Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/07/31

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 31st, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm unable to find any indication that this image is freely licensed. I processed OTRS ticket#: ticket:2016070810007392, and while I can't go into any detail due to confidentiality, permission seems unlikely to be forthcoming. BU Rob13 (talk) 03:57, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation. --Sealle (talk) 05:43, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio : Copyrit belongs to Nicki Minaj (Instagram image) — Sincerely Issimo 15 19:56, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 19:57, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:RSun0525

[edit]

RSun0525 picking up Lego Architectures images from around the web regardless copyrights and upload them under CC BY-SA 4.0. When it's attributed to brickset, Brickset attributes it to LEGO Group; When attributed to lego.com, it's sometime fan/blog images; author field is a mess.

Best regards, --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 14:12, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedily. Images of 3D objects, attributed to websites that do not use compatible licenses, and thus copyright violations. COM:PRP applies, even if one or two don't actually belong to the stated source (which is unlikely). --Reventtalk 00:09, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this fashion drawing which is signed up the leg of the left figure. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:43, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can you delete this pic please. It was a test because another pic (that I have permissions to share) was purposed to be deleted. Now I have understand what I have to do 🙏🏻 --Bx67212 (talk) 16:37, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: uploader request. --INeverCry 21:48, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is my image and i did not upload it to this website. 84.26.11.8 16:38, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Another crop of this image can be found here (published in Sep 2015). So this image qualifies foe {{Speedy}}, IMO. Ankry (talk) 20:39, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: speedy, copyright violation. --Didym (talk) 23:12, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, used for vandalism only. MSJapan (talk) 20:22, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: It's also a copyright violation as the character is owned the media company that created it. ~ Zirguezi 21:14, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Speedily, as a COM:DW of material copyrighted by Cartoon Network. --Reventtalk 23:12, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

recent building, no FoP in France Bloody-libu (talk) 17:40, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is in Liège in Belgium. Belgium has FoP since 15 July 2016, see here. Ymnes (talk) 17:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, we can cancel this deletion request, it was not specified on file description on French Wikipedia. Bloody-libu (talk) 04:29, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, see above. Bloody-libu (talk) 04:29, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope & useless; Promotional; Maybe copyrighted; Use an image that can be found in several contexts like here, here or here Lacrymocéphale (talk) 11:39, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio, derivative work of http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-203283577/stock-photo-excited-happy-businessman-standing-under-dollar-s-rain-and-looking-up.html?src=ijRP6Q5qIkX8I6864nb-ew-1-25 . --Achim (talk) 14:32, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PDF file with a password, not educationally useful and out of scope. Sunmist3 (talk) 02:56, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Magog the Ogre: Out of scope / copyright violation

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing stereochemistry at methyl, as tagged. en:Dorzolamide is about a single stereoisomer and have File:Dorzolamide.svg of it. DMacks (talk) 03:50, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for tagging this image. I've uploaded an updated version with the correct stereochemistry. --Ben (talk) 09:23, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: New image addresses nominator's concern. Ed (Edgar181) 19:30, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: (c) at source, Tafila Technical University 2016 me I see a CC BY-SA 3.0 license Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:11, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arts1.jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:51, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:19, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: (c) at source, Tafila Technical University 2016 me I see a CC BY-SA 3.0 license Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:12, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arts1.jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:50, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:19, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: (c) at source, Tafila Technical University 2016 me I see a CC BY-SA 3.0 license Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:12, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Christian Ferrer: I went back to the pages and found that my browser was putting a dark bar over the license, but that Firefox browser did not do that. I've now replaced the old browser with Firefox permanently because this can't happen again. I withdraw this and all the others of the same situation. Please close all these as keep. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:49, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:19, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 1989 as no permission (No permission since), I reviewed this and I remember it, the source was ok, and such a licensing is irrevocable even if the source have been changed, I think maybe Ellin Beltz can remember too. For me the licensing is ok, in the extend the file is in scope of course. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:56, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:36, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: (c) at source, Tafila Technical University 2016 me I see a CC BY-SA 3.0 license Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:12, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arts1.jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:51, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:19, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: (c) at source, Tafila Technical University 2016 me I see a CC BY-SA 3.0 license Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:13, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arts1.jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:51, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:20, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

debo cambiarlo Salsaenlacalle (talk) 00:19, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:03, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is another file with the same name, so I cannot link this one. Nomdeploom (talk) 00:21, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: local file should be renamed to make way for this one. --INeverCry 00:04, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bkbeltgal images

[edit]

Bkbeltgal uploaded all of these images and claimed they were "own works". This seems highly implausible, as File:George & Nellie Welsh, Bermuda 1906.jpg was created in 1906. Without more details, we can't know that these are available under a free license. --BU Rob13 (talk) 00:52, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The 1906 image, if verified as such will make it public domain. SYSS Mouse (talk) 00:11, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cheap knockoff of an image that isn't even the real logo Suzukaze-c (talk) 01:11, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a copy of the legitimate icon of UTAU. The image present here on Commons is a shoddy imitation of an icon that can be seen in [1], an icon used to represent a portion of the software (compare images [2], [3].) It's like using an MS Paint prism to depict Pink Floyd. Suzukaze-c (talk) 03:28, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. --INeverCry 00:05, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very unlikely "own work". It looks like scanned from a newspaper's picture. Low quality; low resolution; not exif, no metadata. Regards Ganímedes (talk) 01:37, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of a defunct website, not useful for any educational purpose, likely promotional Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 01:54, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image of Mark Hamill from The Force Awakens. TAnthony (talk) 02:46, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment I think it might be best if we just discuss these three images, and any more that are uploaded here, in one place. My response is going to be the same, virtually, for all of them, and honestly, I think a speedy deletion might've been appropriate anyway. The Millionth One (talk) 02:58, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is actually under the CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 license. (see https://www.flickr.com/photos/42264328@N00/2827309845) Sunmist3 (talk) 02:52, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The cover of a literary magazine, which is copyrighted per the website in the link given. There's not much to protect on the cover, but it's still copyrighted. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 03:46, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leonews425 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Paintings of a living person: https://plus.google.com/109261701991852768118/posts/JGS8z83bxxL. There is a chance that the uploader is also the author, but there is no proof of this at the moment.

jdx Re: 04:56, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Martin Nijum (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images, doesn't seem to be notable.

--ghouston (talk) 05:12, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images used only on 2x promotional 'userpage articles' on the English Wikipedia (nominated for speedy deletion, now) with a low likelihood of being in scope.... the name of the Guru 'at issue' has no Google hits other than the file pages of these images.

Reventtalk 05:42, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-trivial logo - permission aka OTRS ticket required 2003:45:5C6F:A801:69EE:B8DE:774B:3B32 05:42, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own" work (looks like a photomontage) 2003:45:5C6F:A801:69EE:B8DE:774B:3B32 05:45, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Temkabbath (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious "own" works without EXIF

2003:45:5C6F:A801:69EE:B8DE:774B:3B32 05:52, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file 2003:45:5C6F:A801:69EE:B8DE:774B:3B32 06:15, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sbs zipper (talk · contribs)

[edit]

OTRS tickets required

2003:45:5C6F:A801:69EE:B8DE:774B:3B32 06:17, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious"own" work, see https://twitter.com/abogadofreddy 2003:45:5C6F:A801:69EE:B8DE:774B:3B32 06:33, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file 2003:45:5C6F:A801:69EE:B8DE:774B:3B32 06:35, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file 2003:45:5C6F:A801:69EE:B8DE:774B:3B32 06:50, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Own work" 2003:45:5C6F:A801:69EE:B8DE:774B:3B32 07:03, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sixtynine band (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious "own" works (small resolutions, no EXIF)

2003:45:5C6F:A801:69EE:B8DE:774B:3B32 07:07, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original uploader, Fengxianjin said that this photo is their own work, even though there is a watermark saying "Photo by K. Singer". This was also discussed on the enwiki talk page of this file, but no one cared. Per COM:PRP, OTRS permission is needed from K. Singer. Poké95 07:14, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Fixertool (talk) 07:25, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission from the photographer. Image was uploaded by the subject (Mari Kim). Random86 (talk) 07:38, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. MKFI (talk) 08:18, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused image of unknown person. Esprit Fugace (talk) 08:35, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в лицензии. Дата создания оригинального фото неизвестно Dogad75 (talk) 09:24, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в лицензии. Дата оригинального фото неизвестно Dogad75 (talk) 09:24, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 09:25, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 09:25, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 09:25, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 09:25, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 09:25, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в лицензии. Дата создания фото, автор неизвестны Dogad75 (talk) 09:26, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в лицензии. Дата фото неизвестно, нет разрешения на указанную лицензию Dogad75 (talk) 09:27, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Non notable individual. Unused. Uploaders only contribution. DavidIvar (talk) 09:29, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low resolution image with dubious COM:SCOPE eligibility. Also, I don't think this image is the uploader's own work; people don't embed this level of details into such a small resolution for Commons. It is likely cropped and cut from somewhere unreferenced. Codename Lisa (talk) 09:37, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

is this an official logo and if yes, for what (maybe for this)? what is the licence of the backgound picture? and i can't see the notibility for that picture, maybe its a private one? Queryzo (talk) 09:43, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fan poster Queryzo (talk) 09:49, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low file resolution and missing exif, might be copyright violation Queryzo (talk) 10:02, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems to be a movie still and may be copyrighted Queryzo (talk) 10:05, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems to be copyrighted movie still Queryzo (talk) 10:06, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I remember that I nominated exactly the same photo for deletion, and it was deleted, and now the same user just reuploaded it. --C messier (talk) 13:07, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this might be a copyrighted logo Queryzo (talk) 10:10, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this might be a copyrighted logo Queryzo (talk) 10:10, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely authorship claims based on the extremely low resolution and the uploader's history. Also: unauthorised derivative of copyrighted trophy. LX (talk, contribs) 10:27, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely authorship claims based on the low resolution, missing metadata, the uploader's history and previous publications found elsewhere four and a half months before the uploader claims to have created it. LX (talk, contribs) 10:27, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Either it's PD or it's a copyvio, but it most certainly is not the flickr user's own work. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:40, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not taken by himslef, nad exist on the net in several places already Yger (talk) 12:06, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flawed-missing pages; Dup of correctly uploaded file File:Life and Select Literary Remains of Sam Houston of Texas (1884).djvu Maile66 (talk) 12:29, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for sculptures. A.Savin 12:36, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The microphone in front of her face and the angle of the photo and pose, combined with shadows, make it hard to see what she looks like (which is the main reason we'd probably want an image like this).

This isn't helped by the sensor's poor handling of the light and dark areas, and the image quality is in general extremely poor. (Is this a still from video footage?)

This is the only image we have of this person (though it's not clear how famous she is); if we had another, this would almost definitely warrant deletion, but it's less clear-cut in this case.

However, I consider the quality on the borderline of usability regardless. And as I've already said elsewhere, too many of the uploader's images are like this (i.e. it's not a one-off) and I'm wary of giving the impression that this sort of image quality is "okay", full stop.

Ubcule (talk) 13:03, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files by Geo087

[edit]

Some of them are small, without EXIF data. The others with EXIF data show many different cameras that it is difficult to think that they all belonged to the user (a Canon DSLR, a Nikon DSLR, a Sony DSLR, and few compacts). Possible copyvios. --C messier (talk) 12:57, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

WIkimedia is not social media or a webhost for personal images Takeaway (talk) 13:31, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nikhil2525 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Daniel alves teixeira (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from web site screenshot. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JiNej (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from commercial packaging. Should be blanked/cropped to keep.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sarahelizabethsec (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/740031558485217280/2KNbbSFP_bigger.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from web site screenshot. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is in en.wiki (en:file:UnionLaCaleraBadge.svg), de.wiki (de:Datei:Unión La Calera.svg), fr.wiki (fr:Fichier:Unión La Calera.jpg) and ru.wiki (ru:Файл:Union La Calera.png) as fair use. We must decide, does the file surpass threshold of originality or not. Taivo (talk) 14:33, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Senorjoseedinaguit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yasarjose (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.elpais.com.co/elpais/sites/default/files/2014/12/jag-campeon-1-2014.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hamid Haouzi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aldecy Oliveira Campos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Giovanni.leon.100001 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial flags of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Daniel Silva Mendanha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://rcmetalicas.com.br/extra-images/14/Capela-Presbiteriana003.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Either PD or a copyvio, but certainly not flickr user's own work. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:50, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Russia for artworks. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Public domain I, the copyright holder of this work, release this work into the public domain. This applies worldwide.
In some countries this may not be legally possible; if so:
I grant anyone the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law.
Abrikoss (talk) 15:11, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by LIMO 5 (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://www.flickr.com/photos/26714704@N08/3487400134/.

List of files

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by LIMO 5 (talk · contribs) 2

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by LIMO 5 (talk · contribs) 3

Appear to be Google Street View images

Ytoyoda (talk) 04:11, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:09, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by LIMO 5 (talk · contribs) 4

Too complex for PD-textlogo to apply

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 17:06, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:42, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by LIMO 5 (talk · contribs) 5

Obvious false claims of own work / false CC licenses. Probably too complex for PD-textlogo to apply.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 17:13, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by Minorax. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:45, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by LIMO 5 (talk · contribs) 6

Likely not own works: low-res/web-size images, missing or FB/transmission code in EXIF data. Some images credited to others (e.g. File:Yng Lvcas en 2023.jpg). Unreliable uploader with innumerable previous copyvios.

List of files

P 1 9 9   16:17, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I opened several DRs with plain copyvios so I agree with the nomination. Maybe some of these images are legitimate, for them we need a COM:VRT ticket. Günther Frager (talk) 00:16, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:43, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by LIMO 5 (talk · contribs) 7

Like #6 above. Likely not own works: low-res/web-size images, missing or inconsistent EXIF data, and many with FB/transmission code. Unreliable uploader with innumerable previous copyvios. If there are any legitimate uploads, they'll need VRT.

List of files

P 1 9 9   03:10, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:31, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LIMO 5 (talk · contribs) 8

[edit]

Unfortunately, still not done; this user has been uploading images with FB/transmission code in metadata for a long time. For now, I have left out questionable low-res/web-sized images without any EXIF data, but maybe they should be looked at also...

P 1 9 9   14:59, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 16:22, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bust of Mokichi Saito

[edit]

The Saito Mokichi Memorial Museum, where this bust is situated, opened in 1968; hence the bust is not older than 48 years. Unfortunately COM:FOP#Japan doesn't cover artworks that are not yet in PD. Yasu (talk) 15:08, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The text says it is authored by 上山郷土史研究会 (Kaminoyama Local History Research Group) in 1999 (the 11th year of the Heisei era). Not in PD. Yasu (talk) 15:10, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LorbeerWHY (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Again, I question whether these photos are all uploader's own work because of the inconsistent camera EXIF info and low image sizes.

Wcam (talk) 03:15, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all. All files grabbed from Internet. Gunnex (talk) 19:40, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 15:25, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:30, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this drawing. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:31, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a selfie, also not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:32, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:35, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this image, which includes an inset of a cartoon character as well as the central photograph. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:35, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pure spam. I'm not clear if a CSD covers this, but this is about as blatant as it gets. Commons isn't a free image host. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 15:37, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously not own work, appended to social media style "user page" with no other contributions in 2016. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:37, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously not own work, appended to social media style "user page" with no other contributions in 2016. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:37, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nationalsecurityguard (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Pure spam. The ones with stock photos probably qualify as copyvios as well. I'm not sure if there's a CSD for these, but there ought to be.

—/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 15:38, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HBMack (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not a place to advertise yourself, your business, or your friends businesses... all these uploads are promotional in nature, and unlikely to be uploader's own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:40, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Echhu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Same image, three sizes, but even so, it's unlikely that any of the three football logos are own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:40, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:44, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:45, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dderoquefeuil (talk · contribs)

[edit]

While all four of these images appear to be old enough to be public domain, the way they are currently described and licensed as own work is incorrect. Valid sources of the images are required.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:48, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JVAGANT (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images of family and tours are out of COM:SCOPE, even assuming they were taken by the uploader, which several of these appear to not have been.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:50, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional image. Out of scope. MetaKnight93 (talk) 16:26, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal photo. MetaKnight93 (talk) 16:27, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional logo, possible copyvio. MetaKnight93 (talk) 16:34, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This might be, as claimed, a work of the US government, but I rather suspect this (image quality and resolution) to be a video screenshot from a news item. The source doesn't help. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 16:38, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep See https://catalog.archives.gov/id/596517. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 07:47, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above. --INeverCry 00:29, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

United Arab Emirates Warning sign

Copyright warning: A subject in this image is protected by copyright.

This image features an architectural or artistic work, photographed from a public space in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Except for broadcast programmes, there are no Freedom of Panorama exemptions in the UAE, which means that they cannot be photographed freely for anything other than personal purposes. However, images depicting buildings during construction showing incomplete prominent exterior designs, and those subject to de minimis, are permitted.

If a copyrighted architectural or artistic work is contained in this image and it is a substantial reproduction, this photo cannot be licensed under a free license, and will be deleted. Framing this image to focus on the copyrighted work is also a copyright violation.

Before reusing this content, ensure that you have the right to do so. You are solely responsible for ensuring that you do not infringe someone else's copyrights. See our general disclaimer for more information.

...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 16:46, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

- Es gibt kein Grund das Bild zu löschen, es ist meine eigene Aufnahme. --World24 (talk) 20:13, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of panorama in Senegal. ...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 16:54, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio: https://www.facebook.com/BNIPolska/photos/a.1037158069631434.1073741836.118510848162832/1037158209631420/?type=1&theater WTM (talk) 17:15, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Noy2011 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Credits are plastered prominently over the image in such a way that the image is unusable.

Takeaway (talk) 17:33, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational value. There are historical anachronisms (the pearls, for example) added here that are not present in the image sources given within the license. The amount of changes made to the file also seem to indicate that the user is using Commons as a personal webhost for artwork. I'm also not sure why I'm getting a hit on the image at Amazon AWS. MSJapan (talk) 17:33, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ModaGhariborg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope. Personal photos used in repeatedly-deleted (and salted) en:Moda Gharib. File:Modagharibrozy .jpg also contains autobiographical text.

JohnCD (talk) 17:35, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Given the number of copyrighted "sources" given in the license and the vagueness of where the source pages are, I'm not sufficiently convinced that this isn't a full copy of a page in a book where the page is not being given on purpose. MSJapan (talk) 17:37, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. No educational value, not used in any articles. Not entirely convinced it was not made from a font requiring attribution here. MSJapan (talk) 17:52, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, not used in articles, possibly created with a font requiring attribution here. MSJapan (talk) 17:54, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, not used in articles, possibly created with a font requiring attribution here. MSJapan (talk) 17:55, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, not used in articles, possibly created with a font requiring attribution here. MSJapan (talk) 17:55, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, not used in articles, possibly created with a font requiring attribution here. MSJapan (talk) 17:56, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, not used in articles, possibly created with fonts requiring attribution here. MSJapan (talk) 17:56, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, not used in articles, possibly created with a font requiring attribution here. MSJapan (talk) 17:57, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. ot used in any articles, but is not the same image uploaded by Sushil hansda and deleted. MSJapan (talk) 18:01, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, not used in articles, possibly created with a font requiring attribution here. MSJapan (talk) 18:02, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, not used in articles, possibly created with a font requiring attribution here. MSJapan (talk) 18:03, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am new to Wikimedia Commons and was trying to test and I did not know files could not be removed. I uploaded 3 files. For the future, I now know. JimmyPiersall (talk) 19:10, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am new to Wikimedia Commons and was trying to test and I did not know files could not be removed. I uploaded 3 files. For the future, I now know. JimmyPiersall (talk) 19:10, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am new to Wikimedia Commons and was trying to test and I did not know files could not be removed. I uploaded 3 files. For the future, I now know. JimmyPiersall (talk) 19:10, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a photo about nothing and has no place on wikimedia 99.253.204.188 19:33, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE. --INeverCry 00:30, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mea1999 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

False "own work", published previously e.g. at http://www.leadinglightdesign.com/hp-lovecraft-from-beyond/, https://redrumers.com/2015/08/31/alan-moore-providence-3/, http://grimuar.ru/zashita/zhuk-skarabey-znachenie-talismana.html

Tatewaki (talk) 20:42, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Josve05a (talk) 20:49, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Josve05a (talk) 21:20, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked image - likely copyrighted. Richard Symonds (talk) 21:50, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mounesh034 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused files that don't show any useful information. (I think they are intended to visualize Twitter trending topics... maybe.)

Senator2029 ➔ “Talk” 21:56, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be copied from flickr "all rights reserved": https://www.flickr.com/photos/51065869@N05/4693410989/ Jim1138 (talk) 22:23, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be "own work": http://www.faculdadevicentina.com.br/918-professor-da-favi-e-nomeado-bispo Py4nf (talk) 22:39, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor-quality image. Looks like it has been intentionally processed to make it look like a ratty old photo; but whether that was an aesthetic choice is irrelevant from our (scope) point of view- the end result isn't very usable, and the shadow detail and lighting are very poor. Ubcule (talk) 22:44, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a clear COM:DW of the login screen (including the logo), which doesn't meet COM:DM (the entire point of taking the image appeared to have been to get the login screen). RJaguar3 (talk) 23:28, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

its a Extended Play cover, but not "own work" Cap1000 (talk) 23:51, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is freedom of panorama in USA for architecture, but not for text. Author of this text is organization "The Native Sons of Kansas City". I think, that they are not part of US government, so OTRS-permission is needed. Taivo (talk) 07:00, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Almost definitely copyright infringement of TfL; deliberate vandalism of Tottenham Hale and Leytonstone labels. Jc86035 (talkcontributionsuploads) 07:09, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sostituita da una versione svg con sfondo (File:Italia - mappa strada statale 9.svg). Sono l'autore di entrambe Friedrichstrasse (talk) 20:31, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete this different version. Basvb (talk) 21:04, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mappa errata e obsoleta, sostituita da File:Italia - mappa strada statale 9.svg. Sono l'autore di entrambe. Arbalete (talk) 03:49, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 03:29, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rahmatgee (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful

INeverCry 18:49, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete: I'm doubtful about the "own work" claim as well. I had found one of the images (now deleted) on the website of University of the Punjab. There is a possibility though that the uploader was the photographer and had given the photos to the university. In that case, it would be helpful if the uploader can clarify - do they own the copyright? Or has the copyright been transferred to the university? --Lemongirl942 (talk) 15:08, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I know to reaffirm 'own work' claim is less useful but let me know how to prove it. At least, it will help me for future. Most of the pages linked to images has been deleted after convincing discussion. I liked it also. your guidance will at least help me to save volunteer's time. Thanking in anticipation. --Rahmatgee (talk) 16:14, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:20, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by NiridyA as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: File is not used in Wikipedia
In use, but perhaps above COM:TOO and not a text logo as licensed. INeverCry 21:39, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:30, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by NiridyA as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: File is not used and SVG is available INeverCry 21:49, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:33, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doesn't seem to be open content. Drahreg01 (talk) 04:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

*It's not the original logo: i redraw it in vector. --panappパナップ 07:08, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If I took my own pencil to make a copy of the newest book of Joanne K. Rowlings, I still couldn't put it under a free licence. --Drahreg01 (talk) 08:06, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Indistinguishable from the original without a looking-glass. Thuresson (talk) 22:39, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ariadacapo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Andi Siebenhofer can’t be both on stage and the author of the photo, regardless of "permission" Requires an OTRS check to determine how to proceed.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:46, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - file not mentioned on ticet, ticket is very vague as well. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:16, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ariadacapo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Andi Siebenhofer can’t be both on picture and author of it, regardless of "permission". Requires OTRS check to help determine how to proceed  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:47, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - file not mentioned on ticet, ticket is very vague as well. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:16, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ariadacapo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Andi Siebenhofer can’t be both on picture and author of it, regardless of "permission" Requires OTRS check to determine how to proceed.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:47, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - file not mentioned on ticet, ticket is very vague as well. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:16, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AT44 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Just like last time (before the name change): Questionable authorship claims given the low/inconsistent resolution and missing/inconsistent metadata. Several of the files have been previously published elsewhere on the Internet before they were uploaded here.

LX (talk, contribs) 11:57, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I object the deletion of the following pictures made personally by me:

and the following photo in my family archive, scanned by me

and the following phots that are in public domain according to PD-old-70 and PD-Montenegro:

--AT44 (talk) 12:17, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: some may be ok per uploaders statement, but I'm not convinced, so per PCP. --Jcb (talk) 21:47, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abrikoss (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and newspaper. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

авторское право 75 лет. Во всех изображениях это право вышло. Abrikoss (talk) 15:14, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Тогда лицензия должна быть {{PD-Russia}}. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 15:21, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:36, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abrikoss (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos, newspapers, documents, logos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
эти фото из собственного архива и архивных материалов публичной бесплатной библиотеки - ДВГНБ (Хабаровск) в России. Датировка к каждой фотографии указана. {{PD-Russia}} Abrikoss (talk) 22:43, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Если снимки находятся в общественном достоянии, должна быть соответствующая лицензия. А как {{PD-Russia}} относится к снимкам, сделанным после 1949 года? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 22:50, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
эти снимки из личного архива и подарены мне семьей. Я решил, что они являются общественным достоянием. Abrikoss (talk) 07:09, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:51, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abrikoss (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Russia for sculptures and 2D works.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:31, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Я, как автор этих фото, разрешил ими пользоваться по условиям лицензии CC BY-SA 4.0, в сведениях о файле все указано Abrikoss (talk) 22:40, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Вам надо получить разрешение от скульпторов на использование снимков под такой лицензией. Прочитайте, пожалуйста, w:ru:Свобода панорамы. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 22:50, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
как от скульпторов, если это памятники в общественном месте и я их сфотографировал? Это тогда надо во всей Википедии удалить фото строений, зданий и памятников, который сфотографированы, но не имеют разрешения скульпторов. Разве скульпторы дают разрешения фотографам? Abrikoss (talk) 07:07, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Вы прочитали w:ru:Свобода панорамы? Судя по Вашему вопросу, ещё нет. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:50, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. While The original picture is from Minnesota Vallry National Wildlife Refuge, under USFWSmidwest (US Fish and Wildlife Service) Flickr account, which normally qualify as public domain (US Federal Agency), the inclusion of a picture of Pikachu makes the picture copyrighted as even US FWS is using the picture of Pikachu under fair use. SYSS Mouse (talk) 01:28, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removed from the en article for the time being. Timothyjosephwood (talk) 16:03, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The Pikachu can be cropped out to remove the copyrighted component and the image will be public domain. SYSS Mouse (talk) 13:48, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Also File:Pokémon Go Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge.jpg. Reventtalk 20:44, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

for the cropded one  Delete for the the origonal de minimis aplies so  Keep.--Sanandros (talk) 22:28, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Sanandros: I don't see how you can argue that de minimis applies to the larger image. It was clearly meant to include the copyrighted character, and it's in focus and clearly recognizable. The use of the Pokemon character in both was rather obviously not 'incidental'. Reventtalk 04:46, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
OK Tell me how you would photograph the whole, let's say installation? U have to include the pokemon.--Sanandros (talk) 08:53, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Sanandros: That including the Pokemon is 'important' to the photograph is exactly why it's not de minimis. How small a portion of the image that it takes up is irrelevant. I don't really see how you could photograph it in a way that would be DM without either mostly obscuring it, making it significantly out of focus, or shooting from such an oblique angle to the sign that it's unrecognizable. Reventtalk 09:52, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
So u want to tell me it's not possible to photograph this thing completely? Because I think the focus in on that installation and not on the sign as the sign is not in the center so the focus is on the thing. Pls tell me also what u mean with "important" with respect to the sign.--Sanandros (talk) 14:00, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That it's a Pokemon on the sign, as opposed to some other random cartoon character, that it's clearly a Pokemon, and that it's relevant to the subject of the image that it's a specifically a Pokemon is why it's not de minimis. One description of de minimis, really, is when it would not matter if you replaced the 'work' with some other random example of the same kind of thing. If it matters what it 'specifically' is, then it's not de minimis. Courts have also used 'if it's easily recognizable as the specific work to a lay observer' as an indication that a use is not de minimis. Reventtalk 00:05, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: contains CV material and not de minimis, no fair use possible.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:18, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Labelling second identified image as {{Fair use delete}} as the copyrightable object is minimal, and is pertinent to the stories. We will need to check that they are relocated and then we can delete.  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:24, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: (c) at source, Tafila Technical University 2016 me I see a CC BY-SA 3.0 license though I don't see the image Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:15, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arts1.jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:51, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I tend to disagree with the "withdraw" by Ellin above. @Thelaststory99: please provide another link for your source, the image is not currently visible at source. If, and only if, you're the photographer, then tag the file with {{own}}, or you must provide a link to a source that lead to a page where the image is visible. Otherwise, the file should be deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:31, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

sorry but you all make me sick ,this is my own image, you can see similar image on the page , you made too much problems to me since I started editing , the schizophrenia among wiki editors and managers is unbearable , some agree and confirm , others just come and revert! , could you please delete my account permanently, its not a honor for me to be member here , I will not rely on any article in this website anymore , I will read trusted and respectful books and websites only . Bye! --Thelaststory99 (talk) 06:56, 8 August 2016 (UTC)--Thelaststory99 (talk) 06:56, 8 August 2016 (UTC)--Thelaststory99 (talk) 06:56, 8 August 2016 (UTC)--Thelaststory99 (talk) 06:56, 8 August 2016 (UTC)--Thelaststory99 (talk) 06:56, 8 August 2016 (UTC)--Thelaststory99 (talk) 06:56, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I could not find the file at source site. --Jcb (talk) 16:56, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Die Genehming für dieses Bild liegt mir mündlich und per Email vor. Ich möchte aber vorher sicherheitshalber eine schriftliche Erlaubnis einholen. Dann werde ich das Bild wieder einstellen. Time Roller Univers (talk) 13:58, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Die schriftliche Genehmigung (Email) ist mir deshalb nicht ausreichend, weil sie mir nur indirekt von einer Managerin der Schauspielerin mitgeteilt wurde. Die Fotografin (Annemone Taake) hat dieses Foto als angestelle Fotografin des Theaters Heidelberg gemacht und mir die Genehmigung nur mündlich erteilt. Das scheint mir aber jetzt insgesamt zu wenig zu sein, weshalb ich jetzt eine offizielle Genehmigung der Pressestelle des Theathers einholen möchte. Bis dahin bitte ich um eine Löschung dieses Fotos (das auf keiner Wiki Seite bisher verlinkt wurde, weil ich es eben erst eingestellt hatte). -- Time Roller Univers (talk) 16:39, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Schicke doch schon mal die E-Mail vom Managment an das OTRS Team, weil eine Angestellte Fotografin eigentlich per Arbeitsvertrag ihre Rechte abtritt.--Sanandros (talk) 22:31, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:12, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author is not notorious. Markov (talk) 08:41, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oui mais pourquoi cela cela serait gênant, on ne demande pas aux photographes qui illustrent des articles d'être connus, quand il manque une illustration on peut faire une photo libre et pour reproduire les traits d'un visage, un dessin ne fait pas plus ni moins qu'une photo.--Odilino (talk) 10:28, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 22:24, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal art. Markov (talk) 20:04, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

But there exists also File:Honore busto.jpg which looks similar.--Sanandros (talk) 22:36, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: not out of scope, see fr:Philippe Honoré. --Jcb (talk) 22:16, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Template:GJSTU1" is the template for the file that is licensed under the Government of Japan Standard Terms of Use (Ver.1.0). But Government of Japan Standard Terms of Use (Ver.1.0) is not the free license. --Scanyaro (talk) 16:16, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please not that all images using that license are affected as well: see Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:GJSTU1. --JuTa 18:07, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I commented in Japanese because it's troublesome for me to translate my opinion into English. Template:cc-by-ndなどが即時削除テンプレートにリダイレクトされていることを考えると、このテンプレートもリダイレクト化するという方策をとることができるように思われます。--Kkairri (talk) 13:15, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Info 政府標準利用規約は第1.0版、第1.1版、第2.0版の3つが存在し、テンプレートもそれぞれGjstu-1.0、Gjstu-1.1、Gjstu-2.0が用意されています。Kkairriさんご指摘の件については、既にTemplate:Gjstu-1.0Template:Gjstu-1.1にて対応済みです。そもそもGJSTU1というテンプレート名称は、政府標準利用規約の第1.0版と第1.1版のどちらを指しているのか不明瞭であり、存在自体が不要だと思います。--Scanyaro (talk) 18:44, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Yasu says "True that some say the GJSTU1 may not be an free license". That's right! Then Wikimedia Commons cannot accept the file that is licensed under the Government of Japan Standard Terms of Use (Ver.1.0). In the first place, the Strategic Headquarters for the Promotion of an Advanced Information and Telecommunications Network Society enacted the Government of Japan Standard Terms of Use. And the Strategic Headquarters says that Ver.1.0/1.1 is not the free license, Ver.2.0 is the free license. Would you like to try to use the "Template:Gjstu-2.0"?--Scanyaro (talk) 13:16, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep for the same reason mentioned above by Yasu. --果壳军事 (talk) 01:51, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete We can't discriminate between GJSTU1.0 and GJSTU1.1 from this template name. I see what did Yasu say too, but this name,“GJSTU1”, can't be discriminated between GJSTU1.0 and GJSTU1.1. So I think template name occurs the problem and GJSTU1.0, GJSTU1.1 has been supplied. Redirect destination has no there. Then we can do only deleting.
    (以下は日本語で書きます)Scanyaroさんから“GJSTU1”だと第1.0版なのか第1.1版なのかわかりませんよ?と言われました。ああ、その通りだと思いました。Yasuさんの言っていることもわかります。例えばCommonsで利用可能なライセンスの一つ、Cc-by-sa-2.0-jpはテンプレートの表示内容はCc-by-sa-2.0と変わりません。しかしながらライセンス文書を読むとわかる通り、「原著作者及び実演家の名誉又は声望を害する方法で原著作物を改作、変形もしくは翻案して生じる著作物は、この利用許諾の目的においては、二次的著作物に含まれない」と、しています。これは日本の著作権法第113条第6項が盛り込まれた産物で、著作者への誹謗中傷の為に二次利用する行為はCCライセンスでは認めないぞということです(この条項については『クリエイティブ・コモンズ : デジタル時代の知的財産権』ISBN 978-4757101524に詳しいです、また現行ライセンスの4.0は世界中で使えるようにということで日本の事情も加味されているでしょうから、この条項はどこかしらで生きているでしょう)。この種のCCライセンス適用除外利用がCCライセンスにある以上、GJSTU1.0(及び1.1)も類似のライセンス適用除外利用と考えることができようかと存じます(これは、実は1.0時代からcommonsにアップロードできたのではないか?というある種の主張ですね)。しかし、やはりこのテンプレート名はまずいです。これでは1.0なのか1.1なのかわかりません。しかも1.0も1.1も既に作成されています。リダイレクト先や移動先はありません。となりますとやはり削除しかないのではないかと考えます。--Kkairri (talk) 23:32, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment As we can see it from the edit history, this template is made to represent the GJSTU version 1.0. If and only if the template name itself is inappropriate, then we don't have to delete it - just rename it to an appropriate name (e.g. GJSTU1.0 or Gjstu-1.0 or whatever) by which we could distinguish the license from version 1.1. {{Gjstu-1.0}} has been created already, but as a redirect to {{Nonderivative}}. If we ever need to delete anything, I suppose this redirect should be deleted first.
    (Translation follows) 編集履歴を見ればわかりますが、このテンプレートは第 1.0 版用として作られています。テンプレート名だけが問題なら、たとえば GJSTU1.0 など、あるいは Gjstu-1.0 でもいいのですが、とにかく第 1.0 版であることが明確になるよう改名すれば解決することですから、名称の問題のみをもって削除すべきとは思われません。{{Gjstu-1.0}} は既に作成されているとはいえ、これは全く別のライセンスではなく {{Nonderivative}} へのリダイレクトとして作られたものであり、むしろ不要というべきはこのリダイレクトのほうではないかと思います。Yasu (talk) 15:06, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no consensus for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 22:25, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]