Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/12/17
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_copy.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
00.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Not Free, album cover Ueutyi (talk) 00:53, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: definitely a copyvio Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:08, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful
- File:Victor ousado.jpg
- File:Lucca moicano.jpg
- File:Ronaldinhooo.jpg
- File:14jan2014---uma-foto-do-jogador-de-futebol-ronaldinho-gaucho-esta-fazendo-sucesso-nas-redes-sociais-na-imagem-o-craque-aparece-de-pe-na-piscina-com-na-piscina-com-cinco-mocas-1389696830129 599x491.jpg
INeverCry 04:48, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvios. Yann (talk) 12:34, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Not the copywright holder. Jacquefuller (talk) 12:49, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedied: Uploader request, not copyright holder Mormegil (talk) 13:09, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
No indication that the uploader is the copyright holder (which I guess is Trollback and Company) which would indicate that it was released under a free license. On the other hand, it's just plain text so it may ineligible (I don't know enough to be certain). Ricky81682 (talk) 08:07, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 21:06, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
This is the old logo for a company that has updated it's logo. Maxnelson88 (talk) 19:07, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: We keep old logos. You might update the description. Yann (talk) 21:07, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Looks like not own work, as there is no EXIF data present, and is a small image. OTRS permission is needed. ★ Poké95 04:07, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete - Found a version at https://www.pinterest.com/wathmal/shanudrie-priyasad/ --Obi2canibe (talk) 14:40, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted by Natuur12. ★ Poké95 01:14, 18 December 2015 (UTC) (non-admin close)
I am not the copywright holder. Jacquefuller (talk) 12:41, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: PD-ineligible. Yann (talk) 22:14, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Twitter profile pic link Biplab Anand (Talk) 12:21, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:56, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
nose me parece algo obseno Fede caminos (talk) 21:44, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:06, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
I am not the copywright holder. Jacquefuller (talk) 12:42, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 19:26, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
I am not the copywright holder. Jacquefuller (talk) 12:45, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request, the logo surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 19:28, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
I am not the copywright holder. Jacquefuller (talk) 12:48, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 19:28, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Asqueladd as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: not own work http://www.elalmanaque.com/Marzo13/11-3-13.htm HR with EXIF data, proper DR is better. Yann (talk) 23:25, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Grabbed from http://www.madrid.org/cs/Satellite?c=CM_Actualidad_FA&cid=1354189135350&language=es&pagename=ComunidadMadrid/Estructura (2013) = http://www.madrid.org/cs/Satellite?blobcol=urldata&blobheader=image%2Fjpg&blobheadername1=Content-Disposition&blobheadervalue1=filename%3D1.jpg&blobkey=id&blobtable=MungoBlobs&blobwhere=1352812254183&ssbinary=true (identical size&exif). Gunnex (talk) 09:47, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as per Gunnex. Yann (talk) 11:13, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
copyvionote – Deletion request of BIGRULE, missing subpage. Bjarlin (talk) 19:49, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Obvious copyvio, not waiting for 7 days. — regards, Revi 13:33, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Grabbed from the web. Not own work Threeohsix (talk) 21:07, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted. Delete. 85.240.130.12 01:41, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 18:20, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Again, photo grabbed from the web, not own work but it might be free if date and author was known Threeohsix (talk) 21:11, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted. Delete. 85.240.130.12 01:40, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 18:21, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SportingCP1906 (talk · contribs)
[edit]All grabbed from the web, not own work as stated. The logo is just 10 years old, too recent to be here.
- File:Emblema de 100 anos.jpeg
- File:Manuel Fernandes scored four goals against Benfica on 14 December 1986.jpeg
- File:The Five Violins.jpg
- File:Manuel Fernandes (A lenda)!.jpg
- File:Curva Sul.jpg
- File:Alvalade4.jpg
!.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Threeohsix (talk) 21:16, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted. Delete. 85.240.130.12 01:40, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No evidence at all that these can be freely licensed Herby talk thyme 18:21, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Not educationally useful and really out of place for such a Center ! Cquoi (talk) 13:17, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete ... Not really your bog standard image here! .... Oh I am hillarious!
, Puns aside we have plenty of toilet images and most are being used in articles so IMHO there's no need for another. –Davey2010Talk 15:17, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:09, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Incorrect structure: sodium is not covalently bound. Leyo 00:08, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- This complaint has been rectified. However the diagram is still misleading as there are 4 oxygen atoms bound to each phosphorus, and they are connected in a ring, see File:Sodium_hexametaphosphate.png. So the diagram should be changed to show -O- links coming out each side of the brackets if we are going to keep this. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:19, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as totally incorrect bonding, and we already have a correct one (that is higher quality image too). DMacks (talk) 03:37, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Chemical structure is incorrect. Ed (Edgar181) 19:42, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Obviously not own work and unsourced images
- File:Carmel Valley 1964.jpg
- File:Snow Library 1951.jpg
- File:VJ Day detail.jpg
- File:Fishermans Harbor 1937.jpg
- File:French Ladies.jpg
- File:VBS 1960.jpg
Rodrigolopes (talk) 00:03, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:49, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Elizaveta Konysheva (talk · contribs)
[edit]
Rodrigolopes (talk) 00:06, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:49, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GNelsonFernandez (talk · contribs)
[edit]some unknown persons, see description, commons are not facebook
- File:Nelson Fernández y Melany Acosta CDT2.jpg
- File:Nelson Fernández y Melany Acosta CDT.jpg
- File:Cathos, Georgibus y Magdelon.jpg
- File:Nelson Fernández, Gianni Paulino, Jessi Rodriguez.jpg
- File:Rueda De Preansa PR.jpg
Motopark (talk) 00:16, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:49, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GNelsonFernandez (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal images : out of scope
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:38, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 09:30, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
unsourced image OussDB (talk) 02:03, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:50, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jordansocial (talk · contribs)
[edit]All related to Paul Allen. If he is indeed a publicist for him, it needs to go through OTRS.
- File:Paul Allen raising 12 Flag at CenturyLink.jpg
- File:Mouse Brain Map.jpg
- File:Allen Institute for Brain Science collaboration.jpg
- File:Allen Institute for Brain Science Building.JPG
- File:Allen Institute for Brain Science Workers.jpg
- File:Allen Institute for Brain Science Logo.png
- File:The Cinerama new seats.jpg
- File:Seattle Cinerama Updated.jpg
- File:Allen Institute for Cell Science Large.jpg
- File:Allen Institute for Cell Science.jpg
SounderBruce 02:28, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:50, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Promotional; please see our project scope.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:18, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:50, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:27, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:51, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:36, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:51, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cleaningmelbourne (talk · contribs)
[edit]spam/COM:ADVERT
- File:End of Lease Cleaning Melbourne.jpg
- File:End of Lease Cleaning Melbourne services.jpg
- File:Best End of Lease Cleaning Melbourne.jpg
- File:Best House Cleaning Melbourne.png
- File:House Cleaning Melbourne.png
- File:House Cleaning Melbourne Tips.png
INeverCry 08:12, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:51, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cleaningmelbourne (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:19, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cleaningmelbourne (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotional, out of scope.
Sunmist (talk) 06:44, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, advertizing. I warned Cleaningmelbourne. Taivo (talk) 19:37, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Kulvin90
Gunnex (talk) 10:59, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:53, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
For:
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (226x262 px) resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering previous DR and User talk:Kulvin90/logs.
For:
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related enwiki entry speedy deleted.
- File:EG India Office.jpg
- File:Emerio Logo.jpg This is PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 19:52, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Gunnex (talk) 19:29, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above Yann (talk) 19:54, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Murli20009 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.
Gunnex (talk) 11:04, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:53, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Facebook image (link provided) Biplab Anand (Talk) 12:22, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:54, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Garik.Khachatryan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Garik.Khachatryan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/journalstar.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/a/03/a03e87cc-edf3-57a1-8c3f-4a6121ee1c79/4dacad0b0c9d0.image.jpg.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Garik.Khachatryan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:54, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Archivo CODEHS (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:1° de Mayo de 1912.jpg
- File:Juan Onofre Chamorro.jpg
- File:Juan Chamorro.jpg
- File:Clotario Blest.jpg
- File:Clotario Blest hacia 1970.jpg
- File:Rafael Maroto Pérez.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:56, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:56, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Historical documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:56, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photos are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 15:47, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:56, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Drjenniferwalden (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photosNo evidence of permission(s).
- File:Dr Jennifer Walden-Best Plastic Surgeons in America.pdf
- File:Dr. Jennifer Walden and her twin sons, Houston and Rex.jpg
- File:Dr. Jennifer Walden.jpg
- File:Jennifer Walden.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:56, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:56, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:56, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:56, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- also file:CSzkA-ZXIAASIZx.jpg
Small photos without metadata, uploader is serial copyright violator. I suspect copyright violation here also. Taivo (talk) 15:58, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:57, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Metadata credits "Eric Rossell Vela / Alca Films". If uploader is copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 16:05, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:57, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
I uploaded this image by error. Moriokane (talk) 16:35, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:57, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Not own work, bogus license, no permission. Yann (talk) 16:38, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:57, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
This is Wheeler's Twitter profile image [1]. There is no evidence of permission, and the image uploader used adding the 'updated image' as a stalking horse for adding spam to Wheeler's en.wiki page. (I'll also note that there they claimed the image was of Wheeler in 2013, while here the image date is given as 2008...) The Bushranger (talk) 16:45, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:57, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Watermark, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 16:48, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:57, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
- File:CarteMlea.jpg
- File:Juraea.jpg
- File:Lecturaea.jpg
- File:Hipódromoea.jpg
- File:Snvea.jpg
- File:Voleyea.jpg
- File:Pileea.jpg
- File:Escudoea.jpg
- File:Escudo EA.jpg
- File:Euskal etxea.jpg
- File:Cartel ingreso.jpg
- File:Centro Vasco.jpg
Yann (talk) 16:54, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- In my opinion this contributor simply uploads images found on the internet and falsely claim them as own work. Thuresson (talk) 02:59, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:57, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own works, bogus license. More info needed.
- File:Bandera Municipio Maturin.jpg
- File:Bandera Municipio Guanipa.jpg
- File:Escudo Municipio Guanipa.jpg
- File:Bandera Municipio Simón Rodríguez.PNG
- File:Escudo Municipio Simon Rodriguez.jpg
Yann (talk) 17:15, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:57, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:30, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
_copy.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_copy.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of project scope. Stefan2 (talk) 17:16, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
_copy.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:57, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
_copy.jpg){kind=link}
Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work, no permission. Yann (talk) 17:22, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:57, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope — Racconish ☎ 17:45, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:58, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Not own work, probably above threshold of originality. Yann (talk) 17:49, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:58, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal picture, out of scope. Yann (talk) 17:49, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:58, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 17:52, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:58, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this is from NASA. Yann (talk) 17:53, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:58, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Not own work, no source, bogus license, no permission. Yann (talk) 17:59, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:58, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Bogus license. Might be old enough, but more info needed. Yann (talk) 18:00, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:58, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 18:01, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:58, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Unu2sed personal picture. Josve05a (talk) 18:02, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:58, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Bogus license. Might be old enough... Yann (talk) 18:02, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:58, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Author is François Berthier, permission needed. See COM:OTRS. / L'auteur est François Berthier, autorisation nécessaire, voyez COM:OTRS/fr. Yann (talk) 18:09, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:58, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
http://www.diendantienganh.com/uploads/24/Logo_1000.jpg Yann (talk) 18:21, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:58, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hotbarchili (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works. Also may be out of scope.
Yann (talk) 18:23, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:58, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 18:28, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:58, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Evgenigerm (talk · contribs)
[edit]Screenshots, no permission. User blocked for copyvios, unlikely to be free.
Yann (talk) 23:10, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:59, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 23:15, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:59, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
According to the image captions in pt:João Moojen de Oliveira, these are not own work by the uploader. No evidence of permission from the copyright holders.
- File:Captura de Tela 2015-12-17 às 11.53.49.png
- File:Captura de Tela 2015-12-17 às 11.33.37.png
- File:Captura de Tela 2015-12-17 às 11.34.15.png
- File:Captura de Tela 2015-12-17 às 11.24.36.png
Stefan2 (talk) 23:16, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:59, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work, no permission. Yann (talk) 23:20, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:59, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Logos, not own work by the uploader.
- File:Capture d’écran 2015-05-14 à 22.38.14.png
- File:Capture d’écran 2015-04-08 à 22.14.06.png
- File:Capture d’écran 2015-04-08 à 22.10.40.png
- File:Capture d’écran 2015-04-08 à 21.05.32.png
Stefan2 (talk) 23:49, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:59, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thomasaidan1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]The cropped version is used as a profile picture on Twitter.[2][3] Questionable authorship claim.
![[2]](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/657283352127524865/MFGu7dXT_400x400.jpg){kind=link}
Stefan2 (talk) 23:52, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:59, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Seems to be a screenshot of an unidentified computer program. Unknown copyright status. Stefan2 (talk) 23:58, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:00, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
self promotion Bazj (talk) 23:59, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:00, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
appears to be advertising for a game hack The Anome (talk) 01:17, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:07, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
appears to be here purely as advertising for a game hack: note submitter's username The Anome (talk) 01:19, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:10, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
appears to be here purely as advertising for a game hack: note submitter's username The Anome (talk) 01:19, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:10, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
appears to be here purely as advertising for a game hack: note submitter's username The Anome (talk) 01:19, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:10, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
see [4], the photo from AP(watermark), not VOA. Not PD shizhao (talk) 02:56, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: AP watermark at source page . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:13, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Restored per [5].-- Darwin Ahoy! 16:19, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
from [6], "Copyright University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC)", not NASA shizhao (talk) 03:56, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:14, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Something untoward is going on here. On en:File:Matrix Realty Group, Inc. Corporate Center Danbury, Connecticut.jpg, it is claimed that the image was sent personally to the uploader by the author Glen Nelson. On the duplicate file page en:File:Matrix Corporate Center Danbury, Connecticut.jpg, it is claimed that "This is the CEO - i took the photo." Here on Commons at File:Matrix Corporate Center Danbury, CT.jpg it is sourced as "Own work". Either the user behind the account has simultaneously claimed that Glen Nelson created it and then claimed self-work, or the initial uploader allowed someone else to use their account (en:WP:Shared accounts) to log in and say "This is the CEO - i took the photo". The picture is low resolution, unlikely to have been produced by a modern camera and more likely taken from a website, which makes me doubt a self-work claim. Nick (talk) 05:30, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:16, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The images are out of scope. It's a promotion content by The Land Of Living.
- File:Svyato uspenskiy.jpg
- File:Strana zhivyh 005.jpg
- File:Strana zhivyh 004.jpg
- File:Strana zhivyh 003.jpg
- File:Strana zhivyh 002.jpg
- File:Programma strana zhivyh.jpg
- File:Odin den 006.jpg
- File:Odin den 005.jpg
- File:Odin den 004.jpg
- File:Odin den 003.jpg
- File:Odin den 002.jpg
- File:Odin den 001.jpg
- File:Strana zhivyh.jpg
Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 05:38, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 06:59, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Source has clear (c) . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted artwork at temporary exhibition within a building, no FOP given --> copyright violation. Paulae (talk) 07:40, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- If this beautiful photo really hurt rules, it should be deleted. Wenn dieses schöne Foto wirklich Regeln verletzt, sollte es gelöscht werden.--Bybbisch94 (talk) 08:12, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted artwork at temporary exhibition within a building, no FOP given --> copyright violation. Paulae (talk) 07:40, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- If this beautiful photo really hurt rules, it should be deleted. Wenn dieses schöne Foto wirklich Regeln verletzt, sollte es gelöscht werden.--Bybbisch94 (talk) 08:14, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted artwork at temporary exhibition within a building, no FOP given --> copyright violation. Paulae (talk) 07:41, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- If this beautiful photo really hurt rules, it should be deleted. Wenn dieses schöne Foto wirklich Regeln verletzt, sollte es gelöscht werden.--Bybbisch94 (talk) 08:15, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted artwork at temporary exhibition within a building, no FOP given --> copyright violation. Paulae (talk) 07:41, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- If this beautiful photo really hurt rules, it should be deleted. Wenn dieses schöne Foto wirklich Regeln verletzt, sollte es gelöscht werden.--Bybbisch94 (talk) 08:16, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted artwork at temporary exhibition within a building, no FOP given --> copyright violation. Paulae (talk) 07:41, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- If this beautiful photo really hurt rules, it should be deleted. Wenn dieses schöne Foto wirklich Regeln verletzt, sollte es gelöscht werden.--Bybbisch94 (talk) 08:17, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted artwork at temporary exhibition within a building, no FOP given --> copyright violation. Paulae (talk) 07:41, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- If this beautiful photo really hurt rules, it should be deleted. Wenn dieses schöne Foto wirklich Regeln verletzt, sollte es gelöscht werden.--Bybbisch94 (talk) 08:17, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted artwork at temporary exhibition within a building, no FOP given --> copyright violation. Paulae (talk) 07:41, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- If this beautiful photo really hurt rules, it should be deleted. Wenn dieses schöne Foto wirklich Regeln verletzt, sollte es gelöscht werden.--Bybbisch94 (talk) 08:18, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted artwork at temporary exhibition within a building, no FOP given --> copyright violation. Paulae (talk) 07:41, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- If this beautiful photo really hurt rules, it should be deleted. Wenn dieses schöne Foto wirklich Regeln verletzt, sollte es gelöscht werden.--Bybbisch94 (talk) 08:19, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
I want to delete my account Usman Ullah Khan 08:43, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: That is not a reason to delete this image, but the image infringes on the trophy's copyright. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Data sheet, which would typically be owned by the device manufacturer, not necessarily own work as claimed. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:02, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Data Sheet, which would typicaly be owned by the device manufacturer, not necessarily own as claimed. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:03, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
It's unlikely the uploader is a copyright holder. It's a derivative work of a photograph by an unknown author. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:38, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 14:40, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
What is the encyclopedic value? Hansmuller (talk) 14:49, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- To illustrate the person in question? Media do not need to be of "encyclopedic value", but "realistically useful for [the] purpose [of] providing knowledge; instructional or informative". Commons:Project scope#Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. All media do not need to be used in Wikipedia articles. They can be useful to someone somewhere. This file doesn't seem to have a problem with scope. It could have a problem with permission. From the uploader's username, the file was apparently uploaded by someone from the publishing company of the subject, who probably has the rights to use it. The EXIF mentions the name of the photographer. OTRS communication could be required to check if the photographer transferred the rights to the subject and if the uploader has the permission to offer it under a free license. -- Asclepias (talk) 18:22, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Subject is probably notable, so it is in scope, but it is a copyvio, see http://www.inspiretoi.ca/team/lise-bourbeau/ . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Chilean Escudo
[edit]Is there something I'm missing here, or don't these also fall under Commons:Currency#Chile?
- File:0,50E° anverso.jpg
- File:0,50E° reverso.jpg
- File:10000E° anverso.jpg
- File:10000E° reverso.jpg
- File:1000E° anverso.jpg
- File:1000E° reverso.jpg
- File:100E° anverso.jpg
- File:100E° reverso.jpg
- File:10E°Anverso.jpg
- File:10E°Reverso.jpg
- File:1E° anverso.jpg
- File:1E° reverso.jpg
- File:5000E° anverso.jpg
- File:5000E° reverso.jpg
- File:500E°Anverso.jpg
- File:500E°Reverso.jpg
- File:50E° anverso.jpg
- File:50E° reverso.jpg
- File:5E° anverso.jpg
- File:5E° reverso.jpg
Josve05a (talk) 15:00, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. The description pages don't even mention the source. The broken link in the source field apparently used to link to this page (archived copy), which is not the source of the files, but refers to conditions for the use of the permission granted by the Bank of Chile for educational and non-commercial use of the designs. The description pages don't even have a copyright status template either. They have only an empty non-parametered PD-Art warning template, which can't be used alone, as it's not a copyright status template for the original work. It's the burden of the uploader to at least provide the source information and to offer a rationale for a free copyright status. -- Asclepias (talk) 00:04, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:26, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The design on the bag would be copyrighted, so this is a non allowable DW 106.68.83.12 15:20, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:27, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
All the files are moved to the suitable categories. Nick.Pr (talk) 02:48, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:28, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Please delete Category Anton Hartlinger and save all to Anton Hartinger.
The correct name is w:de:Hartinger, Anton. Painter of flowers in Austria, born 1806. Anton Hartlinger does not exist. Zabia (talk) 11:30, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:31, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Obviously copyvio. Picture is no own work, but scan from book cover as stated in the description, and certainly not in the public domain. FordPrefect42 (talk) 13:14, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:27, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
possible copyviol: gmaps screenshot Ciaurlec (talk) 19:00, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:28, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
possible copyviol: google earth screenshot Ciaurlec (talk) 19:00, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:28, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
possible copyviol: gmaps screenshot Ciaurlec (talk) 19:01, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:28, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Logo, no permission. Yann (talk) 19:04, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:28, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 19:13, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:29, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Unused logo. Out of scope logo, promotional. Josve05a (talk) 19:54, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:29, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
This looks like a classic case of the author of the PHOTO releasing the rights but the author of the UNDERLYING WORK having done no such thing. If this is a sculpture by Bansky, which I think it is, then either we need evidence that BANSKY is releasing it into the public domain (by a link stating as much or an OTRS ticket confirming it) or it needs to be removed from Commons as a copyright violation. KDS4444 (talk) 19:59, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: I suggest you ready COM:FOP -- this clearly permitted under UK law. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:30, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted -- Sorry. I ready "Theme Park" as permanent, but apparently this was temporary and therefore does not qualify for FOP. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:44, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
copyright violation. Image is available here: http://www.information.dk/fotobloggen/542950 KDS4444 (talk) 12:31, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Keep Why does the claim that it's available from one location under a non-free licence change the fact that from the original source location [7] it was offered under a free licence? Andy Dingley (talk) 13:35, 26 August 2015 (UTC)- Keep: See the source closer. The copyvio comes from information.dk, posting this pictrure one day after its uploading to Flickr without crediting and licensing. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:57, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Image is clearly licensed (CC BY-SA 2.0) as above, this can not be rescinded and especially not by someone else who is not the copyright holder. --Wintonian (talk) 21:20, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep:: the author uploaded it to flickr, under a suitable license to be included in Wikimedia.(talk) user:Al83tito 16:45, 05 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: The publication on Flickr under an acceptable license is less recent than the publication on information.dk. BrightRaven (talk) 13:33, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
I nominated this image for deletion once before, and am looking at it in a new light: as a work of art, don't we need to have a statement of permission from the author of the underlying work in order to accept a photo of that work for hosting on Commons? Which artist created this work? Do we have that person's permission or evidence that he/ she is willing to release that work under a suitable license? I am not questioning the photo itself— that seems to be fine— I am questioning the copyright status of the underlying work, which I suspect (though I may be entirely wrong) is not PD. KDS4444 (talk) 20:05, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept see COM:FOP . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:32, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted It turns out that this is a temporary exhibition, therefore not eligible for UK FOP. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:25, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted book cover. I99pema (talk) 20:06, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:34, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
I am the author of photo. Although I have attributed it creative commons license, I am concerned about the privacy of the persons on the photo. Meanwhile I have deleted the photo from flickr (where I assigned the creative commons license). I would appreciate it if this photo could be deleted. Tanacross (talk) 21:05, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: File still used, but France require consent for taking photos. --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:19, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:34, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Grabbed from the web. Unknown author but it doesn't became free until 2034 Threeohsix (talk) 21:09, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted. Delete. 85.240.130.12 01:40, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:34, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Looks like not own work, as there is no EXIF data present, and is a small image. OTRS permission is needed. Uploader has uploaded many images that have been removed as copyright violations and has recieved a final warning. Ahecht (talk) 21:15, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete until there is OTRS permission. --★ Poké95 01:05, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Speedy delete A version of this image can be found at http://www.online-instagram.com/tag/janith --Obi2canibe (talk) 11:13, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:34, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Falsified licensing data provided by uploader. These images were downloaded from various places on the internet without authorization. They are not in the public domain, and they are not the the intellectual property of Sub5189. Listing here for consideration as opposed to tagging each individually as copyvios. Please do not hesitate to contact me if there are any questions or concerns. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:12, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- File:Bhupen Memorial.png
- File:KStation.jpg
- File:LGBIA.jpg
- File:Borjhar airport.png
- File:Ghyairport.jpg
- File:Ghy diwali.png
- File:Brahmaputra cruise.jpg
- File:Betkuchi.jpg
- File:GPlanet.jpg
- File:RSCG.jpg
- File:Assam museum.jpg
- File:Balaji Ghy.jpg
- File:Doul Govinda.jpg
- File:Ugratara temple.jpg
- File:Navagraha temple.png
- File:Basistha Mandir.jpg
- File:Basistha.jpg
- File:Umananda.jpg
- File:Cloudy Ghy.jpg
- File:Dipor beel.jpg
- File:C Flyover.jpg
- File:Sri Sankaradeva Nethralaya.jpg
- File:Chandmari at night.png
- File:Barsapara stadium.jpg
- File:NEDFI house.jpg
- File:Zoo road tiniali.png
- File:Guwahati montage.png
- File:GMC Seal.jpg
- File:Guwahati Seal.jpg
- File:Durga Guwahati.jpg
- File:Pan Bazaar.jpg
- File:Rush hour at Ganeshguri.png
- File:Lachit Nagar area.jpg
- File:Ulubari area.jpg
- File:Dona Ghy.jpg
- File:Kalakshetra.jpg
- File:Ghy ac bus.jpg
- File:Azara area.jpg
- File:Ganeshguri intersection.jpg
- File:West Guwahati.jpg
- File:Ghy stadium.jpg
- File:Guwahati junction.jpg
- File:Medical college.jpg
- File:Iitg.jpg
- File:Dispur footbridge.jpg
- File:Panbazaar overbridge.jpg
- File:Typical Assamese thali.jpg
- File:Sattriya dance.jpg
- File:Bihu dance.jpg
- File:Guwahati collage.jpg
- File:Guwahati view.jpg
- File:ISL in Guwahati.jpg
- File:Indira Gandhi Athletic Stadium Guwahati.jpg
- File:Cloudy weather at Guwahati.jpg
- File:Assam Police Headquarters.jpg
- File:Assam Secretariat at Dispur.jpg
- File:Gauhati High Court new building.png
- File:New building of Gauhati High Court.jpeg
- File:Guwahati Tea Auction Centre.jpeg
- File:View of Nehru Stadium.jpeg
- File:Guwahati at night.jpeg
- File:View of Guwahati from Nilachal Hilltop.jpeg
Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:12, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Also no description or cats, so not useful . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:37, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Unused selfie. Yann (talk) 21:56, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:38, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Not a free file - This is a logo of an education institution in Israel and there's a picture in the background, while no OTRS release approval has been received for them. Ldorfman (talk) 22:05, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:39, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Picture of a picture, bogus license. More info needed. Yann (talk) 23:01, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:39, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image of a flickr user uploaded by mistake. Rodrigolopes (talk) 23:38, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:39, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Double. The file is a lower quality and later upload of File:Paarse Vrijdag Baarns Lyceum 2013 Neeltje Knaap.jpg. Moreover it still has the copyright watermark, which was removed (after it was uploaded with permission by copyright holder) on the other image. Taketa (talk) 09:38, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Krd 18:14, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
I want to delete my account Usman Ullah Khan 08:43, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
I want to delete my account Usman Ullah Khan 08:44, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
I want to delete my account Usman Ullah Khan 08:45, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: creator will, privete image and out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:03, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
I want to delete my account Usman Ullah Khan 08:44, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
I want to delete my account in Wikipedia Usman Ullah Khan 09:36, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: creator will, privete image and out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:02, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope? Josve05a (talk) 15:06, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:59, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope logo, promotional. Josve05a (talk) 15:10, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:59, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Vandalisme sur la version francophone de WP, titre inacceptable, motifs douteux. Do not follow (talk) 19:35, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:58, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
out of scope KDS4444 (talk) 21:11, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:57, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Olga Seromyatnikova (talk) 01:00, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:08, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
out of scope KDS4444 (talk) 21:13, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:57, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
I want to delete my account Usman Ullah Khan 08:46, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: creator will, privete image and out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:03, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
I want to delete my account Usman Ullah Khan 08:47, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: creator will, privete image and out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:03, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
I want to delete my account Usman Ullah Khan 08:47, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: creator will, privete image and out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:04, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
I want to delete my account Usman Ullah Khan 08:48, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: creator will, privete image and out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:05, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
I want to delete my account Usman Ullah Khan 08:48, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: creator will, privete image and out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:05, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Attack image (https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=P%C3%A9d%C3%A9rastie&action=history) missing exif, out of scope Josve05a (talk) 19:33, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:06, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ferakp as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Uploader say it is his own work but the picture has been uploaded to internet 2013, see [1]. Too simple. Amitie 10g (talk) 19:14, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Krd 17:31, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Self nomination. Fence obstructs the car, so this image cannot be reasonably useful. There are much better photos of this model at Category:Kia Sportage (NB-7). OSX II (talk) 05:26, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination Krd 18:51, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Above COM:TOO logo? Josve05a (talk) 14:22, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 19:19, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
The uploader claims it is his own, though the IndiaGlitz website's tag is clearly displayed. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:32, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Krd 19:19, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
not found the image from source. shizhao (talk) 02:35, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Available at http://web.archive.org/web/20101204121604/http://www.kremlin.ru/news/9677 Latakia2015 (talk) 10:13, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep CC-BY 3.0 is irrevocable license, see archive and site: http://static.kremlin.ru/media/events/photos/big/41d33df92fede07223b7.jpeg. --sasha (krassotkin) 12:19, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
The geometry around the alpha-carbon is incorrect. It should be tetrahedral. Ed (Edgar181) 19:24, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per Edgar. --Smokefoot (talk) 13:40, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per discussion. Leyo 21:46, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
Mire Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:20, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:36, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Mire Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:20, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:37, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 03:38, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: can be found several time previously published on the web Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:45, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. The image is in the threshold of originality. OTRS permission is needed. ★ Poké95 04:54, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: lack of permission Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:47, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
from [8], not NASA shizhao (talk) 03:32, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Incompatible license at source . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:05, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Only used in an promotional biography which was deleted on Chinese Wikipedia. Lakokat (talk) 03:44, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:06, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
In view of the studio marking, this is unlikely to be "own work." —teb728 t c 09:48, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted by Herbythyme: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing
License improper, I doubt that the uploader is the author of the photo Threecharlie (talk) 10:23, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- I believe that a license more correct, given the subject and appearance of the people photographed, may be the PD-Italy, however, the uploader should be correct in providing data which has been retrieved and/or when it was taken (and what circumstances).--Threecharlie (talk) 10:27, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:08, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
No evidence of true author/permission, photo made in 1995 A.Savin 11:54, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:08, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
This looks like an extract from a website, and thus may not be own work as claimed. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:01, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:09, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivate work of Satoyasu, TOMPOP is not the source author. The page licence is about content, however, images are derivate works The Photographer (talk) 14:44, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:10, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.yoursingapore.com/mice/en/plan-your-event/venues/resorts-world-sentosa/overview/_jcr_content/cardcontent/cardcontentpar/image_video/carousel/item_1.resize.carousel-img.0.0.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:10, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from political poster. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
My own work. It has been on Wikipedia for more than two years. Why does it have to leave now?
Deleted: It infringes on the copyright for the poster. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:11, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
I think the "Smurf look" is also copyrighted, so that the author of this derivative work can't release his work under a free license. Ras67 (talk) 16:40, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:11, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
00.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
00.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Olei as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: image does not meet wp quality requirements: low resolution, out of focus, false colors. A lot of better images of this species are available. Didym (talk) 13:02, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
00.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: I was unable to find any other image of this on Commons. And image is in use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:19, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
00.jpg){kind=link}
00.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by 134.100.17.30 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Very low quality with a category full of alternatives--134.100.17.30 16:06, 17 December 2015 (UTC) Didym (talk) 16:47, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused image and better images are available, exemple File:Agriphila tristella (9451673740).jpg Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:01, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Capture d’écran 2015-12-17 à 21.15.06.png
Josve05a (talk) 19:33, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:07, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
It doesn`t seem to be an own work, but rather have been taken from the web. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 19:36, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:08, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
website screenshot, permission missing Bjarlin (talk) 20:45, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:28, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
dupe File:Deepin logo.png shizhao (talk) 03:14, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Krd 17:22, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
I have changed my mind regarding this biography Usman Ullah Khan 04:09, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Krd 17:23, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nebo-Neron (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status. It is very unlikely that the uploader is the author of the image. The original date, source, and author is needed.
- File:Старший помощник командира крейсера "Красный Кавказ" Агарков Константин Иванович.jpg
- File:Гвардии капитан 1 ранга Агарков Константин Иванович.jpg
- File:Фото дедушки.jpg
★ Poké95 06:24, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:23, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Enthält keinerlei Mehrwert Derbrauni (talk) 08:39, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- Bitte umgehend löschen - Irrläufer!!!--Bybbisch94 (talk) 20:33, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:24, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Por diversos motivos deseo eliminar esta imagen. Avispa (talk) 08:43, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
Comment: Aunque la licencia utilizada es irrevocable, será trivial alcanzar el borramento de esta foto declarándola fuera del ámbito de Commons. -- Tuválkin ✉ 15:09, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason for deletion given. Krd 08:20, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
uploader requested deletion (ticket:2015121710025794), unused personal image, out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:31, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: This is a fine messy mess. So, we have this Mr. Upper Case, apparently not notable, who uploaded a vanity shot to Commons in Oct.2008. It is licensed as a selfie («trabajo propio»), though it might be someone else’s photography work — and therefore a copyvio.
- Almost 5 years later, Mr. Upper Case decides he doesn’t want his portrait in Commons anymore, for unknown reasons (maybe a vanity page in wp:es got deleted as off scope?, maybe because one Mary Paz left him a mocking note?), and, half a year after an unsucessful attempt at concealing the full name he had made public in 2008, files in a deletion request (see above). Therein, Mr. Upper Case is informed that while Coomons-accepted licenses are irrevocable, he could get his pic deleted if off-scopeness is argued. This suggestion is followed by cricket chirping and the pic is kept.
- Suddenly, 15 months later, Mr. Upper Case decides to remove his likeness from Commons once again, and, instead of following the sensible advice given the the first DR, he goes on to undertake the following:
- Whine at OTRS — diverting volonteer time and effort from tasks for which OTRS is actually for —, where his plea was nonetheless heard.
- Vandalize the photo at Commons (see file history).
- Vandalize the photo’s file page at Commons.
- Well, we do have something called courtesy deletions, but this case only qualifies for an uncourtesy deletion. This photo is a possible copyvio, a portrait of an off-scope nobody, with scarce additional value (hmm: Category:Portraits with bokeh?, Category:Surplus US Army jackets?), so it could be deleted without a loss for Commons — but this user should be blocked for vandalism. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 23:55, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per Tuvalkin --Krd 16:38, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Inferior copy of File:Державна служба охорони при МВС України (чорний).jpg. Kwasura (talk) 23:00, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- File:Ukraine Police Patch 01.jpg is better than File:Державна служба охорони при МВС України (чорний).jpg --Butko (talk) 05:53, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
- How it is better? --Kwasura (talk) 22:22, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- File:Державна служба охорони при МВС України (чорний).jpg is smaller and has big JPG compression so contains JPG artefacts. Any way they are two different images --Butko (talk) 06:13, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
- How it is better? --Kwasura (talk) 22:22, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: One is a drawing of the patch, the opther is an actual cloth patch. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:41, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Incorrect structure: sodium is not covalently bound. Leyo 00:00, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- This looks to have been changed to correct the issue, so may as well keep. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:42, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Ball-and-stick models absolutely need to have an accurate geometry and size of atoms. Otherwise, they are misleading like in this case. Hence, still Delete. --Leyo 17:09, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom (also lower quality than File:Sodium sulfite ball-and-stick.png for equiv content) DMacks (talk) 20:21, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Incorrect structure: sodium is not covalently bound. Leyo 00:04, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom (even worse than originally noted...see en:Sodium trimetaphosphate) DMacks (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Incorrect structure: sodium is not covalently bound. Leyo 00:04, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- This has been fixed. Though I would say that the oxygen atoms are likely to be equivalent with the same bond order and charge on each. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:30, 19 December 2015 (UTC)t
Deleted: not correct structure per nom (even worse, per en:Sodium trimetaphosphate). DMacks (talk) 20:16, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Incorrect structure: nitrogen isn't coodinated five times. Leyo 00:15, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- Improved configuration. Ionic structure is difficult to represent, so I put the eletronic charges, the question is not to deleting, but improving. Dash between atoms indicate they are linked and not covalently bounded. Thanks for helping.Claudio Pistilli (talk) 08:18, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Even with the update, there are pentavalent nitrogen atoms and covalent bonds where there should be ionic bonds. Ed (Edgar181) 12:54, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- redraw please redraw without lines joining the atoms. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:05, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Just stupid in all respects. I dont understand how such a drawing could be rectified since the species does not exist and is so extremely dumb that theorists would not even be interested. 13:38, 19 December 2015 Smokefoot
Deleted: per nom DMacks (talk) 21:16, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
copyvios and COM:SELFIE
.jpg){kind=link}
Rodrigolopes (talk) 00:01, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- I don't see reason to believe that these are copyright violations. I couldn't find the first file on the internet, and the second was uploaded in a higher resolution than anywhere in the web. And the person depicted has an article on the German language Wikipedia (de:Christian Filips), so we can't assume he's just not notable. Keep. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 15:39, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Kept per above Natuur12 (talk) 22:46, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Inferior duplicate of File:17-а танкова бригада.png. Kwasura (talk) 00:48, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:48, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:1-а танкова бригада.jpg. Kwasura (talk) 01:00, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:48, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 04:01, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:48, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image I try my best (talk) 20:12, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 21:48, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Forgery, from a copy/forgery business site (spam). Original painting (from the museum) is here: File:Boy in the Red Vest.jpg Softlavender (talk) 04:51, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:48, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Inferior copy of File:81-а тактична група.jpg. Kwasura (talk) 05:49, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:48, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Looks like not own work, as there is no EXIF data present, and is a small image. OTRS permission from the author is needed. ★ Poké95 05:53, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:48, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. It is very unlikely that the uploader is the author of this image. The date, source, and original author is needed. ★ Poké95 05:57, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:48, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. It is very unlikely that the uploader is the author of the image. The original date, source, and author is needed. ★ Poké95 06:03, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:48, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. Although the date is given (1953), there is no source and author. At least, the death date of the author is needed. ★ Poké95 06:11, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:49, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Incorrect structure: sodium is not covalently bound. Leyo 00:01, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- This looks to have been changed. Though I would like to see the anion drawn more like what you see in File:Ammonium-acetate-3D-balls.png with a dotted line across the two oxygens. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:41, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Ball-and-stick models absolutely need to have an accurate geometry and size of atoms. Otherwise, they are misleading like in this case. Hence, still Delete. --Leyo 17:09, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In use . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:34, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Incorrect structure: sodium is not covalently bound. Leyo 00:01, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- File improved. It's not a matter of deleting, but of improving. Thanks for helping. Claudio Pistilli (talk) 06:41, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- This looks to have been changed. Though I would like to see the anion drawn more like what you see in File:Ammonium-acetate-3D-balls.png with a dotted line across the two oxygens. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:40, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Ball-and-stick models absolutely need to have an accurate geometry and size of atoms. Otherwise, they are misleading like in this case. Hence, still Delete. --Leyo 17:08, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In use . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:35, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
(1) different sizes of atoms of the same element, (2) incorrect geometry due to being a composite of different files, (3) possible licence violation as this is a derivative of uncited original files made by indef-blocked uploader that had problems with proper licensing. Wostr (talk) 23:46, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Furthermore I have replaced/removed all its uses, hence the file can get deleted. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:49, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:39, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Incorrect structure: sodium is not covalently bound. Leyo 00:01, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- This looks to have been changed. Though I would like to see the anion drawn more like what you see in File:Ammonium-acetate-3D-balls.png with a dotted line across the two oxygens. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:37, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Ball-and-stick models absolutely need to have an accurate geometry and size of atoms. Otherwise, they are misleading like in this case. Hence, still Delete. --Leyo 17:08, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: in use . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:36, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Likely copyvio: Graphical composite of multiple uncited originals. DMacks (talk) 11:57, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom + chemically incorrect model of salt that has no educational value. Wostr (talk) 10:44, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Most likely copyright violation due to composite of multiple uncited originals. The file should be deleted even if it's in use. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 17:16, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:42, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Incorrect structure: sodium is not covalently bound. Leyo 00:02, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- This looks to have been changed. Though I would like to see the anion drawn more like what you see in File:Ammonium-acetate-3D-balls.png with a dotted line across the two oxygens. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:37, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Ball-and-stick models absolutely need to have an accurate geometry and size of atoms. Otherwise, they are misleading like in this case. Hence, still Delete. --Leyo 17:06, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In use . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:36, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Incorrect structure: sodium is not covalently bound. Leyo 00:05, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- Correct structure. Dash between Na-SH does not indicate covalent bond, because charges are inserted. Claudio Pistilli (talk) 07:40, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. The image incorrectly depicts a covalent bond between the sodium and sulfur atoms. Ed (Edgar181) 13:04, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:39, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
The structure is still factually incorrect. The previous DR was closed as kept because the image was in use in one small Wikipedia (the article with one single user contribution only). I replaced this usage by a correct version. --Leyo 23:55, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Incorrect charge location. Fixed in File:Sodium hydrosulfide 2D.png DMacks (talk) 15:28, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Chemical nonsense (H atom can never have a negative charge), mispositioning of charges. Provided replacement fixes all these errors. I support the deletion! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:36, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: chemical nonsense. Taivo (talk) 16:37, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Incorrect structure: sodium is not covalently bound, see en:Sodium hydride. Leyo 00:08, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- Correct structure. The atoms were eletronically charged, but unnecessarily, dash between atoms indicate they are linked to each other, and not necessarily covalently bounded. Thanks for helping. Claudio Pistilli (talk) 07:45, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. The image incorrectly depicts a covalent bond. Ed (Edgar181) 13:03, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep in the gas form the molecules resemble this, ad they are partly covalently bound. This molecule is found in the Sun and some other stars. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:28, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- The quality is clearly insufficient, e.g. compression artifacts. --Leyo 09:42, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:39, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
The structure is still factually incorrect. The previous DR was closed as kept because the image was in use in one small Wikipedia (the article with contributions of one user only). I replaced the usage. File:3D Sodium hydride.png may be deleted, too. --Leyo 23:37, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. Ed (Edgar181) 15:15, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Incorrect structure, see Category:Sodium phosphide. Leyo 00:10, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- Improved configuration. The structure was improved, although the eletronic charges were correct. Dash between atoms does not mean covalent bond, but they are ionically bounded. Thanks for helping. Claudio Pistilli (talk) 07:52, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. The new image still incorrectly shows covalent bonds. In chemistry diagrams, ionic bonds are not depicted by solid lines. Ed (Edgar181) 13:01, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- redraw please redraw without lines joining the atoms. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:05, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Also the new version is inaccurate and misleading. Hence, still Delete. --Leyo 16:55, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as incorrect. The charges are inconsistent with the bonding even if the bonding were to be correct. DMacks (talk) 03:36, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:39, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
The structure is still factually incorrect. The previous DR was closed as kept because the image was in use in one small Wikipedia (the article with one single user contribution only). I replaced this usage by correct versions. --Leyo 00:13, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. No longer in use. Ed (Edgar181) 13:10, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Incorrect structure: sodium is not covalently bound. Leyo 00:11, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- This looks to have been changed. Though I would like to see the anion drawn more like what you see in File:Ammonium-acetate-3D-balls.png with a dotted line across the two oxygens. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:11, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. It is "dangerously" misleading to show naked Na+ and the conformation, especially such slick graphics which implies advanced knowledge (but results from the opposite). --Smokefoot (talk) 13:32, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:39, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Still lots of chemical mistakes. One Na looks within VDW radius of adjacent O, and even other is "closer" than covalent distance. This is an ionic substance, and (if I understand DOI:10.1107/S0108270183006587 correctly) the Na are not localized to one or the other O on a carboxylate. High-quality incorrect image provides deception of reliable content. Unused (pending-changes notwithstanding). DMacks (talk) 03:46, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per DMacks and Smokefoot above. The image is now orphaned. --Leyo 10:20, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:05, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Incorrect structure: hydrogens in ammonium are not bound like that. Leyo 00:12, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- This looks to have been changed. Though I would like to see the anion drawn more like what you see in File:Ammonium-acetate-3D-balls.png with a dotted line across the two oxygens. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:10, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. It is misleading to show naked ammonium centers, especially such slick graphics which implies advanced knowledge (but results from the opposite). --Smokefoot (talk) 13:33, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:39, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Incorrect structure/geometry at ammonium. Leyo 00:13, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- This looks to have been changed. Though I would like to see the anion drawn more like what you see in File:Ammonium-acetate-3D-balls.png with a dotted line across the two oxygens. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:09, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Ball-and-stick models absolutely need to have an accurate geometry. Otherwise, they are misleading. Hence, still Delete. --Leyo 16:53, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:39, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Incorrect structure: sodium is not covalently bound. Leyo 00:15, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- redraw Although it may be wrong, if the file has been used, I think it is better to retain it, but label it with do not use and explain why it is wrong. Otherwise it would be great if it can be replaced by a correct structure. If we delete these files and not replace them, it will make old version of articles that use them ugly. It would be better to have a wrong diagram than nothing, as it would show what the article was like back in the past. * please redraw without lines joining the atoms. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:06, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Misleading to readers. The material has an close-packed structure (polymeric). --Smokefoot (talk) 13:39, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as incorrect. The charges are inconsistent with the bonding even if the bonding were to be correct. DMacks (talk) 03:35, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:39, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
The structure is factually incorrect as discussed above. Since its use in pt:Nitreto de sódio has been replaced by a correct structure (in agreement with e.g. en.wikipedia) the likely keep reason In use does not apply anymore. --Leyo 23:44, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. Ed (Edgar181) 15:15, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
from [9], "NGC 1277 taken by the Hubble Telescope Observatory © Mcdonald, Texas." shizhao (talk) 06:38, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Effettuata correzione. Come illustrato nella didascalia dell'immagine (vedi: http://www.astronoo.com/en/news/super-black-hole.html), la galassia è stata ripresa dal Telescopio spaziale Hubble.
Mylkomeda
Deleted: No evidence to support the PD-claim provided Natuur12 (talk) 23:34, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status, unlikely own work, permission needed, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Tawara3 / logs (last remaining file) and file logs = 2x deleted / 2x reuploaded and taken from (as indicated) http://bluestyle.livedoor.biz/archives/50717411.html (2007, wayback to 2007 available) = http://livedoor.blogimg.jp/bluestylecom/imgs/4/2/42353447.JPG (identical size & exif).
Affected montage:
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 23:34, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Inferior copy of File:Ukraine-army-iraq-800x800.jpg Kwasura (talk) 10:11, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 23:35, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Es una foto mia y esta colgada sin permiso. Rogaria que la borrasen.Muchas gracias 85.152.4.7 11:18, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 23:35, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Organisational logo, with TOO concern, Willing to assume good faith if more information provided. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:00, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 23:36, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
complex logo? — regards, Revi 13:41, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 23:36, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
rename with new name https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kantor_Kelurahan_Damai_Baru,_Balikpapan.JPG Exagren (talk) 13:51, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: No reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 23:34, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
rename with new name https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kantor_Kelurahan_Damai_Baru,_Balikpapan_%282%29.JPG Exagren (talk) 13:51, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: No reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 23:34, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
User abuse Jan von Erpecom (talk) 15:21, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Look at this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Xx_live-laugh-love_xX. Jan von Erpecom (talk) 14:59, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 23:33, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. format (cropped?) and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 15:24, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 23:33, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Inferior duplicate of File:54r.jpg. Kwasura (talk) 15:45, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 23:33, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Inferior duplicate of File:24 Залізна механізована дивізія Сухопутних військ ЗС України.jpg. Kwasura (talk) 15:55, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 23:33, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
I am the author of this file. I took this photo at a private party when I was younger and forgot it was here. It violates the privacy of the subject depicted as I never explicitly obtained their consent. As such, I believe the free-use rationale I used with this photo is invalid, and the photo should be deleted. Thanks. GreyWyvern (talk) 17:50, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per com:IDENT Natuur12 (talk) 23:33, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Uploaded in support of blatant hoax Wikipedia article. Not necessarily a copyvio as I can't see a source through Google Images search. Blythwood (talk) 18:21, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 23:31, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. format (montage?) and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 19:11, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete - I agree to the nomination. This seems to be a copyright violation. --Sreejith K (talk) 21:06, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 23:30, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Is this logo realy below COM:TOO? Josve05a (talk) 20:07, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 23:31, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Copied from http://www.josedeecatenor.com/#!Tenor José de Eça/zoom/c1ppg/dataItem-ihdgzhe3 / https://static.wixstatic.com/media/7173bf_3b7008035a7b4f68a0381f1d1ce4195e.jpg/v1/fit/w_1200,h_974,q_90,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01/7173bf_3b7008035a7b4f68a0381f1d1ce4195e.jpg Nemo 21:20, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 23:31, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Wap logo is out of scope, not used anymore and not notable, the article about Wap has been speedily deleted in pt-Wikipedia because of missing notability. Bjarlin (talk) 21:27, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 23:31, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. rather thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 22:08, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 23:31, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Incorrect structure: sodium is not covalently bound. Poor quality anyway. Leyo 00:03, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- This looks to have been changed. Though I would like to see the anion drawn more like what you see in File:Ammonium-acetate-3D-balls.png with a dotted line across the two oxygens. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:36, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In use . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:37, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Now not in use anymore. --Leyo 11:17, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Also consider to delete the file redirect File:3D Sodium carbamate.png. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 06:29, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 22:04, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
Incorrect structure in many ways, including charges and inappropriate depiction. Leyo 00:05, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- Correct structure. See http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/product/aldrich/460990?lang=pt®ion=BR Claudio Pistilli (talk) 07:36, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- But it is still badly colored with shadows, which is not common in chemical structures. Rjh (talk) 06:59, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Structure seems OK, but better and clearer colours should be used! For this sort of diagram, just use Black "Na" letters. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:34, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- You failed to see that the lone pairs and charges are inconsistently drawn. Delete if unchanged. --Leyo 09:45, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Structure seems OK, but better and clearer colours should be used! For this sort of diagram, just use Black "Na" letters. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:34, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- But it is still badly colored with shadows, which is not common in chemical structures. Rjh (talk) 06:59, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In use . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:37, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Info I drew a corrected version, uploaded it and wanted to withdraw my DR, but Jim was faster. --Leyo 23:54, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Incorrect structure: sodium is not covalently bound. Leyo 00:02, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- This looks to have been changed. Though I would like to see the anion drawn more like what you see in File:Ammonium-acetate-3D-balls.png with a dotted line across the two oxygens. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:39, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Ball-and-stick models absolutely need to have an accurate geometry and size of atoms. Otherwise, they are misleading like in this case. Hence, still Delete. --Leyo 17:06, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: This, and the remaining similar files below, are all in use. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:38, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Chemically incorrect: this structure has an extra atom between the As and one of the O, so I removed it from its use-cases. Also (as others have noted) it's a crazy mix of styles, and problems regarding the fundamental way to depict a salt. That's because it's an uncited composite of uncited originals (license fail). DMacks (talk) 05:15, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. This structure is indeed a complete mess & composite of different other uncited files. The result is an inferior quality with opaque (white) background. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 22:11, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - now unused. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:06, 24 July 2020 (UTC)