI/AAAAAAAAAcY/QNfPkYJV0Ts/s1600/529702_428160893876413_698300401_n.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:55, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:46, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thematerialisticmaiden (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photo and drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: first one deleted by Hystrix, the second one appears in a work of Thomas William Herringshaw (January 27, 1858 – June 27, 1927), thus PD-old. Ruthven (msg) 06:49, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer needed Awu1996 (talk) 19:37, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 06:50, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A private image, moved from panoramio. GeorgHHtalk   20:01, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Maybe crop to the grafitti, and keep that part?-- Darwin Ahoy! 21:36, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination: without the graffiti, it would be a Personal unused image. Ruthven (msg) 06:51, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of the copyright in the pub sign. Sign is main subject of the picture, so not de minimis. Sign is flat, so no FoP. bjh21 (talk) 23:53, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:50, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File was not content produced by VOA. VOA pulls content from a variety of sources and does not clear the copyright on this video. Heyyouoverthere (talk) 04:22, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:PRP. --Guanaco (talk) 07:29, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar files discussed at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Zwerubae were also sourced to the Indian Army website and deleted because the licensing is too restrictive for Commons: it requires that the file not be used in a "derogatory manner or in a misleading context". The same also applies to this file, so it should be deleted as well. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:50, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 07:29, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: {{GODL-India}} Yann (talk) 11:41, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's doubtful that this jingle is licenced under a free licence. jdx Re: 07:03, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 07:30, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate with https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:IAS-director_and_Leon_Levy_professor_Robbert_Dijkgraaf_interviews_Martin_Rees_on_the_future_of_man_in_the_cosmos-VPRO-The_Mind_of_the_Universe.ogv 85jesse (talk) 07:56, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 07:34, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope because the article has been deleted on en.wikipedia. see en:Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nicholas_J._W._Drake Zaccarias (talk) 17:13, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: probably also copyvio. --Guanaco (talk) 07:38, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. E.g. no information on the photographer of this 3D object. Jcb (talk) 17:14, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 07:37, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal file. No actor with this name 141.196.208.110 17:32, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per above. Delete for that stache alone Heyyouoverthere (talk) 00:02, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 07:37, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image with no EXIF data. Delete per COM:PRP. Wikicology (talk) 18:08, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 07:38, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 09:43, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination of original. --Guanaco (talk) 16:33, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful "own work". Besides, Colombian copyright law, Art. 25 states that "Anonymous works shall be protected for a term of 80 years from the date of publication" so this image will enter to the PD in January 2052. - Fma12 (talk) 12:08, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination . --Guanaco (talk) 16:34, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ADE Surya Dinata (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in id.wiki and uploading a photo about himself, which is used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:10, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 16:35, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The photo of Katsuhiko Kimura.jpg is created by me, Motohiko Kimura, so copy right belong to myself and there is no issue what so ever as you pointed out.


Deleted: per nomination . --Guanaco (talk) 16:40, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because the article of him was deleted on en.wikipedia the image is out of project scope. see http://deletionpedia.org/en/Daniel_Cepeda
additional images (same uploader and same guy):

--- Zaccarias (talk) 16:29, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 16:41, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the description says, this is a Dancing With the Stars Profile picture, so highly unlikely to be own work of the uploader. Here it is at a higher resolution credited "Courtesy Dancing With The Stars": http://www.newyorkupstate.com/niagara-falls/2017/01/dancing_with_the_stars_pro_lindsay_arnold_dwts_tour.html GRuban (talk) 17:23, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, it's even simpler. The EXIF clearly says "Lindsay Arnold. Dancing with the Stars for Inside Seneca magazine. Embargoed for Jan. 2017. Courtesy of Dancing with the Stars." --GRuban (talk) 17:25, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 16:43, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not created by the uploader, no free licences found AleWi (talk) 07:34, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Ruthven (msg) 08:57, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Discasto as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: In fact, the author died in 1950. To be restored in 2030 - converting to regular DR, in order to add it to the undelete in 2031 category. Jcb (talk) 08:04, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

El dueño de este cuadro es el Círculo de Contribuyentes de Alcalá de Henares y me ha autorizado a fotografiarlo y reproducirlo. Un cordial saludo:----Raimundo Pastor (talk) 16:45, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Lo que pasa es que ser el dueño de un cuadro no significa que tienes los derechos de autor. Solamente los herederos del autor pueden dar permiso, hasta que caduca el copyright en 2031. Jcb (talk) 16:54, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Gracias por la información. Pero ahora hay otros problemas: ¿quienes son los herederos? y ¿cómo puedo localizarlos?. Un cordial saludo:--Raimundo Pastor (talk) 18:10, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yo no lo sé. Probablemente será imposible. Si no tenemos este permiso, podemos restaurar el archivo en 2031. Jcb (talk) 18:33, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Veo que es un problema importante. Le voy a consultar al presidente del Círculo de Contribuyentes y a la Sociedad General de Autores. No me desanimo. El cuadro merece que el público lo conozca, ya que representa muy bien una época de la historia de Alcalá de Henares, y además es la joya de la institución que lo expone. Un cordial saludo:--Raimundo Pastor (talk) 20:55, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dudo que los dueños del cuadro no sean, en este caso, los titulares de los derechos de explotación. El cuadro, por lo que entiendo, fue encargado por el Círculo, el cual adquirió, con total probabilidad, no solo el cuadro en sí sino también cualquier derecho anejo. Se trataría, en cualquier caso, de seguir el procedimiento estándar de autorización. --Discasto talk 21:10, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Si el cuadro fue encargado por el Circulo, hace falta enviar a OTRS 1) el contrato con el pintor (seguro que está en un archivio), 2) la autorización del director del Circulo para publicar el cuado con licencia libre. Gracias --Ruthven (msg) 16:52, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias por la información. Le acabo de enviar un correo-e a Ivan Lope Parias (Presidente del Círculo de Contribuyentes) explicándole la situación y la propuesta. El seguimiento de este asunto se registrará en el Ticket#: 2017091810022869. Por otro lado, si se repasa la historia del Círculo de Contribuyentes, durante la Guerra Civil Española (1936-1939) el edificio estuvo confiscado, por lo que desconozco el estado de conservación de los archivos de dicha institución. Espero que esté disponible la documentación solicitada. Un cordial saludo: --Raimundo Pastor (talk) 18:04, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: waiting for the ticket to be solved. Ruthven (msg) 08:56, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Undelete in 2030 - On the anniversary of the author death, not on January 1, per 1879 law. Platonides (talk) 23:49, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of a rotated text string which could easily be re-made if needed. Created by user:MiewEN who also created the similar one deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/File:2011to2015.JPG Fayenatic london (talk) 14:22, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; unused. Ruthven (msg) 08:58, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Thesea are not works of the Red/Soviet Army (so they can not be {{PD-Russia}}). It is possible, that these are anonymous works, but their status must be correlated with the German regulation on anonymous works. Alex Spade (talk) 17:12, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per AlexTref871. Ruthven (msg) 09:01, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image with no EXIF data. Possibly a copyvio. Wikicology (talk) 18:13, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't find an exact match on the internet, I found one that was close, but not same. Notice the description of photographic details directly below the template. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:36, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Is there any evidence of this being a copyvio aside from lack of EXIF data? It's easy for editing programs to remove EXIF, so I don't see this as a reason to delete. Huntster (t @ c) 05:18, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion + the uploader added details of the shot. Ruthven (msg) 09:03, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright in Spain lasts for 80 years pma. As the poster's author is identified (Pedrero) it's unrealistic to consider he died the very same year he made the poster Discasto talk 23:37, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The author is pseudonymous,[3] meaning PD-80 applies. However, that term doesn't start until January 1, 2018. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently false date (see EXIF) and apparently false claim of authorship and of copyright ownership, per the uploader's comment on another page: [4], where they say that this photo was sent to them by the subject. Needs identification of the actual photographer and proof of licensing. -- Asclepias (talk) 20:01, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Answer: True, this photo is not my own work. FS has been shot by her partner and sent me this photo because she doesn't know how to proceed to do it by herself. The previous photo was shot by someone she doesn't know and she wasn't agree with it. How to deal with this ? What can we do ? Could she write herself to wikipedia for giving her agrement to the present picture ? Please, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sandek33 (talk • contribs) 07:28, 2 September 2017‎ (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour, Il faut que vous contactiez le photographe et que vous obteniez qu'il offre cette photographie sous licence libre. S'il est d'accord pour offrir une licence libre, alors il envoie un courriel à Wikimedia pour confirmer sa déclaration de licence, suivant la procédure décrite sur la page d'aide Commons:OTRS/fr. -- Asclepias (talk) 13:03, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merci beaucoup pour vos indications précieuses, je viens d'interpeler l'auteur de la photo selon les instructions ci-dessus ! J'inscrirai les suites

qu'il souhaite donner sur cette page. --Sandek33 (talk) 14:02, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:10, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted cartography information. §2.2 of Terms of Use. ← Alex Great talkrus? 12:47, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Если удалить логотип Яндекс или перерисовать — то тогда можно будет оставить карту? Без неё в статье о реке трудно понять, где это место находится. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 13:08, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Нет, информация предоставляемая с Яндекс.Карт полностью закопирайчена. Если хотите указать местоположение реки, то вы можете оставить координаты этого места в статье, использовать скриншот карты OpenStreetMap или же сделать запрос в «Графическую мастерскую», где вам нарисуют эту речку. А вот так в наглую скриншотить и заливать на Викисклад, увы, нельзя. ← Alex Great talkrus? 03:07, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyright violation. Yandex maps (and Google maps, Bing maps, Apple maps, etc etc) are all copyrighted. You can't just copy them and claim own work, as you have done here. There are open maps available (see OpenStreetMap, for example) - but while those would be acceptable for upload, you must credit them properly, per the terms of their license. You cannot claim own work for works you have not authored. --Storkk (talk) 10:18, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]