Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/02/16

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 16th, 2017

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Xmas tree.svg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Taken from source indicated ([1]), but there is no evidence at the source to indicate this image is available under the license indicated. Hammersoft (talk) 03:25, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted: copyvio. --Ankry (talk) 07:53, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Who is architect and when (s)he died? Taivo (talk) 10:43, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, my mistake. This is really 1941 building, but architect Gherardo Bosio (born 1903) died the same year. Taivo (talk) 11:06, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Protanthea simplex incorrectly labelled as Pachycerianthus multiplicatus. 143.234.101.119 13:09, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - file name corrected instead. --Nick (talk) 13:16, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Cabayi (talk) 09:52, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Wikitanvir: Out of project scope

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hipco, also called Hip Coloquial, is Liberian music genre close to Hip Hop music. Younglollywood (talk) 12:45, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: housekeeping. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:13, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PENIS. Yann (talk) 15:42, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Poor quality Cernunnos54 (talk) 16:03, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and author agrees. --Yann (talk) 17:31, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violance Gulabgang (talk) 00:58, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy: Uploader request deletion of recently uploaded unused file. - Reventtalk 22:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{copyvio|1=Non possiedo i diritti di pubblicazione, non è una mia creazione e desidero ricaricare l'immagine indicando correttamente il proprietario. Si è trattato di un errore dovuto a inesperienza, stavo facendo la mia prima prova di caricamento}


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:15, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Motion blur makes image unrecognizable. No educational use. A half dozen of the users recent uploads appear to be basically the same: unrecognizable motion blurs of otherwise fine images. TimothyJosephWood 19:06, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm the user that was uploading those edited photos. I'm already using them in a new style for a competition portal on Wikipedia Español. You can see the job made here Usuario:Jsmura/Taller/prueba7. Althought I didn't know that would have a problem with the effect as long as I always put correctly the CC license from the original. I apologize for that. Greetings, and I wait for a commentary about the case :) --Jsmura (talk) 19:22, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I guess that settles the question of whether they're useful for anything. TimothyJosephWood 20:21, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose in case it's not clear: happy to withdraw. TimothyJosephWood 20:22, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Request withdrawn by the OP after uploader explanation of its usefulness. --Platonides (talk) 00:04, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violance Gulabgang (talk) 00:53, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:25, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violance Gulabgang (talk) 00:55, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:25, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violance Gulabgang (talk) 00:56, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:25, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sexual content Gulabgang (talk) 00:57, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:25, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violance Gulabgang (talk) 00:57, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:24, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong source link Gulabgang (talk) 01:00, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:25, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

잘못올렸습니다. 삭제해주시면 감사하겠습니다. MODELS 03:16, 16 February 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: uploader request. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:27, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am cannot find real source Gulabgang (talk) 03:20, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:24, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am cannot find real source Gulabgang (talk) 03:22, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:24, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am cannot find real source Gulabgang (talk) 03:23, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:24, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope / very blurry Elle India (talk) 13:15, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:57, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope / very blurry Elle India (talk) 13:15, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:57, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I can't get the licensing to work out ;o ... I have been able to years before but things must have changed since then :/ . Unless someone could please give a hand on fixing it, I'm going to give up and nominate it for deletion ;o . Sorry but thank you ^_^ ~ Hanyou23 (talk) 19:34, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Fair use is not allowed on Commons

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These files are on Flickr with the 'Public Domain Mark', which is not a valid license, see Template:Flickr-public domain mark. As long as the license is not changed at source, we cannot keep these files.

Jcb (talk) 19:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: It is well established that the PDM is not a license and threfore not acceptable on Commons. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.


Taken from Flickr with the invalid PDM license, no longer available at source.

Jcb (talk) 21:06, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Admin Fae contacted the copyright owner Jillian Sallaway and she categorically rejected her images being used on Wikimedia Commons in her reply to him in a separate DR of another set of her photos and then deleted them on her flickr account. The images were originally licensed as Public Domain Mark. This means that Commons cannot use these images since they never passed review as I think other Admins such as Josve05a might view this situation. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:08, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Speedily. Per prior discussion of images from this Flickr account, and author's request they not be on Commons. - Reventtalk 06:49, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to this, Doug Waite is a retired member of the USN and therefore, {{PD-USGov-Military}} does not apply

Discasto talk 22:40, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

He is still a member of the US Naval Reserve, as far as I could gather, and was acting in that capacity when he took these photos. If that is not the case, we will have to find a separate PD categorization for these images. However, they were made public domain. SecretName101 (talk) 22:55, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The last image you included was not credited to Doug Waite. SecretName101 (talk) 22:57, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment No, he's acting as a member of the Blue and Gold committee. Membership is not restricted to (retired) servicemen and therefore there's no "that capacity" involved. You're right with regard the last image. --Discasto talk 06:42, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am presuming the uploader was not being dishonest in labeling these images. If that is the case, are these images eligible as {{cc-zero}} SecretName101 (talk) 21:46, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'm also presuming good faith. This is not a problem of mallicious license washing (as far as I understand) but a mistake (always IMHO, I can be wrong). Thus, an admin will assess our arguments. Best regards --Discasto talk 14:06, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment It's sad to say I'm afraid LCS7 Imagers might have made a mistake when he uploaded these images to Flickr: he set Public domain flag only to this album, while other albums are "All rights reserved" including this album (Photo by Doug Waite). --miya (talk) 15:18, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:47, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not PD in the United States.

Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:32, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:53, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Voglio eleminare la mia foto Alberto Gramsci (talk) 19:35, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, unused personal photo, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 08:59, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, no educational content. GeorgHHtalk   20:20, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Shizhao: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Likely Flickrwashing; even though this image is now freely licensed, it was originally posted with an All right reserved licence on Flickr. I highly doubt the Flickr user has any rights over this image having only just joined Flickr and uploading on 6 images of music artists. The uncropped version of the same image is ARR. Ww2censor (talk) 10:28, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all, looks like Flickrwashing. Taivo (talk) 11:58, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete, none cropped image e.g here.--Wdwd (talk) 12:42, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:26, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file in copyviol (taken from Juventus.com, a website without CC content). Danyele (talk) 16:52, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

hit with Google Image Search, suspicious copyvio. Kkairri (talk) 00:09, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:02, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing EXIF, uploaded from internet see [2] kovox90      16:24, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:59, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong author, this image was uploaded from internet see [3] kovox90      16:32, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:01, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Prevan (talk) 04:23, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:44, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image. not educationally useful. not used, not categorized. DavidIvar (talk) 00:03, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:44, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It may be from Google Image Search. See matadata. Suspicious copyvio. Kkairri (talk) 00:06, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:44, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No license. Zeitungsente0815 (talk) 01:42, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No permission since 14 February 2017. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:54, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1998 monument

lNeverCry 02:29, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


I do not understand the whole thing...why it should be deleted.. Laborec (talk) 12:06, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:44, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 2006 monument

lNeverCry 02:34, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:44, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 03:14, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:37, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Arguablefool (talk) 04:35, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:45, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1965 monuments/busts

lNeverCry 04:35, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:45, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely the artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 05:15, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 20:13, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope per en:User talk:Hardcoreemcee. Castillo blanco (talk) 06:51, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:47, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, article was deleted as promotional at enwp czar 07:02, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:47, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kevin Jharlyn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work.They look like grabbed from Facebook. It is worth to mention that I have just speedy deleted 3 other files of this uploader as clear copyright violations.

jdx Re: 07:21, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:47, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely an image from modern book cover: https://www.macrolibrarsi.it/libri/__storie_di_un_siciliano_mezzo_russo-un_po_cinese.php ; unlikely to be own photo Ankry (talk) 07:26, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:47, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The specific permission that claims these are in the public domain are in contradiction to the posted email from El Salvador which specifically does not allow commercial use. Assuming these stamps could be uploaded was based on the previous version of Commons:Stamps/Public domain#El Salvador is unfortunately but was a false claim. That entry has now been updated to reflect the current El Salvador copyright law Law on the Promotion and Protection of Intellectual Property Rights (Legislative Decree No. 604 of 15 July 1993) which provides for copyright protection for 50 years from January 1 of the year following that of first publication.

Ww2censor (talk) 07:27, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:48, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ConcreteFancy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

How is Claudia Mason the author of this photo? Lack of permission from the photographer.

Castillo blanco (talk) 09:52, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:53, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gorfactory (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

Castillo blanco (talk) 10:33, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:49, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private low resolution photo. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:48, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:49, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:49, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:49, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Qurren 20170216

[edit]

No COM:FOP#Japan for modern 3D artwork in Japan (see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Qurren).

Qurren (talk) 10:54, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Qurren (talk) 10:54, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:54, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo (out of scope) GermanJoe (talk) 11:18, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:54, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:19, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:54, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:19, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:54, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:19, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:54, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:19, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:54, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photos (out of scope) GermanJoe (talk) 11:19, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:54, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:20, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:54, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:ADVERT. --XXN, 15:47, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:46, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:46, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zakaria Metare42 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://dev.atelier-111.fr/villars/dev/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/gestes_architecturaux_sem_2014-30-700x467.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:46, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:43, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:07, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:50, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:47, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:54, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:47, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:56, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:47, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently, a personal homework, without clearly educational content, violating COMMONS:NOTHOST. Épico (talk)/(contribs) 03:36, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:53, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 03:42, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:53, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:16, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:54, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 03:26, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:38, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:24, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:38, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:38, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused trivial table, out of project scope. If it is really useful, then should be written using wikitables. Taivo (talk) 08:47, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:38, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:45, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:39, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:47, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:39, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably personal image Jugydmort (talk) 11:48, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:39, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:51, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:39, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:51, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:39, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably personal image Jugydmort (talk) 11:54, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:39, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:56, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:39, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:41, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:02, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:41, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:05, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:41, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:05, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:41, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:05, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:41, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:05, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:41, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:06, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:41, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:09, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:47, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:12, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:46, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:13, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:46, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:13, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:46, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:16, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:46, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:16, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:46, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Low resolution. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:06, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:47, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:06, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:47, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:07, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:47, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo. Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 13:08, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:47, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo. Out of scope. User did nothing for Wikipedia apart from creating a user page in 2014. Castillo blanco (talk) 14:11, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:47, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:48, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mikemueller81 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:48, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 2010 statue by living artist Ivan Brovdi

INeverCry 05:37, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: except 2 Krd 17:03, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - modern monument to gentleman who died in 1985 lNeverCry 02:45, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And what about destroyed monuments? It seems that it has been destroyed on 05.05.2015--Divega (talk) 19:46, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
they can be uploaded locally to Ukrainian Wikipedia. their destruction does not mean they become free --アンタナナ 20:03, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:34, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - modern monument - death date on monument is 1985

lNeverCry 02:48, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Yes, delete. Files uploaded in the competition «Wiki Loves Monuments». --Mykola Vasylechko 19:59, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:35, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - modern sculptures lNeverCry 02:51, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:37, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - modern monument lNeverCry 02:52, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:37, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - modern monument lNeverCry 02:58, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This monument should be destroyed by now according to the Law of Ukraine, so please keep it here. --Visem (talk) 21:14, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, it can be free if it is old enough to be in PD, not because it will be or it was destroyed. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:41, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - modern monument

lNeverCry 03:07, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:43, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:ADVERT: self-promotional upload. --XXN, 15:17, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:04, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 15:18, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:04, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 15:18, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:04, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bhatiyadevendra1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:04, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:04, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-notable persons, probably personal photo; unused - out of scope. --XXN, 15:38, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:29, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Trump image is from Commons but no verifiable source for the Thilo Sarrazin image superimposed on top Ytoyoda (talk) 15:39, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:29, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 15:41, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:29, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:43, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MercedesServiceCard (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:43, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from official Twitter: https://twitter.com/lescanadiennes/status/768892917435998208 Ytoyoda (talk) 15:48, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:43, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Soufiane maroc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:44, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Soufiane maroc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:20, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected copyright violation: smaller resolution image found in http://elizabethlsilver.com/news-events/, no EXIF, only upload by this user. MKFI (talk) 15:50, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:44, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture - out of scope; and/or copyrighted content. --XXN, 16:29, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a personal file but the disc cover of a musician. Please do not delete it. --E4024 (talk) 12:22, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Then it's copyrighted. See COM:OTRS (for copyright holders). --XXN, 14:30, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:45, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:SCOPE: Self-created artwork. Unlikely to be used for a project. Takeaway (talk) 16:36, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:45, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted banner. --XXN, 16:39, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:45, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I created it by mistake Rcbutcher (talk) 00:35, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:58, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sfsy1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's article was deleted in October 2016 via deletion discussion. Out of project scope.

ξxplicit 01:04, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:58, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - modern monument lNeverCry 03:12, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:47, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - modern monument lNeverCry 03:13, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:47, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - modern sculpture lNeverCry 03:14, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:48, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - modern sculpture lNeverCry 03:15, 16 February 2017 (UTC) This is mine foto!!! No deletion, doc!!![reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:48, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - modern sculpture lNeverCry 03:15, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:49, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - modern monument lNeverCry 03:16, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:49, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - modern monument lNeverCry 03:17, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - modern sculpture lNeverCry 03:18, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1988 monument lNeverCry 03:23, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1988 monument lNeverCry 03:23, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - modern monument to woman who died in 1986 lNeverCry 03:26, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:51, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - modern monument to woman who died in 1986 lNeverCry 03:27, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:52, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - modern monument lNeverCry 03:32, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:52, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - modern monument lNeverCry 03:33, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:52, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1992 monument lNeverCry 03:37, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:53, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - modern monument to man who died in 1958

lNeverCry 03:57, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:54, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1959 monument lNeverCry 04:03, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:55, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1974 monument lNeverCry 04:04, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:55, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1970 monument lNeverCry 04:05, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:55, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 2006 monument lNeverCry 04:06, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:55, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1966 monument lNeverCry 04:09, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:59, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1984 monument lNeverCry 04:11, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:59, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1985 monument lNeverCry 04:13, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:00, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1960 monument lNeverCry 04:16, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:00, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lousy drawn football, out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:16, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:01, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1966 monument lNeverCry 04:17, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:01, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1966 monument lNeverCry 04:18, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:01, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, and probable copyright violation Arguablefool (talk) 04:35, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:54, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Atal Hind (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's page was deleted as spam. Out of project scope.

ξxplicit 04:37, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:56, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Screenshot. --XXN, 16:46, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:48, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless sexual content Martial BACQUET (talk) 17:19, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete not own work, from a website with no permission. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 21:39, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:49, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal artwork, the uploader's only contribution, the file is not in use; has no potential educational value. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 17:37, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:49, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and meaningless shot of shrubbery, no educational value. P 1 9 9   18:14, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photos of unknown musical group Pippobuono (talk) 18:38, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, apparently no educational purpose DCB (talk) 18:44, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random collection of pebbles, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:51, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No use on commons or other wikis; not encyclopedic in any way whatsoever TJH2018talk 19:16, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:44, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:51, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:45, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:51, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:48, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:51, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:48, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:51, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:49, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:51, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:50, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:51, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image personal image. Article has been deleted from the English wikipedia as not meeting notability. Whpq (talk) 21:03, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:52, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image personal image. Article has been deleted from the English wikipedia as not meeting notability. Whpq (talk) 21:03, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:52, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image personal image. Article has been deleted from the English wikipedia as not meeting notability. Whpq (talk) 21:04, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:52, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image personal image. Article has been deleted from the English wikipedia as not meeting notability. Whpq (talk) 21:04, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:52, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not for articles; See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:20, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:03, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. --XXN, 15:42, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Colloque-Aviaire (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused documents of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality Cernunnos54 (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:48, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously it's a screenshot, not uploaders own work. --XXN, 17:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:48, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FRSDZ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

--XXN, 17:06, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:48, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 08:19, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Found elsewhere eg https://www.tumblr.com/search/turkish%20actress%20and%20actor Green Giant (talk) 00:44, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

hit with Google Image Search, not matched between uploader and author in matadata. suspicious copyvio. Kkairri (talk) 00:13, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:10, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Belekeke (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted as spam earlier this month. Out of project scope.

ξxplicit 00:49, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, spam. P 1 9 9   14:11, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poorly exposed, poorly focused picture of nothing in particular. I can't imagine a reason to keep this. Jmabel ! talk 00:58, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:11, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Arguablefool (talk) 04:34, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:12, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

extremely out of scope Arguablefool (talk) 04:34, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:13, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Company logo which never appeared to be used. Commons is not a webhost and out of project scope. — ξxplicit 04:45, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no educational value. P 1 9 9   14:13, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused schema, out of project scope. Grammatically incorrect (athmospäre is mistake, Atmosphäre is correct). Taivo (talk) 08:50, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:14, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deletion requested by the person depicted on the picture. Selbymay (talk) 09:13, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per selft-nomination of recent upload. P 1 9 9   14:16, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 09:35, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:17, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. {{PD-Mexico}} cannot be applied. The picture is stated to be from somewhere in the 1950s, so it's very improbable that the author would have died before 1952. Jcb (talk) 21:34, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:14, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio from a fair use image on trwiki uploaded in 2008 w:tr:File:Cemal Süreya.jpg Bulgu (talk) 21:34, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:13, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hsksahota (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploading images copied from the internet as "own work".

Takeaway (talk) 22:02, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:11, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Jcb (talk) 22:30, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:10, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 22:40, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:10, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. According to the watermark on the image, the copyright belongs to Yonhap News. Cyberdoomslayer (talk) 23:41, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:00, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Strakhov (talk) 23:44, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:59, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsharp subject Mhohner (talk) 10:22, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unusable. P 1 9 9   15:30, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wiki commons is not a picdump for non notable persons: his Instagram picture. Agora (talk) 11:08, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:30, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsure if this are only simple geometric shapes as the licence says. Otherwise copyvio. Der Buckesfelder  Talk  Evaluation  E-Mail  commons 11:22, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: below TOO. The shapes are merely stylized letters. P 1 9 9   15:32, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not accurate version 3DS claudiamarques (talk) 12:19, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: The file is widely used, from ar:داسو سيستمس to zh:达索系统. Commons defers to other projects on matters of accuracy, so if those projects think the file is accurate enough, we should not delete it. See COM:INUSE and COM:NPOV for more details on this policy. --bjh21 (talk) 12:25, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per bjh21. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:13, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:23, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:35, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File until now never used and no potential for the wikis. Der Buckesfelder  Talk  Evaluation  E-Mail  commons 11:24, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, spam. P 1 9 9   15:35, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:25, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:36, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

plik powinien zostać usunięty 164.126.101.18 12:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason provided Natuur12 (talk) 17:43, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:30, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:37, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:31, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:37, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably private image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:33, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:37, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal foto Reinhardhauke (talk) 13:22, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. out of scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:14, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:33, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:37, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:36, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:38, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Low resolution. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:37, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:38, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Low resolution. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:37, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:38, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:37, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:38, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:38, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:38, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo. Probably out of scope. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:43, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:39, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:44, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:39, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:45, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:39, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:46, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per user:Mungoola. P 1 9 9   15:39, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is not need for this image. A profile picture from Steam has no educational use. SimmeD (talk) 12:21, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:40, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private and dark image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:25, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:41, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:39, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:41, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

picture is replaced by a newer one (werk1.jpg) Broehl2016 (talk) 12:42, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not the same; older images don't need to be deleted when a newer one is uploaded. P 1 9 9   15:43, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

picture is replaced by a newer one (werk2.jpg) Broehl2016 (talk) 12:43, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not the same; older images don't need to be deleted when a newer one is uploaded. P 1 9 9   15:43, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

picture is replaced by a newer one (werk3.jpg) Broehl2016 (talk) 12:43, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not the same; older images don't need to be deleted when a newer one is uploaded. P 1 9 9   15:43, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope / very blurry Elle India (talk) 13:16, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Certainly in scope -- it's from a 1900 book Seattle and the Orient...; I scanned and digitized all the photos from the book, and it would be ridiculous to leave one out because it's a bit low-quality. This is from a now 117-year-old book (107 years old at the time I scanned it) and it's not surprising that the quality of some of the images is lower than we would expect from a recent source. - Jmabel ! talk 15:46, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I note that the Elle India account is a brand new account that has done nothing but request deletions. - Jmabel ! talk 15:49, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The quality is certainly not great, but it’s not bad for a ‘rescreen’ of a small, cheaply printed original either. The educational value may be limited, but the subject & some of the details may be of historical interest, beside the image’s being part of a set.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 21:17, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9   15:45, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

remains after move Aeroid (talk) 21:07, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:18, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 21:10, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:17, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 21:11, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:17, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 21:11, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:17, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 21:11, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:17, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 21:11, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:17, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 21:11, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:17, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: low quality, private family photo Elle India (talk) 13:17, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: part of series, historic photo, in scope. P 1 9 9   15:55, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:09, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:07, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It looks someone uploaded photos of herself. Pikador (talk) 14:30, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:08, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:41, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:08, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Forwhat790406 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not a selfie repository; out of scope

TJH2018talk 22:43, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:24, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Forwhat790406 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused out of scope images; one seems like a program and other is a chemistry formulas but equating atoms with girls and boys. Pure vandalism!

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:27, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:45, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:51, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:09, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:51, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:09, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Meaningless title and description; no categories; little encyclopedic value - out of scope. --XXN, 14:57, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:10, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:ADVERT. --XXN, 15:05, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:10, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Información Antigüa Sergio Moragues (talk) 15:09, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused personal image, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:11, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

tage

This file is licensed under the Open Government Licence - Canada 2.0.
You are free to:
  • Copy, modify, publish, translate, adapt, distribute or otherwise use the Information in any medium, mode or format for any lawful purpose.
You must, where you do any of the above:
  • Acknowledge the source of the Information by including any attribution statement specified by the Information Provider(s) and, where possible, provide a link to this licence;
  • If the Information Provider does not provide a specific attribution statement, or if you are using Information from several information providers and multiple attributions are not practical for your product or application, you must use the following attribution statement:
"Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence – Canada."
This licence does not grant you any right to use:
  • Personal Information;
  • third party rights the Information Provider is not authorized to license;
  • the names, crests, logos, or other official symbols of the Information Provider (n.b.: including the Arms of Canada and the Canada Wordmark); and
  • Information subject to other intellectual property rights, including patents, trade-marks and official marks.

English | français | 中文 | +/−

is actually inccorect - I created this file, and realize my error. Also, the page that this was intended for was not created during the planned edit-a-thon. I will create a new, correct file, in the future as needed. Thanks! :) Ottawaorrell (talk) 15:09, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per self-nomination, recent upload. P 1 9 9   16:11, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 16 February 2017 (UTC) This logo was provided directly by the company named, with permission. I will replace the .jpg fire with a suitable SVG.[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:13, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:13, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope?, Anyway I'd imagine we've got better images of images looking out of bus windows, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 20:56, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:14, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality image - we have better and clearer images of the vehicle, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 20:58, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality image - we have better and clearer images of the vehicle, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 20:59, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This completely misses the point. File:Badjpeg.jpg is meant to illustrate the compression artifacts of JPEG. nyuszika7h (talk) 21:16, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have a problem with deleting the file, but I think is scientifically interesting to compare Quality and File-Size of different Types, therefore
83x27Pixels: 453 Bytes (JPG with lowest quality)
83x27Pixels: 211 Bytes (PNG with highest compression level)
83x27Pixels: 160 Bytes (SVG with most efficient code)
 Keep — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 22:54, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That's true, I didn't think of that. It can be linked as another version, but {{Vector version available}} implies that one should be preferred, although it does say "when not inferior" so I don't know. Either way, I'm withdrawing the nomination. nyuszika7h (talk) 08:41, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Nyuszika7H:
{{Vector version available}} says (in the english version)
filename.svg is a vector version of this file.
For more information, see Help:SVG.
here is nothing about which one is preferred.
On commons are different templates, some are just informing about other versions, other tells you to use an other version, and everything between is also available.
Templates
Beginning from the weak formulation to the strong formulation:
  1. Just informs about other version:{{Vector version available}}
  2. Says you should use the other one if it is better: {{Bitmap version available}}
  3. You should create it in vector format: {{Convert to SVG}}
  4. This picture was uploaded in a stupid format: {{BadJPEG}}
  5. This picture is superseded by another one: {{Superseded}}
Usage and Reason
  • As you can see i used the weakest formulation on File:Badjpeg.jpg, which only informs about an other file, but does not say anything about which one you should take.
Which makes sense due to the fact that most want to show the artifacts, but in some cases they want to know, how the picture would that be as a vector-file.
  • I used a slightly stronger version for File:Badjpeg.svg, which says that the better version should be taken,
Which makes sense, due to the fact that you can compare the JPG with Vector (font looks different) or (intelligent) Raster graphics(has still pixels).
  • I used the strongest version for File:Badjpeg.png, which says that the JPG schould be used with the reason:„JPEG has a bigger file size (more colours) and creates JPEG-Artifacts, which the PNG can't“
Which makes sense, due to the fact that this picture as you wrote above should show the artefacts.
conclusio
I think we can add {{Vector version available}} to the File:Badjpeg.jpg again, due to the fact that it only informs about the other file.
 — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 20:34, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@JoKalliauer: Oh, I see, I don't know why I thought it said it's preferred. Never mind then, feel free to add it back. nyuszika7h (talk) 16:06, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. P 1 9 9   16:16, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stkcb (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status, Permission (COM:OTRS) from the copyright holder is needed.

Steinsplitter (talk) 11:35, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:04, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo located on Flickr is CC BY-NC-SA 2.0, which is not compatible with Commons. The image did not go through the FlickrBot license check when uploaded. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 12:54, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:04, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF cites "Stephan Huger"/"Studio Huger" – apparently a Vienna-based professional photographer. Own work claim dubious, COM:OTRS permission probably necessary. darkweasel94 13:09, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I hope I am right here? Stephan Huger takes is the photografer of the Schick Hotels. We have all rights for the pictures, as you can see on our website. There is no problem with the copyright of the picture. Regards

Hallo, ich hab die Fotos hier gefunden. Könntet ihr bitte trotzdem den Fotografen eine E-Mail entsprechend den Anweisungen auf COM:OTRS (bzw. COM:OTRS/de) schicken lassen, dass die Lizenz, die ihr gewählt habt, in Ordnung ist? Niemand hier hat sonst eine Möglichkeit, zu überprüfen, dass ihr wirklich die Hotelbetreiber seid, und auch nicht, ob ihr wirklich das Recht habt, das Foto unter eine freie Lizenz zu stellen (und nicht nur z.B. auf eurer eigenen Website zu verwenden). Danke! darkweasel94 14:16, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Requires a free license from Stephan Huger via OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:06, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF cites "Stephan Huger"/"Studio Huger" – apparently a Vienna-based professional photographer. Own work claim dubious, COM:OTRS permission probably necessary. darkweasel94 13:11, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Same like the picture before: Stephan Huger takes is the photografer of the Schick Hotels. We have all rights for the pictures, as you can see on our website. There is no problem with the copyright of the picture. Regards

discussion continued at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hotel Stefanie, 2016, Seitenansicht.jpg. darkweasel94 14:16, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:06, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture seems to be a "PR picture" of this lawyer and appears in several websites, while no OTRS release note has been obtained. It has no place in the Commons in this situation. Ldorfman (talk) 13:31, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:06, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable authorship. Square 200×200px portret photo, missing EXIF, doubtful title which suggests image is copied from Internet. --XXN, 14:51, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:07, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable authorship: it's not clear how the depicted person can be the author of this photo. Also, if is an unused personal photo - is out of scope. --XXN, 15:29, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Watermark "By Ada". .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:08, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Biplob.modak (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:08, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Loksa108 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical drawings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Loksa108 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical documents and painting. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:08, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:02, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sgschwandtner (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern artwork, copyrighted. OTRS permission from Andreas Christian Haslauer needed.

MKFI (talk) 15:54, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:08, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Manifestation kaypakkaya2.jpg, non de minimis reproduction of a fair use image (w:tr:File:Ibrahim+kaypakkaya.jpg, reversed) Bulgu (talk) 21:54, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It has a valid license (cc-by-2.0), it's a de minimis reproduction and it's focused on the crowd, the event not on Kaypakkaya. I'm against your request. --Ylzkhan (talk) 23:06, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
In my opinion, it should be OK, if you, the uploader, crop the rightmost part out, if you want to do so. I am not sure about the validity of a free license, therefore I do not want to do the cropping, etc. I would be glad, if it is not used on Wikidata. --Bulgu (talk) 23:44, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
IMO it is rather like saying (Theme From) Midnight Express" (Instrumental) is non de minimis of Knights in White Satin. This is a different medium, photograph of a 3-d work of art, itself a derivative work in another medium. And en:File:Campbells Soup Cans MOMA.jpg is non de minimis of Campbell's soup, and Campbell's return fire File:TAG Andy Warhol Soup Can 01.jpg—hosted here—is absolutely derivative of Warhol's works (and includes quotes from him) such as File:Original and Pixelism.png (also hosted here.) com:Copyright paranoia. - Amgine (talk) 23:12, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
We do not have Freedom of panorama everywhere, and we do not have 'freedom of fair use' anywhere. The supposed 'creator' is not the only one with the rights (that may or may not be relinquished). Removing this image from Commons does not mean that it will also be removed from other Wikimedia projects (like trwiki or enwiki which also has w:en:File:Campbells Soup Cans MOMA.jpg). Please see the deletion discussion for the Warhol style image for the reason it was kept, and the likely irrelevancy.
Keeping paranoia paranoia aside (maybe it also has a Meta: essay), as I mentioned above, a cropped version would be welcome to be used as sample image of a protest. This image is obviously for Kaypakkaya. Unfortunately, it seems that we do not have a free image of him, not yet. The image is for instance, not old enough. The owner might still be living.
Let me reiterate what I said on the other discussion. "The image by itself should be OK being cc-by-2.0, but aren't we just circumventing fair use laws when we use this image on local Wikipedia's? If I take a photo of any fair use image, I shouldn't be able to make it magically free. Photos of paintings are typically non-free. On the image in question, the fair use material is used predominantly". Going to another medium does not make a material necessarily free either. Otherwise, the near perfect 'forgeries' of artistic/scientific material would be probably applauded and not called forgeries. --Bulgu (talk) 23:44, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Allow me to reiterate the primary argument I presented alone, so you may attempt to address it solely:
This is a different medium, photograph of a 3-d work of art, itself a derivative work in another medium.
That is, the photograph, which carries artistic value, of the flag, which re-interprets the original photograph. Which places this image copyright at three removes from your argued infringement. - Amgine (talk) 04:47, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The flag is clearly not de minimis -- it is the only thing that is in focus and the very title given to the file makes that clear. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:12, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely own work Ankry (talk) 07:35, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely own work Ankry (talk) 07:36, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely own Ankry (talk) 07:39, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

published on book cover: http://www.maimone.it/schedadinam1.asp?CodLib=201608 ; unlikely own Ankry (talk) 07:45, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:49, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - modern monument lNeverCry 02:25, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1998 monument lNeverCry 02:28, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1960 monument lNeverCry 04:21, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:22, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:46, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:28, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1957 monument lNeverCry 04:22, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1964 monument lNeverCry 04:23, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1964 monument lNeverCry 04:24, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1971 monument lNeverCry 04:25, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1960 monument lNeverCry 04:26, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1993 monument lNeverCry 04:32, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1985 monument lNeverCry 04:32, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 2001 monument lNeverCry 04:36, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1993 monument lNeverCry 04:37, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1996 monument lNeverCry 04:37, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine -1999 monument lNeverCry 04:38, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1997 monument lNeverCry 04:39, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 2004 monument lNeverCry 04:40, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - modern monument lNeverCry 04:42, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine -2001 monument lNeverCry 04:43, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1992 monument lNeverCry 04:44, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:FOP#Ukraine. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:44, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:FOP#Ukraine. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:44, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:FOP#Ukraine. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:44, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1997 monument lNeverCry 04:45, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:FOP#Taiwan (Republic of China) Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:46, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - modern monument with 1979 death date lNeverCry 04:47, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:FOP#Ukraine Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:47, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1991 monument lNeverCry 04:48, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1964 monument

lNeverCry 04:50, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1981 monument lNeverCry 04:51, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1972 monument lNeverCry 04:53, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1970 monument lNeverCry 04:54, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1978 monument lNeverCry 04:54, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1975 monument lNeverCry 04:55, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1994 monument lNeverCry 04:56, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1975 monument lNeverCry 04:57, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1971 monument lNeverCry 04:58, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1972 monument lNeverCry 04:59, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1990 monument lNeverCry 05:02, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 2008 monument lNeverCry 05:06, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1991 monument lNeverCry 05:07, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1958 monument lNeverCry 05:08, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1958 monument lNeverCry 05:08, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 2001 monument lNeverCry 05:13, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1992 monument lNeverCry 05:15, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 2001 monument lNeverCry 05:17, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1992 monument lNeverCry 05:18, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 2011 monument lNeverCry 05:20, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1964 monument lNeverCry 05:23, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1995 monument lNeverCry 05:24, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 2003 monument lNeverCry 05:24, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1995 monument lNeverCry 05:27, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1954 monument lNeverCry 05:28, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1982 monument lNeverCry 05:29, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1974 monument lNeverCry 05:30, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 2008 monument lNeverCry 05:36, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1956 monument lNeverCry 05:39, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1992 monument lNeverCry 05:41, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1992 monument lNeverCry 05:41, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1992 monument lNeverCry 05:42, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1976 monument lNeverCry 05:43, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1976 monument lNeverCry 05:44, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - modern monument lNeverCry 05:45, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 2013 monument lNeverCry 05:46, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 2003 monument lNeverCry 05:47, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1977 monument lNeverCry 05:52, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 2013 sculptures lNeverCry 05:53, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - modern monument lNeverCry 05:55, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - modern monument lNeverCry 05:57, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - modern statue lNeverCry 05:57, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - statue by living artist uk:Мамедов Катіб Сафар огли lNeverCry 06:04, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - modern monument lNeverCry 06:07, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - statue by living artist uk:Мамедов Катіб Сафар огли lNeverCry 06:09, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nagasaki has released rights to his photograph, but this plaque is still separately copyrighted. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:27, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:26, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nagasaki has released rights to his photograph, but the plaque is still separately copyrighted. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:27, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:26, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Уважаемый Евгений,

Я Петровский Михаил Алексеевич - единственный внук Роуз Коэн и единственный сын Петровского Алексея Давидовича (сына Роуз Коэн) перефотографировал эту фотографию Роуз Коэн (File:Rose Cohen IMG 0437 1024.jpg.pdf) с надгробия моего отца Петровского Алексея Давидовича. Указанные Фотографии моей бабушки - Роуз Коэн и деда - Давида Петровского были размещены на надгробии моего отца по его просьбе вместе с его фотографией как символическое захоронение сына вместе с родителями. Первоначально эта фотография Роуз Коэн была привезена в Москву племянницей Роуз Коэн - Джойс Рашборн в 1985 году.

С уважением,

Семья Петровских


Deleted: First, we do not keep PDFs of photographs. Second, in order to keep this on Commons, we must have a free license from the actual photographer or his heir. Owning a paper copy of a photograph does not give you the right to freely license it. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Dear opponent,

I am the only grandson of Rose Cohen. My name (in Russian) - Петровский Михаил Алексеевич. My name in English - Michael A Petrovsky. For direct contacts in Moscow, in Russia: tel.+79160172011, email mapetrovsky@hotmail.com Photo of my grandmother Rose Cohen was placed on the grave of my father Alexey Petrovsky when he died in 2010 in Moscow. My father - the only son of Rose Cohen. The grave of my father is located in Moscow (Cemetry Donskoy) and is opened for visitors. I made this photo Rose Cohen from the photo on the grave of my father using my own digital photocamera (in 2016). The original photo of Rose Cohen was presented to my father by his niece Joyce Rathbone (died in Graet Britain). Joyce Rathbone presented original photo of my grandmother Rose Cohen to my father when she came to us in Moscow in 1985 (*). I and my family many years were gathering materials about my grandmother Rose Cohen - in Great Britain, US and in Russia - including the materials from the central arhives of the Federal Security Service in Russia. We had access to archives as the single direct relatives of Rose Cohen. We wrote the article about Rose Cohen in Russian Wikipedia and placed this photo Rose Cohen. One can find the book about Rose Cohen and our family in - Francis Beckett: Stalin’s British victims, United Kingdom, 2004, p.p.184,185 and etc.

(*) [1]


Sincerely,

Michael A Petrovsly and his family

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of the United States.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:27, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:43, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:24, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:59, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image doesn't seem to be own work Prevan (talk) 04:29, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio from www.enterartemdp.com. Ruthven (msg) 10:00, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not "own work" Arguablefool (talk) 04:31, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:01, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not "own work" Arguablefool (talk) 04:32, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:01, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mom free see source Yger (talk) 05:41, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: copyvio from white.se. Ruthven (msg) 10:05, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Currency#Macedonia and note on this category.

Themightyquill (talk) 08:51, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:06, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Main object of the photo is screenshot with unknown copyright status. OTRS-permission from copyright holder (presumably Ilana Yahav) is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:42, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: de minimis here, the main object is the stage and Yahav. Ruthven (msg) 10:07, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Badly tilted. Better use file:Xhamia e Et'hem Beut3.jpg. Taivo (talk) 10:18, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: use {{Superseded}} and {{Rename}}. Ruthven (msg) 10:08, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe this is artist's copyright violation. Who is artist and when /s)he died? Taivo (talk) 10:21, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and COM:PCP. Ruthven (msg) 10:09, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is not found at the source link provided. It is located at this website, which has copyright information. Unclear source and authorship; at any rate, it does not have the CC license the uploader gives it. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:07, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: I found an older use (2012) on YouTube, with YT Std. License. Ruthven (msg) 10:20, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

個人の顔が写っているのに Shirobbq (talk) 11:11, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

個人の顔が写っているのに気づかずアップロードしてしまった。 Shirobbq (talk) 11:11, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 10:21, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of "own work" from a user whose other three uploads were copyvios. Can't find the source of this one, but https://www.computer.org/web/awards/entrepreneur-len-bosack is a 2009 page with a similar photo. McGeddon (talk) 11:59, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio from www.imillerpr.com. Ruthven (msg) 10:23, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Indoor! Not Freedom of panorama, FOP. Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 17:11, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: modern art. Ruthven (msg) 10:25, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality image - we have better and clearer images of the vehicle, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:39, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 10:30, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality image - we have better and clearer images of the vehicle, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:39, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 10:30, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality image - we have better and clearer images of the vehicle, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:39, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: use {{Superseded}} if a better image is available. Ruthven (msg) 10:31, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality image - we have better and clearer images of the vehicle, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:41, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: if we do have better images of this vehicle, use {{Superseded}} for this one. Ruthven (msg) 10:33, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality image - we have better and clearer images of the vehicle, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:42, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose Where are these alleged "better and clearer images of the vehicle"? We are not limited to the number of images of a vehicle that we host. The image is not of poor quality: just because the nominator doesn't particularly like the angle at which the image is taken, or the fact that it includes only part of the vehicle, is not an adequate reason for deletion. The image also shows the juxtapostion with other vehicles in the bus depot. Skinsmoke (talk) 14:32, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Davey2010. Ruthven (msg) 10:34, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disputing the {{PD-textlogo}}. The graphics on this logo are well above the threshold of originality. There is no indication this was released under a free license otherwise. — ξxplicit 04:52, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. (tJosve05a (c) 06:26, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Circumstantial evidence: this user has a lengthy record of uploading copyvio, including several other images of Dr. Qazi Nisar (all misdated to 2016, 22 years after Nisar's murder, but that's less indicative). Also, there's not really any provenance. I mean, yes, uploader says "own work", but there's a clear record of misunderstanding what that means.

On the other hand, there's no non-circumstantial reasons to delete this image? I dunno, that's why I went with a full DR instead of just marking it as copyvio. Have a look at this person's other uploads (incl. deleted), and decide from there. DS (talk) 14:37, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The image appears to be a scan, and unlikely to be own work. Not a trustworthy uploader. - Reventtalk 01:00, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I Karl Weingärtner, am the creator and owner of the exclusive copyright of the media work "Babylonokia.jpg".My copyright for this photo and my identity is confirmed on this website of the Austrian Post: https://www.post.at/sammelboerse/go/marke_detail/id/ab3777a4002cf809c0a2acea715d9c48

Dort verifiziert die Post nichts. Da trägt man selbst ein wenn man seine eigene Briefmarke der Sammelboerse für etwa 30 Euro bestellt. --2003:4D:2C53:9CE1:186E:E81C:1C00:DB4A 01:37, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, kostet 48 Euro. Die Post verifiziert da nix. https://onlineshop.post.at/onlineshop/content/show/15 Ist aber auch egal, bei uns ist das mit com:OTRS zu verifizieren. --2003:4D:2C53:9CE1:A008:CFC5:E38A:E3C9 08:54, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Wieviel jetzt? 30 oder 48 Euro? Und wo zahlt man das Geld ein? - Warum so lange diskutieren und dann sagen: aber ist auch egal!Kalligrafiemonk (talk) 12:55, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


File is from here this pic 80.145.200.170 20:53, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Babylonokia.jpg --2003:4D:2C53:9CE1:186E:E81C:1C00:DB4A 01:37, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
www.giga.de has uploaded the picture of Babylonokia on her website without my (Karl Weingärtner) permission.Kalligrafiemonk (talk) 15:15, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:29, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per OTRS permissions. --Krd 11:20, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo of the Israeli postal company. The logo is copyrighted and cannot be considered too simple to appear in the Commons without a specific OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 23:28, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:28, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo is copyrighted and cannot be considered too simple to appear in the Commons witout a specific OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 23:30, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:28, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Why do these pictures have a free license?

Discasto talk 23:53, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vicente Lopez-Carril - Tour 1976.jpg. BastienM hasn't contributed for a year, so I don't think you'll get a reply soon. I believe he is genuine. BaldBoris 01:04, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn't obviously aware of such DR, but the fact is that none of the pictures was updated as agreed in the DR you quote :-(
I can't see a problem regarding the uploader's good faith but possibly sort of OTRS would make no more DR are triggered by these pictures. BR --Discasto talk 09:54, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Photographs by Renato Cornelio Milanese (1926 Saint-Jean de Maurienne –2010 Ariège), uploaded by his grandson User:BastienM. Vysotsky (talk) 19:08, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion; per discussion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:28, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It doesn't appear that the website from which this photograph was taken (http://velikoross.org/) has a compatible license. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 02:09, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:41, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader has the name Jasmar Cassar. The subject of the picture is also Jasmar Cassar. Obviously Jasmar Cassar did not take this picture of himself. I think the image was either taken by a professional photographer or it's a screenshot from a video or a TV show. Unless we get permission from the owner of the picture or video to have this image on Commons, I think this could be a copyright violation. Dontreader (talk) 04:19, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:41, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nominating file to discuss the validity of "own work" authorship and the CC-BY-SA 4.0 license. Senator2029 ➔ “Talk” 06:36, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:41, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused bad JPEG, superseded by PNG. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 08:17, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:40, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot from copyrighted app Triplecaña (talk) 11:13, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:40, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot from copyrighted app Triplecaña (talk) 11:13, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:40, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot from copyrighted app Triplecaña (talk) 11:13, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:39, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot from copyrighted app Triplecaña (talk) 11:13, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:39, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Albania. Who is architect and when (s)he died? Taivo (talk) 11:40, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:39, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright unclear 93.142.155.90 12:22, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have been attached one of the last photos of the last stećak-tombstones in Šiprage. Old photos is from my private collection. I uploaded this for public use on Commons.
Note: This stećak photography is very important for the history of Šiprage and Central Bosnia, and for the eventual reconstruction of the cultural remains from 12th century!

Yahadzija (talk) 13:46, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; the image had no information on copyright status and was not 'own work' of uploder. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:39, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, user's last remaining upload. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Also depicted person isn't mentioned in en.wiki and maybe she is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:48, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:38, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a scanned picture and so I don't believe "own work" of the uploader. 2003:D3:A3D7:A00:8506:70B6:1FEA:F285 13:15, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See also: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tipologie costume Piana degli Albanesi.jpg

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:38, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW: montage consisting of multiple images without indicated sources or authorship for each of them. --XXN, 15:21, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:38, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:NOTUSED. Out of scope personal logo that resembles the Calvin Klein logo. Does not conform to COM:EDUSE. BriefEdits (talk) 19:04, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:40, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have better images here and the image is too dark for it to be of any use - could be touched up however as we have better images of the vehicle it would seem pointless to attempt, Cheers, –Davey2010Talk 15:22, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:38, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is way too sharp - could be fixed however we have better images of the vehicle, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 15:26, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:37, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright notice on EXIF doesn't match the source info:

Denis Concordel - www.widgic.com - Copyright Notice: All the photos are the property of the photographer.

Ytoyoda (talk) 15:32, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:38, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Full size image at http://www.arna-bjornar.no/portal/theme/team/news/show.do?id=9354745, image copyright belongs to the club, not the player Ytoyoda (talk) 15:34, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:37, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from http://www.chrisholder23.com/rostrum-return-holder/ Ytoyoda (talk) 15:45, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:37, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File EXIF shows "Author CHRISTI STRAHAN". MKFI (talk) 15:51, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:37, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from video stream. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:37, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing EXIF, not own work, uploaded from internet see [4] kovox90      15:55, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:37, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, uploaded from internet, see [5] kovox90      16:25, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:36, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per description, the author had also been in the picture. At least, the uploader needs to send an e-mail to OTRS explaining how the author's also in the picture! Mhhossein talk 17:05, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:36, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:Redundant. See File:MercadoNiñoDiosDF044.jpg. Mhhossein talk 17:21, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:36, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable own work, it is an upscaled version from hier, many findings in the net, many other copyright violation from this user, COM:PCP. Ras67 (talk) 17:21, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:36, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per com:redundant. See File:MercadoNiñoDiosDF041.jpg and File:MercadoNiñoDiosDF040.jpg. Mhhossein talk 17:23, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:36, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, it's from here, © 1999-2002 Fanàticou Nissart, COM:PCP. Ras67 (talk) 17:28, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:35, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author is not Idamlowe but KARLBERG media AB . Södermälarstrand 25 . 118 25 Stockholm who owns all rights. Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 17:30, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:35, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author is not Idamlowe, but Karl Gabor (all rights reserved). Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 17:33, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:35, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author is not Idamlowe but Fredrik Persson, Copyright Fredrik Persson. Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 17:35, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:35, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author is not Idamlowe but Karl Gabor, all rights reserved! Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 17:37, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:35, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Super small picture. Hardly usable. Badzil (talk) 18:04, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:35, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The portrait is taken from the modern gallery of Russian attorneys general. Ergo, copyrighted. Ghirlandajo (talk) 18:05, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:35, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo used as a profile pic on this Twitter account. No OTRS authorization. Titlutin (talk) 18:06, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Français : Photo déjà utilisée par le compte Twitter @TheNancyRoc. Or Twitter n'est pas libre de droits. Il faudrait donc un email d'autorisation de la part de l'auteur de la photo pour que Commons puisse héberger légalement cette image - voir pour cela Aide:Republication/Image--Titlutin (talk) 18:08, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:35, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's fairly clrear that this image is part of the same photo shot as this resume photo from IMDB which credits copyright to Creativebuild. We would need OTRS confirmation of a free license, Whpq (talk) 19:28, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:34, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image can not be "own work" by the uploader. We need a permission via OTRS that he is the only heir of the copyright or if that picture is in PD. Ras67 (talk) 19:31, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:34, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a DVD cover and not an original poster. We hope (talk) 20:22, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The movie itself is PD-1923, the screencap from it would also be free. The only other things added to this image were some words, not enough or of a nature to be copyrightable. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:34, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maxpicasso (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files obviously taken from the internet, or television screenshots, or logo images. Not uploader's own work as claimed, etc. (This is not a complete list of questionable uploads, so add additional images as necessary.)

Senator2029 ➔ “Talk” 20:27, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Maxpicasso (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work. Most images are facebook or smaller sized. When not, they have scanning/copying artefacts, or due to age and style are obviously not the work of the same person. User's uploads included images screencaptured from television, group shots, many rugby images, and so on.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:32, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:33, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the uploaders own work, the sketch was made by Alain Charasse, COM:PCP. Ras67 (talk) 20:49, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:30, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Serious doubts, contains a logotype Arthur Crbz (talk) 16:50, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:22, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

это не может быть собственной работой Barbariandeagle (talk) 19:21, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:21, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not "own work" Arguablefool (talk) 04:32, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Probably {{PD-US-no notice}} can be used. --Ruthven (msg) 10:04, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete - The image might be copyrighted, Own work and image age not matching, Let the up loader clarify this image ...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 11:42, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:01, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original file was deleted due to infringement. The original file belongs to Sony Music Entertainmen (Japan) Inc.. アルトクール (talk) 18:29, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, per Puramyun. Taivo (talk) 18:57, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incompatible licensing: GPLv3+'d works (GIMP) cannot be adopted to use BY-SA licenses for the derivative work. 84.251.84.243 03:41, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Yes, the uploader can. The arragement and the document itself can be licensed under another free license meanwhile the GIMP and Wikipedia logo are properly licensed. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:56, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep: Per amitie. As long as there are licensing for both the Wikipedia logo and GIMP licensing then it's okay. 210.55.186.185 00:32, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: @Amitie 10g: The uploader has claimed own work and only stated a license for CC BY-SA, and never seemingly agreed to GPLv3+ or shown permission to license under CC BY-SA 4.0 only. Licensing only under CC BY-SA 4.0 would be in violation of the license text of GPLv3+. Cross-licensing would not be issue with CC BY 4.0 for example, but the two copyleft clauses are incompatible. 84.251.84.243 10:08, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No, because the licenses are applied separately: The depicted software (GIMP), the depicted document (the Wikipedia logo), and the arragement (the screenshot), wich in this way is allowed, because ios a derivative work of two or more elements licensed under different licenses. --Amitie 10g (talk) 11:31, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Amitie 10g: There is no apparent proof that the depicted document (the Wikipedia logo) is licensed under GPLv3+ too. Refer to Template:Incompatible license. The way you describe it would be allowed with another copyleft license which is compatible with the GNU GPLv3 (or later version). Refer to Various Licenses and Comments about Them by the GNU Project for compatible licenses. CC BY-SA 4.0 is not a compatible license (though CC BY 4.0 would be, the way you describe it). 84.251.84.243 23:18, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please read carefuly my above comment: Licensing can be applied separately to different elements contained in a screenshot. Everything in the screenshot are licensed under a free licenses, and this nomination is based on copyright paranoia. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:30, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No, CC licenses are irrevocable. The file is not multilicensed, but released under a free license, and the individual elements under their corresponding licenses. A screenshot of a free software depicting a free document is perfectly fine, meanwhile the individual elements in the screenshot are properly licensed, but the screenshot itself should be released under a valid license (and the CC-BY-SA is a valid one, as it does not contaminate the individual elements, and the individual ones shold not contaminate the license for the screenshot itslef, unless, if the depicted contents are licensed under a single license). --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:33, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: As a counter-argument to @Amitie 10g: Yes, there are only freely licensed works in this screenshot. Yes, licensing can be applied separately to different elements displayed in a screenshot. Yes, Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable. It is also correct that the authors have not multilicensed the file. I still disagree with your view if this is an aggregated work or a modified version.

GPLv3's section 5(c) says the entire work (GIMP in this case), as a whole, must be licensed under the GPLv3, with no permission to license the work in any other way. Furthermore, this section goes on to talk about aggregated works and modified works. (See Frequently Asked Questions about the GNU Licenses § What is the difference between an “aggregate” and other kinds of “modified versions”?)

GPLv3 also says Inclusion of a covered work in an aggregate does not cause this License to apply to the other parts of the aggregate. I believe this means what you referred to as contamination, which is true: GPLv3'd works (GIMP) won't make the Wikipedia logo (CC BY-SA) also GPLv3 in the work.

CC BY-SA 4.0 says in section 3(b) the adapted work must be licensed under the same Creative Commons license (this version or later) or a BY-SA Compatible License. It also prohibits offering or imposing any additional or different terms or conditions on the adapted work, which would restrict the rights given in the CC BY-SA license.

I've already established the incompatibility between CC BY-SA 4.0 and GPLv3+, so this work does not fit into the criteria of CC BY-SA's BY-SA Compatible License mentioned in the license text. (See Frequently Asked Questions about the GNU Licenses § What does it mean to say that two licenses are “compatible”?)

As I see it, I don't see this to be an aggregate work. GPLv3 section 5 defines it like so:

A compilation of a covered work with other separate and independent works, which are not by their nature extensions of the covered work, and which are not combined with it such as to form a larger program, in or on a volume of a storage or distribution medium, is called an “aggregate” if the compilation and its resulting copyright are not used to limit the access or legal rights of the compilation's users beyond what the individual works permit.

I believe this work being nominated is an adapted work or a modified work, which combines two works into a a larger work. Quoting from the FAQ linked earlier on compatible licenses:

In order to combine two programs (or substantial parts of them) into a larger work, you need to have permission to use both programs in this way. If the two programs' licenses permit this, they are compatible. If there is no way to satisfy both licenses at once, they are incompatible.

I believe it'd be fine to distribute the Wikipedia image and GIMP image seperately on a CD-ROM, but not together in one image because it is impossible to convey this modified work under both licenses without violating the other license and one author's rights, without permission.

User:Gazebo has previously commented on license incompatibility in Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2016/08#Non-free revisions of File:Inkscape0.45.png. 84.251.84.243 09:32, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Info: File:GIMP 2.8 in Single Window Mode running on Ubuntu.png is believed to be free under GFDLv1.2+ with no known incompatibilities and is currently in use at English Wikipedia. 80.221.152.17 16:59, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: GIMP is licensed under the GPL. The Wikipedia Puzzle Globe is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0. Derivatives of GPL-licensed works cannot be licensed under a CC BY-SA license, as this image is. The image can be restored if licensed by the author, Transfat0g, under a GPL license. - Reventtalk 08:54, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The album cover of Bilingual by Pet Shop Boys was discussed in COM:VPCOPY. The UK court ruling on the EDGE magazine logo set UK's originality standards very low, resulting in some images deleted, like album covers of Introspective and Yes by Pet Shop Boys. In this case, the very small "PETSHOPBOYS" is seen through the "NG" of the very big "BILINGUAL". Two colors of "PETSHOPBOYS" are used, but I don't know how else to describe its creativity. The cover may be original enough for copyright in the UK, but I'm uncertain.

I did tell a user to upload the PNG version of the album cover, but I mistakenly assumed the cover to be free to use. Then I have second thoughts about this, and I may take responsibility for that. This may be a deletion nomination, but this should not put bad faith on hard-working editors who contribute to the project. George Ho (talk) 15:58, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging Ruslik0 and for their input. --George Ho (talk) 17:43, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I dislike deleting this... I do not believe it merits protection. However, the test applied in the Edge case, for artistic originality, is "the expenditure of more than negligible or trivial effort or relevant skill". The bar is extremely low.

As a further note, the inclusion of "effort and skill" is such a test is distinctly different from that applied under US law, where both effort and skill are deliberately excluded from contributing to originality. - Reventtalk 09:15, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What is the copyright situation of money from Montenegro? No information at COM:MONEY. Jcb (talk) 21:51, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per COM:PCP. --Daphne Lantier 18:32, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Francis Beckett: Stalin’s British victims, United Kingdom, 2004, p.p.184,185