Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/08/29
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
COM:ADVERT: Incomplete document for promotional purposes — see page 15. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 16:15, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:15, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
uploaded as test file for upload wizard; apparently no longer needed Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:37, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 19:12, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Image promotionnelle par ailleurs non libre de droits. L'utilisateur PickandGo indique un travail personnel mais c'est clairement une photo professionnelle utilisée par ailleurs sur des sites officiels. Elle est sous copyright comme le montre cet article de presse (http://www.lopinion.fr/16-septembre-2015/universites-mieux-gerees-sont-mieux-ponctionnees-28173) ou celui là (qui indique le véritable auteur) (http://orientation.blog.lemonde.fr/2013/01/31/luniversite-a-evolue-pour-mieux-accueillir-les-etudiants-jean-loup-salzmann-president-de-la-conference-des-presidents-duniversite/). Il existe par ailleurs des images libres de droit. 2A02:8428:1B0:CC00:DD6A:1741:FBC7:B6B 00:00, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, real author: "©CPU – Alexandre Sallé de Chou". --Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:14, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ukranenland01.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ukranenland02.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ukranenland03.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ukranenland06-2.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ukranenland06.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ukranenland07.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ukranenland08.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ukranenland09.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ukranenland10.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ukranenland11.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ukranenland12.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ukranenland13.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ukranenland15.jpg
la page affecte sur les comportements des enfants 41.137.57.129 16:14, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
- Per COM:CENSORSHIP, a file is not deleted solely on the grounds that it may not be "child-friendly" or that it may cause offence to you or others. Betty Logan (talk) 16:56, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Non-sense DR (and vandalism). Commons is not censored. --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:01, 13 April 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
this media file is Not educationall or useful at all it's just a Pornographic video and should be removed Motawer.Dev (talk) 15:16, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- The fact it is pornographic does not come into it. If it were not useful then the media would not be used by the various Wikipedias and at least two language editions use the media file. Whether it is educational or not is subjective, but I would say hosting classic films that have fallen into the public domain is a credible use of the Commons. Betty Logan (talk) 18:44, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- if anyone uploaded their amateur porn videos which might be free to use (public domain) commons will become a porn site, and yes hosting films that have fallen into the public domain is a good use of commons but only if the file has any educational value, and the reason commons exists is [Educational & Useful].--Motawer.Dev (talk) 23:21, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- The file is useful because it is used as a supporting material on articles about the film. Its presence and purpose on Commons is no different to that of File:Birth of a Nation (1915).webm and File:Night of the Living Dead (1968).webm. The only reason you have singled it out is because it is pornographic so I suggest you review COM:CENSORSHIP. Betty Logan (talk) 23:31, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
- As for a supporting material a Trailer would be fairly enough File:Debbie Does Dallas, 1978, Edited Trailer.webm or File:Debbie Does Dallas, 1978, trailer.webm. As for my reasons, being pornographic is one but not all, I don't see any educational value that this file can add to the community or to the entire world, it's not an illustration of something or has any valuable info, even when considering the broad meaning of "Educational" the file does not provide knowledge nor it is instructional or informative. Motawer.Dev (talk) 10:04, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- The educational value is fairly obvious: readers are able to view the work that is being discussed. In that regard it offers the same value as any other classic film in the public domain hosted on the Commons. Your agenda here is transparent: the fact the film is pornographic isn't "one of" your reasons, it is the sole reason. Betty Logan (talk) 22:25, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- As for a supporting material a Trailer would be fairly enough File:Debbie Does Dallas, 1978, Edited Trailer.webm or File:Debbie Does Dallas, 1978, trailer.webm. As for my reasons, being pornographic is one but not all, I don't see any educational value that this file can add to the community or to the entire world, it's not an illustration of something or has any valuable info, even when considering the broad meaning of "Educational" the file does not provide knowledge nor it is instructional or informative. Motawer.Dev (talk) 10:04, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- The file is useful because it is used as a supporting material on articles about the film. Its presence and purpose on Commons is no different to that of File:Birth of a Nation (1915).webm and File:Night of the Living Dead (1968).webm. The only reason you have singled it out is because it is pornographic so I suggest you review COM:CENSORSHIP. Betty Logan (talk) 23:31, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Excuse me because I failed to understand your definition of "Educational", the way you describe it seems like a "reference", and if it's only that then a Trailer is super enough, while the meaning I'm referring to is 'Educational', if it was the MakeOf the film then I would say it has some educational value because it show how films of that kind are made. But this case is not the file's not informative nor instructional or even provide any useful knowledge and in addition to all this it's Pornographic -Motawer.Dev (talk) 11:56, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - as much as I don't love this keep !vote being one of the few deletion discussions I've participated in on commons, this is clearly in scope as a well known film that is the subject of wikipedia articles, etc. No other policy-based reason to delete given. — Rhododendrites talk | 04:05, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per COM:INUSE on fr:Debbie_Does_Dallas. d:Q579826 lists 12 articles about this movie, that meet criteria of notability. The movie should be added to all that do not include it. --Jarekt (talk) 02:30, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - per COM:INUSE. Wikicology (talk) 21:35, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I strongly vote for delete, because if we kept them with reasons such COM:INUSE then no body will complain if someone wrote an article on Wikipedia about self cannibalism (or anything disgusting ) and by chance he found a video on commons of someone who cut his arm and ate it or chewed it while it's still connected, so he used the file to support his article, or an article about Self-Nutrition, and of course a file is always ready for the case showing someone eating his feces, or anything disgusting, Sorry for the words but you can imagine. And this case is not different from the above cases: the file is In Use and Commons is not Censored and lastly the file has no Licensing Issues. the point is if there is no law (yet) against killing someone on the moon, it does not mean you can, and if a file is intended for adults, then it should be uploaded where it belongs not here, I never imagined a world famous website intended to teach the world and spread knowledge to host such files, never in a million year, I wonder if people who donate to Wikimedia foundation know about the rules here !!. anyway sorry if crossed the grey line but I think I made myself clear. DroidPedia (talk) 13:37, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
- Not sure how seriously this comment should be taken, given its content and the fact that the user has 0 other edits, but Wikipedia is not censored, and neither is Commons. This is a film that has been the subject of a lot of coverage and is therefore an encyclopedic subject. That it contains explicit content is not reason to delete. Nor is what someone might upload in some ridiculous hypothetical. See COM:SCOPE and COM:NOT. — Rhododendrites talk | 15:51, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry if I sound rude but you should take my comment very seriously, and about the 0 edits, I've made some edits at Wikipedia but only as visitor I never thought about creating an account as my contributions are very rare, but I created an account just to contribute to the deletion of this file (and similar ones) So I guess this is the only good thing came from it. I work as an IT specialist at the Municipality Public Library in which we provide aside from local books more than 80 computer with free and unlimited access to online libraries and useful websites such as e-mail services and of course can't forget all Wikimedia projects, even in summer we get some visitors and last Saturday I was doing some minor computer maintenance I saw a 13 maybe 12 years old kid watching something, the poor kid just run out of luck because when I turned my eyes toward the screen I saw it clearly (a *** and ***), the kid was playing nothing but this file, I was so angry and gave him a hell of a slap but the kid didn't cry instead he run away with a creepy smile on his face, I could only imagine what was in his little head maybe :"I found a treasure", and when I checked the browser history the kid entered wikimedia.org then commons and searched for "porn video" (I'm sure this is universal in all languages) and I'm also sure the kid did not understand what they said in the film because he barely know French (English has to wait for few other years), the kid didn't saw the film on Wikipedia or any other page but Commons, you get the idea right?. anyway I hope their parent don't sue me because I provided access to digital pornographic content to minor (which is forbidden not only in my country ) and here it's forbidden even for adults, even if it was unintentionally from my side but it is considered lack of responsibility and professionalism, Now I think I should start doing some filtering either search for files and block links one by one (which is really Stupid) or block commons.wikimedia.org (this is also a bad idea) or lastly ask people here reasonably, logically and politely to delete the files. I think this a very long comment so I will end it with: I remember reading about a law project in the USA (about 2003) to criminalize providing pornographic materials to juveniles with prior knowledge of their legal situation this goes also for websites based in the USA and that they should inform the visitor to not enter if he's under 18. DroidPedia (talk) 00:10, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
- Not sure how seriously this comment should be taken, given its content and the fact that the user has 0 other edits, but Wikipedia is not censored, and neither is Commons. This is a film that has been the subject of a lot of coverage and is therefore an encyclopedic subject. That it contains explicit content is not reason to delete. Nor is what someone might upload in some ridiculous hypothetical. See COM:SCOPE and COM:NOT. — Rhododendrites talk | 15:51, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
- DroidPedia, I understand it is a problem, but we can not help you with it. Commons is not censored and it does have a lot of material which might not be OK for minors to watch. And if they want to find porn I am dure they will find it, if not here than on other sites. Check out w:Porn 2.0 article for ideas of other sites to either block or ask to delete their content. --Jarekt (talk) 03:19, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks Jarekt, But the listed websites are intended for adults and they announce it publicly and loudly “we provide adults content only”, and most of them prompt the visitor with a message to either Leave as this is only an Adult place or to enter at his own risk, and some of them use age verification system, all this just to be on the brightest side of the law, and honestly I can't got to a porn site and ask them to erase all the data in their server's hard drives, though I wish if it could work, and for me I'm running a White listed Firewall, The world is blocked except for the good websites, and I had no issues with that list except for two cases, the first with Internet Archive and the last with Commons. the two cases use Educational flag and hide mines in their fields. Look I don't mean to be mean or anything, I really like the whole Idea of Wikimedia and I learned a lot from here, But I think it could be perfect if only they did something about this black spot, In fact I never saw any kind of signs or anything that say "shocking images" at least except for once, it was an image hidden by a sign and I don't even remember whether it said shocking image or pornographic media, and if only they prompt the visitor with a warning message, I wouldn't be angry. and again I think there is a law against providing pornographic materials to minors with prior knowledge of their age. --DroidPedia (talk) 10:40, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- DroidPedia, I understand it is a problem, but we can not help you with it. Commons is not censored and it does have a lot of material which might not be OK for minors to watch. And if they want to find porn I am dure they will find it, if not here than on other sites. Check out w:Porn 2.0 article for ideas of other sites to either block or ask to delete their content. --Jarekt (talk) 03:19, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE (used in fr wikipedia main namespace) and no consensus to delete the file. If there is evidence that the file has been hosted in violation of US law please contact the Wikimedia Foundation (in his role as hosting provider). --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:16, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Hardcore-Pornography, no educational purpose TünnesUndSchäl (talk) 22:04, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jarekt (talk) 03:21, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Former nominations for a deletion argued that "Debbie Does Dallas" endanger the well-being of children. That is right, but it is not the a discussion I'd like to start, as far as I know the community's point of view. The primary problem is the law! As you know, the open access to pornography without any check of the legal age is highly forbidden. A second argument is the educational purpose: "Debbie Does Dallas" is a porn video, not a documentary. You could argue about the historical porns you could find here, but a full porn of 1978 hasn't any educational purpose! Some aruge, that the french wikipedia would use it. In fact, the open access of porn is higly forbidden in France. So first: there is a legal ban on porn in the internet, and second: there is no educational purpose. So why retain a porn on wikimedia commons? TünnesUndSchäl (talk) 11:38, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Keep: Wikimedia projects are hosted in the United States, not France. Commons is not censored. There is no legal requirement in United States to check age for pornography as far as I'm aware: Such extraordinary claim needs extraordinary references to back it up. The work is in use at Wikimedia projects, so it falls within Commons' project scope per COM:INUSE. These arguments have been previously iterated. 80.221.159.67 12:13, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Comment Reiterating what was said by User:Steinsplitter in closing the second deletion nomination: If there is evidence that the file has been hosted in violation of US law please contact the Wikimedia Foundation (in his role as hosting provider).
80.221.159.67 12:16, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Comment I recommend imposing a 1-year moratorium on deletion nominations. Three nominations in a 2-month period is an abuse of the process and just wastes people's time. If the circumstances change sufficiently then it can be reviewed a year from now, or if the legal context changes the foundation can delete it at its own discretion. Betty Logan (talk) 12:49, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Keep So TünnesUndSchäl, a user that [:[Category_talk:Females_having_sex|"been irritated of a photograph showing a close-up of a penetration in the german Wikipedia"]] - by the way what kind of articles were you reading to appear this kind of imagery? I ask this as i find odd what kind of article would had this kind of imagery except ones related to sex and pornography? - after your first (and third deletion request about this file) not happy with the closure, you open a new deletion request only 2 months have passed, with the very same arguments and make several wild claims without backing them up with facts and laws. You, that only "contribute" with deletion requests of this kind of files, as you are on a moral crusade per your own words as you asked "Is there any cleanup of this category planned?", should know what the law of the land is, beggining per Miller v. California.
File in use so in scope. This movie has articles on 12 languages in Wikipedia, so educational and " it is regarded as one of the most important releases during the so-called "Golden Age of Porn",[5] and remains one of the best-known pornographic films" per english Wikipedia article.Tm (talk) 22:06, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: the file has been in used continuously in the article for almost a year, so we don't have to look at the 'scope' question. Laws on child protection may play a role, but this is not handled by our DR procedure. If you think there is a legal problem with the file, please contact legal at wikimedia dot org. --Jcb (talk) 09:15, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
I am the file creator and I have created a better file called File:Israel Tel Aviv-Yafo location map.svg Mikey641 (talk) 22:57, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 14:01, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Derivative work of posters. (Cropping is possible, but a lot should be cropped from left and right.) Taivo (talk) 11:33, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Cropped per nomination to minimize the amount of the posters visible. Tabercil (talk) 02:39, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept, fixed. Taivo (talk) 14:03, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nambiarbuilders (talk · contribs)
[edit]Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 15:39, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Herbythyme: Out of project scope: promotional content
Ukranenland
[edit]- File:Ukranenland01.jpg
- File:Ukranenland02.jpg
- File:Ukranenland03.jpg
- File:Ukranenland04.jpg
- File:Ukranenland06.jpg
- File:Ukranenland06-2.jpg
- File:Ukranenland07.jpg
- File:Ukranenland08.jpg
- File:Ukranenland09.jpg
- File:Ukranenland10.jpg
- File:Ukranenland11.jpg
- File:Ukranenland12.jpg
- File:Ukranenland13.jpg
- File:Ukranenland15.jpg
- File:Ukranenland06.jpg
The picture doesn't show the actual status of the museum right now. Everything has developed since the making of this pic. It hurts the image of the museum drastically and destroys it's appearance to visitors. (members of the museum will upload new pictures soon if the old ones are deleted.) Thanks for helping us on this issue! Eygenart (talk) 19:31, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep no reason to delete. If the image doesn't show actual state of the museum it could be historical valuably.--Wdwd (talk) 19:35, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - It's good that the museum has developed, but we will not delete these images just because they no longer reflect reality. That what they depict does not exist anymore arguably makes them more valuable, because you can't just go out and see it for yourself. Commons exists as an educational resource, not a form of promotion for the museum. -mattbuck (Talk) 06:12, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep trolling or vandalism mass deletion request. Info Requesting User was blocked indefinitely. --Foreign Species (talk) 14:33, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reasaon for deletion given. Old photographs are not to be deleted because they are old. Upload new images under a different(!) filename. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:48, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 11:24, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: More image spam - gone. --Herby talk thyme 15:08, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Change NSD to DR. Test say "from an old postcard". This is 2D art so who cares who made the scan? MGA73 (talk) 15:17, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing source as of 26 August 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
There is no actual image Satdeep Gill (talk) 16:36, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by INeverCry: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Harpreet Sandhu
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:12, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tulsidasah (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not Facebook or other social media and is not a place to post resumes, identification cards, personal photos take by other people and so on.
- File:Tulsidas ahirwar ka adarcard.jpg
- File:Tulsidas ke pariwar ki jankari.pdf
- File:Photogjkgkgkgkgkgkg.pdf
- File:Tulsidas ka jeewan parichay.pdf
- File:Apne ghar ke devtao ko kya chadate hai.pdf
- File:Tulsidas ahirwar ka jeewan parichay.pdf
- File:Tulsidas ahirwar ke account ki photo.pdf
- File:Tulsidas ahirwar ke pariwar ki jankari.pdf
- File:Tulsidas ahirwar ki photo shera wali ma ke sath.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:02, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:07, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tulsidasah (talk · contribs)
[edit]Collection of unused poor-quality private photos and official documents (ID cards and certificates etc) belonging to a non-notable individual. Outside project scope and more suited to Facebook.
- File:Vayapam090.jpg
- File:Vayapam9.jpg
- File:Vayapam00.jpg
- File:Vayapam7.jpg
- File:Vayapam5.jpg
- File:Vayapam.jpg
- File:Vayapam2.jpg
- File:Vayapam1.jpg
- File:Mponline9.jpg
- File:Mponline8.jpg
- File:Mponline7.jpg
- File:Mponline5.jpg
- File:Mponline4.jpg
- File:Mponline.jpg
- File:Mponline1000.jpg
- File:Mponline123.jpg
- File:Mponline121.jpg
- File:Www.vyapam.com2123.jpg
- File:Www.vyapam.com1212.jpg
- File:Www.vyapam.com0000000.jpg
- File:Www.vyapam.com0000000.png
- File:Www.vyapam.com1234.jpg
- File:Www.vyapam.com00000.jpg
- File:Kiranagencymews.jpg
- File:Ravi ahirwar deerendra ahirwartulsidas ahirwar.jpg
- File:Www.vyapam.com000.jpg
- File:95tulsidas mosi or bhai.jpg
- File:Tulsidas ahirwar mosi.jpg
- File:Www.vyapam.com1232.jpg
- File:Www.vyapam.com1.jpg
- File:Www.mponline.com8.jpg
- File:Www.mponline.com00.jpg
- File:Www.mponline.com0.jpg
- File:Www.mponline.com7.jpg
- File:Www.mponline.com345.jpg
- File:Www.mponline.com45.jpg
- File:Www.mponline.com32.jpg
- File:Www.mponline.com12123.jpg
- File:Www.mponline.com121.jpg
- File:Www.mponline.com4.jpg
- File:Www.mponline.com3.jpg
- File:Www.mponline.com1.jpg
- File:Www.mponline.com2.jpg
- File:Tulsidas ahirwar ssim id panna.jpg
- File:Tulsidas ahirwar ka N.c.c. certifecate.jpg
- File:Tulsidas ahirwar ka N.c.c. certifate2.jpg
- File:Tulsidas ahirwar ka adharcard panna.jpg
- File:Tulsidas ahirwar ka adharcard panna2.jpg
- File:Tulsidas ahirwar ke account ki photo.pdf
- File:Tulsidas ahirwar chitra pramad patra.jpg
- File:Tulsidas ahirwar Singnuter and photo.jpg
- File:Tulsidas ahirwar ke pariwar ki jankari.pdf
- File:Tulsidas ahirwar ka jeewan parichay.pdf
- File:Apne ghar ke devtao ki pooja kese kare.pdf
- File:Tulsidas ki photo.pdf
- File:Tulsidas ahirwar ke pariwar ki photo.pdf
DAJF (talk) 10:25, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:58, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
and also :
This photo and the others above come from the website of ratp, the mention RATP / CML / Agence photographies prove it. Olivier LPB (talk) 18:54, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:09, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
tulsidas ahirwar ka adharcard Tulsidasah (talk) 22:15, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
tulsidas ahirwar ki photo shera wali ma ke sath Tulsidasah (talk) 22:16, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
tulsidas ahirwar ka jeewan parichay Tulsidasah (talk) 22:18, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:10, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused photo. Uploader requests deletion Jannienuts (talk) 14:13, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bruno Torres DJ (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope.
★ Poké95 12:00, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:08, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Very complex logo, it surpasses the threshold of originality. Permission from the Bangladesh Army International University of Science & Technology is needed. ★ Poké95 12:02, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:08, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by শাওন রহমান (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope, Commons is not a personal photo album.
★ Poké95 12:10, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:08, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
i understand the value of what is offered here, but i think this veers too far from being a gallery, and is in fact an article, which means its in the wrong place. maybe the text can be stripped, but i dont read french Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:28, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: mainly a gallery. Ask for help at Commons:Bistro if you need help from French speaking users. --Jcb (talk) 11:11, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Codelyok. Per FBMD...
grabbed from Facebook. All files with EXIF "Copyright = FCG" ( = Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian) taken from Flickr via https://www.flickr.com/photos/biblarte/ (2 copyvios, 2x CC BY-NC-ND 2.0). Historical photos may be in public domain by other means but relevant info (proper author/date of creation or first disclosure/country of creation information) must be provided to determine copyrights status.
- File:قاعة كولبنكيان للفنون.jpg
- File:بناية إتحاد الجيولوجيون في المنصور.jpg
- File:الكلية العسكرية 1969 بالرستميه.jpg
- File:جامعة الحكمة سابقا.jpg
- File:الجامعة المستنصرية.jpg
- File:جمعية مكافحة التشرد العراقية المنصور بغداد.jpg
- File:مكتبة الطفل الكرخ المنصور 25 تموز 1967.jpg
- File:مركز التأهيل المهني في بغداد 1965.jpg
- File:مركز الفن الحديث.jpg
- File:اعدادية المنصور للبنين.jpg
- File:المجمع العلمي العراقي في الوزيريه.jpg
- File:مدينه العاب الرصافه.jpg
- File:مجسم لبناية المكتبة الوطنية في باب المعظم نهاية الستينيات .jpg
- File:الواجهة الأمامية لبناية المركز الثقافي والنادي الإجتماعي والرياضي لعمال النفط 1968 .jpg
- File:قاعه كولبنكيان للفنون.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 06:19, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:12, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 08:35, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:29, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Sergeant Alam MD Rabbi US Army.jpg
- File:MD Alam speaking at Jeff City.jpg
- File:MD Alam with Community at Jeff City.jpg
- File:Md Alam Campaign Picture 4.jpg
- File:Syrian Rally.jpg
- File:Md Alam Campaign Picture 6.jpg
- File:MD Alam with supporters 2012 1.png
- File:MD Alam National Chair USNDPAAC in DC3.jpg
- File:Sergeant Alam MD Rabbi US Army in Class B.jpg
- File:Sgt Alam in Class A 2.jpg
- File:MD Alam Filed for MO SOS March 6 2012 1.jpg
- File:MD Alam logo 1.jpg
- File:Sergeant Alam in Iraq War.jpg
- File:MD Alam with US Vice President Joe Biden.jpg
- File:MD Alam with Nobel Pecae Prize Winner Muhammad Yunus.jpg
- File:MD Alam 2011 National Chairman USNDPAAC.JPG
- File:MD Rabbi Alam Dec 2011 at DC.JPG
- File:MD Rabbi Alam Dec 2011 at DC 1.JPG
- File:MD Rabbi Alam Dec 2011 at DC 3.JPG
- File:MD Alam BDUs US Army Active.jpg
- File:MD Alam speaking at the special settings.jpg
- File:MD Alam speaking on Libean issue in 2011 during the crisis.jpg
- File:MD Rabbi Alam Official Profile Picture 2010.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:18, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Martin1994ramos (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:19, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sandile 2010 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Rt Rev P.M. Ngcobo.jpg
- File:Rt Rev. H.J. Smith.jpg
- File:Rt Rev A.D. Mpanza.jpg
- File:Rt. Rev A. Ntombela.jpg
- File:Rt. Rev A.P. Ntombela.jpg
- File:Rt Rev. S.B. Shibe.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sandile 2010 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CeZQTG1WIAA_EIR.jpg:large.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:19, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:Gazipur , Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2016 , Sayemur Rahman Rafi 04.jpg
- File:Gazipur , Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2016 , Sayemur Rahman Rafi 02.jpg
- File:Gazipur , Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2016 , Sayemur Rahman Rafi 03.jpg
- File:Gazipur , Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2016 , Sayemur Rahman Rafi 01.jpg
Ies (talk) 15:33, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:20, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bcomhonours (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:Chalakudy.jpg
- File:Going to class all dresed up.jpg
- File:2016 pooram selfies.jpg
- File:Pooram selfie.jpg
Ies (talk) 15:34, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:20, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nicolae VASILE (talk · contribs)
[edit]No confidence that any of these images was created by uploader. Only two are large, those two do not share the same camera metadata. Ten photos, four cameras and three without any metadata looks more like a collection of images from the internet (including two sets of duplicates), than user's own work.
- File:Claudia Motea, actriță româno-canadiană.jpg
- File:Nicolae VASILE, Lansarea Volumului "Universul ciclic", 26 Mai 2015.jpg
- File:Nicolae VASILE, în costumul de gală ASTR, 2016.jpg
- File:Seniorii în direct, Spectacolul de debut al Teatrului Nostru, 14 decembrie 2015.jpg
- File:Teatrul Nostru. Repetiție la Sceneta "Freddy", Silvia SĂRACU și Nicolae VASILE.jpg
- File:Claudia Motea, actriță.jpg
- File:Claudia Motea.jpg
- File:Maria NICULESCU.jpg
- File:Nicolae VASILE.JPG
- File:Maria Niculescu.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:37, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:22, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hosamtaha90 (talk · contribs)
[edit]A series of PDF documents (out of COM:SCOPE) which contain embedded images of unknown provenance.
- File:شرح مصور المنتدى.pdf
- File:الدردشة.pdf
- File:وربطه بمدونتك الخاصةflickr انشاء البوم صور على.pdf
- File:انشاء حساب فليكر.pdf
- File:استخدام فليكرفي التعلم والتعلم.pdf
- File:الوسيط التكنولوجي.pdf
- File:ما هو فليكر.pdf
- File:WEBMIX.pdf
- File:ما هو Symbaloo.pdf
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:42, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hosamtaha90 (talk · contribs)
[edit]same as above: PDF documents which seem to be out of scope. Some of them contain elements that are maybe copyvio.
- File:مفهوم البريد الإلكتروني.pdf
- File:عزيزي الطالب كيف تستخدم صفحات البداية في تعلمك.pdf
- File:ويب 2.pdf
- File:متصفح الانترنت.pdf
- File:ما هو slideshare.pdf
- File:مواقع التواصل الاجتماعي.pdf
- File:استخدام المنتديات في مجال التعلم.pdf
BrightRaven (talk) 11:56, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hosamtaha90 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.
- File:Symbaloo في التعلم.pdf
- File:مفهوم صفحة المواقع المفضلة.pdf
- File:التعامل مع المدونات.pdf
- File:التعديل في المدونة.pdf
- File:التعديل في تصميم المدونة.pdf
- File:انشاء مدونة على Blogger.pdf
- File:المكاسب التعليمية من استخدام المدونات الالكترونية.pdf
- File:الفصول الافتراضية.pdf
- File:مفهوم وتاريخ ظهور المدونات.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:23, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hosamtaha90 (talk · contribs)
[edit]As above.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:53, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:16, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
The picture doesn't show the actual status of the museum right now. Everything has developed since the making of this pic. It hurts the image of the museum drastically and destroys it's appearance to visitors. (members of the museum will upload new pictures soon if the old ones are deleted.) Thanks for helping us on this issue! Eygenart (talk) 19:00, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep trolling or vandalism mass deletion request. Info Requesting User was blocked indefinitely. --Foreign Species (talk) 14:47, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:24, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
This image shows a wrong image of the museum. It transmitted, especially in Google search without any description a wrong impression. (It is more than 4 years old). The employees are hoping for a deletion, because it's such a wrong picture of their work. Mors certa (talk) 09:38, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per previous DR resolved as Kept, and no newer and stronger reasons provided. --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:27, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Comment @Mors certa: the images, which you want to remove, have no real descriptions at the moment (only the name "Ukranenland"), this likely influences their positions in search engines (note: if you primarly want that your own images show up at better positions, you should think about better filenames on your own website, but please don't expect others to delete their images). Please read Commons:Help_desk/Archive/2016/09#Deletion_of_Pictures_.22Ukranenland.22 and especially Prosfilaes's hint there. Contextualizing the images by improving their descriptions is the best: you could add something more exact like
{{de|Flutschäden im Ukranenland-Museum im Jahr …}}
or{{de|Haus im Ukranenland-Museum während Renovierungsarbeiten 2012}}
. Please understand that we generally do not delete images only because they show an old status of something. It is well within our scope to document history. Or, in other words, should we delete every old image of demolished or renovated buildings? Would you really want that Wikipedia has no images like this because the church looks different today? I hope not. Holger1959 (talk) 10:32, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep DR by a suspected sockpuppet of Eygenart, and per keep consensus above.
I am going to rollback this troll's edits.Not for now --★ Poké95 11:26, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:21, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
The picture doesn't show the actual status of the museum right now. Everything has developed since the making of this pic. It hurts the image of the museum drastically and destroys it's appearance to visitors. (members of the museum will upload new pictures soon if the old ones are deleted.) Thanks for helping us on this issue! Eygenart (talk) 19:01, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep trolling or vandalism mass deletion request. Info Requesting User was blocked indefinitely. --Foreign Species (talk) 14:47, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:24, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
The picture doesn't show the actual status of the museum right now. Everything has developed since the making of this pic. It hurts the image of the museum drastically and destroys it's appearance to visitors. (members of the museum will upload new pictures soon if the old ones are deleted.) Thanks for helping us on this issue! Eygenart (talk) 19:01, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep trolling or vandalism mass deletion request. Info Requesting User was blocked indefinitely. --Foreign Species (talk) 14:46, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:24, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
The picture doesn't show the actual status of the museum right now. Everything has developed since the making of this pic. It hurts the image of the museum drastically and destroys it's appearance to visitors. (members of the museum will upload new pictures soon if the old ones are deleted.) Thanks for helping us on this issue! Eygenart (talk) 19:02, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep trolling or vandalism mass deletion request. Info Requesting User was blocked indefinitely. --Foreign Species (talk) 14:46, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:24, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
The picture doesn't show the actual status of the museum right now. Everything has developed since the making of this pic. It hurts the image of the museum drastically and destroys it's appearance to visitors. (members of the museum will upload new pictures soon if the old ones are deleted.) Thanks for helping us on this issue! Eygenart (talk) 19:02, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep trolling or vandalism mass deletion request. Info Requesting User was blocked indefinitely. --Foreign Species (talk) 14:46, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:25, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
The picture doesn't show the actual status of the museum right now. Everything has developed since the making of this pic. It hurts the image of the museum drastically and destroys it's appearance to visitors. (members of the museum will upload new pictures soon if the old ones are deleted.) Thanks for helping us on this issue! Eygenart (talk) 19:03, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep trolling or vandalism mass deletion request. Info Requesting User was blocked indefinitely. --Foreign Species (talk) 14:45, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:25, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
The picture doesn't show the actual status of the museum right now. Everything has developed since the making of this pic. It hurts the image of the museum drastically and destroys it's appearance to visitors. (members of the museum will upload new pictures soon if the old ones are deleted.) Thanks for helping us on this issue! Eygenart (talk) 19:03, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep trolling or vandalism mass deletion request. Info Requesting User was blocked indefinitely. --Foreign Species (talk) 14:45, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:25, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
The picture doesn't show the actual status of the museum right now. Everything has developed since the making of this pic. It hurts the image of the museum drastically and destroys it's appearance to visitors. (members of the museum will upload new pictures soon if the old ones are deleted.) Thanks for helping us on this issue! Eygenart (talk) 19:04, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep trolling or vandalism mass deletion request. Info Requesting User was blocked indefinitely. --Foreign Species (talk) 14:45, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:25, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
The picture doesn't show the actual status of the museum right now. Everything has developed since the making of this pic. It hurts the image of the museum drastically and destroys it's appearance to visitors. (members of the museum will upload new pictures soon if the old ones are deleted.) Thanks for helping us on this issue! Eygenart (talk) 19:05, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep trolling or vandalism mass deletion request. Info Requesting User was blocked indefinitely. --Foreign Species (talk) 14:44, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:25, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
The picture doesn't show the actual status of the museum right now. Everything has developed since the making of this pic. It hurts the image of the museum drastically and destroys it's appearance to visitors. (members of the museum will upload new pictures soon if the old ones are deleted.) Thanks for helping us on this issue! Eygenart (talk) 19:06, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep trolling or vandalism mass deletion request. Info Requesting User was blocked indefinitely. --Foreign Species (talk) 14:44, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:25, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
The picture doesn't show the actual status of the museum right now. Everything has developed since the making of this pic. It hurts the image of the museum drastically and destroys it's appearance to visitors. (members of the museum will upload new pictures soon if the old ones are deleted.) Thanks for helping us on this issue! Eygenart (talk) 19:07, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep trolling or vandalism mass deletion request. Info Requesting User was blocked indefinitely. --Foreign Species (talk) 14:43, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:25, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
The picture doesn't show the actual status of the museum right now. Everything has developed since the making of this pic. It hurts the image of the museum drastically and destroys it's appearance to visitors. (members of the museum will upload new pictures soon if the old ones are deleted.) Thanks for helping us on this issue! Eygenart (talk) 19:08, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep trolling or vandalism mass deletion request. Info Requesting User was blocked indefinitely. --Foreign Species (talk) 14:43, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:25, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
The picture doesn't show the actual status of the museum right now. Everything has developed since the making of this pic. It hurts the image of the museum drastically and destroys it's appearance to visitors. (members of the museum will upload new pictures soon if the old ones are deleted.) Thanks for helping us on this issue! Eygenart (talk) 19:11, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep trolling or vandalism mass deletion request. Info Requesting User was blocked indefinitely. --Foreign Species (talk) 14:42, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:25, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
The picture doesn't show the actual status of the museum right now. Everything has developed since the making of this pic. It hurts the image of the museum drastically and destroys it's appearance to visitors. (members of the museum will upload new pictures soon if the old ones are deleted.) Thanks for helping us on this issue! Eygenart (talk) 19:11, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep trolling or vandalism mass deletion request. Info Requesting User was blocked indefinitely. --Foreign Species (talk) 14:42, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:25, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
The picture doesn't show the actual status of the museum right now. Everything has developed since the making of this pic. It hurts the image of the museum drastically and destroys it's appearance to visitors. (members of the museum will upload new pictures soon if the old ones are deleted.) Thanks for helping us on this issue! Eygenart (talk) 19:12, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep trolling or vandalism mass deletion request. Info Requesting User was blocked indefinitely. --Foreign Species (talk) 14:42, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:25, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
The picture doesn't show the actual status of the museum right now. Everything has developed since the making of this pic. It hurts the image of the museum drastically and destroys it's appearance to visitors. (members of the museum will upload new pictures soon if the old ones are deleted.) Thanks for helping us on this issue! Eygenart (talk) 19:12, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep trolling or vandalism mass deletion request. Info Requesting User was blocked indefinitely. --Foreign Species (talk) 14:41, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:25, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
The picture doesn't show the actual status of the museum right now. Everything has developed since the making of this pic. It hurts the image of the museum drastically and destroys it's appearance to visitors. (members of the museum will upload new pictures soon if the old ones are deleted.) Thanks for helping us on this issue! Eygenart (talk) 19:13, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep trolling or vandalism mass deletion request. Info Requesting User was blocked indefinitely. --Foreign Species (talk) 14:40, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:25, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
The picture doesn't show the actual status of the museum right now. Everything has developed since the making of this pic. It hurts the image of the museum drastically and destroys it's appearance to visitors. (members of the museum will upload new pictures soon if the old ones are deleted.) Thanks for helping us on this issue! Eygenart (talk) 19:14, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep trolling or vandalism mass deletion request. Info Requesting User was blocked indefinitely. --Foreign Species (talk) 14:40, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:25, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
The picture doesn't show the actual status of the museum right now. Everything has developed since the making of this pic. It hurts the image of the museum drastically and destroys it's appearance to visitors. (members of the museum will upload new pictures soon if the old ones are deleted.) Thanks for helping us on this issue! Eygenart (talk) 19:14, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep trolling or vandalism mass deletion request. Info Requesting User was blocked indefinitely. --Foreign Species (talk) 14:40, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:25, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
The picture doesn't show the actual status of the museum right now. Everything has developed since the making of this pic. It hurts the image of the museum drastically and destroys it's appearance to visitors. (members of the museum will upload new pictures soon if the old ones are deleted.) Thanks for helping us on this issue! Eygenart (talk) 19:15, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep trolling or vandalism mass deletion request. Info Requesting User was blocked indefinitely. --Foreign Species (talk) 14:39, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:26, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
The picture doesn't show the actual status of the museum right now. Everything has developed since the making of this pic. It hurts the image of the museum drastically and destroys it's appearance to visitors. (members of the museum will upload new pictures soon if the old ones are deleted.) Thanks for helping us on this issue! Eygenart (talk) 19:16, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep trolling or vandalism mass deletion request. Info Requesting User was blocked indefinitely. --Foreign Species (talk) 14:39, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:26, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
The picture doesn't show the actual status of the museum right now. Everything has developed since the making of this pic. It hurts the image of the museum drastically and destroys it's appearance to visitors. (members of the museum will upload new pictures soon if the old ones are deleted.) Thanks for helping us on this issue! Eygenart (talk) 19:16, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep trolling or vandalism mass deletion request. Info Requesting User was blocked indefinitely. --Foreign Species (talk) 14:38, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:26, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
The picture doesn't show the actual status of the museum right now. Everything has developed since the making of this pic. It hurts the image of the museum drastically and destroys it's appearance to visitors. (members of the museum will upload new pictures soon if the old ones are deleted.) Thanks for helping us on this issue! Eygenart (talk) 19:17, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep trolling or vandalism mass deletion request. Info Requesting User was blocked indefinitely. --Foreign Species (talk) 14:38, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:26, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
The picture doesn't show the actual status of the museum right now. Everything has developed since the making of this pic. It hurts the image of the museum drastically and destroys it's appearance to visitors. (members of the museum will upload new pictures soon if the old ones are deleted.) Thanks for helping us on this issue! Eygenart (talk) 19:18, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep trolling or vandalism mass deletion request. Info Requesting User was blocked indefinitely. --Foreign Species (talk) 14:37, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:27, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
The picture doesn't show the actual status of the museum right now. Everything has developed since the making of this pic. It hurts the image of the museum drastically and destroys it's appearance to visitors. (members of the museum will upload new pictures soon if the old ones are deleted.) Thanks for helping us on this issue! Eygenart (talk) 19:18, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep trolling or vandalism mass deletion request. Info Requesting User was blocked indefinitely. --Foreign Species (talk) 14:37, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:27, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
The picture doesn't show the actual status of the museum right now. Everything has developed since the making of this pic. It hurts the image of the museum drastically and destroys it's appearance to visitors. (members of the museum will upload new pictures soon if the old ones are deleted.) Thanks for helping us on this issue! Eygenart (talk) 19:23, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep trolling or vandalism mass deletion request. Info Requesting User was blocked indefinitely. --Foreign Species (talk) 14:37, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:27, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
The picture doesn't show the actual status of the museum right now. Everything has developed since the making of this pic. It hurts the image of the museum drastically and destroys it's appearance to visitors. (members of the museum will upload new pictures soon if the old ones are deleted.) Thanks for helping us on this issue! Eygenart (talk) 19:24, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep trolling or vandalism mass deletion request. Info Requesting User was blocked indefinitely. --Foreign Species (talk) 14:36, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:27, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
The picture doesn't show the actual status of the museum right now. Everything has developed since the making of this pic. It hurts the image of the museum drastically and destroys it's appearance to visitors. (members of the museum will upload new pictures soon if the old ones are deleted.) Thanks for helping us on this issue! Eygenart (talk) 19:25, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Commons hosts old and outdated photos also to show history. Taivo (talk) 06:52, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep trolling or vandalism mass deletion request. Info Requesting User was blocked indefinitely. --Foreign Species (talk) 14:35, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:27, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
The picture doesn't show the actual status of the museum right now. Everything has developed since the making of this pic. It hurts the image of the museum drastically and destroys it's appearance to visitors. (members of the museum will upload new pictures soon if the old ones are deleted.) Thanks for helping us on this issue! Eygenart (talk) 19:25, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
DeleteKeep Commons hosts old and outdated photos also to show history. Taivo (talk) 06:51, 30 August 2016 (UTC)- Keepno reason for deletion. @Taivo: do you really mean vote-delete?--Wdwd (talk) 07:11, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
- My mistake, sorry. Taivo (talk) 07:12, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep trolling or vandalism mass deletion request. Info Requesting User was blocked indefinitely. --Foreign Species (talk) 14:35, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Per consensus, no need to continue this. ★ Poké95 07:59, 4 September 2016 (UTC) (non-admin close)
This image shows a wrong image of the museum. It transmitted, especially in Google search without any description a wrong impression. (It is more than 4 years old). The employees are hoping for a deletion, because it's such a wrong picture of their work. (You can see non historic stuff) Mors certa (talk) 09:39, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per previous DR resolved as Kept, and no newer and stronger reasons provided. --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:27, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep see my comment there (related DR). Holger1959 (talk) 10:35, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep DR by a suspected sockpuppet of Eygenart, and per keep consensus above.
I am going to rollback this troll's edits.Not for now --★ Poké95 11:25, 18 November 2016 (UTC) (non-admin closure)
Kept, anybody, who nominates the file for deletion again without new arguments, should be blocked. Taivo (talk) 10:54, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nordinhanane1989 (talk · contribs)
[edit]small files, no exif, unlikely to be own work. User has history of uploading copyvios
Dudek1337 (talk) 22:11, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:28, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
The PDF states "Copyright © 2015 ELVIS ROSAS" on the second page, and has a copyright warning directly below it. Additional proof is needed that the author relicensed their work. This file also appears to be out of scope; Commons is not a web host for ebooks. Sunmist (talk) 02:39, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:53, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vatty love (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, mysteriously watermarked. Per FBMD...
grabbed from Facebook.
Gunnex (talk) 05:52, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:55, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
http://www.ebay.ie/itm/Postcard-MODEL-OF-G-F-TRAINS-HORSE-TRAM-CAR-1861-/122085227996 Scanned postcard by Dixon-Lotus; unsure of year but looks like 1960s at oldest. No evidence for license. Carl Lindberg (talk) 05:53, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:55, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Scanned 1970ish UK postcard. Still under copyright, no evidence for license. Carl Lindberg (talk) 05:54, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:55, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
By Leonard Russell Squirrell (1893 - 1979). Copyrighted until 2050 in the UK. Carl Lindberg (talk) 06:04, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:56, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
These images seem to have been taken from a TV/computer screen, possibly from an advertisement or such. They are likely derivative works.
MKFI (talk) 07:50, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:56, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 10:31, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:38, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused, superseded by SVG. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 10:34, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: presence of SVG is not a reason to delete PNG. --Jcb (talk) 16:57, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 10:44, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:38, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation - metadata is a dead giveaway Malpass93 (talk) 22:54, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:00, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
corrupted image, not realistically useable so out of scope MPF (talk) 23:20, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:00, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:29, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:59, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Maiqronnachai (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal image
INeverCry 23:30, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:59, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gigolino24 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal image
INeverCry 23:34, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:59, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Inferior duplicate of File:Ленінська Кузня лого.png PsichoPuzo (talk) 23:38, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:59, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:41, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:58, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:42, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:58, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:46, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:58, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Дмитрий Хмелёв (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 23:48, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:58, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:21, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:22, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:23, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Homework; out of scope Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:23, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be transferred to content wikis in plain wikitext if useful Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:57, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:11, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. Rapsar (talk) 08:33, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted text. Rapsar (talk) 08:33, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:11, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 08:34, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:14, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 08:36, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:14, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 08:37, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:14, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 08:38, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:14, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo. Rapsar (talk) 08:51, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. --Jcb (talk) 17:14, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 08:54, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:14, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo. Rapsar (talk) 08:54, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:14, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Runaway Nightmare Ralph ending.jpg
- File:Cult girls sit looking at worm ranchers.jpg
- File:Runaway Nightmare Movie Marquee 02.jpg
- File:Losing the desert with five shots remaining.jpg
- File:Vampiria living portrait.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:15, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Fan photos, unlikely to be own work, no permission and EXIF data
- File:Shory Flores Photoshot 01.jpg
- File:Shory Flores Cute Selfie.jpg
- File:Shory Flores Photoshot Costa Rica.jpg
- File:René Flores 2016.jpg
- File:Shory Flores 2016.jpg
- File:Shory Flores on Summer Fan Fest 2015.jpg
Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:07, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:05, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Печкуров Алексей
[edit]Self-promotion, out of scope, possibly uploaded by a sock of User:Alex9777777. Pages on en:wp, ru.wp, be:wp are already deleted.
- File:Алексей Печкуров - 08.jpg
- File:Алексей Печкуров 01.jpg
- File:Алексей Печкуров 07.jpg
- File:Алексей Печкуров.jpg
- File:Печкуров Алексей - 23.jpg
- File:Печкуров Алесей.jpg
- File:Печкуров-Алексей.jpg
Achim (talk) 18:48, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Do not forget to delete the category itself.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:51, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, these are out of scope personal shots of a long term Wikipedia self-promotional spammer per this Wikipedia SPI. No usage outside of Wikipedia spam articles which are immediately speedy deleted. --McGeddon (talk) 15:33, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:04, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:12, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:03, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
User states they took it from a skype profile... That isn't fair use Zackmann08 (talk) 22:27, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:03, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:30, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:03, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:36, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:02, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 22:38, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:02, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 22:39, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:02, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:41, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:02, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:45, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:02, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:49, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:02, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:50, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:02, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Page put as source (http://www.internacionalsocialista.org/viewArticle.cfm?ArticleID=1858) doesn't mention any alleged licence, so it couldn't be determined the licence of their images as CC0 1.0 Sfs90 (talk) 22:51, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:01, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:51, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:01, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:52, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:01, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:54, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:01, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:06, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:01, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:08, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:01, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Claim of "own work" does not seem plausible because the same image can be seen used online on numerous websites such as here and here well before being uploaded to Commons. No EXIF data being provided and the angle (altitude) the image appears to have been taken at also seem to indicate this is not "own work". 173.55.239.44 02:50, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:25, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:KellenClemens8-6-2013.jpg 173.55.239.44 03:15, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:26, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Wrong image uploaded by user 173.55.239.44 03:17, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 17:27, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
carlos carrera Tvecuador (talk) 04:21, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:27, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
1980s postcard, nowhere near copyright expired Carl Lindberg (talk) 04:25, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:27, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Secondarywaltz as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: This image is of such low quality as not to be realistically useful for educational purposes. It is out of project scope. INeverCry 04:30, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Speedydelete – fake author and fake source. Also it's total crap. --jdx Re: 05:21, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:27, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Photo by Inge Morath, died 2002. Carl Lindberg (talk) 04:33, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:28, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
1960 UK postcard; still under copyright Carl Lindberg (talk) 04:35, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:28, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
1950s postcard is still under copyright in the UK Carl Lindberg (talk) 04:38, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:28, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Agnjasddgilogdsag (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.newcarselloff.com/content/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/ven.jpg.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:17, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:16, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alesoria21 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos and book cover. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Libro "Nuestra Señora de Lourdes".jpg
- File:Delfina Vidal de Mitre.jpg
- File:Carmen Miguens de Avellaneda.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:16, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.goldflakepaint.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/roo.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:16, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dani Tempest (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Dani Tempest 7.22.2016.jpg
- File:Naughty Christmas.png
- File:Dani Tempest 9-01-2015.png
- File:Dani Tempest.JPG
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:15, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Blatant copyvio - extract from magazine Arjayay (talk) 16:26, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:18, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Blatant copyvio - extract from magazine Arjayay (talk) 16:26, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:18, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Seriesphile (talk · contribs)
[edit]Facebook source for these images, not own work o fuploader.
- File:Kevin Young 2016 (cropped).jpg
- File:Alex Galindo 2016 (cropped).jpg
- File:Ramón Clemente 2016.jpg
- File:Alex Galindo 2016.jpg
- File:Kevin Young 2016.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:31, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- I uploaded these three images because the owner (Karen Marie Orsini) gave me permission to do it same as the other image you deleted. I never violated anything. Seriesphile (talk) 08:44, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: please send permission to OTRS. --Jcb (talk) 17:17, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
unused personal images : out of scope
Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:03, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:24, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused, 217 followers; Youtube's layout may be copyrighted. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 19:47, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:25, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Photo by Henri Cartier Bresson, died 2004. Carl Lindberg (talk) 04:43, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:37, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Not the author's own work, missing data from the file. Edjoerv (talk) 05:10, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:39, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Per http://historydaily.org/vintage-christmastime-photos/, this is 1948, which means it's still under copyright in the UK. Getty Images is credited, from a UK archive. They credit "Warburton", meaning it could be by John Warburton, who died 2004. Carl Lindberg (talk) 05:12, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:40, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
1950s UK postcard; still under copyright there Carl Lindberg (talk) 05:13, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:40, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
1972 UK postcard; still under copyright Carl Lindberg (talk) 05:21, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:40, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
By Monica Rawlins (1903 - 1990); still under copyright. Carl Lindberg (talk) 05:43, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:40, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
1968 UK postcard; still under copyright Carl Lindberg (talk) 05:44, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:41, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Appears to be scanned from a printed source; 1970s UK photograph, still under copyright. Carl Lindberg (talk) 05:48, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:42, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 07:28, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:43, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 07:30, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:42, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
The image is taken from here. There is no sign that shows content of the website or that image is a public domain. Rapsar (talk) 07:32, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I found no other copyright message in the forum than "Copyright © 2000–2006 ASPPlayground.NET". Taivo (talk) 18:35, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:44, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Derivative works of paintings. They might be in public domain but we would need to know who the artist was.
MKFI (talk) 07:55, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:43, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Commons:Fair use is not allowed. This image might be in public domain but from the information it is hard to be certain. MKFI (talk) 07:56, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:45, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gabriel12and (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Gabriel12and (serial copyright violator, file cropper). Last remaining files.
Gunnex (talk) 11:45, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:36, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 11:48, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:36, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope KDS4444 (talk) 12:50, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:35, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope KDS4444 (talk) 12:52, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Jcb (talk) 17:35, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Where is the permission? 181.43.3.236 13:02, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Where it says "permission" twice. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:46, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: assuming that User:MauriceX is indeed Maurice Sparrow. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:21, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope. Promotional image. Poppy Bros Sr (talk) 13:25, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:36, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. montage is missing links to media used from Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 01:32, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, lacks of sources. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:22, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIO. This was deleted before for lack of sources, now reuploaded. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:32, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:32, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:05, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:33, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:28, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:33, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Proof is needed that the uploader has created the logo or has permission to share it under a free license. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 21:03, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:33, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Personal image; not used for educational purposes. 1989 (talk) 21:16, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:34, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Personal image; not used for educational purposes. 1989 (talk) 21:16, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:34, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Personal image; not used for educational purposes. 1989 (talk) 21:20, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:33, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Personal image; not used for educational purposes. 1989 (talk) 21:25, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:33, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo. Rapsar (talk) 08:57, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:45, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 09:45, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:52, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 10:12, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:46, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 10:47, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:45, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
PowerSuite is a non-notable thing, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:55, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:45, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
None of these images appear to be own work of uploader. Some are historical and with proper information might be able to be retained. COM:EVID requires that the information be given by the uploader.
- File:PROTEC 1979.jpg
- File:Otto Hüni.jpg
- File:HÜNI Stand auf der IBO 1953.jpg
- File:HÜNI Luftbild 1959.jpg
- File:HÜNI-Anwesen im Jahr 1889.jpg
- File:Portrait Hans Heinrich Hüni.jpg
- File:Portrait Otto P. W. Hüni.jpg
- File:Luftaufnahme HÜNI + CO.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:04, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Every single picture is own work of the uploader. All rights are with the Hüni Family/Company. This account is officially managed by the Hüni family/company. You can see the verficiation on this page: Huenico --Huenico (talk) 08:37, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
- COM:EVID... The actual source of each image is needed. No user alive today created anything in 1889 and stayed alive to create in 1979 and is still alive in 2016, so the claim that all pictures are own work of uploader are not possible to be true. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:43, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
- Okay. I changed the description of every picture. The owner of the copyrights is Hüni GmbH + Co. KG from Friedrichshafen. The administrator of this account is Hüni GmbH + Co. KG from Friedrichshafen as well. No person can live longer than probably 100 years, but this company is founded 1859, so it is possible that all pictures are "own work of the uploader". "Michael Gunz" is just the photographer. --Huenico (talk) 06:45, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
- For the photo/s by Michael Gunz, we'd need COM:OTRS permission from the photographer. Nothing on those files shows that the copyright is held by a company other than what you changed. What is needed is the source of the photos themselves, not whose file cabinet they came out of. Did you copy from books, from the web, what are the sources of these images, they don't exist in a vacuum without description, source and creator. Sorry but the company did not create all these images. They may own copies, but they did not create them. Please read COM:L if you are unclear on the licensing concepts. This kind of mass upload from old files would be fine on the company Facebook page, Commons respects copyright and to offer free hosting for pictures demands free license. There is no way to guarantee that on these photos as they are now. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:09, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:48, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
copyright violation El Funcionario (talk) 16:08, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:48, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
copyright violation El Funcionario (talk) 16:08, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:48, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Screenshot without any context, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:29, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:49, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Commons is not for promoting/publishing own artwork, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:33, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:49, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused and unusable photo of a non-descript group of people, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:38, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:50, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Promotional image (see username) 1989 (talk) 21:26, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:50, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Promotional image. 1989 (talk) 22:04, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:50, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Personal image; not used for educational purposes. 1989 (talk) 22:05, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:50, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Taken from http://maryamtaqi.co.uk/p383989445/h7a283fc0#h7a283fc0 MKFI (talk) 07:44, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 18:13, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:56, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope.
- File:Vertical AccessSelling Best Home Elevators in Wilmington NC Areas1.jpg
- File:Get Perfect Quality Residential Elevators in Myrtle Beach Area.jpg
Ies (talk) 14:58, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 19:56, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Facu Kuman (talk · contribs)
[edit]Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 15:04, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:57, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Looks like a prank to me. jdx Re: 05:37, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:58, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
This image was posted on a computer wallpaper website in 2013, and never released to the general public for any sort of use. Rather it was released "for personal use on computer screens only". See http://wallpaperweb.org/wallpaper/darkart/3d-fantasy-places-hd_47798.htm. The reverse image search site TinEye says that they crawled this specific wallpaperweb.org page in December 2013.[1] Binksternet (talk) 06:50, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note that the image as uploaded here has been made larger in height by mirror image of the bottom area. This is not enough of a change to make it someone else's "own work". Binksternet (talk) 06:54, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Historical map without any sources. Rapsar (talk) 07:27, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
historic picture so clearly not öwn work" as claimed by uploader. No photographer given MoiraMoira (talk) 07:27, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- MoiraMoira, https://translate.google.ru/ "Торжественные мероприятия в честь 75-летнего юбилея союзных конвоев "Дервиш-75" в городе Северодвинске. " Но спасибо, значит стилизовано отлично. А вообще [вот]. --S, AV 07:31, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Ymblanter, скажите ему, плис, что это реконструкция событий, а то у чела явно с Гуглом беда. --S, AV 07:38, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- The uploader says this is not a historic picture, but a picture of a modern reconstruction event. No reason to not believe him.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:22, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per Ymblanter. --INeverCry 00:14, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- also file:DJCARLOS BERETTA.jpg
Non-notable people (no mention neither in en.wiki nor in es.wiki), out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 07:32, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted image. Rapsar (talk) 07:33, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation. Looks like a professional publicity shot. MKFI (talk) 07:41, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Historical map without source. Rapsar (talk) 07:45, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
No EXIF, image used as Youtube profile image: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHYv2c-oO8IP9VG7KWF5x5g MKFI (talk) 07:47, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
COM:ADVERT: useless catalogue/advertiser Lacrymocéphale (talk) 07:51, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
COM:ADVERT Lacrymocéphale (talk) 07:52, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Uploader has stated that s/he has waived rights to the image, but appears not to be in a position to do so, unless in the unlikely event s/he is the owner of the company that published the magazine YSSYguy (talk) 07:52, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation: incorrect date, subject and photographer claimed to be the same person. MKFI (talk) 07:52, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
File:Model of the Mausoleum of Halicarnassus, constructed for King Mausolus during the mid-4th century BC at Halicarnassus in Caria, Bodrum, Turkey (17362934180) (2).jpg
[edit]We have the corrected version of the file and this one is not being used. Rapsar (talk) 08:55, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Upload date to Panoramio at March 18, 2008. But the image was used in here in 2007. Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 09:01, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Wiki is not a host for selfies. Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:18, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Logo unser free license. Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 09:18, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:World War II memorials in Republika Srpska Smooth_O (talk) 09:37, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
'Commons:Screenshots are a type of Commons:Derivative works' of copyrighted content Tokorokoko (talk) 09:38, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Previously published at http://www.daf-tv.com/%C3%BCber-uns/ without a free license. --ghouston (talk) 09:55, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
It's obviously an official photo (as point of view testifies), low-res, no meta, user with a single upload Shivanarayana (talk) 10:05, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused, bad quality, tilted. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:08, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:14, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Unidentified, maybe non-notable people. I suspect out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:19, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Not public domain in the USA, because its copyright in Japan had not expired before the URAA restoration date. --ghouston (talk) 10:22, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Per Flickr, the photo is made in Hyatt Regency Orlando hotel. There is no freedom of panorama in USA for 2-dimensional art. Taivo (talk) 11:22, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused art of non-notable artist, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:44, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Cropped version of this sign but totally useless and is not being used. Rapsar (talk) 12:03, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
There is not any organisation named "Habertürk Euro". Unused personal image, out of project's scope. Rapsar (talk) 12:28, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Content that is posted with the intention of causing damage, or with the intention of threatening, harassing, or attacking another person. Виолетова (talk) 12:53, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
En event of a non-notable organisation. Can be considered as a personal image, out of project's scope. Rapsar (talk) 12:54, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Logo can't be own or free. Spamer's contribution. Bilderling (talk) 13:22, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Logo can't be own or free. Spamer's contribution. Bilderling (talk) 13:22, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
According to https://www.tineye.com/search/a3cd91b631cc3ddc8ad76cd8e8d230ac14f8ccef/?sort=size and usertalk page thi is cropped version of File:Accept_stage.png, which was uploaded without permission. So license seems suspected. 109.172.98.69 13:28, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Inferior duplicate of File:Ukraine Vice Admiral shoulderboard.svg PsichoPuzo (talk) 13:57, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Inferior duplicate of File:Ukraine Counter Admiral shoulderboard.svg PsichoPuzo (talk) 13:58, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks. Alexander Roumega (talk) 14:07, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello This logo is pulled(fired) by the official site of Samsung, if this one is deleted(eliminated), all the others logo of the other smartphones of Samsung because all are pulled(fired) directly or indirectly of Samsung Oclon
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - image in use. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:02, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:03, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.testimoniosparalahistoria.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/1-Alfonso-Mellado.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:04, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:04, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cq1XR0vVMAAzIL2.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:05, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
This is a logo of a Olympics candidature, fairly unlikely to actually be an "own work". en:File:Polek balso berange.png is the same file under fair use. Another logo upload by this user was deleted. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 14:32, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:05, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from software screenshot. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:06, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
test ! vidéo à intégrer avec notre compte professionnel Cned Accessibilité Mdia12 (talk) 14:42, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
test ! image à intégrer avec notre compte professionnel Cned Accessibilité Mdia12 (talk) 14:43, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- also file:Jesus-candelas-iran-2.png
Small photos without metadata, the user's last remaining photos. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 14:49, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - https://jesuscandelas.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/candelas.png. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:07, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Bonjour, j'aimerai que cette photo soit supprimée, merci. 83.205.224.41 14:57, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
No evidence, that author Joerg Jakobs and uploader Flugakrobat are the same person. Small photo without camera data, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 15:00, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Possibly {{PD-textlogo}}, otherwise unused and out of scope Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:03, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:11, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:25, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:11, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:27, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:11, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Buit by architect. No freedom of panorama in France 194.199.4.201 15:29, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
"Built by architect" any proof of this ?? Maitre So (talk) 22:26, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:12, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:32, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:12, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Masterzatak (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:COPYVIOs... Advertising flyers rephotographed are not own work.
- File:Nayakanahatti-jathre-invite-program-overview.jpg
- File:Gangamma-Jathra-Karaga-Festival-Program.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:36, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi Ellin, the two files in question are indeed 'non commercial' public invitation flyers printed by the temple managements, which I have photographed.
These flyers are for events that have already been concluded earlier this year and they are only for contextual reference.
Since the two festivals (for which these flyers are printed.) are important religious festivals that are several decades (if not centuries) old, they evolve year on year (number of days, events etc. keep changing.), there should be some references to capture what was the event like at some points in time.
For example, for the Nayakanahatti festival, there is not much reference available in terms of what were the events like even a few years ago; and most of the information is relegated to orally transmitted history, that cannot be verified.
Even the flyers themselves may no longer available for the previous years, since they are not archived anywhere. (I could trace out only the current year's flyers.)
Please do not delete these two files as they are quite useful in capturing the overview of the festivals at least for the most recently completed ones. (From 2016.)
The two images add context and are relevant to the articles where I have used them. Please do not delete.
--Masterzatak (talk) 16:41, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:13, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Notice overprinting at top left of image showing source to be www.qbc.at, not uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:40, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:13, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIOs: A series of credit, club, access and business cards all claimed as own work and all obviously not.
- File:Famima T Card.jpeg
- File:Rakuten edy.jpeg
- File:WAON POINT CARD 2.jpeg
- File:Japan Net Bank Famima T Card.jpeg
- File:CooCa.jpeg
- File:Orico Prepaid Card VISA.jpg
- File:Au WALLET.jpg
- File:Osaifu Ponta JCB.jpg
- File:Orico Caed VISA.jpg
- File:Senir nanaco.jpg
- File:COCOKARA CLUB CARD 1.jpg
- File:Softbank card black 1.jpg
- File:HMV GOLD MEMBER`S CARD.jpeg
- File:Suica2.jpg
- File:Nanaco minatomirai ver.jpg
- File:RAKUTEN BANK JCB DEBIT CARD.jpg
- File:B-CAS CARD 4.jpg
- File:B-CAS CARD YELLOW 2.jpg
- File:Mini B-CAS CARD WHITE & BLUE.jpg
- File:B-CAS CARD mini 店頭用.jpg
- File:B-CAS CARD mini RED.jpg
- File:BLACK CAS.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:25, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
It's not an own work by the uploader. It's a derivative work of the picture by an anonymous child. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:28, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Not "own work", please see with highest resolution: https://www.google.com/search?q=софия+блэк+д+элиа&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSnQEJOE-RnsJQjFkakQELEKjU2AQaCggACAMIFwg9CEMMCxCwjKcIGmIKYAgDEij4BLUZ1g7TDvYE1A7JDrYZ6BrYDuol8zDrMMkxhjGDMfQwhTGHMcYxGjBrFraqO8S9iNe0_1pWUDXOw_165qL6lxBWkwafSSwh5LTLKSp-rUWSPuyZfPkCDxB4ogBAwLEI6u_1ggaCgoICAESBNgSB1MM&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiv3aDVhefOAhUmApoKHfp2ALoQ2A4IGigB#imgrc=LwnQa9VTAl8pbM%3A Cap1000 (talk) 16:30, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
This is a routine request for a tiny blurry image with no metadata. Please provide a larger size image of same, or provide accurate source for image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:35, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
To retain this image, permission is needed not only from the photographer, but from the painter/heirs to painter who died in 2007. However this image is dated 2016, so it is possibly a rephotograph of another image (as suggested by odd black border). Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:38, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Permission from the heirs needs to follow the process at COM:OTRS. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:34, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Tehre is nothing to indicate the age of this image, or that the "work was made available to the public more than 50 years ago". Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:39, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Where is the indication that the heirs to this painter released his works to public domain? Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:40, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation – the description says it is a performance from about 2000, so even if it’s PD in Columbia, it is probably copyrighted in US (note that US tag is missing). Polyna V. (talk) 17:05, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:12, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted Logo Nahid Hossain (talk) 17:32, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused selfie. Poppy Bros Sr (talk) 17:32, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Handemiyyy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Per FBMD...
grabbed from Facebook , like File:Burcu Özberk.jpg --> https://www.facebook.com/burcuozberkfanpage/photos/a.1612196422352681.1073741825.1612195665686090/1700699116835744/?type=1&theater (02.03.2016)
Gunnex (talk) 17:37, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Being used in various projects without problems. Please do not delete without a sound basis. --E4024 (talk) 08:46, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
No camera EXIF; large pixels (suggest compression for web); "Dick John Alcantara" watermark just below horizon on right side (apparently a professional photogrpaher for PowerShot Photography); all other skyline images of Philippian cities uploaded by this user deleted as copyios (see user talk/deleted contribs); user currently blocked for copyvios; Quack? Эlcobbola talk 18:05, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
This is a press photo, highly unlikely to be the work of the uploader, very likely re-uploaded from another website. Lacking EXIF. Aero777 (talk) 18:27, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
This is a press photo, highly unlikely to be the work of the uploader, very likely re-uploaded from another website. Lacking EXIF. Aero777 (talk) 18:29, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
This is a press photo, highly unlikely to be the work of the uploader, very likely re-uploaded from another website. Lacking EXIF. Aero777 (talk) 18:31, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
This photo is widely used across multiple 'rent a supercar' websites. Highly likely that it has been re-uploaded from one of them. Aero777 (talk) 18:37, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Claimed as PD because "Image was released by the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (a government agency)" - this is presumably a state rather than federal agency and in any case this is probably a family photo so they would not be the copyright holders. January (talk) 18:51, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Professional looking image of notable person (actress); web resolution; no camera EXIF; clearly same photoshoot as here; all other user uploads copyvios, including related to this person. Duck copyvio. Эlcobbola talk 19:12, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
OTRS-permission from copyright holder Anu Productions is needed. The file is not speedily deleted, because it has been 5 years in Commons. Taivo (talk) 19:28, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
COM:DW - photo of a photo and recreation in spirit of deleted File:Eloise Kruger.jpg. Эlcobbola talk 19:43, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Multichill as no permission (No permission since). Raised to DR for the record. Unlikely to be a good keep rationale. Fæ (talk) 19:59, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
No License Omaislam (talk) 20:49, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Personal image; not used for educational purposes. 1989 (talk) 21:37, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Personal image; not used for educational purposes. 1989 (talk) 21:41, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Personal image; not used for educational purposes. 1989 (talk) 21:45, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Personal image; not used for educational purposes. 1989 (talk) 21:46, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
not used for educational purposes. 1989 (talk) 21:51, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
not used for educational purposes. 1989 (talk) 21:52, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
not used for educational purposes. 1989 (talk) 21:55, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
not used for educational purposes. 1989 (talk) 21:56, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
watermarked picture, doubt it's own work by the uploader Dudek1337 (talk) 22:00, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Doubt it's own work. Looks like professional work and there is no EXIF. Can't find the photo anywhere though Dudek1337 (talk) 22:04, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
A cropped version of this image was in use on 2 February 2014, prior to the upload date https://www.htr.ch/leute---events/schweizer-ex-hyatt-chef-fred-huerst-wird-partner-der-mrp-schweiz--38180.html. At source it has "(Image: zvg)" but as this image was not yet on WikiCommons, I am asking for clarification of source. There is no metadata on the Commons image and the date of it is given as 4 February 2014 which would be after first publication of Part of the Image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:45, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:15, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Потому, что таких файлов, почему то оказалось два. 109.252.61.107 15:47, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:15, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused smaller version of File:Peaches Geldof and Andy Wernig.JPG (also unused). Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:47, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
This file is not own work of uploader, notice :Source Udo Janßen Author Udo Janßen Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:50, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
This file is not the own work of the uploader, notice :Source Strauss & Partner / QBC Author Strauss & Partner / QBC: Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:51, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Not own work of uploader, notice :Source Strauss & Partner / QBC Author Strauss & Partner / QBC: Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:53, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
This painting doesn't look like own work, more information is needed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:55, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Only ten page views so far this year, and it has been replaced by other categories. (see: Category:Disneyland Railroad and Category:Rail transport in Walt Disney Parks and Resorts). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackdude101 (talk • contribs)
- Keep: No need to delete this redirect. --Achim (talk) 20:03, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:18, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Really bad quality, we have much more better photos from the same angle. C messier (talk) 20:57, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Am I the only to see black stripes at preview? I opened it at full resolution and they were gone! (which means that it stands a chance to be kept). --C messier (talk) 20:59, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Apparently something is wrong with the thumbnail generator, the original file is fine. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:29, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
This image is not own work, but is one by W. Gircke photographer which are claimed to be owned by Getty Images. As this image has no souce, and one source which comes up online is http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/cornelius-peter-carl-august-24-12-1824-26-10-1874-news-photo/541050649#cornelius-peter-carl-august-2412182426101874komponist-dichter-d-od-picture-id541050649 and another is http://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-cornelius-peter-24121824-26101874-german-composer-portrait-glasses-27956003.html. Since two major stock companies each claim license on this image, I'd like to know the actual source of the one shown here for clarity... because for sure it is not own work as the subject died an extremely long time ago. Uploader is a new user urged to read COM:L before making more uploads. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:20, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Keep picture is more than 100 years old! Getty pictures claiming copyright on public domain works is copyfraud. --173.55.239.44 02:31, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: picture has been taken no later than 1874, probably earlier, so I think we can safely assume the author has died more than 70 years ago. --Jcb (talk) 16:13, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Turnless as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The user who uploaded this file made it identical to File:Europe-Georgia.svg excpet without the partially-recognized states which were there on the other file for NPOV reasons. He later started POV pushing by globally replacing the old NPOV file with his new one which goes against Wikipedia NPOV policy that the old file was there for. Please delete this file to prevent the user from continuing POV pushing. INeverCry 18:55, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Commons is not censored. --Jcb (talk) 16:16, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Model from a game (only the texture is original), no indication this is free. Same goes for all other uploads from the user. FunkMonk (talk) 19:06, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Keep file was checked by an admin not a bot. --173.55.239.44 21:02, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: the license check was done correctly, but the video at youtube seems to be a copyright violation. The game is apparently non-free. --Jcb (talk) 16:24, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
File:Mass grave soldiers which perished during the liberation of the village Yasnogorodka (Ukraine) in 1943.jpg
[edit]No Panorama Freedom in Ukraine, sorry A.Savin 20:44, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Sculpture in the photo is one of many hundreds of copies of the identical monuments that have been installed at the Soviet period on numerous mass graves of the World War II on the territory of the former Soviet UnionI --Ввласенко (talk) 06:32, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
- Ukrainian copyright law applies to works of art (including sculpture), but does not apply to mass copies of works of art produced by the factory method, the authorship of which cannot be determined. --Ввласенко (talk) 04:14, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:21, 5 September 2016 (UTC)