Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/07/27

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 27th, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:22, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 11:53, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Heubg43 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Very very low quality. There is a good version called File:Escudo de Robleda.svg. In use. Please replace the file. Yann (talk) 13:13, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:14, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mendescawaia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused private or self-promoting images, out of scope

Achim (talk) 17:29, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mendescawaia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 17:28, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 20:51, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anasalialmalla (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files can be found all over the web. COM:OTRS permission needed.

Steinsplitter (talk) 19:02, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by rama -- Steinsplitter (talk) 19:03, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Diskussion um die Kategorie ist beendet. Die Kategorie wird nicht mehr benötigt und somit auch ihre Beratungsseite nicht mehr. Silvio Ludwig (talk) 09:32, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Sanandros (talk) 06:24, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The building is in Frech Guyana. In France is no freedom of panorama Uwe W. (talk) 19:56, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: Obvious Keep. Yann (talk) 13:35, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The building is in Frech Guyana. In France is no freedom of panorama Uwe W. (talk) 20:00, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Obvious Keep. Yann (talk) 13:35, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The building is in Frech Guyana. In France is no freedom of panorama Uwe W. (talk) 20:01, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep What building?

    Honestly, I clicked on the link and I saw a beautiful picture of a rocket taking off. It took me a couple of seconds to realize you meant the outline of the control tower. Since the main thing in the image is the rocket, since the building is small, and the lighting makes all details indiscernable, why shouldn't the building be considered de minimus?

    Is this kind of over-caution really worth wasting time discussing?

    If, for the sake of argument, everyone else disagrees with me that the building is de minimus, then it could simply be cropped out. But I am not suggesting that, as I am convinced it is de minimus. Geo Swan (talk) 02:24, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep De minimis (ablative plural, 2nd declension). Rama (talk) 05:57, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Clearly De Minimis (and is this a building? We can hardly see). Jeriby (talk) 11:16, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Obvious Keep. Yann (talk) 13:34, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The building is in Frech Guyana. In France is no freedom of panorama Uwe W. (talk) 20:01, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


  •  Keep There is no building in the pic. This is an industrial complex.--Sanandros (talk) 06:33, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Can we consider this as a builing? Anyway the main subject is Ariane and not this "structure" which is then De Minimis.

Kept: Obvious Keep. Yann (talk) 13:33, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The building is in Frech Guyana. In France is no freedom of panorama Uwe W. (talk) 20:02, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: Obvious Keep. Yann (talk) 13:33, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The building is in Frech Guyana. In France is no freedom of panorama Uwe W. (talk) 20:02, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: Obvious Keep. Yann (talk) 13:32, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The building is in Frech Guyana. In France is no freedom of panorama Uwe W. (talk) 20:03, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Obvous Keep. Yann (talk) 13:31, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The building is in Frech Guyana. In France is no freedom of panorama Uwe W. (talk) 20:16, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Obvious Keep. Industrial building, no copyright. Yann (talk) 13:29, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ihe bilding is in Frech Guyana. In France is no freedom of panorama Uwe W. (talk) 19:40, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: Obvious Keep. Yann (talk) 13:41, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The building is in Frech Guyana. In France is no freedom of panorama Uwe W. (talk) 19:54, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Obvious Keep. Yann (talk) 13:40, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The building is in Frech Guyana. In France is no freedom of panorama Uwe W. (talk) 19:54, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Obvious Keep. Yann (talk) 13:40, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The building is in Frech Guyana. In France is no freedom of panorama Uwe W. (talk) 19:55, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Obvious Keep. Yann (talk) 13:40, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The building is in Frech Guyana. In France is no freedom of panorama Uwe W. (talk) 19:55, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: Obvious Keep. Yann (talk) 13:39, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The building is in Frech Guyana. In France is no freedom of panorama Uwe W. (talk) 19:56, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: Obvious Keep. Yann (talk) 13:39, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The building is in Frech Guyana. In France is no freedom of panorama Uwe W. (talk) 19:57, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep und was soll daran geschützt sein? --Ralf Roleček 20:10, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Das franz. Urheberrecht macht eine Ausnahme bei simplen Industriebauten. Diese haben nicht die nötige Schöpfungshöhe für einen Urheberrechtsschutz (selbst dieses Bauwerk wurde neulich auf Commons behalten). Abgesehen davon ist auf dem Ariane-Bild nun wirklich keinerlei originelle Architektur oder Kunst zu sehen, und die Logos auf der Rakete fallen unter de minimis. De728631 (talk)
  • Comment -- I used google translate on the two comments above, hoping I would agree with them, and could say "Keep" as per above. I find FOP massively counter-intuitive and highly irritating. I won't claim to fully understand it.

    But I was not convinced by the arguments above (essentially that the building's designers weren't creative enough to merit a claim that their design included copy-protectable intellectual content.) Engineers have to be creative, when they come up with technical solutions. I couldn't explain why this wouldn't make the designs of purely utilitarian buildings as meritful of FOP protections as the beautiful buildings designed by architects. Geo Swan (talk) 02:37, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    • Yes there exists different creativeness but purely engineering creativity is not copyrightable, that's why there exists patents. Lego, after the patent became too old, tried it with their brick stones to claim a copyright on it but failed (just as example). More over the focus is on the space craft than on the building and is so de minimis.--Sanandros (talk) 06:13, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep For me the building is not original enought (just white walls), and the building is in the background, not the subject of the picture, then is De Minimis. Jeriby (talk) 08:35, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep This building is only a technical tower and do not meet the threshold of originality requested by the french copyright law. Lionel Allorge (talk) 12:56, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Obvious keep. Yann (talk) 13:39, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The building is in Frech Guyana. In France is no freedom of panorama Uwe W. (talk) 19:58, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


+ Keep There is no building in the pic. This is an industrial complex.--Sanandros (talk) 06:32, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Structure covering Ariane is not original enough, and is not the main subject of the picture then De Minimis.

Kept: Obvious Keep. Yann (talk) 13:38, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The building is in Frech Guyana. In France is no freedom of panorama Uwe W. (talk) 19:58, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


  •  Keep There is no building in the pic. This is an industrial complex.--Sanandros (talk) 06:34, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I don't know if we can call it a building. It is a technical structure. Moreover for me it is De Minimis, the main subject of the picture is Ariane, which is not a building. And I'm not sure that this "technical structure" is original enough to be copyrighted. Moreover, it has not been designed for any architectural or esthetical aim. Just because we needed it like that for the Ariane launch. Jeriby (talk) 08:38, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Obvious Keep. Yann (talk) 13:36, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The building is in Frech Guyana. In France is no freedom of panorama Uwe W. (talk) 19:59, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: Obvious keep. Yann (talk) 13:36, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, possible professional shot: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:01, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per ticket:2015072710022733 Natuur12 (talk) 18:42, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source reads Copyright © 2015 Pemerintah Provinsi Jawa Barat. All Right Reserved, {{PD-IDgov}} is not applicable. Martin H. (talk) 18:39, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Martin H., yang terhormat..!! Pemerintah Provinsi Jawa Barat itu kan ada di bawah pemerintahan Indonesia, apa alasan anda bahwa {{PD-IDgov}} itu tidak applicable? Thanks--Uchup19 (talk) 11:52, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, because Pemerintah Jawa Barat is under Indonesian Government--Uchup19 (talk) 23:50, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 23:38, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it is reapeted Career44 (talk) 23:49, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

it is reapeted Career44 (talk) 01:16, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request. Green Giant (talk) 19:59, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems to be a scan or photo of a news paper article, and so is not "own work" DESiegel (talk) 02:25, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:58, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It appears to be a scan or photo of a newspaper article and so is not "own work" DESiegel (talk) 02:27, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:58, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non free > http://www.almydan.com/ar/content/1142--%D8%AD%D8%B3%D9%8A%D9%86-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%D9%8A%D8%AF-%D9%8A%D9%88%D9%82%D8%B9-%D9%84%D9%84%D8%A3%D9%87%D9%84%D9%8A محمد الفلسطيني (talk) 04:15, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:59, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gappsurface (talk · contribs)

[edit]

includes web-address and phone number in the picture and text in the picture

Motopark (talk) 05:01, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope and possible copyright issues Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:59, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The USA has no Freedom of Panorama for modern 3D sculptures installed before 1977. Leoboudv (talk) 05:14, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:00, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no quite notable people, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 05:15, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:00, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not used personal image, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 05:17, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:00, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no quite notable people, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 05:18, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:00, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not used personal image, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 05:20, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:00, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion. Vanity Fixertool (talk) 05:42, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:00, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Fixertool (talk) 06:33, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:00, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Fixertool (talk) 06:36, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:01, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Fixertool (talk) 06:36, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:01, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Fixertool (talk) 06:58, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:01, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file does not appear to be the own work of the uploader, as claimed. It appears to be by Alexey Sergeev; it can be found at Swanhurst manor House. No evidence at source that it is available under a free license. —RP88 (talk) 08:55, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:01, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file does not appear to be the own work of the uploader, as claimed. It appears to have been previously published in October 2013 by Providence Journal (Gatehouse Media) at Newport mansion on Bellevue Avenue, and its contents, to go on auction block. Footnote at source says the content is CC-NC, i.e. non-commercial use only. Commons does not accept media licensed under non-commercial only licenses. —RP88 (talk) 09:06, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:01, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These covers are copyright by the publisher; at most they are fair use, not free-license. Yoninah (talk) 09:24, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:05, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable professional/publicity shot: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 09:30, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:05, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 09:32, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:05, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:32, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:05, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:32, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:05, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reproduction of a photograph of unknown origin and copyright status. If uploader is the original photographer, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 09:38, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:05, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rehan Khan2050 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 19:20, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Already deleted by Alan. Green Giant (talk) 13:41, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rehan Khan2050 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope.

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:27, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I will add for deletion all his/her other uploads due to same reason:

Deleted. INeverCry 00:11, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rehan Khan2050 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope.

Thibaut120094 (talk) 10:00, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:07, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:03, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Done by Ellin Beltz Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:08, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:20, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:08, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:20, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:08, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:20, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:08, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:21, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:08, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:22, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:08, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:24, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:08, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image from http://www.elfagr.org/1776069 محمد الفلسطيني (talk) 11:30, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:08, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, possible professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:40, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:09, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, probable professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:42, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:09, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, probable professional/official portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:43, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:09, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, published online: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:46, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:09, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:46, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:09, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:48, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:10, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:50, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:10, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:52, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:10, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:53, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:10, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 11:56, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:10, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, possible professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:57, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:10, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:59, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:10, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal artwork. While "the uploading of small numbers of images... for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 11:59, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:10, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 11:59, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:10, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:02, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:10, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not clear this was created by either the uploader or an employee of DARPA. License should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:04, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:11, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent self-portrait of an artist who died in 2012. Won't be PD until 2093. Storkk (talk) 12:06, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:10, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, private photo Ankry (talk) 12:33, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:11, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promotional includes phone number and web-address Motopark (talk) 12:45, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:11, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Debasish Rout (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, unelikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 13:02, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:12, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collage of presumably copyrighted professional images uploaded for spammy purposes - see also user's other uploads; images probably not validly free-use. Uploader was blocked in 2014 for spamming. Mabalu (talk) 13:08, 27 July 2015 (UTC) See also:[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:12, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam, del. on DE Nolispanmo 13:21, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:13, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:05, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:13, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:05, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:13, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:14, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:14, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:14, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alberto Ferraz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These files seem to be commercial music. The uploader is unlikely to be the copyright holder.

Stefan4 (talk) 10:51, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alberto Ferraz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Songs. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:15, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:15, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:16, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:16, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:17, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:17, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:17, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Carlosbg1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:17, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:17, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juansebastian25 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:17, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:17, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files by User:TiltuM

[edit]

Finnish Defence Force images, each marked "The commercial use of this material is prohibited." Violation of Commons:Licensing policy. --MKFI (talk) 06:41, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Inadequate license. Files on Commons must be usable by anyone, and commercial use must be allowed. Pitke (talk) 15:27, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by رعد براقی (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:17, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text only, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:11, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:18, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 16:41, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:18, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. See copyright declaration in EXIF metadata. Similar images in Philips websites: [1] [2] Verbcatcher (talk) 16:47, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:18, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely taken from here: http://pretty-little-liars.wikia.com/wiki/File:PLL032.jpg Ytoyoda (talk) 16:55, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:18, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 17:36, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:18, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marcos David Serfaty (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of unused private images, out of scope. Commons is no private photo album.

Achim (talk) 17:53, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:19, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marcos David Serfaty (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images.

--ghouston (talk) 02:06, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all. Taivo (talk) 15:06, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:44, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal vanity image. Stuchka (talk) 17:55, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:18, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, uncertain copyright, dubious scope. Yann (talk) 19:54, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:20, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission / scope. Fry1989 eh? 20:03, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:20, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:19, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:20, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Djkeadfan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal photos, out of scope

Mjrmtg (talk) 21:21, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:20, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope (literally) image of poor quality. The subject hosts a YouTube Channel but otherwise there is no evidence of significance. De728631 (talk) 21:32, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:20, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused doodle. Out of COM:SCOPE, this would be better on deviant art or facebook than here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:32, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:21, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of one word, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:36, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:21, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Without a source file to show where this was copied from it's just another unidentified derivative work and private doodle, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:39, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:21, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused doodle art of dinosaur, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:40, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:21, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text file, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:44, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:22, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text file, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:44, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:22, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text file, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:44, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:22, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text file out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:45, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:22, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too bad quality -out of scope /St1995 12:45, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:51, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image ; No notability ; No encyclopedic value ; Watermark copyright Tangopaso (talk) 12:46, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:52, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too bad quality -out of scope /St1995 12:53, 27 July 2015 (UTC) + File:Pôr do sol 02.JPG /St1995 09:52, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:52, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The building is in Frech Guyana. In France is no freedom of panorama Uwe W. (talk) 19:56, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: Technical structures, I agree with commenters that these are ineligible for protection of copyright. Pitke (talk) 15:48, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

rearranging my photos. thank you. 최광모 (talk) 01:56, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: user request Ymblanter (talk) 18:24, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dup with cat 최광모 (talk) 04:46, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Req by user. --Achim (talk) 19:02, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

rearranging my photos. thank you. 최광모 (talk) 01:56, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: user request Ymblanter (talk) 18:24, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dup with cat 최광모 (talk) 04:46, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Req by user. --Achim (talk) 19:00, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

rearranging my photos. thank you. 최광모 (talk) 01:56, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: user request Ymblanter (talk) 18:24, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators's subpage 최광모 (talk) 10:09, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:41, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

rearranging my photos. thank you. 최광모 (talk) 01:56, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: user request Ymblanter (talk) 18:24, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators's subpage 최광모 (talk) 10:09, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:42, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

rearranging my photos. thank you. 최광모 (talk) 01:56, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: user request Ymblanter (talk) 18:24, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators's subpage 최광모 (talk) 10:09, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:40, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

rearranging my photos. thank you. 최광모 (talk) 01:56, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: user request Ymblanter (talk) 18:24, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators's subpage 최광모 (talk) 10:09, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:38, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

rearranging my photos. thank you. 최광모 (talk) 01:56, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: user request Ymblanter (talk) 18:24, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators's subpage 최광모 (talk) 10:09, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:43, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. FunkMonk (talk) 07:42, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No problem - I'll re-upload at Wiki English under fair use for usage in the Hezbollah Al-Hejaz article. MrPenguin20 (talk) 18:06, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion Ymblanter (talk) 18:31, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. BrightRaven (talk) 12:14, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 18:33, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lisbon IMG 2598 (8050898533).jpg should be deleted, because File:Relief fragment of a priest of Thutmose III.jpg already exists in the Commons and depicts the same object with the same quality.

--Movses (talk) 12:24, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep First you to notify me, the uploader about this DR. Why???

Second, lets compare the images. Mine on the left, yours on the right:

The quality is notably worst in yours, as your image has more noise, is overexposured and is unfocused do handshacking, making its quality very low and losing the details.

Also "my" image shows a detail of this relief and your shows the all relief. So how do you want to delete the image with best quality and that focus on one detail, and so its not equal to yours. Also being bad named or having a worst description. Tm (talk) 12:22, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with Tm's arguments. I didn't pay attention to details, like unfocusing, though they are really important. This nomination could be closed and I will create vice versa one to delete the File:Relief fragment of a priest of Thutmose III.jpg. --Movses (talk) 21:31, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion Ymblanter (talk) 18:34, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i am the uploader and wish to delete the file for personal reasons (photo is of my father and me) Firedrop (talk) 21:11, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per Nominator and out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:01, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license (No license since). PD-Textlogo? Amitie 10g (talk) 22:45, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Simple text - Fma12 (talk) 16:31, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 16:49, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused small image, have several other in Category:Asinger reaction that illustrate the generality/scope of the reaction in higher quality. This image is also incorrect in that it's missing the chemical that supplies the sulfur. DMacks (talk) 02:40, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Leyo 21:17, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused equivalent to File:De-Mayo-Reaktion 1a.svg but with poorer spacing/text-layout ("4" of "R4" in product vs its bond, etc) DMacks (talk) 02:52, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Leyo 21:18, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused equivalent of File:De-Mayo-Reaktion 1c.svg except has longer bond to R6 in reactant. That other image is by same editor, unloaded shortly after this one, and in use. DMacks (talk) 02:54, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Leyo 21:19, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from book ביקורת (talk) 12:59, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom -- Geagea (talk) 20:27, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Didym (talk) 18:14, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 14:28, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Didym (talk) 23:45, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 14:29, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused flag of a fictitious city; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 15:05, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   20:52, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self nomination, low quality. OSX (talkcontributions) 03:11, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, No valid rationale, no replacement.--Wdwd (talk) 08:20, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self nomination, low quality file, replaced by File:1999 Holden Statesman (WH) sedan (2015-06-25) 02.jpg and File:1999-2001 Holden WH Statesman sedan 04.jpg. OSX (talkcontributions) 02:00, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Still no reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 00:28, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikimedia has far too many good images of this same subject Eddaido (talk) 03:34, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a valid reason to delete a file. OSX (talkcontributions) 03:43, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Where would I find that on record? Eddaido (talk) 04:37, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
See Commons:Deletion policy.--Wdwd (talk) 08:26, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, No rationale for a deletion.--Wdwd (talk) 08:26, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikimedia has far too many good images of this same subject Eddaido (talk) 03:37, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a valid reason to delete a file. OSX (talkcontributions) 03:43, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It's not a specially good picture but nor is it outstandingly bad. It would have been even better with the sun a few degrees moved round and without those stupid leaflets on the front window. I agree there are better pix of this car on Commons: I happen to think I uploaded several of them, but that's necessarily a question of opinion. And if you think that Comrade OSX might have done us all a service if he had "quality checked" all those pix he uploaded from Flickr, and contented himself with uploading only the best of them, then I happen agree with you. But his intentions were good and .... we are where we are. This particular picture is an ok picture of the not specially common coupe version of the XJ/Sov. The sibling neighbo(u)r is a nice touch. It does not deserve deletion, I think. Regards Charles01 (talk) 06:05, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, No rationale for a deletion.--Wdwd (talk) 08:27, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikimedia has far too many good images of this same subject Eddaido (talk) 03:37, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a valid reason to delete a file. OSX (talkcontributions) 03:43, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, No rationale for a deletion.--Wdwd (talk) 08:30, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikimedia has far too many good images of this same subject Eddaido (talk) 03:38, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a valid reason to delete a file. OSX (talkcontributions) 03:43, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It's not a specially good picture - too many distracting reflections, mixed lighting, photographer stood too close so there's some unnecessary distortion - but nor is it an overwhelmingly bad picture.
The angle is unusual in terms of what we have in Wikipedia, and it is also unusual these days to find a XJ6/Sov of this vintage. The early ones, in particular, tended allegedly to be "thrown together" and to fall to pieces (did I tell you about the air conditioning on my Italian cousin's XJ6?): owners had little incentive to rebuild them and keep them till they became classics! So? ..... so they're rare! Regards Charles01 (talk) 05:57, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, No rationale for a deletion.--Wdwd (talk) 08:31, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality. OSX (talkcontributions) 04:42, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, No rationale for a deletion.--Wdwd (talk) 08:36, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this a derivative image that the photographer doesn't own the rights to or not? Leoboudv (talk) 05:45, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, No permission for shown photograph.--Wdwd (talk) 08:40, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ich als besitzer dieses hauses bin mit der veröffentlichung nicht einvertanten gerhard mayer 188.210.59.225 09:04, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, per Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Germany.--Wdwd (talk) 08:43, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho copyrighted art object, not placed in public space Sonty (talk) 09:31, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, no permission for shown 3D artwork.--Wdwd (talk) 12:27, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho copyrighted art object, not placed in public space Sonty (talk) 09:32, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, no permission for shown 3D artwork.--Wdwd (talk) 12:27, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho copyrighted art object, not placed in public space Sonty (talk) 09:32, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, no permission for shown 3D artwork.--Wdwd (talk) 12:27, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho copyrighted art object, not placed in public space| Sonty (talk) 09:43, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, No permission for shown artwork.--Wdwd (talk) 12:35, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho copyrighted art object, not placed in public space| Sonty (talk) 09:43, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, No permission for shown artwork.--Wdwd (talk) 12:35, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JonGau (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All image are from http://www.lithuania.travel/ and the footnote reads "© Lithuanian State Department of Tourism, 2015" and the terms and condition on http://www.lithuania.travel/en-gb/photography-usage-terms/17333 allow usage "only for the personal and/or not commercial reasons". This license is not compatible with our licenses; unless some OTRS is pending with approval somewhere.

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:19, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Per nomination. License review failed.--Wdwd (talk) 18:31, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Gebäude wurde 2014 endgültig abgerissen. 89.204.135.63 21:38, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: 89.204.135.63 says the building was demolished in 2014, but this is not a reason to delete an image of that building (on the contrary, it's a reason to save the photo for documentation). Holger1959 (talk) 23:27, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep as before: If the building was really demolished, at least the photo should be kept for documentation. --Dehio (talk) 07:05, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: Gleicher Meinung (same opinion). Altsprachenfreund (talk) 13:47, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. No deletion rationale.--Wdwd (talk) 10:18, 15 August 2015 (UTC) Wdwd (talk) 10:18, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this file some time back not realising that freedom of panaroma in the United States only covered buildings and not plaques as well. This plaque was only erected recently and is not in the public domain. I'm requesting that this be deleted as a copyright violation. Zellfaze (talk) 21:54, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FOP in US for buildings only. Wdwd (talk) 10:24, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for signage in the UK.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 03:59, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A.Savin 22:33, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These seem to be at least derivative works, if not out right copies.

Yann (talk) 09:23, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The logo is not own work and surpasses threshold of originality. {{PD-Pakistan}} says, that work of Pakistani government enters in PD after 50 years from creation. Taivo (talk) 10:15, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete First file is attack image, File:Inter-Service Intelligence Logo (2015).jpg should have been deleted speedy because it shows snake painted in colors of Indian flag in jaws of the animal and it has been used mostly. While other one File:Official ISI Logo.jpg is also derivative work and not official logo of ISI, but it has been projected as official logo. I will still request Yann or any other admin to delete that one attack image speedy. --Human3015 (talk) 13:38, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If you see carefully, that first image even has Ashok Chakra on that snake, Ashok Chakra is the symbol which features on Indian national flag, moreover snake has tricolors of Indian flag. This is an attack image. No doubt. --Human3015 (talk) 13:45, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Deleted. Yann (talk) 13:49, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. --Human3015 (talk) 13:52, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: A.Savin 22:33, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Painting purportedly from 1927 by a "W. Harms". Some indication that the painter died before 1945 is necessary. Storkk (talk) 09:36, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A.Savin 22:34, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deroanez sent me an email via Commons claiming he is the copyright holder. genium ⟨✉⟩ 10:51, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A.Savin 22:34, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Description contains "(collection privée)", indicating that the uploader probably owns the painting, but may not be the copyright holder. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:38, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A.Savin 22:35, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Keete 37 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The city of Sheki has the official coat of arms [3]. This image (Shekicoat.png) was thought up by the ordinary person, it has no licenses. Uploaded 5 years ago, we can afford a proper DR. Yann (talk) 11:43, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A.Savin 22:35, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission. Yann (talk) 11:48, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A.Savin 22:35, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 11:55, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A.Savin 22:36, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not believe this is {{PD-ineligible}}. Storkk (talk) 11:58, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you? I has been made as such by it's author Yves Perrin.--Yeupou (talk) 12:28, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Yepou: {{PD-ineligible}} is a statement about the nature of the work (that it is ineligible for copyright). I disagree that this work would be ineligible for copyright. Do you mean that Yves Perrin has placed the work into the public domain? If so, the appropriate template would be {{PD-author|Yves Perrin}}. But is there evidence that Yves Perrin has in fact released the image freely? Cheers, Storkk (talk) 12:48, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: A.Savin 22:36, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author field is "My dad owns the rights". Copyright holder should confirm license via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:00, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A.Savin 22:37, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PDF on how to structure a research proposal from the University of Western Cape. It is unlikely uploader created this by themselves. No correct link to source available. Besides that, I don't think this is within COM:Scope. -- Deadstar (msg) 12:09, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A.Savin 22:37, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded by mistake - now a duplicate of File:César De Cock - Landschap 01.JPG JoJan (talk) 12:18, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A.Savin 22:37, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Iran and Persia are not the same state so a redirect is missleading. Iran is just the succesor of Persia. Sanandros (talk) 12:26, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A.Savin 22:38, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable 'own work', seems to be a professional recording. Buxtehude (talk) 12:29, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A.Savin 22:39, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark Tous droits réservés (=All rights reserved) Tangopaso (talk) 12:30, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Automatically uploaded with "Flickr-to-Commons" upload bot, as the image it was licenced CC-BY-SA 2.0 in Flickr on the date it was uploaded to Wikimedia Commons (This was reviewed by FlickreviewR bot). Even nowadays Markus Eigenheer (the photographer) still keeps this Creative Commons licence on this image.--Dura-Ace (talk) 13:23, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: A.Savin 22:39, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark Tous droits réservés (=All rights reserved) Tangopaso (talk) 12:30, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Automatically uploaded with "Flickr-to-Commons" upload bot, as the image it was licenced CC-BY-SA 2.0 in Flickr on the date it was uploaded to Wikimedia Commons (This was reviewed by FlickreviewR bot). Even nowadays Markus Eigenheer (the photographer) still keeps this Creative Commons licence on this image.--Dura-Ace (talk) 13:22, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: A.Savin 22:39, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too bad quality -out of scope /St1995 12:41, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A.Savin 22:39, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bhuwnesh.joshi2014 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 13:10, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A.Savin 22:40, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Filippo panseca (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Smal lsize, no EXIF data, permission needed.

Yann (talk) 13:20, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A.Savin 22:41, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Allan Aguilar as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Movie screenshot PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 13:34, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A.Savin 22:41, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although this image started off as an official US military photo I believe that it has been photoshopped and was used to create a hoax wikipedia article. No source is given - I propose deleting it Gbawden (talk) 13:42, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A.Savin 22:42, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A.Savin 22:44, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical image. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A.Savin 22:44, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BibianaBravo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A.Savin 22:44, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A.Savin 22:45, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The work may not in fact be out of copyright in it's original publication country.)

Vinayak Damodar Savarkar died in 1966 (India having a 60 p.m.a term would mean the original work expires in 2026)

I've not been able to find further information on the translator. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:39, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

http://dli.gov.in/cgi-bin/DBscripts/allmetainfo.cgi?barcode=99999990235684 tells that the book is published in 1857. Even if the author might have died in 1966, the book is up on DLI and DLI has clearly stated in its copyright statement that all books active on DLI are out of copyright. --రహ్మానుద్దీన్ (talk) 15:56, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn with apologies, Vinayak Damodar Savarkar (1883 – 26 February 1966) is clearly NOT the author of an 1857 published work. This makes me wonder who the earlier author is.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:10, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: A.Savin 22:45, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Professional music recording (see en:Ball J), no evidence of permission or own copyright GermanJoe (talk) 16:22, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A.Savin 22:48, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Professional music recording (see en:Ball J), no evidence of permission or own copyright GermanJoe (talk) 16:23, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A.Savin 22:48, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Professional music recording / video (see en:Ball J), no evidence of permission or own copyright GermanJoe (talk) 16:27, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A.Savin 22:48, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The first two versions have to be deleted, the third version is to be kept Havang(nl) (talk) 16:30, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I don't understand the reasoning A.Savin 22:49, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, bogus license. May be old enough, but more information needed: painter's name? date? Yann (talk) 17:32, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No dispongo de los datos solicitados ya que se ha facilitado el acceso uso de la obra por parte del propietario de la misma, no facilitando los datos que se solicitan, tales como nombre del pintor, fecha... los cuales se pueden añadir a posterior, una vez publicada la misma.Pepeito grillo (talk) 15:26, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A.Savin 22:51, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader requests deletion via Template:OTRS ticket as unused and superceded by higher quality version. Request via OTRS as apparantly unable to to locate "Nominate for deletion" link on page Nthep (talk) 18:42, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader requests deletion via Template:OTRS ticket as unused and superceded by higher quality version. Request via OTRS as apparantly unable to to locate "Nominate for deletion" link on page Nthep (talk) 18:43, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A.Savin 22:52, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader requests deletion via Template:OTRS ticket as unused and superceded by higher quality version. Request via OTRS as apparantly unable to to locate "Nominate for deletion" link on page Nthep (talk) 18:42, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A.Savin 22:52, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicated of File:Orvieto subterranea 2009 30.JPG Paperoastro (talk) 19:36, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A.Savin 22:53, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Conflicting info about copyright. One side the "normal" OK used in Commons and on the other side the strong warning "Warning: Unauthorized use of this photo/image may charge you for Copyright Infringement which may result Five Years Imprisonment or USD$ 7000 under Copyright Law of Bangladesh Government or International Copyright Law." Wouter (talk) 20:12, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A.Savin 22:53, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Poliocretes as no license. Well there is a license, but its had to believe its realy own work as claimed. JuTa 20:19, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A.Savin 22:54, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lucyspears (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confidence that any of these photos/ files were created by uploader: Inconsistent sizes, no metadata, various licenses. One of the titles implies it's a screenshot, etc. Probable COM:COPYVIOs, user's other uploads were nominated and deleted.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:33, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A.Savin 22:54, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lucyspears (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these images of singers, one looks to be an album cover. Probable COM:COPYVIOs.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:53, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Materialscientist (talk) 05:59, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW, obvious tracing of obviously halftoned image .... File:Achelousaurus horneri BW.jpg Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:38, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A.Savin 22:55, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Keine Panoramafreiheit. Aufnahme erfolgte auf Privatgelände, s. [http://www.apx.lvr.de/de/willkommen/service___info_1/haeufige_fragen/haeufige_fragen_1.html#anker-4579607 87.133.96.235 16:21, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: "Any publication of photographs (including the Internet), and in particular the production of commercial recordings require a written permission of the APX." Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:24, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sander.v.Ginkel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright/fails FOP in Italy

Flickrworker (talk) 14:18, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:46, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sander.v.Ginkel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The statement at the sources webpage is not free enough. Your are free to use them as long as you credit the photographer but this does not include making derivatives, and spreading the file. Statement is not free enough for Commons.

Natuur12 (talk) 12:21, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • I see your point. What should be the statement on their website, so I'll ask them to change it if they want to. Which of these licences are suitable for commons (CC BY; CC BY-ND; CC BY-NC-SA; CC BY-SA; CC BY-NC; CC BY-NC-ND) see here? And otherwise, since the images are free to use, is it maybe possible to move them to Wikipedia, so they can still be used in articles? Sander.v.Ginkel (talk) 12:58, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I figured out it is also not allowed to upload the files to Wikipedia. I sent the team an email to ask them whether or not they allow it to keep the images on Wikimedia/Wikipedia. Please give them some time to reply before removing the images. Sander.v.Ginkel (talk) 13:54, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Sander.v.Ginkel: CC BY (attribution) and CC BY-SA (attribution and share-alike) are OK; any jurisdiction (including the "generic" jurisdiction) and any version (including "or any later version") are acceptable: for example {{Cc-by-sa-2.0+}}. Really, anything without the "NC" or "ND" parts. {{CC-zero}} is also acceptable, but you probably don't want that because it doesn't require attribution: It's basically a public domain dedication. --Closeapple (talk) 16:40, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes. Either CC-BY or CC-BY-SA is acceptable. Note that both WP:EN and Commons require that images be free for any use -- a "yes" as an answer to your question "whether or not they allow it to keep the images on Wikimedia/Wikipedia" is not sufficient for either. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:24, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you are the uploader, please email COM:OTRS to get these restored -FASTILY 08:45, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sander.v.Ginkel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Same reason as last time, release at the source website is not explicit enough plus this release is a bit questional at best anyways.

Natuur12 (talk) 21:27, 27 July 2015 (UTC) ___________[reply]

Deleted same reason as last time. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:25, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This flag does not represent the flag of Tamil Eelam, but it seems cartoon figure (see: http://www.tamilnet.com/art.html?catid=13&artid=16423 and http://tamilnationalflag.com/) Tamil23 (talk) 03:56, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Artistic differences are not a reason to delete. It is also in use.  Keep Fry1989 eh? 20:19, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
But, it hurts community's feeling. Think, if someone burn your national flag or make as cartoon, what would be your feeling. Do you agree to make cartoon kinda flags? --Tamil23 (talk) 06:06, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have replaced the image with correct flag in the articles, where it used, but people revert it. Why? --Tamil23 (talk) 06:10, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Artistic differences shouldn't deal with national flag. If you agreed to keep this flag, it would be example to create fun type of national flag. I am from Tamil community, and i look it as racist act. --Tamil23 (talk) 11:26, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

மேற்கண்ட உரையாடல்களத் தமிழில் எழுதுவது நல்லது. அல்லது, ஆங்கிலத்திலத்துடன், தமிழிலும் ஓரிரு வரிகள் இருத்தல் வேண்டும். நன்றி.


Kept: The flag is widely used, so policy is to keep it. If you want it deleted, first it must be removed from every place that it is in use. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:20, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AntanO as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://tamilnation.co/tamileelam/defacto/flag.htm and as per deletion of File:Flag of Tamil Eelam.svg The image on Commons to me seems to be an artistic depiction of the flag, and not direct copy-paste. Also the file is used in over 100 wiki pages. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:55, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Artistic depiction cannot represent real value, and anyone cannot create artistic depiction of other flags including national flags. --AntanO 04:24, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I used delinker to move the uses of this file to File:Tamil flag.png. It should be out of use soon, thus eligible for deletion. This flag is inaccurate, the LTTE flag has words on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ? (talk • contribs)
Delinker started, replacing the flag. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:09, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: superseded by File:Tamil flag.png. Redirect created for instances where this file is still in use. --P 1 9 9   15:27, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]