Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/10/19

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 19th, 2015


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Queríamos q flswl fgkswkxfgk 189.222.211.175 04:15, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept: Vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 04:22, 19 October 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, the copyright holder in the EXIF data is LES LOGES 2014. Pokéfan95 (talk) 06:06, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops,  I withdraw my nomination. I didn't notice that the author is Julien Manceau, and is a Commons user (Klr leon). In the EXIF data, the author is Manceau Julien. My mistake. Pokéfan95 (talk) 06:10, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely taken from here: http://www.futbolparatodos.com.ar/jugador/rodrigo-migone/ Ytoyoda (talk) 00:16, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Hedwig in Washington as copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:58, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:53, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I hate selfie shoes and will block the uploader indefinitely for sockpuppetry and block evasion. Taivo (talk) 09:01, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have downloaded with upper margine. MADRASS2014 (talk) 09:54, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 09:57, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader states "Dr. Kenneth Hansraj (copyright holder) has given me the permission via email to upload on Wikimedia Commons." This e-mail should be converted into OTRS-permission, otherways I do not believe, that such mail exists. Taivo (talk) 19:57, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I asked the copyright holder to send the permission directly to Wikimedia Commons.MADRASS2014 (talk) 06:01, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ticket:2015102110017459 received but insufficient. Clarification has been requested. Storkk (talk) 13:19, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: for the moment. Will be handeled though OTRS. --JuTa 08:28, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is a copyright violoation 39.47.187.169 16:44, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no evidence for copyvio Krd 20:15, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
I have sent an e-mail to the German support team with the proof that I'm the fotograf of both pictures, too. I hope they will confirm this here soon.
[Ticket#: 2015101910023929] --Wosch21149 (talk) 20:30, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per Ticket: 2015101910023929 User Wosch21149 is identical with dep08722 and W. Schwartz Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 20:41, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mitoyoi

[edit]

Looks like not own work, as there is no EXIF data to prove that the uploader is the author. Possible copyvio. Pokéfan95 (talk) 05:38, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvios. Yann (talk) 20:58, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It has files that are possible copyvio. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Mitoyoi. Pokéfan95 (talk) 05:59, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Empty, out of scope anyway. Yann (talk) 21:00, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It has files that are possible copyvio. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Mitoyoi. Pokéfan95 (talk) 06:00, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Empty, out of scope anyway. Yann (talk) 21:00, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

can't be used as flipped image per WP:IMGLOC Naue7 (talk) 21:45, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: invalid reason for DR. Materialscientist (talk) 02:24, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Humans do not have a symmetrical faces, making this a false image which should be deleted. Not useful COM:EDUSE TrashCollector (talk) 19:55, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as uploader of this image just a flipped duplicate of File:Bruce Jenner 2012.jpg. Naue7 (talk) 00:53, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 19:28, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a lower-res copy of File:MANTE(1800) p7.231 SIEGE OF GIBRALTAR - 1782.jpg and therefore redundant Rsteen (talk) 19:44, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it's not lower-resolution, it's from exactly the same Flickr page, and just not cropped. Definitely a duplicate, tho. Revent (talk) 03:27, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Speedied as a duplicate. Revent (talk) 03:31, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Worthless and spam Fredde165487 (talk) 01:45, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request. Softs2PC is unknown to en.wiki. This is the user's only upload. Taivo (talk) 15:35, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lostroveroscriollos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This is not own works, the source is http://www.lostroveroscriollos.com/fotos.segunda_generacion.php and I saw no evidences that the content is free

--Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:58, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, there is even big watermark in bottom of both files. Taivo (talk) 16:56, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and uncategorized logo of a not enough notable company (no articles) : out of scope --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Adapta Solutions are unknown to en.wiki and es.wiki. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:14, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It has files that are possible copyvio. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Mitoyoi. Pokéfan95 (talk) 06:00, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Yann. Taivo (talk) 15:16, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ファイルの更新が上手く出来ずに新しい物をアップロードしたので Ishuty (talk) 06:06, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Google Translation: "Because you upload a new one without being able to successfully update is a file" --Pokéfan95 (talk) 06:16, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, uploader's request, superseded by file:Imperial Japanese Navy Amatsukaze1945.jpg. Taivo (talk) 17:18, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation 46.218.9.198 11:55, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by user:Natuur12 as copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 15:19, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Sannita as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: probable copyvio from http://vista.ir/include/articles/images/b3387427c633c2ab3f8d9e226d16f1e4.jpg

File has been here since 2008. We can afford a regular DR. Natuur12 (talk) 14:44, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, by user: Natuur12 as copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 15:24, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not intended for this page Wikipedian Content (talk) 06:50, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day, the uploader's only contribution. Film posters aren't suitable in Commons anyway. Taivo (talk) 17:22, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Portrayed is "Jimi Dougans", founding member of "The Young Senators" and a related upload File:YOUNG SENATORS MOTOWN PHOTO.JPG by this user was copyvio. Gunnex (talk) 07:07, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Unlikely to be own work, as there is no EXIF data. Possible copyvio. --Pokéfan95 (talk) 07:16, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:33, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

porque se está utilizando sin consentimiento de una de las partes 189.238.0.193 07:22, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:35, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Problème de droit MNM MadameTsching (talk) 07:16, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 17:39, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF. Uploaded by 1-upload user Buchita4 (talk · contributions · Statistics). Gunnex (talk) 08:42, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:22, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, out of scope IMO Gbawden (talk) 08:51, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, only 720×960 pixels, blurry, no metadata, no educational value. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:55, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scoope, low res image of someone holding flowers and with a filenamn indicating that it has something to do with Miley Cyrus!? Hangsna (talk) 10:38, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, only 274×206 pixels, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 19:32, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Files are not legitimately in use.

1989 23:26, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep PDF files

I created the Cat PDF files in 2009 or 10 and most here can be put into legitimate categories. This person should have done more research WayneRay (talk) 01:46, 7 December 2014 (UTC) Okay, the DR has been withdrawn and I'm tempted to do a speedy close as kept but for one issue: is there any quick way I can do a mass "Kept" edit on all 418 files in this DR, or do I have to make that edit one at a time on each one?? Tabercil (talk) 04:30, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Deletion request withdrawn by nominator Tabercil (talk) 14:37, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text documents of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE.

Stefan4 (talk) 14:03, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope. --PierreSelim (talk) 21:31, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

accidental duplicate of another file I uploaded Ijon (talk) 10:40, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 08:03, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deletion Request by Uploader Krishna Chaitanya Velaga(Indian) Talk 10:59, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused and uncategorized photo without metadata. Depicted person is unknown to en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 09:14, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deletion Request by Uploader Krishna Chaitanya Velaga(Indian) Talk 10:59, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused and uncategorized photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 09:11, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, looks like a personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:27, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 09:39, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:31, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, bad quality. Taivo (talk) 09:45, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DigiKnight (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own works : very small images without EXIF

--Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:45, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, these are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 09:55, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't think the Flickr account is the creator of this, therefore the license is invalid. Yann (talk) 12:06, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, all those newspapers (The Economic Times, India Today, Deccan Chronicles etc.) cannot be own work. Taivo (talk) 10:06, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't think the Flickr account is the creator of this, therefore the license is invalid. Yann (talk) 12:06, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, collage of 6 photos – and only 317×200 pixels? For collages source and license for every used image must be given. Taivo (talk) 10:10, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't think the Flickr account is the creator of this, therefore the license is invalid. Yann (talk) 12:07, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, collage of 11 important photos about Indian prime minister Narendra Modi, no source for these photos. Plus Twitter bird, which is copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 10:17, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Babasab Patil (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: personal photos, one used in deleted autobio en:Babasab Patil

JohnCD (talk) 13:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the biggest of them was 196×258 pixels, all unused. These were the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 09:48, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Manik mukherjee (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These do not seem to be own work by the uploader. They do not seem to be in scope either.

Stefan4 (talk) 13:38, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, unused, poor description, no explanation, what kind of value these documents have. These are the uploader's last remaining contributions. Taivo (talk) 11:00, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fdilisa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These files seem to be out of scope.

Stefan4 (talk) 13:39, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, all are unused, font is small and partly not readable. These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 11:54, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Inmgang (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These seem to be non-free covers or logos of products.

Stefan4 (talk) 13:42, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, all unused, in my opinion they are personal posters. I'll delete also file:SofianeINM.jpg as small unused personal photo without metadata and then are all the user's contributions deleted. Taivo (talk) 11:59, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If user-created, then it's out of scope. If it is not user-created, then it is non-free. Stefan4 (talk) 13:45, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I could not think up, how to use the image. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:25, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Stefan4 (talk) 13:46, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, unused art of non-notable artist is out of project scope. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:27, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KGattens (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused tables of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Should be converted into wikicode if useful.

Stefan4 (talk) 13:51, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, these are the uploader's last remaining contributions. Taivo (talk) 12:35, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Use Category:Military schools in Sweden instead. Saftgurka (talk) 13:52, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, transmogrified into redirect. Taivo (talk) 14:24, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Msrofex88 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused PDFs of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE.

Stefan4 (talk) 13:56, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, these are the uploader's only contributions. Try Wikisource and Wikiversity. Taivo (talk) 14:47, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ealarasi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused text documents of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Probably not own work by the uploader.

Stefan4 (talk) 13:57, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, these are the uploader's only contributions. Try Wikisource or Wikiversity, but only if they are really own work. Taivo (talk) 14:54, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arrayan100 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused text documents of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE.

Stefan4 (talk) 13:59, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, these are the uploader's only contributions. Try Wikisource or Wikiversity. Taivo (talk) 15:31, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The same picture as in File:יאיר בר-קול.jpg but in poorer quality. This is file is not in use anyway, so there's really no need in keeping it in the Commons. Ldorfman (talk) 14:18, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:57, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Baljeet Bilaspur (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 14:29, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:21, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:29, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I agree totally. Taivo (talk) 17:20, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:33, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bigley2012 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, these are the uploader's last remaining contributions. Taivo (talk) 17:40, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfree book cover. COM:DW. Steinsplitter (talk) 17:20, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And File:Erlanger Stadtlexikon.jpg --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:21, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, after receiving OTRS-permissions from cover artists the files can be restored. Taivo (talk) 10:16, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seems to be three days earlier, based on the "Last-Modified" HTTP header. Probably copyvio. Stefan4 (talk) 17:55, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:20, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the description, this is a screenshot from World of Warcraft. If this is correct, then the file is unfree. Stefan4 (talk) 18:03, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Warcrat is unknown to en.wiki. Probably screenshot from copyrighted game. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:51, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Youtube screenshot. No evidence of permission. Stefan4 (talk) 18:06, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:54, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jn182 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

What are these? Screenshots of a potentially unfree website? There's a field for entering text on one of the images.

Stefan4 (talk) 18:09, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, depicted person is notable (article in 12 languages), but these are small photos without metadata, the uploader's only contributions. Deleted as copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 11:59, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. I blocked the uploader indefinitely due to massive sockpuppetry and this is his/her last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:29, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: LTA-upload. Blatant copyright violation. Natuur12 (talk) 15:25, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographs of identifiable people 105.66.26.139 04:29, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

my picture 105.65.253.101 11:53, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

you have choice to remove my picture — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noskilomaticha (talk • contribs)


Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:26, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque la Sra. Roth lo solicita. Pueden comunicarse a la agencia de representación de la artista para confirmar esta información. Tel 4862-6443/1728 Alejandro Vannelli Representaciones Artisticas 190.16.112.245 20:42, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alejandro, si queres cambiar la foto de tu cliente en uso en wikipedia, vayte a cada artículo, y cámbiala: Onde estuvir Cecilia Roth 2014 (cropped).jpg o Cecilia Roth.jpg, reemplaza con ROTH Cecilia.jpg — y discute el cambio con los otro editores de cada proyecto, si necesario.
Pero intentar borrar del Commons esas dos otras fotos (tomadas en local público, con evidente permiso de la persona fotografada, y legitimamente licenciadas) es mala idea.
(Y a File:ROTH Cecilia.jpg le falta justo el licenciamento — ¡sugiro que lo añadas urgentemente!) -- Tuválkin 21:39, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: speedy kept - nonsense DR Denniss (talk) 09:44, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Organisational logo, not own work as claimed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:48, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Not own work, but should be compared with threshold of originality. Probably the shield shape makes the logo eligible for copyright. Taivo (talk) 17:54, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: clearly meets the threshold. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:14, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Benoît Prieur as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Text of the speech is copyrighted. Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:27, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep it was not a speech but an improvisation. Jérémy-Günther-Heinz Jähnick (talk) 10:35, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use. -- Geagea (talk) 07:26, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyright violation, speeches are copyrighted, even improvized ones. Pleclown (talk) 09:28, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license (No license since). Just text, but unused and clearly prommotional. Amitie 10g (talk) 04:23, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete NatureForex and Nature Forex are unknown to en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 16:54, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:36, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wangmingqing0756 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded in a row on 25.10.2013 all (art) works appears to be related to — following http://xuping.meishujia.cn/?act=usite&usid=3564&inview=appid-267-mid-760&said=552 (2011) — "Haicang Jiang,", an artist (Chinese?) born 1961, needing permission. File:Jianghaicang3.jpg: unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF.

Gunnex (talk) 06:42, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:36, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chinaleader (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. May be also out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related enwiki entry (created by uploader) 3x deleted.

Gunnex (talk) 06:52, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:36, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie of two unknown guys somewhere. Out of Commons:Project scope. Benoît Prieur (d) 07:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On the right, Jérémy-Günther-Heinz Jähnick, 4th contributor of Wikimedia Commons by the number of file created and uploaded on Commons and first French spoken in this category, who currently direct the biggest projet of illustration (in cycling). Illustration of a Wikimedian at work. So I am very far to be an unknown guy. Jérémy-Günther-Heinz Jähnick (talk) 09:45, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: likely in scope. Steinsplitter (talk) 11:37, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cette photo ne correspond pas à la légende et a été retouchée. 77.157.104.205 07:03, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete COM:PACKAGING does not allow the photo into Commons. Taivo (talk) 17:31, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:37, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution (appears to be cropped), missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Hunstler (serial copyright violator) Gunnex (talk) 08:10, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I warned Hunstler. Taivo (talk) 17:59, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:37, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SOHO images are not freely licensed, category created by banned user. All images in the category should be deleted as well. 189.25.244.90 19:23, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Achim (talk) 08:27, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Indeed, see their copyright policy. All appear to indeed use copyrighted data. Revent (talk) 03:36, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete unfortunately the last photo is a featured picture, which is used 146 times in 37 projects. Taivo (talk) 18:17, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I pinged the various people who voted for it as a FP over on enwiki, to hopefully shortcut the inter-project drama. Revent (talk) 02:40, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. SOHO images are decidedly not public domain. It is unfortunately that so many people simply assume that anything labelled NASA is fair game for Commons. Huntster (t @ c) 05:39, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete as original nominator. Also nominated a derivative work of a non-free SOHO image: File:Rigel-B8.jpg. --189.25.231.188 22:12, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:38, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:44, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I add for deletion all his other contributions, not yet nominated for deletion. All out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 18:36, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:39, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Gamerindo

[edit]

Here are all contributions of Gamerindo (talk · contribs):

They are screenshots and logo of non-notable software (Gamerindo is unknown to en.wiki). The first file is unused personal photo. All out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:43, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:40, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't think the Flickr account is the creator of this, therefore the license is invalid. Yann (talk) 12:08, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:41, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't think the Flickr account is the creator of this, therefore the license is invalid. Yann (talk) 12:09, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:41, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:35, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:02, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Druhlbachmuwimünchen

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Druhlbachmuwimünchen (talk · contribs):

First group. They have usually no metadata and are usually small. Own work is not sure, I suspect copyright violation.

Author is Marcus Kretzer, the art is still protected with copyright. His site has no other license than "© M. Kretzer 2003". Taivo (talk) 10:21, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:02, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:41, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I do not believe, that it is selfie. Taivo (talk) 08:28, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:01, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:41, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with Mjrmtg. Moumou82 (talk) 17:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:01, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ashdovejay

[edit]

AshDoveJay (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? Can you describe and categorize the files correctly? Taivo (talk) 10:41, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:01, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:01, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Hafiz Wasim Abbas

[edit]

Here are all contributions of Hafiz Wasim Abbas (talk · contribs):

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:52, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:01, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:59, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:01, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:59, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:01, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:01, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:01, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image : out of scope --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:20, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:01, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal text : out of scope --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:22, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:01, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Bablu Baghel

[edit]

Bablu Baghel (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? Can you describe and categorize the files correctly? Taivo (talk) 11:06, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:01, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Deepesh.biyani

[edit]

These photos are uploaded by Deepesh.biyani (talk · contribs):

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. I think, that unlinked sandbox does not count. Taivo (talk) 11:34, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:00, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of ElvinNureddinli

[edit]

Here are all contributions of ElvinNureddinli (talk · contribs):

Small photos, half of them without EXIF data, 6 different cameras, no more than 2 photos from the same camera. I suspect copyright violation of real photographers. Taivo (talk) 12:11, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:59, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Paritto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused text documents of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE.

Stefan4 (talk) 14:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in SVG or MediaWiki graph if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. "Own works" derivated from modern banknotes from Guatemala, copyrighted by the en:Bank of Guatemala, the publisher & designer. The related law DECRETO NÚMERO 17-2002 (ARTÍCULO 21) indicates to "está prohibido a cualquier persona, individual o jurídica, reproducir en cualquier forma, así como hacer grabados, litografías o impresiones, de billetes o parte de billetes emitidos por el Banco de Guatemala" (reproduction prohibited).

Per en:List of countries' copyright lengths Guatemala has 75 pma or 75 years from publication or if unpublished 75 years from creation (computer programs and collective works; anonymous or pseudonymous works; audiovisual works. See also full text via http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text.jsp?file_id=127668, where I can't find any term related to governmental works.

Gunnex (talk) 19:16, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:57, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused userlogo? Doesn't seem to be in scope. Stefan4 (talk) 21:06, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:56, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 21:14, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:56, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alizabeto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own works : seems like promotional professional photos

--Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:32, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:56, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I sincerely doubt that this is own work Gbawden (talk) 08:52, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:03, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Also I am not sure, that the logo fits in our project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:06, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:03, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Dbreemeersch

[edit]

Dbreemeersch (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

I suspect copyright violation. OTRS-permission from copyright holder (company representative?) is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:36, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:03, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:34, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:02, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Published before (see search [1]); no evidence for rights of uploader for this image. Tatewaki (talk) 12:30, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:10, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational purpose, possible copyvio (as there is a watermark at the lower left of the image). Pokéfan95 (talk) 13:31, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I think, that the image is ineligible to copyright due to simplicity, but is out of scope. Taivo (talk) 10:28, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:10, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: personal photo used in deleted hoax autobio en:Bharat Pawar JohnCD (talk) 14:44, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:09, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:09, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and File:CONDITIONAL SENTENCES IN ENGLISH AND TURKISH.pdf.

Unused text document of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan4 (talk) 16:16, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:10, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan4 (talk) 16:16, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:10, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan4 (talk) 16:19, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:10, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gildo 900 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused text documents of unclear notability without evidence of permission. See COM:SCOPE.

Stefan4 (talk) 16:20, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per EXIF, authors are Ana Starka and Isabela. OTRS-permissions from authors are needed. Taivo (talk) 10:08, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:10, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Gildo 900 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Plus File:04Fundacao.pdf, a reuploaded file. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:11, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Gildo 900 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These do not seem to be own work by the uploader. They also seem to be out of scope.

Stefan2 (talk) 16:47, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:09, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Afonso Danito (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 16:59, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:10, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused PDF of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan4 (talk) 17:53, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:11, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image appears to be from here, copyrighted: http://www.swanseaphotos.com/galleries/liberty-stadium/ Ytoyoda (talk) 17:58, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:11, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be too blurry to be useful. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan4 (talk) 17:59, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:11, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bastianquills (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All photos credit © Lionel Moreau, connection to uploader not explained.

Ytoyoda (talk) 18:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Needs OTRS permission Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:11, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bastianquills (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:20, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Teambean7 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collages do not specify sources for individual images. Unable to verify that these are the uploader's works.

Ytoyoda (talk) 18:04, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete two more collages, uploaded after Toyoda's request. Taivo (talk) 11:36, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:12, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 18:05, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:12, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused personal picture Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 23:34, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:14, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused personal picture Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 23:34, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:14, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused personal picture Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 23:34, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:14, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused personal picture Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 23:34, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:14, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 23:38, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:14, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 23:38, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:14, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 23:39, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:14, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 23:39, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:14, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 23:39, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:14, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 23:40, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:14, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 23:53, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:14, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt this is own work of the uploasd, I have found a smaller size image here: [2] Avron (talk) 19:30, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A search found over a dozen copies of the larger version all over the internet. Not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:16, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW Base (talk) 20:07, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The image is of a poster or display which is not user's own work, although the photograph most likely is. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:15, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Vlademp. Most likely screenshotted somewhere from Youtube like File:Desastrecambray.png. Gunnex (talk) 20:28, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating also:

Gunnex (talk) 20:35, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:14, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear source : far to old to be an own work, it is published here https://www.gadsby.co.uk/20/our-history , as there is no evidence the image is in the PD (first publication?), I think we need an OTRS permission.


Deleted: Neither file was own work. Both were older images without source. The &Sons photo was of higher quality than the one on the company website cited by the nominator, but that page had no information about the image either and was copyright. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:13, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Regarding the description of the picture (decommission in Switzerland was 1994) and the EXIF data. MBurch (talk) 21:03, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Obviously the photo is taken from a print media. J-4021 is in the UK since 1995 and marked as G-HHAC without Swiss Airforce roundels ([3]). No "secret mountain airfield" fantasizing please. --83.78.27.130 21:20, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Saying "obviously" you seem to want to create the impression, that you know the book? Please name the book then.
And now the quiz: can you show me one file with an EXIF data prior to 1994?--Anidaat (talk) 20:48, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The Hunter aircraft were removed from service in 1994. This photo had Apple iPhone exif data. It is impossible for an iPhone to have taken the photo prior to 1994 when the aircraft stopped being used. Therefore, this is a rephotograph of an uncredited intermediate image and COM:PRP requires a source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:08, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: ticket:2015122410009726 and [4]. Yann (talk) 18:58, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image will be free (1968+80=2048) the 01/01/2049 (Commons:Copyright rules by territory#Colombia : "The rights for collective works and anonymous works expires eighty (80) years from the date of publication") --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:23, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:04, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope : unused personal images --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:55, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:03, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Samral (talk · contribs)

Several non-trivial logos claimed to be PD because of inegibility (File:AzPFL_logo.jpg), claims that files are released under CC without evidence (File:Isa Gambar (1).jpg), files supposed to be in PD because of age but undated (File:Pənahəli xan.jpg) or created long after the limit for copyright expiry (File:Səməd Vurğun (Pekin, 1955).jpg). In at least one case, the claim of authorship seems to be simply false (File:Cəmil Həsənli (21.09.2013).jpg).

Underlying lk (talk) 00:35, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Underlying lk

File:İçərişəhər DTMQİ icazə vərəq 1.jpg, File:İçərişəhər DTMQİ icazə vərəq 2.jpg and File:Bakı şəhərində M.Ə.Rəsulzadənin abidəsinin ucaldılması haqqında 26 saylı qərar (13.01.1993).jpg my images.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

= PD-old-70. what's the matter ?--samral talk 23:39, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gazanfar Halykov, the author of File:Nizami Gəncəvi - Qəzənfər Xalıqov.jpg, died in 1981. 2014-1981=70? --Juggler2005 (talk) 01:12, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This is a mess, with way too many different arguments. File:AzPFL_logo.jpg, to pick on one, is probably ineligible for copyright in the US, and deserves its own discussion.--Prosfilaes (talk) 04:11, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


No evidence that the author died 100 years ago like {{PD-old-100}} requires.

Juggler2005 (talk) 00:05, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Juggler2005 bəs sənin sübutun var mı ki, müəllif 100 il əvvəl ölməyib ?--samral talk 00:11, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"The burden of proof lies on the uploader." --Juggler2005 (talk) 00:16, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Juggler2005 File:İçərişəhər DTMQİ icazə vərəq 1.jpg, File:İçərişəhər DTMQİ icazə vərəq 2.jpg and File:Bakı şəhərində M.Ə.Rəsulzadənin abidəsinin ucaldılması haqqında 26 saylı qərar (13.01.1993).jpg mənim şəkillərimdi. MY IMAGE . Do you understand me? My image. How can I prove that my? I upload pictures below is incorrect:

File:Yeni nəbz qəzeti.jpg File:Azərbaycan İslam Partiyasının loqosu.png File:AzPFL logo.jpg File:The Gospel of Barnabas (Samuel Green).jpg File:AHC logo.jpg File:KHC logo.jpg File:Isa Gambar (1).jpg--samral talk 13:20, 15 December 2014 (UTC) I thought that there is copyright of the logo.--samral talk 13:22, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2 pictures below is from a Pakistani newspapers of the 1890 scan. Article "Peshawar Nights" about the book. If you want to learn, you know that when researching the book printed: File:"Dürrü Nəcəfi" jurnalının 1-ci səhifəsi.jpg File:"Dürrü Nəcəfi" jurnalının 2-ci səhifəsi.jpg.--samral talk 13:25, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Juggler2005 Why not write me an answer?--samral talk 01:01, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but I don't know what to say. --Juggler2005 (talk) 01:50, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Juggler2005 I repeat. File:Yeni nəbz qəzeti.jpg

File:Azərbaycan İslam Partiyasının loqosu.png File:AzPFL logo.jpg File:The Gospel of Barnabas (Samuel Green).jpg File:AHC logo.jpg File:Sabir bağı (1930-cu il).jpg File:Su kəməri və kanalizasiya qədimdə.jpg File:Nizami Gəncəvi - Qəzənfər Xalıqov.jpg File:Səməd Vurğun qohumları ilə.jpg File:Səməd Vurğun həyat yoldaşı ilə.jpg File:Səməd Vurğun iş otağında (1954).jpg File:Səməd Vurğun (Pekin, 1955).jpg File:İncil nüxəsi (XVI əsr).jpg File:The Twelve Imams.jpg File:The Twelve Imams(1).jpg File:Pənahəli xan.jpg File:KHC logo.jpg and File:Isa Gambar (1) You know, because I've installed incorrectly delete. File:İçərişəhər DTMQİ icazə vərəq 1.jpg, File:İçərişəhər DTMQİ icazə vərəq 2.jpg and File:Bakı şəhərində M.Ə.Rəsulzadənin abidəsinin ucaldılması haqqında 26 saylı qərar (13.01.1993).jpg belongs to me. My. Prove otherwise if the command is not so--samral talk 16:16, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree to Prosfilaes, this is a mess. You cannot mix deletion requests for several files and reasons. How should that be discussed? Alos agree to AzPFL logo.jpg, which seems too simple to me to be protected. --Don-kun (talk) 11:30, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Procedural close. Please renominate in smaller batches. Natuur12 (talk) 23:06, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:14, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Samral (talk · contribs)

Photos from a book published in 1990. No evidence that they are in the public domain. Commons:Project scope/Evidence: "In all cases the uploader must provide appropriate evidence to demonstrate either that the file is in the public domain or that the copyright owner has released it under a suitable licence. (...) In all cases, the burden of proof lies on the uploader."

Juggler2005 (talk) 16:11, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

These pictures were taken in 1940-55. Image is not the owner of the image that attracts the party pictures. Name of Səməd Vurğun. Although the picture of health Səməd Vurğun's death in 1956, published in the public domain. Officially published in 1990 in the book take place bi is for this reason also..--samral talk 13:07, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nomination. --Krd 13:28, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Samral (talk · contribs)

Artwork. No date, no author information. No evidence that these pictures are in the public domain. Commons:Project scope/Evidence: "In all cases the uploader must provide appropriate evidence to demonstrate either that the file is in the public domain or that the copyright owner has released it under a suitable licence. (...) In all cases, the burden of proof lies on the uploader."

Juggler2005 (talk) 16:17, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

These pictures were taken in the XIX century in Iran.--samral talk 13:13, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I said 18 December: "File:Azərbaycan İslam Partiyasının loqosu.png File:AzPFL logo.jpg File:The Gospel of Barnabas (Samuel Green).jpg File:AHC logo.jpg File:Sabir bağı (1930-cu il).jpg File:Su kəməri və kanalizasiya qədimdə.jpg File:Nizami Gəncəvi - Qəzənfər Xalıqov.jpg File:Səməd Vurğun qohumları ilə.jpg File:Səməd Vurğun həyat yoldaşı ilə.jpg File:Səməd Vurğun iş otağında (1954).jpg File:Səməd Vurğun (Pekin, 1955).jpg File:İncil nüxəsi (XVI əsr).jpg File:The Twelve Imams.jpg File:The Twelve Imams(1).jpg File:Pənahəli xan.jpg File:KHC logo.jpg and File:Isa Gambar (1) You know, because I've installed incorrectly delete. File:İçərişəhər DTMQİ icazə vərəq 1.jpg, File:İçərişəhər DTMQİ icazə vərəq 2.jpg and File:Bakı şəhərində M.Ə.Rəsulzadənin abidəsinin ucaldılması haqqında 26 saylı qərar (13.01.1993).jpg belongs to me. My. Prove otherwise if the command is not so."--samral talk 13:15, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
A lot of these are still PD-simple, this should be again closed and the images under suspicion should be individually re-nominated. Fry1989 eh? 20:29, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I renominated it in smaller batches like Natuur12 demanded. Your demand crosses the line of common sense. --Juggler2005 (talk) 09:15, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Since Samral provides no evidence to support the claim that they were created in the 19th century. From the art style they would seem to be from the late 20th century, but in any case it's always the uploader that has to to the proving.--Underlying lk (talk) 04:37, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File:Azərbaycan İslam Partiyasının loqosu.png  Delete

File:AzPFL logo.jpg  Delete File:The Gospel of Barnabas (Samuel Green).jpg  Delete File:AHC logo.jpg  Delete File:Sabir bağı (1930-cu il).jpg  Delete File:Su kəməri və kanalizasiya qədimdə.jpg  Delete File:Nizami Gəncəvi - Qəzənfər Xalıqov.jpg  Delete File:Səməd Vurğun qohumları ilə.jpg  Delete File:Səməd Vurğun həyat yoldaşı ilə.jpg  Delete File:Səməd Vurğun iş otağında (1954).jpg  Delete File:Səməd Vurğun (Pekin, 1955).jpg  Delete File:İncil nüxəsi (XVI əsr).jpg  Delete File:The Twelve Imams.jpg  Delete File:The Twelve Imams(1).jpg  Delete File:Pənahəli xan.jpg  Delete File:KHC logo.jpg and  Delete File:Isa Gambar (1)  Delete--samral talk 18:33, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted 2 files per nomination. (Discussion for the rest sadly is not comprehesible. Please renominate if necessary.) --Krd 13:31, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Samral (talk · contribs)

Copyright for these files is claimed to have expired, but the author and date of publication are missing (Naməlum means 'unknown'), therefore the claim is impossible to verify.

Underlying lk (talk) 17:01, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I agree  Delete. But

No. Because its scans pages of Journal of Durru Najafi article about of "Peshawar Nights". And Peshawar Nights is a Shi'a book by Sultanu'l-Wa'izin Shirazi[1] ("Prince of Preachers from Shiraz")[2] recounts a public debate between Shi'a Muslims and Sunni Muslims. The debate took place in the city of Peshawar in the North-West Frontier Province (present-day Khyber Pakhtunkhwa) in Pakistan of British India beginning on 27 January 1927.

References

[5]

2015-1927=88. And 88>70 :)--samral talk 20:14, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: except the two. Natuur12 (talk) 22:28, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Samral (talk · contribs)

Photos made by azerbaijani photographer Ehtiram Jabi and previously shared social network [6]. Most likely grabbed by Samral somewhere from social media.

--Sefer azeri (talk) 20:03, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sefer azeri I upload my photos on the original. Here is the photo copy photo. :)--samral talk 20:12, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Author of this photos photographer Ehtiram Jabi. In here [7] his other photos taken the same camera.--Sefer azeri (talk) 20:18, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Photos of me now that I have installed here. Originally started as me now. Already evident in everything from the installation of the original photograph.--samral talk 20:23, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
All this photos (and more) are originally shared in here [8] 11 may 2015 --Sefer azeri (talk) 20:28, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This photo is not original. For example, this photo here 182 KB, if I was when I installed 4.21 MB. According to you, which is the original?--samral talk 20:38, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The case is not about which photo is original. You're not author this photos because they made by professional photographer Ehtiram Jabi. --Sefer azeri (talk) 06:50, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Be prove me--samral talk 07:46, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've gave the links to original (and earlier) photos in upper.))--Sefer azeri (talk) 15:14, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
They are not original. They have 140 kB. I'd dealt with 3-4 MB. You're wasting my time. If show the evidence. Or do not engage me. You block me WIKIPEDIA The user has seven times. Now here you are interfering with my activity. Bye--samral talk 16:46, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
_______________________________

Deleted: The images bore no resemblance to user's own photography, including metadata. User has never claimed to be Ehtiram Jabi except for these seven pictures. COM:OTRS can be filed by Mr. Jabi at any time, should he so desire, and the images could be restored. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:41, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:20, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:12, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by Ymblanter. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:07, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:37, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Samral (talk · contribs)

False dates of shooting, unlikely to be uploader's work.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:00, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Rogel, The photos are mine. But I don't know the exact shooting dates. (Google Translate)--samral talk 11:26, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Samral: "Mine" doesn't mean anything: do you own a copy of these images or are you the photographer? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:29, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: , These pictures were given to me by Farman Mahmudov's son.--samral talk 12:22, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Then first you are not allowed to claim "own work" on them and Farman Mahmudov's son probably not since he was not born when the pictures have been shot. You may ask him to send a permission via COM:OTRS but i'm not sure it will be enough. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:26, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: , Elshad Mahmudov, son of Farman Mahmudov, sent me these photographs.--samral talk 15:35, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:37, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Samral (talk · contribs)

http://sia.az/az/news/politics/745641.html

Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:34, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:37, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by someone else. ~riley (talk) 05:11, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:58, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Samral (talk · contribs)

https://www.mimta.az/

Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:22, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:50, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Samral (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible COM:FLICKRWASHING, every one of these images was uploaded to Flickr as PD 1.0 a week or so before it was uploaded to Commons. In each case the Flickr user has uploaded no other images.

Belbury (talk) 10:39, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

VRT is receiving several tickets related to this DR, but up to now none of it was confirmed. --Krd 12:41, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Belbury, I did not upload any of these photos to Flickr. Each image has been uploaded by its author. I just explained the rules and procedure to them. I have informed all the authors of the picture. Each of them gives and will give more detailed information about it by mail. samral talk 15:47, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All were deleted already, except one, which is kept. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:09, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status/futher details needed, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GuatExp (and other related DR). All files uploaded by several users mostly in 2015, which licensed the files with {{PD-1996}} + (often) citing/translating/individual interpreting article 49 + 64 b from local copyright law. The basics: Per en:List of countries' copyright lengths Guatemala has 75 pma or 75 years from publication or if unpublished 75 years from creation (computer programs and collective works; anonymous or pseudonymous works; audiovisual works. See also full text via http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text.jsp?file_id=127668.

Example: File:Tomadeposesiónmarcocerezo.png, a 1986 photo. Main uploader is Vlademp (talk · contributions · Statistics) who is flooding Commons with similar uploads. Most of the files are sourced with a Facebook link (+ random blogs/etc.). Original publication source and/or photographer are not given.

  • Art. 49 (so far I understand) refers to some agreement about copyright holders who died, and if the state or public entities, municipalities and universities and other educational institutions gains (somehow = ??) the copyrights and became heir (how = ??) and the heirs do not within 5 years assume the copyrights, the copyright expires. Or what?
Original text: "El Estado o sus entidades públicas, las municipalidades, así como las universidades y demás establecimientos de educación del país, gozarán de la protección que establece esta ley, pero cuando fueren declarados herederos del derecho de autor y no hicieren uso del mismo en el plazo de cinco años, contados a partir de la declaratoria respectiva, la obra pasará al dominio público."
Google translates this to: "The State or its public entities, municipalities and universities and other educational institutions of the country, shall enjoy the protection established by this law, but when declared to be heirs (how = ?? copyrights from whom?) of copyright and have not made ​​use of it in the within five years, counted from the respective declaration (which declaration ??), the work shall become public domain.

Is this valid for the following hypothetical situation? A poor Guatemalan guy is encounterd dead in 2009 in the dust of a street in Guatemala City (capital of Guatemala). Besides a Guatemalan passport and some quetzal in his jacket the authorities find a camera with some nice shots. No heirs available. Anonymous funeral paid by the state. After 5 years, the copyright is expired and in 2015 the state publishes a bestseller containg the photos of the poor guy. --> ??

  • Art. 64 b is per "La reproducción individual de una obras por bibliotecas o archivos que no tengan fines de lucro (...)" my underline --> obviously a non-commercial term which is not compatible with COM:L

Nominating all files which would fail +75 years publication, ignoring for today 1938 + 1931 + 1932 + etc. photos

Special cases

Gunnex (talk) 18:57, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This file is from 1936, meaning that it has been 79 years since it was released. It is OK to keep. --Nerdoguate (talk) 04:46, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Which file? Gunnex (talk) 07:17, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yo no entiendo porqué son tan necios y de mente cerrada, las imágenes de la Revolución (1944-1954). Quedaron en dominio propio desde el año de 1959. CLARAMENTE LA LEY DICE: ARTICLE 49: The State or its public entities, municipalities, and the universities and other educational institutions of the country, will enjoy the copyright protection that this law stipulates, but, when they are declared inheritantes of the copyright and they do not use that right within five year, starting from the respective declaration, the item will go into the public domain. (NOTE: in the case of president Ydigoras, he was deposited in 1963 by a coup d'état and his successor did not follow up on the 5 year window; therefore, the picture is now in the public domain).. Qué parte no entienden?. Es como si les quisiera dar clases de derechos de autor en su propio país. Porfavor. --Vlademp (talk) 21:44, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Considering also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arevalo.png (a donation case) there is no proof that the state, public entities (etc.) were declared new owners of the copyrights via a "respective declaration" from the original copyright holder and did not use it (the copyright) in a five year period. Most of the files were taken from a private FB group https://www.facebook.com/groups/287826347977264 where members are posting old pictures from their own archives or photos taken from the Internet — all with unclear copyright status as original publication source, date and/or photographer are (mostly) not given. They may be also unpublished before. Gunnex (talk) 09:10, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
La mayoría de fotografías de los presidentes están en dominio público, porque se cumplen los 5 años de plazo, yo creo que se debería crear una plantilla para imágenes de Guatemala, así como lo tienen otros países. --ElisonSeg (talk) 17:09, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Did you read my comment above? Apparently no... Gunnex (talk) 21:21, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Le sugiero que lea esto. LEY DE DERECHO DE AUTOR Y DERECHOS CONEXOS DE GUATEMALA --ElisonSeg (talk) 00:36, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I read it, I even cited it above (which you did not read apparently). From where the uploader knows (obviously not from the Facebook source) that the state has become the new copright holder and from where the uploader knows that the state did not used it (the copyright) for +5 years? Where I can access the "declaratoria respectiva" from the original copyright holder (or his heirs)? Who is the original copyright holder? And how I can check the the 5-years-term? Gunnex (talk) 18:56, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per copyvio and bad interpretation of local copyright laws. --Taichi (talk) 02:25, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per Gunnax & Taichi. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:33, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unusably tiny, unidentifyable image. Atlasowa (talk) 08:35, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use Didym (talk) 16:49, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

unusably tiny, unidentifyable image. no longer embedded in inactive wikiproyecto. ping Didym Atlasowa (talk) 19:25, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Image no longer in use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:17, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Seahunter4

[edit]

Seahunter4 (talk · contribs) uploaded these logos:

First group. The logos surpass threshold of originality. OTRS-permission from copyright holder is needed.

Second group. Members of non-notable organization, out of project scope. The photos are used only in unlinked sandboxes. (In addition, the photos are without metadata and not big, own work is not sure.) Taivo (talk) 08:53, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:07, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems to me, that the map is somehow corrupt. No legend, not used. Taivo (talk) 09:13, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:07, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bassma Abdulmajid

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Bassma AbdulMajid (talk · contribs):

This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? Can you describe and categorize the files correctly? Taivo (talk) 09:54, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:05, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aauaccount

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Aauaccount (talk · contribs):

This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? Can you describe and categorize the files correctly? Taivo (talk) 10:00, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:04, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Atasfab

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Atasfab (talk · contribs):

This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? Can you describe and categorize the files correctly? Taivo (talk) 10:08, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:04, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:36, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:03, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:37, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:03, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:39, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:03, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture, out of project scope Fenerli1978 (talk) 13:47, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

include:


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:46, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project Fenerli1978 (talk) 10:45, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

______________________________

Deleted per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:02, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Latifju

[edit]

Latifju (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia except userpage and sandbox in en.wiki and uploading some personal photos, which are used nowhere except on the userpage and sandbox. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:29, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: personal images, promotional en:wiki page. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:57, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Visiloni

[edit]

Here are all photos, uploaded by Visiloni (talk · contribs):

These photos have different resolution and camera. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:39, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:55, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP in Lithuania don't allow commercial reuse of images of sculptures. The license is not ok. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:44, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This is gravestone to person, who died in 1929. Without knowing, who is sculptor, we do not know, does the photo violate his/her copyright or not. Taivo (talk) 09:51, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Litinvita: This photo I took myself in the cemetery where the person is buried. It's my photo. I do not reuse it. And... I want to ask, is it possible to know the sculptor of the tombstone?!


Deleted: While the uploader took the picture, there is no "freedom of panorama" for sculptures in Lithuania (see COM:FOP) and thus without knowing who carved the stone, it is not possible to know its current copyright status. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:53, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Fayazamar

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Fayazamar (talk · contribs):

They are small photos and usually without metadata. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:48, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:52, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Taichi as no source, but I could not find an external source to doubt own work as claimed. JuTa 02:26, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Screenshotted from (example) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E2WWrxAxF5k&t=0m40s (02.2015, © by "Soy502"). Gunnex (talk) 16:37, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:22, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The graphics make this image copyrightable. It has bubbles or circles. Also, it has the bird symbol. George Ho (talk) 03:29, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Yes, surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 16:50, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:22, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There's no freedom of panorama for this kind of artwork in the United States. Same for File:Animodules.jpg. -- Diannaa (talk) 05:07, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:22, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Sannita as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyviol from http://www.jblasa.com/caria/images/fotogallery/07b.jpg
Converted to DR by me for procedural reasons, as this image is on Commons since 2008. Though the external hit is undated, I tend to agree with the nomination. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:40, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nominations. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:21, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The text seems to have been written less than 50 years ago, so the one who wrote it can't have been dead for 50 years. Stefan4 (talk) 13:50, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Thibaut120094 (talk) 02:54, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text documents of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Possibly not own work. Seems to consist of questions, probably written by one person and answered by another person.

Stefan4 (talk) 16:19, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused text document of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE.

Stefan4 (talk) 16:06, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete These are some school tests in biology, chemistry and mathematics. The pupil is clever, answers are generally correct. Taivo (talk) 10:04, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:18, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 07:47, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. it is not a simple text, the layout has been carefully reflected, it have been designed --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:44, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 07:48, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and it is a simple logo. CFCF (talk) 08:02, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The logo consists of simple shapes. I doubt this reaches threshold of originality. --Chewbacca2205 (talk) 20:41, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination, it is not a simple text, the layout has been carefully reflected, it have been designed --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:45, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mistakenly uploaded - wronly named - duplicates File:241088 - Closing Ceremony Seoul Paralympics -2 - 3b - Scan.jpg Hawkeye7 (talk) 08:30, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: : --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:46, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

eine "von Saldern Gruppe" kann kein Urheber sein, daher als URV zu betrachten. Jbergner (talk) 08:53, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination, unclear source/author/EXIF --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:48, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't think the Flickr account is the creator of this, therefore the license is invalid. Yann (talk) 12:10, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination : image come from http://vicepresidentofindia.nic.in/former.asp --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:01, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: {{GODL-India}} Yann (talk) 10:38, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by TTP1233 as no permission (No permission since). Tagged as CC-BY-SA on Flickr, GODL on Commons. Should be checked. King of ♥ 05:23, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @King of Hearts: , but changing the license tag may an appropriate job (If possible). That's why I think from where did this picture came from other source which is not government website. Let's bring this attention to an admin for checking--TTP1233 (talk) 07:05, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion; confirmed that the image complies with the GODL. howcheng {chat} 17:53, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't think the Flickr account is the creator of this, therefore the license is invalid. Older and higher resolution here. Yann (talk) 12:12, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The image consists of photo and text. The text is probably really own work, but photo – unlikely. Taivo (talk) 10:30, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination, can also be found here http://www.indiatourismamsterdam.com/content/culture --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:08, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable trabajo no propio extraido de internet. Luce como una fotografía profesional, ausencia de datos EXIF. El usuario que la subió tiene sendos antecedentes de violaciones a los derechos de autor Banfield - Amenazas aquí 12:14, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination : recortar de una revista de lencería/cut from a lingerie magazine http://www.intimostore.com.ar/catalogo/00050003762-5050-lara-teens/#articuloPhoto[gallery]/1/ --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:12, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't think the Flickr account is the creator of this, therefore the license is invalid. Bigger and older copy here. Yann (talk) 12:16, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Narendra Modi is probably author of the text, but not of the photo. Taivo (talk) 10:49, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:17, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't think the Flickr account is the creator of this, therefore the license is invalid. Source of the image is here ([9]), no evidence of a free license. Yann (talk) 12:21, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:28, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the uploader's own work. The circle with the cross seems to be similar to the modified "E" under COM:TOO#United Kingdom. Stefan4 (talk) 13:36, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

had been renamed to: File:Bishop of Guildford logo.jpg. --JuTa 05:01, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination: not simple text and copyrighted source --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:18, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: no evidence that the architect died before 1945.

Eleassar (t/p) 07:17, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 20:57, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like not own work, as there is no EXIF data to prove that the uploader is the author. Possible copyvio. Pokéfan95 (talk) 10:30, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 21:00, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deletion Request by Uploader Krishna Chaitanya Velaga(Indian) Talk 10:59, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: CC licenses are irrevocable Alan (talk) 20:59, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deletion Request by Uploader Krishna Chaitanya Velaga(Indian) Talk 11:00, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The file is big, properly licensed and used. It has been in Commons since July. Uploader's request is not enough in such circumstances. Taivo (talk) 09:08, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: CC licenses are irrevocable Alan (talk) 20:59, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Sannita as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyiol from http://www.poro.it/caria/Caria_Aria_20a.jpg

File has been here since 2008. We can afford a DR. Natuur12 (talk) 14:41, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete only 268×184 pixels, no metadata. Taivo (talk) 17:46, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Alan (talk) 21:03, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear source : far to old to be an own work --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:27, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 23:10, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2011 was not 60 years ago, as required by the template. Stefan4 (talk) 13:52, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 23:11, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused population plot. There is also no source for the data, so other projects would not want to use the file. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan4 (talk) 17:57, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete There is description in Finnish (population of Europe in millions), but no source. Taivo (talk) 11:32, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Alan (talk) 23:12, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:The street railway review (1891) (14738459726).jpg: Shows up twice in the Internet Archive (and its Flickr gallery) because it was published twice, by the same magazine (June and October 1904). It is the same photo, though, and that improved version has already all the specific data of this one in its file page. (Pinging @: for advice.) -- Tuválkin 23:53, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: The brightness is not the same, then, Duplicate statement cannot be applied. For my eyes, this darker version seems better (more details can be found, the text depcited there are more legible, etc) than the lighter one. --Amitie 10g (talk) 02:17, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, not a true duplicate, or else I’d use {{Duplicate}} instead (which causes a speedy deletion process). As for comparing both images and the percieved better quality of this one, you did consider the other file’s history, yes?… -- Tuválkin 11:32, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Generally, for old and interesting photographs, it is reasonable to keep multiple prints. Digital editors may improve the image given multiple prints and reduce later damage or compensate for moiré patterns from the printing process. We do the same for early lithograph prints, so long as they are not scans of the same physical object. -- (talk) 10:07, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That’s a good approach and I cannot fault it in general. In this case, however, the October republication is done in an inferior medium (the very same plate on coarser paper with oilier ink — it is the weekly supplement, not the monthly issue, after all): If this image is in any way better than the other, it stems from scanning artifacts (for which there’s a caveat in every page); the ideal solution here (short of a scan of the original film cliche, of course) would be a new scan, and the best original for it is the June edition, not the October one. In terms of curation, seeing this as one photograph that was published (unchanged) twice seems to me to be a better idea than two separate photographs. -- Tuválkin 11:32, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: not valid reason Alan (talk) 23:14, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

J'ai fais une erreur. Il y'en a deux exemplaires de cette photo. Canudo (talk) 13:56, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The file has been in Commons a year. It is big, properly licensed and beautiful. Uploader's request is not enough in such circumstances. Taivo (talk) 14:43, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Non, il n'y a qu'une xemplaire de cette photo, vous avez bien téléchargé deux fois, mais sur le meme fichier, donc pas de problèmes --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:42, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Denislavgeorgiev

[edit]

Here are all contributions of Denislavgeorgiev (talk · contribs):

This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? Can you categorize the files correctly? Taivo (talk) 14:01, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:46, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Reddragon77

[edit]

Reddragon77 (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

They are derivative works, photos of photos. Who is photographer of underlying photos?

I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:42, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation, British Antarctic Survey claim.Battleofalma (talk) 09:54, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request in uploading day. The request was incorrectly formed, I hope, that this does not create problems with archiving. Taivo (talk) 19:18, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:02, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mulgis

[edit]

Mulgs (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

Small photos without metadata, different resolutions and cameras, half of files has no metadata. I suspect copyright violation. But maybe keep files, taken with Lumia? Taivo (talk) 13:48, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination : Keep the both with EXIF and big size, the other are likely copyvio and can be found in other site (one come from a Utube video ""All right reserved" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6-Hqdncer4 --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:19, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f5/NIFT_SHILLONG.jpg Pcpradeep434 (talk) 10:55, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nothing requested -- simply restated the file name in a diferent form .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:48, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you describe the file correctly? This is the user's last remaining upload. Taivo (talk) 18:27, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination, I found oldest version ex:http://www.indiamart.com/jai-tirupati-holidays/assam-tour-package.html --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:30, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For collages, source and license of every image used must be given. Description "Collage of photos in category 2" is inadequate. Taivo (talk) 18:32, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Remove the template on the page, please!
Sincerely yours, Frutti-mytti (talk) 14:38, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, now the licenses are fixed. Taivo (talk) 13:07, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded without a license, the uploader later change source to own and license {{PD-self}} - see here. likely a copright violation. JuTa 01:19, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This file is a flag; their (Arakan Army's) national symbol, and neither I nor they (the Arakan Army) claim any copyrights on it. I understand will accept the decision made, if this file is deleted. However, I see no issues with it that cannot be fixed. The reason why I (the uploader) changed the source to "own" is because I did not understand how to upload a free image that is not copyrighted. I thought I had uploaded with a copyright claim (which does not exist). The original source links to the Arakan's Army's webpage.
- CentreLeftRight (talk) 21:35, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The file has no source. Commons needs proof, that Arakan Army has used the flag. Taivo (talk) 15:32, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The source has been re-added. You can review any copyright concerns at their website thearakanarmy.com; they do not claim copyrights over their flag, and it is free to use as long as you credit them (Which has been done by referring to the file as "Flag of the Arakan Army).
- CentreLeftRight (talk) 19:08, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Everything is copyrighted (all right reserved) by default, except otherwise explicity stated. Where do we see that the file is in public domain? --JuTa 20:02, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above JuTa 05:08, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License is certainly wrong. May be PD-India if before 1957. Yann (talk) 12:00, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep This comes from the official count of a head of state known for his ability to use new websites effectively. It is presumptive to challenge the authority of this account to share what it shares.
As Yann suggests - the assertion of copyright by a prime minister is an odd thing to do, and it is strange that Modi's account would do this. Still, I trust that he has control of copyright law in India. Blue Rasberry (talk) 17:34, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Indian politicians often pass judgements like these.
Yann what about New Zealand prime ministers? I think there is a rule that says they can remove the copyright on media from India. Blue Rasberry (talk) 10:10, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That's more interesting. It's quite probable that this image is in the public domain in India, being taken and published before 1957. But the copyright status has nothing to do with New Zealand prime ministers. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:20, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. JuTa 05:06, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

New photograph of someone holding the old photograph. Copyright status of both photographs is unclear: no proof that old anonymous photograph was published, no proof that unknown photographer died before 1945. Unknown license of the new photograph. Jarekt (talk) 14:19, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Schraut died on November 9, 1923. Therefore the image must have been created prior to this date. Regarding the question of whether the image is in the public domain or not, we must look at the legal situation when the picture was created. At that time, the Culture Act of 1907 was still in power (for http://www.fotorecht.de/publikationen/kug.html). The KUG initially envisaged a protection period of 10 years for photos (or 25 years, if the picture was not published). Thus, the image was public domain in Germany since 1933 (or 1948, when it was not published). However, on 12th May 1940 an extention of the protection period to 25 years came into power. However, this extention was only applicable, if the rights have not been expired. If the picture was published, the rights have already been expired. Only if the picture was not published, the protection period was extend to 25 years after the death of the photographer. On 1st January 1966 it was extend to 70 years (but only, if the rights have not been expired). In 1995 it was extend to 80 post mortem of the photographer (§ 137 f Abs. 2 UrhG with regards to Spainish legislation).
Conclusion: If the picture was published, it was public domain from 1933 to 1995. And it will be in public domain again (and if the picture was not published) 80 years after the death of the photographer (in 2015, when he died in 1935 or earlier). Any questions? --Hemeier (talk) 08:05, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: minimum no valid license of the new photo. JuTa 05:24, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der "Urheber" hat kein Recht am Logo der Nemetschek AG. Dieses Logo ist zudem veraltet. Wir, die Nemetschek AG, möchten unser von 2008 bis 2014 benutztes Logo nicht an dieser Stelle veröffentlicht sehen. Nemetschek AG (talk) 14:26, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment As the logo does not surpass threshold of originality (and the file is accordingly licensed), the company's representative has no right to ask removing the file from Commons. And Commons does not delete outdated logos, because old logos are also useful for showing company's history. Taivo (talk) 16:41, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above and still in use. JuTa 05:21, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of unclear notability without evidence of permission. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan4 (talk) 16:17, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Stefan4, I'm happy for your observations about the copyright in the file "May 22, 1907". But I pray the whole community to consider that the owner of those documents I am. In fact neither the document nor the logo copyright I never registered in any country in the world. Also the original documents of which they own and are currently in my possession, they in agreement between me and the Italian Air Force Museum all these documents in the coming weeks pass at the Museum. The intent of both because it is a Museum is to make documents available to the public. Useful for those who wish to do research and copies and publications. I myself won't hold any copies for me. When and if I need more information I will go to the Museum. Finally, given that the original material is also made of silver plates also of photographic film also contact sheets that are older than a hundred years they need to be restored. And last but not least because Italy for museums to theaters for art for the archaeological sites they say they have not more money / I am the one paying with my foundation restoration of documents and organize the site for storing documents. So I pray the community not to delete these files and please the community makes good use. These are my intentions and my thoughts to all of you I wish good work. Emilio Munari


Deleted: out of scope. JuTa 04:58, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a scan of someone elses work (or more likely a photograph since GPS EXIF is available). Stefan4 (talk) 16:18, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sirs, also for this deletion request should take into account what I said to : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:22_Maggio_1907.pdf - Otherwise I don't know how you could do to make it really frees information wiki speaks. As far as there is no absolute vacuum May 22, 1907 between 1900 and 1923. First because in Italy the Military Aviation was founded by Decree of King in 1923. Second because the production of both aircraft (Hydroplane) that were that were Airships Hyd designed and built and tested at Vigna di Valle. The designers were Officers of the military engineers ' army. They are the same who founded the Italian Airforce in 1923. Third and last because over one thousand five hundred documents between 1900 and 1923 belong and are subscribed to me. Neither my grandfather nor my father nor I until today we all wanted to leave this museum documentation. Of course, the reason for this denial is strictly private. So I'm not in agreement with you to delete the two files because when I have finished uploading my archives the public could better understand how from 1900 arrived at 2015. So what do we do? Instead of putting obstacles that do not understand you should give me a hand. Regards Emilio Munari


Deleted: per nom. JuTa 05:10, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Was first claimed to be taken by father, then by mother. The image Exif says it was taken in 2007; description from the uploader states that it was them at six months of age; Uploader has been active on Wikipedia since 2005, making the six months old claim in 2007 a bit invalid. —SpacemanSpiff 17:46, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: its a color corrected crop of File:Infant smile.jpg, which seems to be a scan of a physical photo. JuTa 05:16, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Benoît Prieur as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Too recent building: acceptable on wpfr if necessary. Yann (talk) 21:12, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no COM:FOP in France. JuTa 05:18, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a work created by the Argentinian Ministry of Justice. Not own work by the uploader. Stefan4 (talk) 13:54, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep {{PD-AR-Gov}} says, that work of central and provincial governments are in public domain. I change the license, but I do not close the request, because I do not understand Spanish and I am not totally sure, that the license applies. Taivo (talk) 14:37, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to be PD, yes. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:25, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. JuTa 09:45, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Belarus. The building shown in the photo is "Omega Tower" and it was built in 2013. Jarash (talk) 14:15, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. JuTa 09:52, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GuatExp (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status + per Commons:Deletion requests/File:JacoboÁrbenz.png (main discussion) and (related) Commons:Deletion requests/File:FranciscoArana1944.png + Commons:Deletion requests/File:HéctorGaitánGuat.png + Commons:Deletion requests/File:JavierArana02.jpg + etc.. All files (source country: Guatemala) licensed with {{PD-1996}} and all deletions related to the (unresponded) question: "Why this 19XX photo was in public domain in source country Guatemala before URAA date?" Per en:List of countries' copyright lengths Guatemala has 75 pma or 75 years from publication or if unpublished 75 years from creation (computer programs and collective works; anonymous or pseudonymous works; audiovisual works, so 1983 + 1991 + 1974 + 1966 + etc. photos are unlikely PD in Guatemala (and US).

Gunnex (talk) 17:09, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Update and related: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Presidents of Guatemala. See also Vlademp (talk · contributions · Statistics) who is flooding Commons with similar uploads. Gunnex (talk) 19:26, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Files uploaded by GuatExp (talk · contribs) regarding video screenshots^

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:GuatExp. All files most likely video screenshots and grabbed from Youtube etc., considering also File:AlfonsoPortilloyEvelyndePortillo.png ("own work"), per Commons:Deletion requests/File:AlfonsoPortilloyEvelyndePortillo.png grabbed & screenshotted from Youtube. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Baldizón001.png + Commons:Deletion requests/File:BlandónRaquel.png ("screen cap of an interview"). Uploader related: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GuatExp.

Gunnex (talk) 17:15, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per copyvio. --Taichi (talk) 02:42, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. JuTa 10:04, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hasn't this already been deleted before? The thing to the left of the text looks very complex. Stefan4 (talk) 22:07, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But... this file is (almost) the same as File:Xbox One logo wordmark.svg, and both files are currently used, so, keep the file and tag as Duplicate. --Amitie 10g (talk) 02:38, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The old revision is still in the history and should still be deleted. The new revision is currently unused and almost identical to File:Xbox One logo wordmark.svg, so let's delete that one too as an unneeded file. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:58, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Then,  Delete and redirect to File:Xbox One logo wordmark.svg. --Amitie 10g (talk) 04:41, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete ONLY because there is also File:Xbox One logo wordmark.svg. Microsoft is an American company and this logo is very obviously below American TOO, which I see Stefan4 continues to ignore. Fry1989 eh? 21:44, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: 1st version hidden. JuTa 09:49, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The words contained in this template is a deliberate part-creative, part-selective misinterpretation [10][11] of the copyright law of Hong Kong (The Copyright Ordinance, Chapter 528) [12][13] in an attempt to justify otherwise obvious infringement of copyright of the works of the Government of Hongkong Special Administrative Region or of the British Government in Hong Kong, called the Government of Hong Kong, which are by default, by local law (by local legislative ordinance), protected [14][15][16][17], and their copyright have not been automatically disclaimed whilst being automatically released into the public domain free of copyright. Unless Section 182 of the Copyright Ordinance were repealed, the Ordinance and the term "public records" therein obviously cannot be construed as meaning, or, interpreted to mean, all works of the Government of Hongkong Special Administrative Region or of the British Government in Hong Kong (the Government of Hong Kong), and most works thereof presently found in Wikimedia Commons would certainly fall foul of the words and the provisions of Section 182. Urquhartnite (talk) 22:18, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


  • Keep. The words in the template are almost entirely verbatim quotation of Chap. 528 Section 58's two subsections. As such they cannot simultaneously be an intepretation or mis-interpretation. Any individual misapplication of a template does not invalidate the template and all other uses of it. –84.92.129.87 22:21, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I originally Deleted this but have reverted it to give more time to examine the photographs to which it was attached. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:02, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete While copying public records is not copyright infringement, that is not the same thing as public domain. There are no implied commercial rights or in particular derivative rights. The scope of fair use or fair dealing on such works would therefore be pretty wide, but it is still not public domain. That is basically like a section in copyright law which allows libraries to use and copy works for limited purposes; this is a somewhat limited exception to allow anyone from the public to view and inspect public records (and copy them to allow others to do the same), but not necessarily use such works for any use they want. Note that public records often come from material outside the government (evidence in court cases etc.) and use of such works would definitely be restricted to uses related to their public record status. Even in the U.S., there are only a couple of states whose public record laws have been considered broad enough to basically defeat copyright protection; for most states we assume state government works are still copyrighted even though most are public records. Hong Kong basically inherited Crown Copyright for government works from UK law; other than bills which become law, it looks like, governments usually own copyright for 50 years from creation or publication depending on the circumstance. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:02, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. Just another instance of conflating public access and public domain. If the premise of the template were to be true, the evidence from copyright lawsuits would be in the public domain, making such lawsuits rather pointless. LX (talk, contribs) 08:53, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per cmts Alan (talk) 11:33, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Alan: There are now several hundreds files without a license. What to do? Yann (talk) 13:46, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files using Template:PD-HK-PR

[edit]

Files using Template:PD-HK-PR which no longer have a license. If any can be relicensed please relicense.--Jarekt (talk) 11:50, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There are several files ending in "Pressure.gif", "Pressure.png", and "Wind.png" and a number of others which look like simple line graphs -- I think those are PD-ineligible. The related radar, wind, and precipitation files might be more based on the underlying map copyright. There are a lot of road signs... many of those may also be PD-ineligible, though probably not all of them. The flag and emblem ones (File:Flag of Hong Kong.svg, File:P Hong Kong.png, File:Hong Kong SAR Regional Emblem.svg, File:Hong Kong Bauhinia Flag (Navy Blue).svg) look to be vectorizations made by a Commons contributor following a specification provided by the government... that gets into idea/expression divide territory, and I don't think I would delete those. The original license (on File:Hong Kong SAR Regional Emblem.svg, the source of the others) was marked as PD-author by User:Zscout370, and that should probably be restored. There may well be a copyright on the vectorization in some countries and that tag should not have been removed. The bulk of the files though are those radar maps and the road signs. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:00, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep The Hong Kong road signs are mostly derivatives from British road signs (as former Coloniser) which are under OGL, or PD-shape, or a combination of both. I ask they be speedily kept and any that may be ineligible for those licenses be reconsidered individually. I have no comment on the other images listed here, except the national emblem. It's loss would be inexcusable. Fry1989 eh? 15:17, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Have no idea which (if any) of these files I ever uploaded, but the road signs and File:Flag_of_Hong_Kong.svg would appear to be special cases... AnonMoos (talk) 22:20, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I suggest that we close this as an unsuitable mass nomination and split it into several individual nominations based on what the image shows:
  1. Maps.
  2. Satellite photos.
  3. Data plots. Most probably PD-ineligible.
  4. Road signs. Fry says that many can be kept under OGL by virtue of the signs being very similar to British signs. If so, fine. A few signs also seem to be below the threshold of originality.
  5. Bauhinia × blakeana symbols (such as the flag). I hope that we can keep these as some of the files are heavily used.
  6. Other images probably nominated individually.
Also, can some images be migrated to PRC tags? I note that File:Cover of HKSAR e-Passport.jpg is very similar to File:People's Republic of China Biometric passport.jpg. However, I'm not sure if the PRC tag covers anything which is not a textual document. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:00, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I added better template to some simple road signs, crossed them in the list and removed them from gallery. Taivo (talk) 11:35, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I am fine with closing this one and starting several smaller ones, or reorganizing this one into several separate DR's. I was trying to prevent the files being tagged individually with {{No license}} and deleted after a week. --Jarekt (talk) 14:01, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure why File:Hong Kong Stop Sign.gif was deleted -- superseded files are not grounds for deletion, in particular a bitmap superseded by a vector. That used to be made more clear at Commons talk:Superseded images policy though now it is buried in the deletion policy. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:07, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Restored. --Jarekt (talk) 14:27, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Even the File:Flag of Hong Kong.svg is deleted now, which means an estimated number of 1,000+ articles is now affected by the deletion. --Lmmnhn (talk) 15:54, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, the deletions seem botched. The flag/emblem SVGs were created by Commons contributors and should be kept under their original license. File:Hong Kong Stop Sign.gif was deleted again even though it's PD-ineligible; I should have fixed that before. Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:01, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted most as having no license. Kept some where another valid license was applied. --JuTa 17:27, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]