Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/08/26
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Uploaded with incorrect license Mouzreaper (talk) 10:16, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:22, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Derivative work of book cover. Who is cover artist and when did (s)he die? Taivo (talk) 10:57, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, sorry – 1966 book, so speedily deleted. Taivo (talk) 10:58, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Arrows from bot upload
[edit]- File:A journal of transactions and events, during a residence of nearly sixteen years on the coast of Labrador (microform) - containing many interesting particulars, both of the country and its (20009352683).jpg
- File:A journal of transactions and events, during a residence of nearly sixteen years on the coast of Labrador (microform) - containing many interesting particulars, both of the country and its (20630250345).jpg
- File:A journal of transactions and events, during a residence of nearly sixteen years on the coast of Labrador (microform) - containing many interesting particulars, both of the country and its (20604079076).jpg
- File:An elementary course in practical zoölogy (microform) (1895) (20643749125).jpg
Arrow pictures from a bot upload from Internet Archives. These are of no value for commons --Achim Raschka (talk) 08:07, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
See User:Fæ/Project_list/Internet_Archive#Mostly_blank_pages. The housekeeping task that does this handles about 20 images/minute and cannot be done pre-upload as human checks are needed, even though around 90% are suitable for deletion. Speedies are fine for any you find, and that includes the "mostly blank" category! --Fæ (talk) 11:30, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Yann JuTa 19:31, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Angola Facebook case. Gunnex (talk) 17:19, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 19:20, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Smal lsize, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 18:48, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Yann JuTa 19:29, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Error al subir la foto Xxbcn (talk) 09:30, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uploader request Rodhullandemu (talk) 21:44, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
DW of possibly copyrighted contents A.Savin 19:17, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Paul Gauguin was died in 1903 so his paintings are in public domain --Butko (talk) 19:38, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
_Logo.jpg){kind=link}
![82 File:Journal of Art article on "Thinking of You".jpg](#File:Journal_of_Art_article_on_"Thinking_of_You".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
BikiniTooNaughty-001At.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![114 File:Kenneth "Babyface" Edmonds.JPG](#File:Kenneth_"Babyface"_Edmonds.JPG){kind=link}
_-_classée_par_ordres,_genres_et_espèces,_d'après_le_système_de_Linné_avec_les_caractères_géné_riques_et_la_nomenclature_Linnéenne_(1802)_(20449577368).jpg){kind=link}
.PNG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_containing_many_interesting_particulars,_both_of_the_country_and_its_(20009352683).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_containing_many_interesting_particulars,_both_of_the_country_and_its_(20630250345).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_containing_many_interesting_particulars,_both_of_the_country_and_its_(20604079076).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(1895)_(20643749125).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Unused fictitious logo; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 10:20, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Keep it is actually in use on it.wiki (COM:INUSE: «A media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose»), and nothing changed since the last deletion request which stated this image can stay on Commons. --Gambo7 (talk) 11:57, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- PS: moreover, it's been YOU who removed it from our template without ANY reasons except the intention to nominate it for deletion in the future --Gambo7 (talk) 12:00, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Made-up logos have no place in articles. Either use a real logo or nothing. I went for the latter option. This is so obvious that I did not even bother explaining it. Keφr (keep talk here) 13:39, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- It is in use → it must stay. End of the game. If you don't like it on it.wiki, go to our sports project and discuss about it, before removing it from a template used in hundreds of articles. --Gambo7 (talk) 16:13, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Made-up logos have no place in articles. Either use a real logo or nothing. I went for the latter option. This is so obvious that I did not even bother explaining it. Keφr (keep talk here) 13:39, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep -- User:Kephir has had it explained to him on numerous occasions that his approach to the "special and fictional flags" issue is problematic and mostly unproductive (including on his personal user talk page and twice being referred to "Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems"). After the message left on his user talk page -- warning him that if he refused to engage in the current "User problems" noticeboard discussion, and instead started in with a whole new round of deletion nominations against inoffensive (i.e. non-hoaxing non-hatemongering) special or fictional flags, it would be unlikely to be interpreted as evidence of good faith on his part -- he then chose to do engage in exactly that problematic course of action. Therefore User:Kephir's action in nominating this file for deletion would appear to contain a significant malicious or spiteful component, and I would strongly recommend that all Kephir's post-August-25th "special or fictional flags" deletion proposals be automatically rejected until some of the underlying issues are settled, and Kephir's behavior can be adjusted so that it does not appear to have a goal of stirring up turbulence and turmoil among the Commons community. AnonMoos (talk) 17:29, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Oh boy, clearly in scope, used, and allowed on Commons. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:33, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
L'utilisateur ayant partageait cette photo sur Flickr serait sur une liste de "mauvais utilisateurs" et pourrait lui même violer les droits d'auteurs. AntoCharl (talk) 18:13, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 09:10, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Inconsistent EXIF: unlikely "own work"
Wcam (talk) 13:34, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio Mys_721tx (talk) 04:54, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
crude copyright violation Kopiersperre (talk) 18:48, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: please use {{Copyvio}} next time Thibaut120094 (talk) 21:44, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RonsterBlum 1
[edit]Artist (Norbert Hartmann) died in 2007. Works still under copyright. Doubtful that File:Norbert Farbfoto.jpg is own work.
- File:Norbert Farbfoto.jpg
- File:Nr.410.JPG
- File:Nr.443.JPG
- File:Nr.395.JPG
- File:Nr.360.JPG
- File:Nr.349.JPG
- File:Nr.43.jpg
- File:Nr.36.jpg
- File:Nr.203.JPG
- File:Nr.149.JPG
- File:Nr.297.JPG
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:33, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
can you please specify why the authorship is doubtfull? --Jörgens.Mi Talk 17:05, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- Because, judging by the age of the artist, it was taken sometime in the 1980s or 90s, prior to digital photography. So it is a scan from somewhere else. Besides, it looks like it is taken in a private setting, so it is likely a promotional or press-release photo. Was User:RonsterBlum the official photographer for Hartmann, thereby owning the rights to this photo? Very doubtful indeed. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:04, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Why is this doubtfull? I've a lot of photos out of the pre digital ära, that doesn't change my state. it does not make my photos doubtfull. --Jörgens.Mi Talk 04:36, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: See http://nhartmann.jimdo.com/about/ Galerie Ronny Blum. Kept per AGF --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:19, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RonsterBlum 2
[edit]The previous nomination was not closed right. User:Joergens.mi only discussed File:Norbert Farbfoto.jpg. But the issue that works by Norbert Hartmann are still under copyright was ignored. There is no evidence that Ronny Blum is the copyright owner.
- File:Nr.410.JPG
- File:Nr.443.JPG
- File:Nr.395.JPG
- File:Nr.360.JPG
- File:Nr.349.JPG
- File:Nr.43.jpg
- File:Nr.36.jpg
- File:Nr.203.JPG
- File:Nr.149.JPG
- File:Nr.297.JPG
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:01, 26 August 2015 (UTC) ____________
Deleted Photographs appear to be own work of uploader, but they depicted artworks created by someone else. If these were to be restored, the artist would need to file a COM:OTRS form. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:21, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: The images were artworks of an artist, not own work of uploader. Photos were own work, but that which was depicted was not. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:22, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
image copied from a news outlet, no evidence of free licensing Quenhitran (talk) 06:51, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 20:15, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
No licensing info provided. Most likely copyright of the station. Illegitimate Barrister 21:25, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Yes, but it could have fair use added on Wikipedia. It shouldn't be on Commons though.--Ianmacm (talk) 21:33, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete I concur (unless I am once again being told that the shot on its own is too simple of a work under United States copyright laws to qualify for copyright!) -- Urquhartnite (talk) 01:03, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Comment No need for snarky comments. Illegitimate Barrister 10:21, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copright violation. JuTa 18:38, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Self promotion and out of project scope. --Moheen Reeyad (talk) 22:09, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:21, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
No uses. Self promotion and out of project scope. --Moheen Reeyad (talk) 21:59, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:21, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Occasionally graffiti will be kept, using the claim that an author might be denied any copyright relief based on an illegal act; however, there is no evidence of this legal theory being tested.
Official Commons policy is Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle, which rejects claims such as "The copyright owner will not bother to sue or cannot afford to." or "Nobody knows who the copyright owner is".
Given that the second argument (quote) above describes that even though it will be hard for a graffiti painter to sue for copyright infringement, we should err on the side of causion.
The {{Non-free graffiti}} is just a tag, like {{NoFoP-Italy}} to warn re-users that it might not be completely ok. These tags are not magical tags you can place on an image and use as a exemption from deletion. If the image is in violation, it needs to go. Those are the rules we play by, until any legal theory regarding graffiti has been tested, and we can see some real case law examples.
Any graffiti that is not verified by some credible source to be illegal (and/or taken in a country restricting FOP) cannot be uploaded to Commons, because as a (likely) sanctioned work [or assumed to be sanctioned per COM:PRP] it becomes a derivative of non-free content.
- All quotes are copied and licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 (link at the bottom). Quote emphasis are my own and additions to quotes are noted with brackets.
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:18, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:19, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Should be PD by age? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:20, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Overwritten with dog-photo 08-30-2015. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:07, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 07:54, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Bellow the COM:TOO? Amitie 10g (talk) 04:50, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 07:55, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Bellow the COM:TOO? Amitie 10g (talk) 18:09, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 07:55, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
looks to me fairly out of scope an likely not own work as claimed. JuTa 03:27, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:28, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal doodle. Many better electrical diagrams already on Commons. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:38, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:28, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Text only, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:39, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:28, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Text only, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:42, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:28, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
no quite notable people, out of scope --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:52, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:29, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Burns-Johnson (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope.
- File:Burns johnson1.jpg
- File:Burns-johnson9.jpg
- File:Burns-johnson8.JPG
- File:Burns-johnson4.jpg
- File:Burns-johnson.JPG
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:42, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:30, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
non notable person, page deleted in english wikipedia Motopark (talk) 05:44, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:31, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 06:23, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:31, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 06:27, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:31, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
{{BadJPG}}, orphaned/replaced by File:Methoxyketamine.svg. Leyo 09:21, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 13:53, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abdullahalmamuncse2015 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:PS: not used personal photo. Uploader has no contributions on wiki-project except for uploading these files (Special:CentralAuth/Abdullahalmamuncse2015).
KurodaSho (talk) 09:25, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:33, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photos are out of project scope. Metadata is missing. Taivo (talk) 10:06, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:34, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused photos about non-notable musicians are out of project scope. Also this is small photo without metadata, so own work is not sure. Taivo (talk) 11:27, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:35, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused simple logo of non-notable band is out of project scope. SS-2O is unknown to en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 11:30, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:36, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Please kill this side, wrong number of the sign. Mediatus (talk) 12:55, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Please kill this side, wrong number of the sign. Mediatus (talk) 11:56, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: unused redirect George Chernilevsky talk 16:37, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
spam, del. on DE Nolispanmo 12:11, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:39, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
spam, del. on DE Nolispanmo 12:11, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:39, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
spam, del. on DE Nolispanmo 12:11, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:40, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
spam, del. on DE Nolispanmo 12:11, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:40, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Image trouble, couleurs saturées. JessydeVilly (talk) 12:41, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:42, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:42, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:42, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:43, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:43, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:43, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:44, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
No context, no educational value (likely some sort of personal artwork?), out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:36, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:49, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:57, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:49, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Small, blurry image of a woman of whom we have several images already, and the DW of the advertising poster over her shoulder. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:12, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Also, the top of the head is cut off. Not useful. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 18:41, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete for the reasons already indicated. --81.149.56.169 02:37, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom George Chernilevsky talk 16:48, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
no offense, but imho commercial advertisements, hence 'out of scope', Roland zh (talk) 19:16, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:46, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
_Logo.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Logo.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:53, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
_Logo.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:45, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
_Logo.jpg){kind=link}
Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:53, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:45, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:55, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:45, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mdshahadat92 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
- File:Financial performane analysis of Prime Bank Ltd part 2.pdf
- File:Financial performane analysis of Prime Bank Ltd part 1.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:51, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jack Latroche (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused files, artworks without obvious educational use, advertising or self-promotion
- File:JOECOLOSIMO.jpg
- File:Minou Gif.gif
- File:Minou violet.jpg
- File:Minou jaune.jpg
- File:Joe Minou.JPG
- File:JOE COLOSIMO.jpg
- File:Joe Colosimo 10.JPG
- File:Joe Colosimo 9.JPG
- File:Joe Colosimo 7.JPG
- File:Joe Colosimo 8.JPG
- File:Joe Colosimo 4.jpg
- File:Joe Colosimo 6.JPG
- File:Joe Colosimo 5.jpg
- File:Joe Colosimo 3.jpg
- File:Joe Colosimo 2.jpg
- File:Joe Colosimo 1.JPG
- File:Joe Minou colosimo.jpg
- File:Colosimo joe.jpg
- File:Minou joe colosimo.jpg
- File:L'amour parle.jpg
- File:Ommagio a keith haring.jpg
- File:Joe. Colosimo.JPG
- File:Joe colosimo.JPG
- File:JOE Colosimo.JPG
- File:Joe COLOSIMO.jpg
- File:Joe Colosimo.JPG
- File:123454322cuoreminou(joecolosimo).jpg
- File:Pensatore123454321(joecolosimo).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
BrightRaven (talk) 14:27, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:53, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:59, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:58, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:57, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: What new could be added to collection of explicit media?
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:56, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Origamicomunicaciones (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:50, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sasi merkkupalayam (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:50, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
small file. no exif. many occurrences on internet. highly probable that it is not own work. possible copyvio. Takeaway (talk) 00:19, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio Captain-tucker (talk) 19:50, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused image of personal artwork by non-notable artist, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:17, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by George Chernilevsky --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:52, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
possibly COM:COPYVIO: according to the EXIF metadata, author is "Susan Gulliford & George Mariasz". KurodaSho (talk) 03:36, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio Captain-tucker (talk) 19:59, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Unsure. A private discussion regarding image status is occurring on a user talk page. Deletion should be officialized so a decision is made transparently and with maximum involvement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BlueSalix (talk • contribs) 2015-08-26T04:42:22 (UTC)
- Since receiving the deletion notice, I've been informed that while the photo had the right modification permissions, it was not licensed for commercial use. Because Wikipedia/Wikimedia is a non-profit, I erringly believed it was not "commercial". My error. The photo should be deleted. Winkelvi (talk) 17:39, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete https://www.flickr.com/photos/96024429@N00/17966165892/ license is by-nc 2.0; non-commercial. --GRuban (talk) 15:51, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Captain-tucker (talk) 20:06, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Personality, small size, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 15:06, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Sourced to http://www.arvindiyer.com/Arvind_Iyer.jpg - http://www.arvindiyer.com/ contains a CC-Zero license. INeverCry 09:27, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
This image has a reviewed license, but per ticket:2015082510015583, the license at the soure was probably incorrect. Didym (talk) 19:37, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete There may have been a free license at source (not any more), but all considering, I would delete this. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:43, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Source not found.Author not verified.Delete.Thank You --Bluewhalex (talk) 02:17, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete No source found.License unavailable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.194.43.68 (talk • contribs) 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, Per consensus. The archived versions of the website, at Internet Archive, do not show any licensing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Green Giant (talk • contribs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wiki Preston Corbell 2015.jpg
Meaningless logo, no educational value. Only used on userpage which was uploader's only contribution. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:45, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. BrightRaven (talk) 13:19, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
image copied from a media outlet, no evidence of free licensing Quenhitran (talk) 06:48, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio BrightRaven (talk) 13:20, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
Isn't it derivative work of copyrighted poster? Taivo (talk) 09:43, 26 August 2015 (UTC) No, the photo is an original piece of work.
Deleted: Maybe we could pretend that the poster is de minimis, but the picture is out of scope (unused low quality personal picture). BrightRaven (talk) 13:22, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
copyright violation. Image is available here: http://www.information.dk/fotobloggen/542950 KDS4444 (talk) 12:31, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Why does the claim that it's available from one location under a non-free licence change the fact that from the original source location [1] it was offered under a free licence? Andy Dingley (talk) 13:35, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: See the source closer. The copyvio comes from information.dk, posting this pictrure one day after its uploading to Flickr without crediting and licensing. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:57, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Image is clearly licensed (CC BY-SA 2.0) as above, this can not be rescinded and especially not by someone else who is not the copyright holder. --Wintonian (talk) 21:20, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep:: the author uploaded it to flickr, under a suitable license to be included in Wikimedia.(talk) user:Al83tito 16:45, 05 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: The publication on Flickr under an acceptable license is less recent than the publication on information.dk. BrightRaven (talk) 13:33, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
I nominated this image for deletion once before, and am looking at it in a new light: as a work of art, don't we need to have a statement of permission from the author of the underlying work in order to accept a photo of that work for hosting on Commons? Which artist created this work? Do we have that person's permission or evidence that he/ she is willing to release that work under a suitable license? I am not questioning the photo itself— that seems to be fine— I am questioning the copyright status of the underlying work, which I suspect (though I may be entirely wrong) is not PD. KDS4444 (talk) 20:05, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept see COM:FOP . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:32, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted It turns out that this is a temporary exhibition, therefore not eligible for UK FOP. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:25, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
No proof of licence Ariam (talk) 13:02, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission. BrightRaven (talk) 13:36, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
L'utilisateur sur Flickr aurait enlever la photo de son site. Aucuns moyens de pouvoir vérifier la licence. AntoCharl (talk) 18:15, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No valid source, so no evidence of permission. BrightRaven (talk) 13:39, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
Steve Schapiro is the author... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marek Koudelka (talk • contribs) 2015-08-23T21:52:40 (UTC)
Deleted: Flickr-washing. Copyvio. BrightRaven (talk) 13:41, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
Almost certainly a copyright violation: this image is available on Trainweb and credited to Stan Feldman [2]. The original uploader on en.wp was User:Oanabay04, who's been blocked for sockpuppetry and committed massive copyright infringement there. There's no reason to believe that he's Feldman, especially given the location of the crop. Mackensen (talk) 01:06, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
![[2]](http://www.trainweb.org/railpix/ayres1.jpg){kind=link}
- As stated in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rdc trainwesttrenton1975.jpg, we still should use the link as a substitute. Is anything from the pre-SEPTA era not a copyright violation? ----DanTD (talk) 01:50, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 15:27, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely that the user took the photo in question; see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rdc trainwesttrenton1975.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Newtown train at AYRES May 1982.jpg. The original uploader on en.wp was User:Oanabay04, who's been blocked for sockpuppetry and committed massive copyright infringement there. I have been unable to locate a copy of the image. Mackensen (talk) 01:38, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 15:27, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
possibly COM:COPYVIO: according to the description, this photo was taken in 1972, unlikely to be own work. KurodaSho (talk) 02:10, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No real source so deleted per nom Herby talk thyme 15:28, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
This 2014 image has copyright (http://www.diarioveloz.com/notas/140631-quien-era-el-periodista-omar-bello). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rosarino (talk • contribs) 2015-08-20T14:31:13 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom, copyvio Fma12 (talk) 22:22, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 15:28, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
possibly COM:COPYVIO: scanned image of a copyrighted article published in 1994, according to the description. KurodaSho (talk) 03:38, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
![03:38, 26 August 2015 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2015/08/26#c-KurodaSho-2015-08-26T03:38:00.000Z-File:Journal_of_Art_article_on_"Thinking_of_You".jpg){kind=link}
- according to the image itself, published in "Maggio 1996" (May 1996). --KurodaSho (talk) 03:39, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Clear copyvio - probably could have been speedy Herby talk thyme 15:29, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
![15:29, 18 September 2015 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2015/08/26#c-Herbythyme-2015-09-18T15:29:00.000Z-File:Journal_of_Art_article_on_"Thinking_of_You".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
image copied from a news outlet, no evidence of free licensing Quenhitran (talk) 06:49, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 15:31, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
image copied from a news outlet, no evidence of free licensing Quenhitran (talk) 06:49, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 15:32, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
image copied from a news outlet, no evidence of free licensing Quenhitran (talk) 06:49, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 15:32, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
possibly COM:COPYVIO: seems scanned image, unlikely to be own work KurodaSho (talk) 07:32, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No real source so deleted per nom Herby talk thyme 15:33, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Delete -This image is not in pd or a free licesense, this film was released in 1969. It's a copyvio therefore. film Screenshots are not permitted in commons. - 42.0.7.126 04:31, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: Per nom (& it even says "fair use" on the licensing...) Herby talk thyme 15:34, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
possibly COM:COPYVIO: This file came from this file on flickr but it seems promotional/professional photo. Flickr's uploader 海想赫你在一起 has been uploaded lots of copyvio file (such as this ad) under CC-BY licence. It seems Commons:License laundering. KurodaSho (talk) 08:14, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- and found on the web: [3] ([4]; it's bigger than Flickr image). --KurodaSho (talk) 08:15, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
![[4]](https://kraypop.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/super-junior-bonamana-super-junior-17680141-1934-960.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 15:34, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
under COM:PCP, possibly COM:COPYVIO: This file came from this file on flickr but it seems promotional/professional photo. Flickr's uploader Ruijin Minxoxo has been uploaded lots of copyvio file. In addition this image is found on the web: [5] [6] and others. It seems Commons:License laundering. KurodaSho (talk) 08:29, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 15:35, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
BikiniTooNaughty-001At.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
BikiniTooNaughty-001At.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Based on his other uploads, I doubt that the uploader took this photograph himself. Leyo 09:00, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
BikiniTooNaughty-001At.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 15:36, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
BikiniTooNaughty-001At.jpg){kind=link}
http://ericorporation.com/ru/aluminium-counterflow-exchanger/ is not free Bilderling (talk) 09:18, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Speedy delete external source, no permission, "All rights reserved". --KurodaSho (talk) 09:29, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 15:36, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cesarbeltran (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Cesarbeltran. All files related to Garzón, a municipality in Colombia.
- File:GARZONPARATODOS.jpg
- File:Las clarisas.JPG
- File:Seminario.jpg
- File:EDIFICIO DEL CAFE thumb 1.jpg
- File:ALCALDIA.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 09:39, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 15:36, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Motopark as no permission (No permission since). This is clearly textlogo, so no permission is needed. But maybe we can delete this as unused logo of non-notable company? Taivo (talk) 09:54, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: I agree it is a textlogo however equally I agree with Taivo Herby talk thyme 15:38, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Motopark as no permission (No permission since). As this is textlogo, no permission is needed. But maybe the logo is out of project scope as unused logo of non-notable company? Taivo (talk) 09:56, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: I agree it is a textlogo however equally I agree with Taivo Herby talk thyme 15:38, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Motopark as no permission (No permission since). No permission is needed, because this is textlogo. But maybe it is out of project scope as unused logo of non-notable thing? Taivo (talk) 09:59, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: I agree it is a textlogo however equally I agree with Taivo Herby talk thyme 15:39, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you describe and categorize the file correctly? This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:16, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 15:39, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jhosi-cali es cali (talk · contribs)
[edit]The source/license and author information of every image used in these collages are missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. See also Commons:Collages. No related uploads by user. Most likely all grabbed from Internet, considering uploaded both on 26.07.2013, using e.g. https://www.flickr.com/photos/fourpointshotels/8432137972 (01.2013, © by "Four Points and Resorts").
Gunnex (talk) 10:27, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 15:40, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Uploader is not author. OTRS-permission from Bernard Francois is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:32, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 15:40, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Author is not uploader. OTRS-permission from author is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:55, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Nothing heard from OTRS so deleting per nom Herby talk thyme 15:42, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
No proof of licence Ariam (talk) 13:03, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Clear copyvio to me Herby talk thyme 15:42, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
photo of a photo, unclear copyright status Didym (talk) 13:53, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: In the absence of a real source deleted Herby talk thyme 15:43, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No evidence of the licence stated, I'd expect such a politician to go for editorial use only. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:11, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: I don't see that this is validly licensed Herby talk thyme 15:44, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 15:44, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 15:44, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Promo photos and logo. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Meaning of life song by Stellar.jpg
- File:Farukh Abdullayev Stellar Bass.jpg
- File:Stellarweare1.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 15:45, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Image failed flickr review, the flickr license is incompatible with Commons. It is also highly unlikely that the tugboat took it's own photo as implied by the Flickr user name "Jacob Michael Eckstein". Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:57, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Seems to have gone Herby talk thyme 15:45, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
The file was upload from Flickr but according to Exif data it's copyrighted by the author Carnby (talk) 15:16, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep But the author is the uploader on Filckr, and he released it under cc-by-sa license. Dudek1337 (talk) 17:59, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: If the uploader is the copyright holder, the license choosen at Flickr and Commons prevails over any Exif metadata. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:07, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep I checked Flickr carefully and, yes, the uploader is the creator of the pic and has released it under CC BY-SA 2.0. I changed the Exif entry; you can close the deletion request. Thanks anyway.--Carnby (talk) 22:11, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Resolved Herby talk thyme 15:46, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
The text in this newspaper and other images are ARR (©). Josve05a (talk) 15:33, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio Herby talk thyme 15:46, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
"ANNAELISEPOCHE" in metadata does not match "Sam Huff" from flickr nor "John" of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:52, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Correct --- I ("John") did not take the photo. Thanks
- Delete per nominator. --Leoboudv (talk) 05:20, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom/discussion Herby talk thyme 15:47, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pablomoscatto (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small size, no EXIF data, user with bad history, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Paky Robot Wikipedia.png
- File:Kiko Robot Wikipedia.png
- File:Mou Robot Wikipedia.png
- File:Javi Robot Wikipedia.png
- File:Robot Zonda - Nueva foto 2013.png
- File:Guido - Robot Zonda - 2012.jpg
- File:Paky - Robot Zonda - 2012.jpg
- File:Kiko - Robot Zonda - 2012.jpg
- File:Mou - Robot Zonda - 2012.jpg
- File:Robot The Roxy 2.jpg
- File:Robot The Roxy 1.jpg
- File:Robot Groove 2.jpg
- File:Robot Groove 1.jpg
- File:Tipografía Robot Zonda Ufff.png
Yann (talk) 17:06, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 15:48, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pablomoscatto (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:ROBOT ZONDA RZ.jpg
- File:ROBOT ZONDA FOTO.jpg
- File:ROBOT ZONDA Rock.jpg
- File:ROBOT ZONDA 2017.jpg
- File:ROBOT ZONDA 2018.jpg
- File:ROBOT ZONDA VIVO 2018.jpg
- File:ROBOT ZONDA .jpg
- File:ROBOT ZONDA ROBOT ZONDA.jpg
- File:ROBOT ZONDA EN VIVO.jpg
- File:ROBOT ZONDA VIVO.jpg
- File:ROBOT ZONDA ROCK.jpg
- File:ROBOT ZONDA.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:29, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:18, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Smal lsize, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 17:11, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 15:49, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
Yann (talk) 17:14, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 15:49, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be free. Yann (talk) 17:25, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
![17:25, 26 August 2015 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2015/08/26#c-Yann-2015-08-26T17:25:00.000Z-File:Kenneth_"Babyface"_Edmonds.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 15:49, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
![15:49, 18 September 2015 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2015/08/26#c-Herbythyme-2015-09-18T15:49:00.000Z-File:Kenneth_"Babyface"_Edmonds.JPG){kind=link}
Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be free. Yann (talk) 17:27, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 15:49, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Many copies on the web, bigger copy here. Yann (talk) 17:41, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 15:49, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, user blocked for copyvios, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Ghulam Ali and Sabir Hussain Khan in Ustad Mahmood Khan Sarangi Festival 2015.jpg
- File:Organizer Mohammed Iqbal of Ustad Mahmood Khan Sarangi Festival 2015.jpg
- File:Sarwar Hussain Sarangi in Ustad Mahmood Khan Sarangi Festival 2015.jpg
- File:Ahsan ali Sarangi in Ustad Mahmood Khan Sarangi Festival 2015.jpg
- File:Ghulam Ali in Ustad Mahmood Khan Sarangi Festival 2015.jpg
- File:Sarwar Hussain in Ustad Mahmood Khan Sarangi Festival 2015.jpg
- File:Ahsan Ali in Ustad Mahmood Khan Sarangi Festival 2015.jpg
- File:Shabbir Hussain in Ustad Mahmood Khan Sarangi Festival 2015.jpg
- File:Ghualam Ali Sarangi and Mohammed Iqbal In Evening Raga 7th August Indian Habitat Center Delhi.jpg
- File:Tabla Player Mohd Amjad Khan.jpg
- File:Ahsan Ali Sarangi kirana Gharana.jpg
- File:Shabbir Hussain Sarangi Player from Kirana Gharana.png
- File:Mohd Amjad Tabla Player.jpg
- File:Rasheed Niyazi Tabla Player.jpg
- File:Ahasan Ali Hindustani Classical Sarangi Player.jpg
Yann (talk) 17:50, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Old pictures, copies on the web, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Ustad Mahmood Khan Sarangi Nawaz from Kirana Gharana.jpg
- File:Ustad Mahmood Khan Sarangi Nawaz from Kirana Gharana.JPG
- File:Ustad Basheer Khan Kirana.jpg
- File:Mahmood Khan Kirana Gharana.jpg
- File:Mahmood Khan From Gharana.JPG
- File:Ustad Mahmood Khan Sarangi.JPG
Yann (talk) 17:55, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete The old pictures were definitely not taken by the user and the user has not demonstrated any desire to follow the rules on copyright in the last years. I have difficulty believing any of these are genuine. Hekerui (talk) 18:12, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 15:50, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photos. Out of project scope.
- File:Mohd Amjad Tabla Player From Delhi India.JPG
- File:Karim Niyazi Harmonioum Player from Delhi.JPG
- File:Sabir Hussain Tabla Player.JPG
- File:Rasheed Niyazi Tabla Player From Delhi.JPG
- File:Aman Ali Sarangi In Evening Raga 7th August Indian Habitat Center Delhi.jpg
- File:Ghualam Ali Sarangi Mohammed Iqbal and Suhail Yousuf Khan In Evening Raga 7th August Indian Habitat Center Delhi.jpg
- File:Ghualam Ali Sarangi Solo In Evening Raga 7th August.jpg
- File:Ghualam Ali Sarangi Solo In Evening Raga 7th August Indian Habitat Center Delhi.jpg
- File:Mohd Amjad Khan with Ustad Hashmad Khan In Evening Raga 7th August Indian Habitat Center.jpg
- File:Ghualam Ali Sarangi Solo In Evening Raga 7th August Indian Habitat Center.jpg
- File:Suhail Yousuf Khan Sarangi In Evening Raga 7th August Indian Habitat Center.jpg
- File:Junaid Khan Sarangi In Evening Raga 7th August Indian Habitat Center.jpg
- File:Mohd Amjad Khan In Evening Raga 7th August Indian Habitat Center.jpg
- File:Shuaib Khan In Evening Raga 7th August Indian Habitat Center.jpg
- File:Sabir Hussain Tabla In Evening Raga 7th August.jpg
- File:Aadil Hussain In Evening Raga 7th August.jpg
- File:Rashid Niyazi with Conl R C Chadda.JPG
- File:Arbaz Khan with Conl R C Chadda.JPG
- File:Shabbir Hussain with Conl R C Chadda.JPG
- File:Moinuddin Ahmed with Conl Chadda.JPG
- File:Karim Niyazi with Conl R C Chadda.JPG
- File:Moin Khan Ghazal singer from New Delhi.JPG
- File:Moinuddin Ahmed Ghazalist.JPG
- File:Moinuddin Ahmed Ghazal singer from Muzaffarpur.JPG
~ Moheen (keep talking) 22:54, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:45, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Category:Juma Mosque (Baku) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samral (talk • contribs) 2015-08-26T05:55:09 (UTC)
- Keep: An Azerbaijani name is no reason for deleting a gallery. --Achim (talk) 18:30, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Per Achim comment Herby talk thyme 15:52, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
In english : No interest. No file does use this image.
En français : Fichier sans intérêt. Aucune page n'utilise cette image.
Éric Messel (Déposer un message) 20:32, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- I don't care, no problem. --Wikinade (talk) 07:35, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Kept: "No interest. No file does use this image." is not a valid reason to delete Herby talk thyme 15:54, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Watermark and information template state copyright holder is a Thierry Glass. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 21:46, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 15:57, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by NickButera1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low-res, missing EXIF, unlikely to be own work
- File:Noelia Marzol 2014 Todos Juntos 01.jpg
- File:Noelia Marzol crop.jpg
- File:Noelia Marzol-Todos-Juntos-(2).jpg
- File:Noelia Marzol Telefiesta.jpg
- File:Noelia Marzol 2014.jpg
- File:Noelia Marzol-2012.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Thibaut120094 (talk) 21:52, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 15:56, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Lotsenstation Nübbel (Color).tif — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mef.ellingen (talk • contribs) 2015-08-20T17:51:20 (UTC)
- Farbfoto ohne Farbe
Ein Foto, bei dem die Farben maschinell ausgeblendet wurden, muss nicht zusätzlich zum Farbfoto im System sein. --Mef.ellingen (talk) 17:54, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
- Stimmt, war ein Versehen. Hab beim Hochladen versehentlich die SW-Version erwischt und dann die farbige nachgeschoben. Die erste kann gerne gelöscht werden...--MS 1962 (talk) 11:53, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:37, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 04:15, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photo collection. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:38, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
there is nothing in the source that say this image can be uploaded into Commons http://www.fugitiveimages.org.uk/ --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:58, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:40, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
файл не актуален. я автор, хочу его удалить. пожалуйста Alex book (talk) 00:30, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Author requested Natuur12 (talk) 15:00, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Almost certainly a copyright violation: this image is available from the Reading Company Technical & Historical Society website and is credited to Gary Stuebben: [7] [8]. The original uploader on en.wp was User:Oanabay04, who's been blocked for sockpuppetry and committed massive copyright infringement there. There's no reason to believe that he's Stuebben, especially given Commons:Deletion requests/File:Newtown train at AYRES May 1982.jpg. Mackensen (talk) 01:12, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
![[8]](http://readingrailroad.org/roster/images/rdc_train.jpg){kind=link}
- The second link is the real evidence of copyright violation. Unless the Reading Company Technical & Historical Society website specifically has evidence they gave Oanabay04 permission to add this, I'm afraid I have to Support the deletion. Let me state for the record, that I only uploaded it to the commons, and I'd like to find a way to use the links as substitutions for the copyvio images. ----DanTD (talk) 01:41, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- I think a lot of us were caught off guard by these copyvios - I myself transferred a few without realizing. If the RCT&HS is still active, it might be worth sending them an email to see if Gary Stuebben might be willing to license the image. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:55, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:01, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Could be PD but proper author/date/source are not provided. Assume that this person is w:es:María Valdés Mendoza (cf. [9]), she died in 1896. KurodaSho (talk) 04:23, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Source needed Natuur12 (talk) 15:01, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 04:51, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Doubtfull claim of ownsership as well Natuur12 (talk) 15:02, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Could be {{PD-old}} but proper author/date/source are not provided. KurodaSho (talk) 05:36, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:02, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Contemporary monument, no Panorama Freedom for works of sculpture in Russia. S0 (talk) 05:58, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:02, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Contemporary monument, no Panorama Freedom for works of sculpture in Russia. S0 (talk) 05:59, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:02, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Contemporary monument, no Panorama Freedom for works of sculpture in Russia. S0 (talk) 06:02, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:02, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Uploaded locally at enwiki in 03.2008 by 3-edit user en:User:Hanukikanker (and later transferred to Commons), this photo (640x427 px) is most likely a work by © Jack Kurtz, considering http://kurtzjack.photoshelter.com/image/I0000Bmhyar.PBqE (© Jack Kurtz, Photo by Jack Kurtz / ZUMA Press, taken in 2006, max size, as indicated: 4368x2912 / 5.4MB) = http://cdn.c.photoshelter.com/img-get2/I0000Bmhyar.PBqE/fit=4368x2912/Vietnam2005.jpg (exif available, here in 1440x960px) and is part of a Vietnam related gallery with similar shots from this spot. "Jack Kurtz" is a professional "photojournalist & travel photographer" (details at http://www.jackkurtzphotography.com/#!/about).
Permission needed.
Affected collage: File:SaigonCollage.jpg Gunnex (talk) 06:35, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:08, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
No real informations, will upload others. First picture was not thought to be published. PeterBraun74 (talk) 06:46, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:08, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo. 84.61.172.210 06:58, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:08, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Non-free media — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zerabat (talk • contribs) 2015-08-25T12:03:04 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:08, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Could be {{PD-Japan-oldphoto}} but proper author/date/source are not provided. This town name (w:ja:浅川町 (東京都)) was abolished in 1959. KurodaSho (talk) 07:43, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:08, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jean70000 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: That this is not a textlogo. Compare with threshold of originality. Speedy already rejected for similar logos form ESPN. Seems bellow the TOO in the US for me. Amitie 10g (talk) 21:52, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- This is not simple shapes, it is a high quality logo. --Jean70000 (talk) 21:58, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep ESPN logos qualify for PD-textlogo in the United States. Fry1989 eh? 04:13, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Bellow the TOO in the United States. User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 22:39, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jean70000 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: That this is not a textlogo. Compare with threshold of originality. Speedy already rejected for similar logos form ESPN. Seems bellow the TOO in the US for me. But better PNG version exists. Amitie 10g (talk) 21:53, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- This is not simple shapes, it is a high quality logo. --Jean70000 (talk) 21:58, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep ESPN logos qualify for PD-textlogo in the United States. Fry1989 eh? 04:11, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Bellow the TOO in the United States. User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 22:46, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Contemporary monument, no Panorama Freedom for works of sculpture in Russia. S0 (talk) 08:08, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:16, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Contemporary monument, no Panorama Freedom for works of sculpture in Russia. S0 (talk) 08:09, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:16, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Contemporary monument, no Panorama Freedom for works of sculpture in Russia. S0 (talk) 08:09, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:17, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Contemporary monument, no Panorama Freedom for works of sculpture in Russia. S0 (talk) 08:10, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:17, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Contemporary monument, no Panorama Freedom for works of sculpture in Russia. S0 (talk) 08:10, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:17, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Contemporary monument, no Panorama Freedom for works of sculpture in Russia. S0 (talk) 08:10, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:17, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Contemporary monument, no Panorama Freedom for works of sculpture in Russia. S0 (talk) 08:11, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:17, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Contemporary monument, no Panorama Freedom for works of sculpture in Russia. S0 (talk) 08:11, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:17, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Contemporary monument, no Panorama Freedom for works of sculpture in Russia. S0 (talk) 08:43, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:17, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Contemporary monument, no Panorama Freedom for works of sculpture in Russia. S0 (talk) 08:44, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:17, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Contemporary monument, no Panorama Freedom for works of sculpture in Russia. S0 (talk) 08:45, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:17, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Contemporary monument, no Panorama Freedom for works of sculpture in Russia. S0 (talk) 08:45, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:17, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Contemporary monument, no Panorama Freedom for works of sculpture in Russia. S0 (talk) 08:46, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:17, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Contemporary monument, no Panorama Freedom for works of sculpture in Russia. S0 (talk) 08:47, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:17, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Contemporary monument, no Panorama Freedom for works of sculpture in Russia. S0 (talk) 08:47, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:18, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Contemporary monument, no Panorama Freedom for works of sculpture in Russia. S0 (talk) 08:48, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:18, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Contemporary monument, no Panorama Freedom for works of sculpture in Russia. S0 (talk) 08:49, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:18, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Contemporary monument, no Panorama Freedom for works of sculpture in Russia. S0 (talk) 08:49, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:18, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Contemporary monument, no Panorama Freedom for works of sculpture in Russia. S0 (talk) 08:49, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:18, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Contemporary monument, no Panorama Freedom for works of sculpture in Russia. S0 (talk) 08:50, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:18, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Contemporary monument, no Panorama Freedom for works of sculpture in Russia. S0 (talk) 08:50, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:18, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Contemporary monument, no Panorama Freedom for works of sculpture in Russia. S0 (talk) 08:50, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:18, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Contemporary monument, no Panorama Freedom for works of sculpture in Russia. S0 (talk) 08:51, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:19, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Contemporary monument, no Panorama Freedom for works of sculpture in Russia. S0 (talk) 08:51, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:19, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Contemporary monument, no Panorama Freedom for works of sculpture in Russia. S0 (talk) 08:52, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:19, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Contemporary monument, no Panorama Freedom for works of sculpture in Russia. S0 (talk) 08:52, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:19, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Contemporary monument, no Panorama Freedom for works of sculpture in Russia. S0 (talk) 08:52, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:19, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Contemporary monument, no Panorama Freedom for works of sculpture in Russia. S0 (talk) 08:54, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:19, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Contemporary monument, no Panorama Freedom for works of sculpture in Russia. S0 (talk) 08:54, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:19, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Low resolution and should be moved to local wikipedia. --Moheen Reeyad (talk) 05:17, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyrighted logo Natuur12 (talk) 15:19, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Last I checked, Oceana did not have a personal flag. Out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 09:50, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep -- User:Kephir has had it explained to him on numerous occasions that his approach to the "special and fictional flags" issue is problematic and mostly unproductive (including on his personal user talk page and twice being referred to "Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems"). After the message left on his user talk page -- warning him that if he refused to engage in the current "User problems" noticeboard discussion, and instead started in with a whole new round of deletion nominations against inoffensive (i.e. non-hoaxing non-hatemongering) special or fictional flags, it would be unlikely to be interpreted as evidence of good faith on his part -- he then chose to engage in exactly that problematic course of action. Therefore User:Kephir's action in nominating this file for deletion would appear to contain a significant malicious or spiteful component, and I would strongly recommend that all Kephir's post-August-25th "special or fictional flags" deletion proposals be automatically rejected until some of the underlying issues are settled, and Kephir's behavior can be adjusted so that it does not appear to have a goal of stirring up turbulence and turmoil among the Commons community. AnonMoos (talk) 17:39, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused uploader's artwork, redundant to File:Anti copyright flag.svg. Keφr (keep talk here) 09:52, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep -- User:Kephir has had it explained to him on numerous occasions that his approach to the "special and fictional flags" issue is problematic and mostly unproductive (including on his personal user talk page and twice being referred to "Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems". After the message left on his user talk page -- warning him that if he refused to engage in the current "User problems" noticeboard discussion, and instead started in with a whole new round of deletion nominations against inoffensive (i.e. non-hoaxing non-hatemongering) special or fictional flags, it would be unlikely to be interpreted as evidence of good faith on his part -- he then chose to do engage in exactly that problematic course of action. Therefore User:Kephir's action in nominating this file for deletion would appear to contain a significant malicious or spiteful component, and I would strongly recommend that all Kephir's post-August-25th "special or fictional flags" deletion proposals be automatically rejected until some of the underlying issues are settled, and Kephir's behavior can be adjusted so that it does not appear to have a goal of stirring up turbulence and turmoil among the Commons community. AnonMoos (talk) 17:20, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment File:Anti copyright flag.svg uses this as a source. As long as that file is still here, this one shouldn't be deleted. Tom-L (talk) 21:29, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused, poor-quality, and the real Jordanian roundel is File:Roundel of the Royal Jordanian Air Force.svg. Out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 09:55, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep -- User:Kephir has had it explained to him on numerous occasions that his approach to the "special and fictional flags" issue is problematic and mostly unproductive (including on his personal user talk page and twice being referred to "Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems". After the message left on his user talk page -- warning him that if he refused to engage in the current "User problems" noticeboard discussion, and instead started in with a whole new round of deletion nominations against inoffensive (i.e. non-hoaxing non-hatemongering) special or fictional flags, it would be unlikely to be interpreted as evidence of good faith on his part -- he then chose to do engage in exactly that problematic course of action. Therefore User:Kephir's action in nominating this file for deletion would appear to contain a significant malicious or spiteful component, and I would strongly recommend that all Kephir's post-August-25th "special or fictional flags" deletion proposals be automatically rejected until some of the underlying issues are settled, and Kephir's behavior can be adjusted so that it does not appear to have a goal of stirring up turbulence and turmoil among the Commons community. AnonMoos (talk) 17:23, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused fictitious flag, apparently from NationStates. Out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 09:57, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep -- User:Kephir has had it explained to him on numerous occasions that his approach to the "special and fictional flags" issue is problematic and mostly unproductive (including on his personal user talk page and twice being referred to "Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems". After the message left on his user talk page -- warning him that if he refused to engage in the current "User problems" noticeboard discussion, and instead started in with a whole new round of deletion nominations against inoffensive (i.e. non-hoaxing non-hatemongering) special or fictional flags, it would be unlikely to be interpreted as evidence of good faith on his part -- he then chose to do engage in exactly that problematic course of action. Therefore User:Kephir's action in nominating this file for deletion would appear to contain a significant malicious or spiteful component, and I would strongly recommend that all Kephir's post-August-25th "special or fictional flags" deletion proposals be automatically rejected until some of the underlying issues are settled, and Kephir's behavior can be adjusted so that it does not appear to have a goal of stirring up turbulence and turmoil among the Commons community. AnonMoos (talk) 17:24, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused fictitious flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 09:59, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep -- User:Kephir has had it explained to him on numerous occasions that his approach to the "special and fictional flags" issue is problematic and mostly unproductive (including on his personal user talk page and twice being referred to "Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems". After the message left on his user talk page -- warning him that if he refused to engage in the current "User problems" noticeboard discussion, and instead started in with a whole new round of deletion nominations against inoffensive (i.e. non-hoaxing non-hatemongering) special or fictional flags, it would be unlikely to be interpreted as evidence of good faith on his part -- he then chose to do engage in exactly that problematic course of action. Therefore User:Kephir's action in nominating this file for deletion would appear to contain a significant malicious or spiteful component, and I would strongly recommend that all Kephir's post-August-25th "special or fictional flags" deletion proposals be automatically rejected until some of the underlying issues are settled, and Kephir's behavior can be adjusted so that it does not appear to have a goal of stirring up turbulence and turmoil among the Commons community. AnonMoos (talk) 17:25, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Motopark as Fair use (Fair use). But maybe the logo does not surpass threshold of originality. The file is used, so in scope. Taivo (talk) 10:02, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: The arranging is probably copyrightable Natuur12 (talk) 15:23, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused micronation flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 10:04, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep -- User:Kephir has had it explained to him on numerous occasions that his approach to the "special and fictional flags" issue is problematic and mostly unproductive (including on his personal user talk page and twice being referred to "Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems". After the message left on his user talk page -- warning him that if he refused to engage in the current "User problems" noticeboard discussion, and instead started in with a whole new round of deletion nominations against inoffensive (i.e. non-hoaxing non-hatemongering) special or fictional flags, it would be unlikely to be interpreted as evidence of good faith on his part -- he then chose to do engage in exactly that problematic course of action. Therefore User:Kephir's action in nominating this file for deletion would appear to contain a significant malicious or spiteful component, and I would strongly recommend that all Kephir's post-August-25th "special or fictional flags" deletion proposals be automatically rejected until some of the underlying issues are settled, and Kephir's behavior can be adjusted so that it does not appear to have a goal of stirring up turbulence and turmoil among the Commons community. AnonMoos (talk) 17:26, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Motopark as Fair use (Fair use). Maybe the cover art does not surpass threshold of originality. The logo is used, so in scope. Taivo (talk) 10:05, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Below TOO Natuur12 (talk) 15:23, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
File:Histoire naturelle de Buffon (microforme) - classée par ordres, genres et espèces, d'après le système de Linné avec les caractères géné riques et la nomenclature Linnéenne (1802) (20449577368).jpg
[edit]_-_class%C3%A9e_par_ordres,_genres_et_esp%C3%A8ces,_d%27apr%C3%A8s_le_syst%C3%A8me_de_Linn%C3%A9_avec_les_caract%C3%A8res_g%C3%A9n%C3%A9_riques_et_la_nomenclature_Linn%C3%A9enne_(1802)_(20449577368).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_class%C3%A9e_par_ordres,_genres_et_esp%C3%A8ces,_d%27apr%C3%A8s_le_syst%C3%A8me_de_Linn%C3%A9_avec_les_caract%C3%A8res_g%C3%A9n%C3%A9_riques_et_la_nomenclature_Linn%C3%A9enne_(1802)_(20449577368).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - bad quality scan with over half of text missing MPF (talk) 10:10, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Some of these are automatically swept up in Category:Internet Archive (mostly blank), though this comes from a slow housekeeping task. They should be speedy deleted unless there are illustrations or the text is manuscript or otherwise historically unusual types of print. The IA pages include a find matches link, which are handy if a book has been scanned with lots of text pages mistaken for figures in the IA Flickrstream they are based on. At this moment I can only see this one page from the book. --Fæ (talk) 11:18, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:24, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused fictitious flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 10:19, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep -- User:Kephir has had it explained to him on numerous occasions that his approach to the "special and fictional flags" issue is problematic and mostly unproductive (including on his personal user talk page and twice being referred to "Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems". After the message left on his user talk page -- warning him that if he refused to engage in the current "User problems" noticeboard discussion, and instead started in with a whole new round of deletion nominations against inoffensive (i.e. non-hoaxing non-hatemongering) special or fictional flags, it would be unlikely to be interpreted as evidence of good faith on his part -- he then chose to do engage in exactly that problematic course of action. Therefore User:Kephir's action in nominating this file for deletion would appear to contain a significant malicious or spiteful component, and I would strongly recommend that all Kephir's post-August-25th "special or fictional flags" deletion proposals be automatically rejected until some of the underlying issues are settled, and Kephir's behavior can be adjusted so that it does not appear to have a goal of stirring up turbulence and turmoil among the Commons community. AnonMoos (talk) 17:27, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused fictional flag file. Out of project scope. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 16:40, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:26, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Unused fictitious flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. There is an AFD discussion about the supposed "Central Saharan Republic" on enwp, in case anyone is curious. Keφr (keep talk here) 10:28, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep -- User:Kephir has had it explained to him on numerous occasions that his approach to the "special and fictional flags" issue is problematic and mostly unproductive (including on his personal user talk page and twice being referred to "Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems"). After the message left on his user talk page -- warning him that if he refused to engage in the current "User problems" noticeboard discussion, and instead started in with a whole new round of deletion nominations against inoffensive (i.e. non-hoaxing non-hatemongering) special or fictional flags, it would be unlikely to be interpreted as evidence of good faith on his part -- he then chose to engage in exactly that problematic course of action. Therefore User:Kephir's action in nominating this file for deletion would appear to contain a significant malicious or spiteful component, and I would strongly recommend that all Kephir's post-August-25th "special or fictional flags" deletion proposals be automatically rejected until some of the underlying issues are settled, and Kephir's behavior can be adjusted so that it does not appear to have a goal of stirring up turbulence and turmoil among the Commons community. AnonMoos (talk) 17:36, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
edits. If you want 117.24.17.33 14:25, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —RP88 (talk) 14:33, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Unused fictitious flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 10:33, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep -- User:Kephir has had it explained to him on numerous occasions that his approach to the "special and fictional flags" issue is problematic and mostly unproductive (including on his personal user talk page and twice being referred to "Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems"). After the message left on his user talk page -- warning him that if he refused to engage in the current "User problems" noticeboard discussion, and instead started in with a whole new round of deletion nominations against inoffensive (i.e. non-hoaxing non-hatemongering) special or fictional flags, it would be unlikely to be interpreted as evidence of good faith on his part -- he then chose to engage in exactly that problematic course of action. Therefore User:Kephir's action in nominating this file for deletion would appear to contain a significant malicious or spiteful component, and I would strongly recommend that all Kephir's post-August-25th "special or fictional flags" deletion proposals be automatically rejected until some of the underlying issues are settled, and Kephir's behavior can be adjusted so that it does not appear to have a goal of stirring up turbulence and turmoil among the Commons community. AnonMoos (talk) 17:34, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
I share User:Mate2Code's opinion about this. Also, to add my opinion, fictional flags should not be retroactively added to sourced, historical countries. Centralismo (talk) 12:18, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --ƏXPLICIT 01:50, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused fictitious flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 10:35, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
.PNG){kind=link}
- Keep -- User:Kephir has had it explained to him on numerous occasions that his approach to the "special and fictional flags" issue is problematic and mostly unproductive (including on his personal user talk page and twice being referred to "Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems"). After the message left on his user talk page -- warning him that if he refused to engage in the current "User problems" noticeboard discussion, and instead started in with a whole new round of deletion nominations against inoffensive (i.e. non-hoaxing non-hatemongering) special or fictional flags, it would be unlikely to be interpreted as evidence of good faith on his part -- he then chose to engage in exactly that problematic course of action. Therefore User:Kephir's action in nominating this file for deletion would appear to contain a significant malicious or spiteful component, and I would strongly recommend that all Kephir's post-August-25th "special or fictional flags" deletion proposals be automatically rejected until some of the underlying issues are settled, and Kephir's behavior can be adjusted so that it does not appear to have a goal of stirring up turbulence and turmoil among the Commons community. AnonMoos (talk) 17:33, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
.PNG){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
I share User:Mate2Code's opinion about this. Also, to add my opinion, fictional flags should not be retroactively added to sourced, historical countries. For this specific file, maybe a compromise could be made, as in combining two or more sourced historical flags, and calling that fictional. Centralismo (talk) 12:18, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --ƏXPLICIT 01:50, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
.PNG&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
Unused fictitious flag; out of project scope. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 16:42, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:21, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Unused so-called "alternate history" flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 10:37, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep -- User:Kephir has had it explained to him on numerous occasions that his approach to the "special and fictional flags" issue is problematic and mostly unproductive (including on his personal user talk page and twice being referred to "Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems"). After the message left on his user talk page -- warning him that if he refused to engage in the current "User problems" noticeboard discussion, and instead started in with a whole new round of deletion nominations against inoffensive (i.e. non-hoaxing non-hatemongering) special or fictional flags, it would be unlikely to be interpreted as evidence of good faith on his part -- he then chose to do engage in exactly that problematic course of action. Therefore User:Kephir's action in nominating this file for deletion would appear to contain a significant malicious or spiteful component, and I would strongly recommend that all Kephir's post-August-25th "special or fictional flags" deletion proposals be automatically rejected until some of the underlying issues are settled, and Kephir's behavior can be adjusted so that it does not appear to have a goal of stirring up turbulence and turmoil among the Commons community. AnonMoos (talk) 17:32, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused flag of a yet another unfinished conlang; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 10:39, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep -- User:Kephir has had it explained to him on numerous occasions that his approach to the "special and fictional flags" issue is problematic and mostly unproductive (including on his personal user talk page and twice being referred to "Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems"). After the message left on his user talk page -- warning him that if he refused to engage in the current "User problems" noticeboard discussion, and instead started in with a whole new round of deletion nominations against inoffensive (i.e. non-hoaxing non-hatemongering) special or fictional flags, it would be unlikely to be interpreted as evidence of good faith on his part -- he then chose to do engage in exactly that problematic course of action. Therefore User:Kephir's action in nominating this file for deletion would appear to contain a significant malicious or spiteful component, and I would strongly recommend that all Kephir's post-August-25th "special or fictional flags" deletion proposals be automatically rejected until some of the underlying issues are settled, and Kephir's behavior can be adjusted so that it does not appear to have a goal of stirring up turbulence and turmoil among the Commons community. AnonMoos (talk) 17:31, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you describe and categorize the file correctly? This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:42, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:25, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
- also file:KG INVERSE.png
Unused photos of non-notable musicians are out of project scope. These are the self-promotional user's last remaining contributions. Taivo (talk) 10:49, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:25, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 11:01, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:25, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
big posters in background which copyright are unknown Motopark (talk) 11:02, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:25, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 11:06, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:26, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Self-created artwork without obvious educational use SalisburyCentric (talk) 11:09, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Also, this flag
not (typo)never been seen outside Wikimedia Commons, in protests, on the street or other website.SalisburyCentric (talk) 11:11, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In use Natuur12 (talk) 15:26, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Carrotkit as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: In the source claimed by the uploader, there is the disclaimer "Copyright © 2014 HKGalden. All Rights Reserved". INeverCry 17:40, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- I don't see any changes to the design from File:Flag of Hong Kong (1959-1997).svg that would garnish this a new copyright. However the image's scope is certainly in question. Fry1989 eh? 01:27, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Kept: per discussion Krd 18:22, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Self-created artwork without obvious educational use SalisburyCentric (talk) 11:15, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Also, this flag has
not (typo)never been seen outside Wikimedia Commons, on the street, in protest or other website. SalisburyCentric (talk) 11:15, 26 August 2015 (UTC)- Red ensign also unofficial.--DannyChan (talk) 13:32, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Kept: same as last closing. Natuur12 (talk) 15:28, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you describe the file correctly? Taivo (talk) 11:33, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:28, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Proper author/date/source are not provided. According to the web info ([10] [11] [12] etc.), could it be {{PD-old}}? KurodaSho (talk) 11:36, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:28, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Derivative work of a sculpture erected in the U.S. in 2008. No evidence of permission. Powers (talk) 11:57, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
The sculpture appears to be a derivative work based on the logo of a student run magazine published at the university the sculpture was erected. The logo predates the sculpture (1996 vs 2008). -kjoenth
- There's absolutely no evidence that they're actually related in any way. Furthermore, if in fact the sculpture were a derivative work, then this file still should be deleted. If the GDT logo is eligible for copyright, then this photograph violates that copyright. If the GDT logo is not eligible for copyright, then the sculpture (even if derivative) is not a copyright violation but retains its own valid copyright, which is violated by this photo. Powers (talk) 00:13, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:29, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
The author of this letter, Kurt Walter Bachstitz died in 1949, so less than 70 years ago. Not in the PD yet. BrightRaven (talk) 12:49, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello BrightRaven, let me quote from this one in order to show that there is no original authorship involved:
"Dear Professor, please find attached the following photos next to descrptions of: a) Jan Steen (...) b) Ferdinand Bol (...) (...)
Tomorrow I can show you the original of the marble relief by Lorenzo die Credi as well the sculptures that are in the municipal museum (...)"
best Henning1973
- In the US, "names, short phrases, and slogans are not protected by copyright law." Here the text is longer than that, so it should be above the threshold of originality, at least in the US. Not far above, but still above. BrightRaven (talk) 08:34, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:29, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
The author of this letter, Kurt Walter Bachstitz died in 1949, so less than 70 years ago. Not in the PD yet. BrightRaven (talk) 13:01, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Dear BrightRaven, let me quote from this one in order to show it is not eligible for authorship: "I just received your esteemed lines of 11 of this months for which I thank you fondly. As I already assured you I am extraordinarily interested in fulfilling your whishes as far as it is within my powers, and I therefore accept the offer you made: (...) follows a list of works and prices.
best, Henning1973
- In the US, "names, short phrases, and slogans are not protected by copyright law." Here the text is longer than that, so it should be above the threshold of originality, at least in the US. Not far above, but still above. BrightRaven (talk) 08:34, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:29, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 14:50, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Questionable copyright status Natuur12 (talk) 15:30, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Although I'm all against homophobia (as a gay person myself), however this is a derivative work of another persons/organisation's sticker (artwork/photograph) and is therefore protected by copyright. Sorry, Josve05a (talk) 14:51, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:30, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 | If you are the copyright holder, please email our permissions verification team (VRT). | →  |
This is a derivative work of another persons artwork. If you own the copyright of the artwork, please send permission to COM:OTRS Josve05a (talk) 14:53, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:32, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Derivative work of The Incredible Hulk (© Marvel Comics). Josve05a (talk) 14:56, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Commons:De minimis. Gyrostat (talk) 14:57, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- It is the main focus point of this image. Without it is also out of scope. Josve05a (talk) 22:14, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:33, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
| If you are the copyright holder, please email our permissions verification team (VRT). | → |
Derviative work of someone's artwork. Josve05a (talk) 14:57, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Republication verbally granted. Gyrostat (talk) 15:12, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- We need written explicit permission. There's also a difference between freely license it, and allowing it to be redistributed. Josve05a (talk) 15:17, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- This kind lady told me the "story" of her "artwork" when I took this photo. I specifically askd if I could publish it on the internet, and she was more than fine with it. I can't imagine that you bring your paperwork with when you go out to shoot. Especially when your doing photojournalism and have so much other things to deal with. I had the explicit permission of that lady to take a picture of her work, to publish it and whatever the hell redistribute could possibly means. Gyrostat (talk) 15:30, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- You can claim anything you want. We have nothing to verify what you are saying it true, unfortunately. (Also, redistibuting only means "Posting online". WHat you have done is freely license it under a CC-license and claim copyright yourself of the artwork by doing so.) Josve05a (talk) 22:16, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- This kind lady told me the "story" of her "artwork" when I took this photo. I specifically askd if I could publish it on the internet, and she was more than fine with it. I can't imagine that you bring your paperwork with when you go out to shoot. Especially when your doing photojournalism and have so much other things to deal with. I had the explicit permission of that lady to take a picture of her work, to publish it and whatever the hell redistribute could possibly means. Gyrostat (talk) 15:30, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- We need written explicit permission. There's also a difference between freely license it, and allowing it to be redistributed. Josve05a (talk) 15:17, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:33, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Derivative work or another photograph. (No evidence provided that it is under the public domain) Josve05a (talk) 14:58, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- No threshold of originality + PD-text. Also: news reporting exception granted by the CPI, art 122-5 alinéa 9. Gyrostat (talk) 16:25, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- How can photographs be under the TOO? Also Wikimedia Commons (and freely licening an image) is not covered under the "news reporting exemption". Josve05a (talk) 22:17, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Well: photo booth pic + PD-text = no TOO. Gyrostat (talk) 22:48, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- A photo booth picture is also copyrightable, then by the subject. The photobooth is just the tool (camera) s/he used. It is also not a pass-photo or gov.ID photo since one of the people are smiling. Also no evidence of either of these assumptions. Josve05a (talk) 23:45, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Well: photo booth pic + PD-text = no TOO. Gyrostat (talk) 22:48, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- How can photographs be under the TOO? Also Wikimedia Commons (and freely licening an image) is not covered under the "news reporting exemption". Josve05a (talk) 22:17, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:33, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Derviate work of covers of Charlie Hebdo. No evidence of those being in the public domain. Josve05a (talk) 15:00, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Commons:De minimis. No good quality reproduction of those covers can be made from this photo. Gyrostat (talk) 15:46, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Not even close to becoming DM Natuur12 (talk) 15:34, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derviative work of Rugby 15, © Big Ben Interactive Josve05a (talk) 15:01, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:36, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
https://ir.linkedin.com/pub/siamak-khademi/7a/6b2/606 (possible coyright violation) Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 15:15, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:36, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
User claims this picture is coming from defensie.nl, however when I use google Images I can only find marineschepen.nl, which is a independent website and that site uses normal copyright, not CC0. See http://marineschepen.nl/nieuws/Veel-nieuws-op-en-rond-nieuwe-fregatten-130215.html (they claim it comes from the Ministerie van Defensie, however they don't say it comes from the website of the Dutch Ministerie, so we don't know under which license they got it from Defensie) Mbch331 (talk) 15:25, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:36, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
User claims this picture is coming from defensie.nl, however when I use google Images I can only find marineschepen.nl, which is a independent website and that site uses normal copyright, not CC0. See http://marineschepen.nl/schepen/nieuwe-fregatten-2023.html (they claim it comes from the Ministerie van Defensie, however they don't say it comes from the website of the Dutch Ministerie, so we don't know under which license they got it from Defensie) Mbch331 (talk) 15:27, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:37, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
PD-art cannot apply, as picture is from The Netherlands and dates from 1986. There are no other indications why this photograph would be in the public domain or under a free license. Paul B (talk) 16:35, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:37, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
No FOP in Georgia. Restored image on request of Geagea --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 16:53, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- File name already suggests that this is not DM. The tower could have been avoided without any problem. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 16:55, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:37, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RYCY Productions Inc. (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be free.
- File:Ensamble Solistas de la Habana Conductor Ivan Valiente.jpg
- File:Oscar and Kenya Autie, Yalil Guerra.jpg
- File:Ensamble Solistas de la Habana and Iván Valiente.jpg
Yann (talk) 17:22, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:37, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
author wants, bad image — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zunter (talk • contribs) 2015-08-22T18:50:46 (UTC)
Deleted: Fair enough Natuur12 (talk) 15:38, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Michelangelo2204 (talk · contribs)
[edit]These files seem releated to some kind of unrecognized self-styled "monarchy in exile". The files furthermore do not cite their sources precisely.
- File:Don Andres del Pindo.png
- File:Commenda Ayala.png
- File:Macak Senhor de Luthna.png
- File:Macak Senhor de Luthna 2.png
- File:Macak senhor de Luthna.svg
- File:Macak de Luthna.svg
Tom-L (talk) 18:10, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:41, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
essentially same file under right name Lineare Algebra ... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bocardodarapti (talk • contribs) 2015-08-20T17:08:49 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:43, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
I propose to delete this file, because this rank insignia did never exist in Russian and Soviet armed forces. --HHubi (talk) 10:33, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:43, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
author wants, bad image, bad quality — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zunter (talk • contribs) 2015-08-21T13:52:41 (UTC)
Kept: image is fine Natuur12 (talk) 15:44, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
i recently uploaded this, but it is redundant to File:Bing Crosby Billboard 3.jpg Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:35, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:45, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping, file was removed by Natuur12. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:50, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Keine Panorama-Freiheit bei Luftaufnahmen / No freedom of panorama for aerial images in Germany 2003:45:477A:29F3:25F4:3229:3B1F:1EB7 18:42, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:45, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
restored: The construction is plain utilitaristic, so not covered by German copyright. --h-stt !? 11:17, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
no FoP in Russia for modern sculpture A.Savin 19:16, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:45, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Patria press photo, linked legal notice does not permit modifications. MKFI (talk) 06:07, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Hi MKFI, I uploaded the picture mentioned above. What do you mean with "does not permit modification"? No such thing has happened. I downloaded the image, and a second later I uploaded exactly the same image. Furthermore Patria is saying "The use of press releases and other documents classified as public is permitted in public communications if the source for the information has been stated." which I did. Please clarify. Regards, --Chris.w.braun (talk) 12:03, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Commons:Licensing requires that images are freely licensed and that they allow publication of derivative works. In my opinion Patria legal license permits publication but not derivative works and thus falls under Commons:Image casebook#Press photos. Specifically Patria mentions "The reproduction, transfer, distribution or storage of this information in any form without the prior written consent of Patria is prohibited. [...] The use of press releases and other documents classified as public is permitted in public communications if the source for the information has been stated." I understand that to mean that Patria reserves all rights of the images but allows press photos to be published; in my opinion it is not sufficiently free for Commons. MKFI (talk) 12:17, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Hi MKFI, let's discuss the Patria NEMO pictures here: Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Patria_Nemo_120_mm_mortar_system_integrated_on_Patria_AMV.JPG, --Chris.w.braun (talk) 13:43, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: DN has been open since 26 August without OTRS. IF/when valid OTRS is received, image may be restored. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:46, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
The author of this letter, Kurt Walter Bachstitz died in 1949, so less than 70 years ago. Not in the PD yet. BrightRaven (talk) 13:00, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
"Das war ein bisschen schnell, oder? Die Briefe von Bachstitz sind ganz normale Geschäftsbriefe, in denen Rechnungen erwähnt werden usw. Wenn er an seinen Kunden schreibt, er akzeptiere eine Offerte und finde sich zu einem Preis von X Y und Z für diese und jene Werke bereit, ist das urheberrechtlich nicht geschützt. Es fehlt ein "hinreichender schöpferischen Eigentümlichkeitsgrad" (s. LG München I, (Urteil vom 12.07.2006, Az. 21 O 22918/05) mit vielen Nachweisen: http://www.it-recht-kanzlei.de/urheberrecht-geschaeftsbrief.html). Der Maßstab gilt im Prinzip auch z.B. für das amerikanische Copyright. Und die Briefe von Posse sind schon deshalb nicht geschützt, weil er seit über 70 Jahren tot ist. Bitte mache doch Deine Änderung wieder rückgängig, jedenfalls für Posse. Wenn Du meinst, die "Werke" von Bachstitz seien geschützt, dann stell die Löschung doch bitte zur Diskussion. Ich glaube nicht, dass Deine Auffassung viele Befürworter finden wird." (by Henning1973) Dracula Himself (talk) 18:36, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- I am not sure these letters are simple enough for {{PD-text}}. See also COM:TOO. I do not think I have nominated for deletion any work by Dr Posse, because he died more than 70 years ago. BrightRaven (talk) 07:06, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi, let me quote from the text to show that this is not an "original work of authorship", protected under copyright law (US and German law being the same in this respect, here is the US code Copyright Law: http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html#102). The works lacks originality. No-one will invoke a copyright violation:
"Dear Prof., we allow ourselves to send you the invoice for the works of art which you acquired on 9 August 1940. Furthermore you receive the desired photographies:
A-23 Bronze Statuette of Nyx 2 pieces, with description A-27 Tanagra, girl with mirror 2 pieces, with description V-574 Lorenzo di Credi, marble relief 2 " " " V-659 Cima da Conegliano 2 " " V-617 Pietro Tacca, Athlete, Bronze 2 " " P-22 Riccio, Bronze, Satyr 2 " " V-134 Southgerman Master, # # " "
(...)"
The letter goes on informing the recipient that he will send other photos of more narrowly specified works by Berckheyde, Steen and Godl to a place which is not eligible (one paragraph) and it ends with the equivalent of "yours truly".
Thank you for the link to the Threshold of Originality. It discusses merely (like the Wikipedia in this regard) whether signs and logos are admissible. It is not even discussed whether a letter, in parcitular one that is as straightforward as this one, is protected. best w:Henning1973
- In the US, "names, short phrases, and slogans are not protected by copyright law." Here the text is longer than that, so it should be above the threshold of originality, at least in the US. Not far above, but still above. BrightRaven (talk) 08:33, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi, maybe you check out this discussion: Wikisource:Löschkandidaten on deleting the same files as the ones discussed here. These letters are not protected. That is my judgment as a German lawyer with a US law degree (made up of amongst others 8 credit points in copyright law) and it is shared by the people there. Please, think it over. Henning1973
- Your judgement will not be enough. If you can provide cases, in the US and/or in Germany (or even in the Netherlands) about the threshold of originality for texts, it would be a good thing. It would also be an opportunity to improve COM:TOO. I do not know German so I cannot understand the details, but the case you cited here above does not mean that all the business letters are the the public domain in Germany ("Das Landgericht München I stellte also prinzipiell fest, dass Geschäftsbriefe als Schriftwerke (§ 2 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 UrhG) urheberrechtlich schutzfähig sein können.") Maybe it would be interesting to add this case in COM:TOO. BrightRaven (talk) 14:56, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello, what is the weight of the judgment of the people who agreed on wikisource that this work is Not eligible for copyright? By the means of the US National Archives You are wrong. This file is Published by them online as part of the Linz Film. As an example Check out this link https://www.fold3.com/document/271049480/. The entire correspondence of the w:Sonderauftrag Linz is online, as far as the Americans put it in the Linz Film, including Letters from Erhard Göpel or Cornelius Gurlitt and many others who died After the war. Henning1973
- Not sure this website (Fold3) has the same standards as our in terms of copyright. It published documents scanned from the National Archive, but it does not pretend that everything they publish is in the public domain. On the contrary, their terms and conditions state: "Ancestry does not claim an exclusive right to images already in the public domain that it has converted into a digital format. However, the Websites contain images or documents that are protected by copyrights or that, even if in the public domain, are subject to restrictions on reuse." If you could provide convincing evidences that business letters are in the public domain, I would be glad to keep these documents, but up to now on Commons we have generally deleted text longer than a short phrase. BrightRaven (talk) 09:33, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
According German law there is no copyright protection. Keep --FrobenChristoph (talk) 14:33, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Ganz normale Geschäftsbriefe - no copyright protection. Keep --Konrad Stein (talk) 14:25, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Author of letter has not been dead 70 years. Not everything in national archives is free of copyright else all the books they have would have their copyright released the instant they were archived. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:49, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Victor Vasarely was dead in 1997. no FoP in France.
We have to wait untill 2068, January, 1st before charge work of Victor Vasarely. Marianne Casamance (talk) 17:22, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:45, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
File:Medaille van Porto Novo 1894 Senegal.jpg. The picture contains an annoying mistake; It is a medal by King Toffa. It is written in a wrong way... Beter to remove the picture alltogether. Robert Prummel (talk) 23:43, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:49, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
the content of the mentioned source is copyrighted http://saddana.com/aboutus.html --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:36, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:50, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
seem to be a duplicate of File:Harald Grill neu.jpg --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:45, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:50, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
No FoP in Germany for copyright protected interiors of buildings. A.Savin 19:53, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:50, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
COM:DW of possibly copyrighted sculpture A.Savin 19:55, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:50, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
No FoP in Germany for copyright protected interiors of buildings. A.Savin 19:57, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:50, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Doubt it's own work. Low quality, no exif. Looks like agency photo Dudek1337 (talk) 22:28, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:47, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Duplicative of File:Judith Barsi Headstone Grave.jpg. Multiple images of same headstone unnecessary. AldezD (talk) 22:54, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:47, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Photos incompatibles avec une licence CC-By-SA sans une autorisation explicite. Il s'agit de reproduction photographiques d'oeuvres ou de sculptures de Johann PERATHONER (voir http://www.galeries-bartoux.com/fr/artistes/johann-perathoner.html#.Vd5P7ZdrZFc).
Habertix (talk) 23:54, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:47, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
google finds copies to picture, uploaders only picture in flicker Motopark (talk) 23:57, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:47, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Patria press photo, linked legal notice does not permit modifications. MKFI (talk) 06:08, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Hi MKFI, I uploaded the picture mentioned above. What do you mean with "does not permit modification"? No such thing has happened. I downloaded the image, and a second later I uploaded exactly the same image. Furthermore Patria is saying "The use of press releases and other documents classified as public is permitted in public communications if the source for the information has been stated." which I did. Please clarify. Regards, --Chris.w.braun (talk) 12:04, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Commons:Licensing requires that images are freely licensed and that they allow publication of derivative works. In my opinion Patria legal license permits publication but not derivative works and thus falls under Commons:Image casebook#Press photos. Specifically Patria mentions "The reproduction, transfer, distribution or storage of this information in any form without the prior written consent of Patria is prohibited. [...] The use of press releases and other documents classified as public is permitted in public communications if the source for the information has been stated." I understand that to mean that Patria reserves all rights of the images but allows press photos to be published; in my opinion it is not sufficiently free for Commons. MKFI (talk) 12:17, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Hi MKFI. First, can I ask you a favor: would you please use user-name Chris.w.braun so I get pinged when you answer. Otherwise I may not notice that you have answered. I appreciate it.
- You are correct with Patria stating "The reproduction, transfer, distribution or storage of this information in any form without the prior written consent of Patria is prohibited. [...]". But the next paragraph "The use of press releases and other documents classified as public is permitted in public communications if the source for the information has been stated." is clearly allowing public communications, which Wikipedia is, to use the image.
- Is there anyone else who we can ask for advise in this matter? Any suggestions?
- I also suggest that we (I can do that) ask Patria whether it's okay for them to use the images on Wikipedia.
- I'm looking forward for your answer. --Chris.w.braun (talk) 13:42, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- @Chris.w.braun: For Commons, allowing use of image is not sufficient; the license must also allow republishing and modifications. Corporate legal licenses rarely mention copyleft licenses and things can be ambigious. Commons:Village pump/Copyright is probably the best place to get additional advice.
- If you ask permission from Patria please ask them provide an explicit license such as CC-BY-SA, that will make things much more clear. Also note that a file "allowed for use on Wikipedia" is explicitly not enough and will certainly be deleted. Commons requires that files are allowed to be used by anyone, for any purpose (including commercial) and must allow republishing and modifications. Files with more stringent permissions may be allowed locally on Wikipedias (rules wary) but not on Commons. MKFI (talk) 14:49, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
In my opinion the licence given by patria is not free enough. But maybe the company will agree, if someone ememail them by otrs--Avron (talk) 19:39, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Hi guys. Thank you for your feedback. I have sent Patria an email about 8 hours ago. Here is what I wrote:
- Hi Patria Team,
- my name is Chris Braun. I am the creator of an article on Wikipedia Germany about your Patria NEMO system. For better understanding the system I have downloaded three images of the Patria NEMO from your website and uploaded them to Wikipedia Commons (image library of Wikipedia, http://commons.wikimedia.org/). When reading your Legal Notice ("The use of press releases and other documents classified as public is permitted in public communications if the source for the information has been stated.") my understanding is, that your images can be used legally on Wikipedia. I added the source of information which is www.patria.fi
- Would you please confirm, that the use of your Patria NEMO images are legal.
- If this is not the case I apologize for any inconvenience and the images will be deleted from the Wikipedia server asap.
- The following links are the pages using the Patria NEMO images.
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patria_NEMO
- http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patria_NEMO
- I’m looking forward to hearing back from.
- Warm Regards
- Chris Braun
- @Avron: unfortunately I had alredy sent the email to Patria before I read your post. Let's see what they write back and then we'll see. Cheers, --Chris.w.braun (talk) 00:50, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- Hello everyone, this is Patria's answer I received this morning:
- Hello Chris
- Thank you for your email. The use of Patria’s photos in the article is ok.
- Best wishes
- Juha Jäppinen
- Communications officer
- Patria
- Kaivokatu 10 A
- 00100 HELSINKI, Finland
- Cheers, --Chris.w.braun (talk) 11:12, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
This looks good but should be done via OTRS.--Avron (talk) 08:26, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Avron, thanks for your feedback. Are we good now and the files won't be deleted? --Chris.w.braun (talk) 19:29, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- The use of Patria’s photos in the article is ok is promising but not a free license yet. Follow the instructions Commons:OTRS#If_you_are_not_the_copyright_holder for an airtight free license agreement.--Avron (talk) 18:07, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: DN has been open since 26 August without OTRS. IF/when valid OTRS is received, image may be restored. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:46, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
