Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/03/27
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
_1.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
--He_is_a_youtuber_on_YouTube_and_he_has_lots_of_view_but_only_5_subscriber-_2014-03-26_22-46.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Stephan_Schesch_und_Tomi_Ungerer.jpg){kind=link}
Google logo. See Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Potential_problem_user. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 01:12, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- Actually I see it's good as the Google logo is deemed to simple to copyright. I've recategorised the file to "Google logos", where it does nevertheless seem surplus to requirements. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 01:28, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: and kept; duplicate of File:Logo 2013 Google.png JurgenNL (talk) 10:05, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
doubt if derivative — Preceding unsigned comment added by Igcarrillo (talk • contribs) 2014-03-21T21:35:56 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Fastily JuTa 23:42, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Outside the project scope of Wikimedia Commons; most likely also copyrighted. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 22:47, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, uploaded by sock Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:39, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of the project scope of Wikimedia Commons TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 22:35, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: com:otrs McZusatz (talk) 21:32, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
I created the category by mistake, it was already created with different spelling: Oyrarbakki, which is correct, this is wrong.EileenSanda (talk) 18:42, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: Image was deleted previously by another. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:11, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Used by sockpuppets of banned User:SEFPRODUCTIONS on en.wiki NawlinWiki (talk) 15:55, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: Image was deleted previously by another. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:10, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
used by sockpuppets of banned User:SEFPRODUCTIONS on en.wiki NawlinWiki (talk) 16:03, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: Image was deleted previously by another. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:10, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Farrah Yousef
[edit]- File:Farrah Yousef.jpg
- File:Farrah Yousef 3.jpg
- File:Farrah Yousef 4.jpg
- File:Farrah Yousef 5.jpg
- File:Farrah Yousef 6.jpg
Despite the uploader's license tag these images are not the uploader's own work but were taken from the web. They are published in various places, for example here. Copyright is likely owned by whoever filmed the second season of Arab Idol, with no indication of a release under a free license --Huon (talk) 01:16, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: Files were deleted by another. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:04, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
typo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kusurija (talk • contribs) 2014-03-27T21:17:43 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: category was deleted previously by another. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:12, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Used by sockpuppets of banned User:SEFPRODUCTIONS on en.wiki NawlinWiki (talk) 15:56, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: Image was deleted previously by another. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:10, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Created by sockpuppet of banned User:SEFPRODUCTIONS, used to vandalize en.wiki NawlinWiki (talk) 15:50, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: Image was deleted previously by another. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:10, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Used by sockpuppets of banned User:SEFPRODUCTIONS on en.wiki NawlinWiki (talk) 16:05, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: Image was deleted previously by another. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:10, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Another image uploaded by sock of banned User:SEFPRODUCTIONS. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:30, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: Image was deleted previously by another. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:11, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Used by sockpuppets of banned User:SEFPRODUCTIONS on en.wiki NawlinWiki (talk) 16:05, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: Image was deleted previously by another. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:10, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Used by sockpuppets of banned User:SEFPRODUCTIONS on en.wiki NawlinWiki (talk) 18:28, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: Image was deleted previously by another. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:11, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
It will be no more needed when I upload better CoA of Chautur Hosmich (talk) 18:57, 27 March 2014 (UTC) 200px Here is definitive version. The file without parentheses can be deleted. I am not proud of not using SVG Check in the past. Hosmich (talk) 20:45, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Why not upload the new version on the old page? That will save many having to change the filename. — Edokter (talk) — 20:59, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: Image was deleted previously by another. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:11, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
self-promotion Fixertool (talk) 19:58, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: Image was deleted previously by another. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:11, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Nicht mehr benötigte Weiterleitung. Danke. Benutzer:HOPflaume (talk) 16:06, 27 March 2014 (UTC) Ja, ich stimme einer Löschung zu. Danke.--Motmel (talk) 19:27, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: Image was deleted previously by another. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:10, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
some unknown persons and some homepage picture, not used Motopark (talk) 09:10, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: Image was previously deleted by another. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:08, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Used by sockpuppets of banned User:SEFPRODUCTIONS on en.wiki NawlinWiki (talk) 16:22, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: Image was deleted previously by another. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:10, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Used by sockpuppets of banned User:SEFPRODUCTIONS on en.wiki NawlinWiki (talk) 18:29, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: Image was deleted previously by another. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:11, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Used by sockpuppets of banned User:SEFPRODUCTIONS on en.wiki NawlinWiki (talk) 15:58, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: Image was deleted previously by another. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:10, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Used by sockpuppets of banned User:SEFPRODUCTIONS on en.wiki NawlinWiki (talk) 15:57, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: Image was deleted previously by another. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:10, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
It will be no more needed when I upload better CoA of Chautur Hosmich (talk) 18:57, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: Image was deleted previously by another. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:11, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TheTexasBatman (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal image, out of scope
ireas (talk) 19:32, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Delete garbage uploads — billinghurst sDrewth 04:11, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: Image was deleted previously by another. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:11, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
copyright violation according to National Portarait Gallery Rcbutcher (talk) 08:07, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Taken as part of Stoneman's project with the NPG, see Walter Stoneman. I find no evidence that Stoneman was in military service in 1919, so there are no grounds for Crown Copyright. Life+70 = 2028. --Fæ (talk) 12:23, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:53, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag afghanistan 2004.png TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 23:45, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Also duplicate of our SVG file. Fry1989 eh? 19:44, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: duplicate Krd 06:02, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image SamuelFreli (talk) 01:05, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:54, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Outside the project scope of Wikimedia Commons; no educational value here TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 23:36, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:03, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Nonnotable individual, outside the project scope of Wikimedia Commons TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 23:19, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:15, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
It is non free logo of a football team [1]. Only the team has the right to allow the use of the logo. -Xaris333 (talk) 00:27, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete The logo is eligible for copyright, so an OTRS permission is required. --ireas (talk) 11:55, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:52, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Outside the project scope of Wikimedia Commons; photo of nonnotable individual TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 23:09, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:30, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Latvia has no COM:FOP for modern 3D sculptures Leoboudv (talk) 05:40, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Yes, delete it please. Monument was erected in 1952, but 90-year-old author alive! --Voll (talk) 18:36, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:53, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Latvia has no COM:FOP for modern 3D sculptures Leoboudv (talk) 05:40, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Yes, delete the file please. Monument was erected in 1939, author was died in 1986, so the monument is copyrighted. --Voll (talk) 18:25, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:53, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image SamuelFreli (talk) 01:05, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:54, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Outside the project scope of Wikimedia Commons; nonnotable individual TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 23:47, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:01, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of the project scope of Wikimedia Commons; Commons is not private photo gallery.
TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 22:37, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:40, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Nonnotable event, outside the project scope of Wikimedia Commons TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 23:23, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:14, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Does Latvia have COM:FOP for this sculpture? Leoboudv (talk) 05:42, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Yes, delete it please. The monument was erected in 1962, author was died in 2000, so the monument is copyrighted. --Voll (talk) 18:58, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:53, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Walther nova (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photographs. Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Walther en santafe.jpg
- File:Walther en su trabajo.jpg
- File:Walther.jpg
- File:Walther y tania.jpg
- File:Walther nova.png
Brainy J (talk) 03:07, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:55, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Possibly advertising. Unused images.
Jespinos (talk) 21:57, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:41, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Outside the project scope of Wikimedia Commons; Commons is not private photo gallery.
- File:Maquillaje 2014-03-28 00-13.jpg
- File:Rafael 2014-03-24 02-45.jpg
- File:198479 1951933805162 1447141636 32215593 1415309 n.jpg
- File:38963 1560366896234 1447141636 31463023 1900312 n.jpg
TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 23:35, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 06:10, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:02, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 10:18, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:56, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of project scope - picture of an identifieable (not notable) person taken without apparent consent Clemens 14:17, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:59, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Brass Rat 1950
[edit]- File:Brass Rat 1950 Bezel.JPG
- File:Brass Rat 1950 Class Shank.JPG
- File:Brass Rat 1950 Seal Shank.JPG
Photos of jewelry, so these are all Commons:Derivative works. As such, both the jewelry and the photo must be either PD or freely licensed. Uploader makes an own-work release on the photos, but provides no evidence that the jewelry is PD or freely licensed. See previous discussions on same kind of jewelry at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bezel.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:MIT 2015 Brass Rat.JPG and Commons:Deletion requests/Brass Rat - MIT Class Ring.--GrapedApe (talk) 11:44, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept Unlike the cited instances of the Brass Rat, this is from 1950 and the old copyright rules apply. I don't see a copyright notice and I cannot find a renewal, therefore the ring is PD. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:22, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:56, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
unused user portrait 91.65.69.84 10:57, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- Weak Delete: Unused portrait of en:User:Bamajr who contributed only on that project and has been indefinitely blocked for almost a year. Photo could be used to illustrate a certain kind of fashion in the U.S., but it seems marginal, unless someone can explain it better. --Closeapple (talk) 20:20, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:52, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:56, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
This photograph is used in a youtube video. No evidence that this is a free file 91.65.69.84 16:00, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- It is tagged with the PD-voa which would be fine. However we can not be sure if voa has the rights to release this as PD. Therefore I would propose Delete with rationale: com:PRP. --McZusatz (talk) 16:11, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PCP -- Steinsplitter (talk) 08:54, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:02, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 10:19, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
_1.jpg){kind=link}
_1.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Isnt needed any more. Also isnt up to date. Already requested the uploader and the person in the picture and got their agreement. Thank you :) Brainmandolo (talk) 19:52, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
_1.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no reason for deletion Didym (talk) 00:26, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
_1.jpg){kind=link}
_1.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
it isnt needed anymore in articles, also the quality is bad and there are a few other pictures of the event uploaded. there wont be a need in future Brainmandolo (talk) 08:14, 27 March 2014 (UTC) Also the headline has wrong informations
_1.jpg){kind=link}
Kept As above, these are not reasons for deletion. Please do not waste our time with multiple nominations of the same file for the same reasons. If you nominate this again, you will be blocked. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:47, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
_1.jpg){kind=link}
Copied from here. In addition not the correct licence! 79.212.191.27 13:38, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Please see also the other files of this user in this category. --79.212.191.27 13:41, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:04, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image SamuelFreli (talk) 13:42, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:02, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
not good b&w version of a painting. We have other 2 better pictures in color Pierpao.lo (listening) 11:17, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:52, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
out of COM:SCOPE; obviously uploaded as advertisement, see phone in filename. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:39, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:49, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
The person shown on the image can’t be the author, so a OTRS permission is required. ireas (talk) 11:32, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- I assure you that it is me in the picture, and the image was taken using my camera by my family. - D.baugher5 (talk) 14:20, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: THat may be, but you are not the copyright holder, the actual photographer is. Also, this appears to be an unused user pic, out of scope. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:55, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo of a 3D work of art dated 1999 with no evidence that the artwork in the public domain. Unfortunately Romania has no freedom of panorama exception. —RP88 01:04, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nominator. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:22, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- Please specify your "3D work of art", if that's the cross then it's ineligible for copyright. All symbols usd are multiple hundred years old. --Denniss (talk) 11:53, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: THe cross has a copyright. While it is doubtful that a plain cross made of rectangular elements would have a copyright, this a creative, 3D elaboration on the basic cross. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:38, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Looks like an unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:08, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:08, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, but works of this artist are still in copyrighted and France regrettably has no freedom-of-panorama exemption for public works. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:16, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:15, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Used by sockpuppet of banned User:SEFPRODUCTIONS on en.wiki NawlinWiki (talk) 15:48, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:55, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
" little is known" (description) about this woman (????). Probably a joke (without EXIFs). 91.65.69.84 07:39, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:44, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
unused composite image - out of scope surely? Gbawden (talk) 12:21, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:06, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Missing legal information Fixertool (talk) 05:51, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Infringes on the copyrights of the sculptures shown. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:40, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
unused user portrait 91.65.69.84 08:34, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 10:22, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal image (out of COM:SCOPE), low quality, no meaningful description. ireas (talk) 16:32, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:52, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
File:I love alicorns so much just as I love hiccup horrendous haddock the third 2014-03-27 03-11.jpg
[edit]
unlikely own work[2] and likely also out of COM:SCOPE. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:44, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:49, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:16, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:07, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
small, unused image with nonsense description Rybec (talk) 16:31, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:53, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
I want to delete this picture of me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonathan Hornung (talk • contribs) 2014-03-18T13:02:50 (UTC)
Kept: In use. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:51, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 13:59, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:01, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused image, overprinted so as to be unusable, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:15, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:07, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
File:Kelvin Ma(12 year old)--He is a youtuber on YouTube and he has lots of view but only 5 subscriber- 2014-03-26 22-46.jpg
[edit]--He_is_a_youtuber_on_YouTube_and_he_has_lots_of_view_but_only_5_subscriber-_2014-03-26_22-46.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
--He_is_a_youtuber_on_YouTube_and_he_has_lots_of_view_but_only_5_subscriber-_2014-03-26_22-46.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo Gbawden (talk) 07:06, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:46, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope (unused personal image) ireas (talk) 11:41, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:11, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Image does not match the description; unlikely to be own work (small resolution, no EXIF); without a proper description, no educational use is possible. ireas (talk) 11:45, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:11, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal image (out of scope). ireas (talk) 16:37, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:52, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
this is a scan of a postcard, not the authors own work as stated and most probably a copyvio John from Idegon (talk) 01:05, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:18, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work (if it is, a permission should be send to COM:OTRS), PD-textlogo not applicable. ireas (talk) 11:20, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:12, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
I am the author, and it is no longer useful. 187.148.19.192 20:51, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Wvk (talk) 10:30, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Seems to be a scan of a book. There is no evidence that the image is in the public domain. ireas (talk) 16:26, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:53, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
personal photo photoshopped into pop art - out of scope or art? Gbawden (talk) 12:20, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:07, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal image (out of COM:SCOPE), seems to be self-promotion ireas (talk) 16:31, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:53, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:25, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:06, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
personal pic. Delete if unused Boseritwik (talk) 09:53, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:13, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Low resolution scan of diapositive, superseded by File:Schorborn Forsthaus 02.jpg. Deletion request added by uploader of the file -Dehio (talk) 08:33, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Not the same image, at 2746x1771 this is not "low resolution" . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:49, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: as evident from description and choosen category, image has been uploaded for self-promotion. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:46, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:49, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
personal pic. Delete if unused Boseritwik (talk) 09:55, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:12, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:12, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:07, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Logo of this company. If the uploader is an official of that company, he or she should send an OTRS permission. The {{PD-textlogo}} rule does not apply. ireas (talk) 16:25, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:54, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Personal photo, unused, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:29, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:05, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Logo is com:TOO in the Netherlands. No evidence of permission. Natuur12 (talk) 14:11, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:00, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
source site setcelebs.com doesn't look to be reliable as source for Commons. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:15, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:49, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Low quality personal photo, unused, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:07, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:41, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Personal photo, unused, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:29, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:05, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope, no educational use. SamuelFreli (talk) 14:09, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:00, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aries Olympus (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:56, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Outside the project scope of Wikimedia Commons; photo of nonnotable individual TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 22:51, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 10:29, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Collection of advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:MARCOPOLO MULTEGO FUTURA ICONFORT.png
- File:Marcopolo Multego Cootranshuila.png
- File:Azaels Tours Scania Touring.png
- File:Sultana 1971 MCI.png
- File:Exa- Mercedes Benz.png
- File:Viseon- Josue Nava Tours.png
- File:MASA -PREMIER- TURISMOS CALI.png
- File:Encava eduard buses.png
- File:500-RT1 prototipo.png
- File:Irizar Pb 2012 Imagen PB 2012 by Francisco Lira Ramos.jpg
- File:Volvo 9700 luxury - meyvor tours.png
- File:Comil campione 4.png
- File:Setra top class.png
- File:Setra 215hd - buses lit.png
- File:Renault Omli Prototype.png
- File:Marcopolo viaggio paradisso - interregional.png
- File:Marcopolo senior- blind.png
- File:Marcopolo G7-Cruz del sur.png
- File:Marcopolo G7-AINAX.png
- File:Marcopolo Boxer.png
- File:MAN LIONS MEX TANIA.png
- File:Man lions coach griss torres.png
- File:IRIZAR pb- pULLMAN LUNA EXPRESS.png
- File:Busscar Elegance -Camus.png
- File:AGA COONTRASMAGDALENA.png
- File:AGA COONSTRAHUILA.png
- File:BASE1 CONCURSO FRANCISCO LIRA BUSES VALDIVIA 3.png
- File:BASE1 CONCURSO FRANCISCO LIRA BUSES VALDIVIA 4.png
- File:BASE1 CONCURSO FRANCISCO LIRA BUSES VALDIVIA 1.png
- File:Francisco Lira - Lobos Buap-3ro-diseño.png
- File:Francisco Lira - Lobos Buap-2do-diseño.png
- File:Francisco Lira - Lobos Buap.png
- File:Marcopolo Viaggio G7 1050 Mercedes Benz-Lira-BUS.png
- File:Irizar PB Confort 2012 Stock rancing.png
- File:IRIZAR PB PUEBLA FRANJA ESTRELLA ROJA.png
- File:IRIZAR PB CONFORT 2012 EXPEDICION.png
- File:IRIZAR PB CONFORT 2012 EXPEDICION 3.png
- File:VOLVO 9700 verdes plus.png
- File:IRIZAR PB CONFORT 2012 EXPEDICION 2.png
- File:VOLVO 9700 LUXURY-The battle at the berrics.png
- File:VOLVO 7300 turismos tierra del sol.png
- File:Vista elegance-expresso regional.png
- File:Busscar Vista Elegance 360 II - Tours Ave.png
- File:Vista Buss Hi Busscar Turismos Cali.png
- File:Irizar New century tuor´s.png
- File:Irizar New century pacifico.png
- File:MARCOPOLO 1200 turismos gonzales.png
- File:Flecha Azul Reco Mercedes Benz.png
- File:Multego Europa Turismos Gran Nevada.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: No evidence of permission(s) -- Steinsplitter (talk) 08:58, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SanJuanesFutbol (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own works: small size, no EXIF.
- File:LA BANDA VILLERA.jpg
- File:Hinchada del caivo LA BANDA VILLERA.jpg
- File:Caiuuyiyui.jpg
- File:Equipo del torneo Argentino B frente a Doglas Hais de Pergamino.jpg
- File:Recibimento del dia del ascenso al Argentino B.jpg
- File:HINCHADA DEL CAIVO "LOS VILLEROS".jpg
Yann (talk) 05:29, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:18, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vallinayagam satheesh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Facebook might be a better place for this private gallery
- File:Dhol baje.jpg
- File:Vallinayagam Satheesh M.jpg
- File:Agumbe.JPG
- File:With kristina Walter.JPG
- File:Enjoying Manipal.JPG
- File:Manipal Falls.jpg
- File:Karkala Temple.jpg
- File:Vallinayagam @ Alevoor, Manipal.jpg
91.65.69.84 12:05, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:10, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Artist: Marc Chagall, died in 1985. Free in the US, but unfree in the source country (France or Russia) until 2056.
- File:Marc shagal.jpg
- File:Apothecary in vitebsk .jpg
- File:Ipothecary in vicebsk.png
- File:Ipothecary in vitebsk.png
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:57, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:38, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RileyKJ123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]These images are looking like screenshots of video games or similar, but not like own work of the uploader as claimed.
- File:AdventureTime1234.png
- File:F1shb0ne 123.png
- File:The Master of Selfies.png
- File:Temp Server market.png
- File:Temp Server Spawn.png
- File:Wreck it Ralph Pixel Art.png
- File:F1shB0nes.png
- File:TheKillorX.png
- File:RileyKJ.png
- File:TheOnlyGurra.png
JuTa 21:35, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:50, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Aaaaa.jpg
- File:عاصم.jpg
- File:3aSouM Wa7ed BaS.j.jpg
- File:3asem.jpg
- File:Asem.jpg
- File:My PhoTo.jpg
- File:.11صــورى الخاصه.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:57, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Smartdivyansh2012 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Family album with only little educational value
- File:Divyansh agrawal,shivpuri.jpg
- File:Agrawals.jpg
- File:Royal's.jpg
- File:Nano1.jpg
- File:Nano agrawal.jpg
91.65.69.84 15:45, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Not in use, not in scope. Kathisma (talk) 18:03, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:56, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites.
- File:BlaqBoy at R2Bees appreciation concert.jpg
- File:Dr Cryme da General.jpg
- File:Atumpan in an interview.jpg
- File:Atumpan at MOBO Awards.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:56, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Promo photos and TV screenshots. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Flexclusive.jpg
- File:Atumpan in Trust Video.png
- File:Stonebwoy.jpg
- File:Dr Cryme (right), Lukumanu (left).JPG
- File:Dr Cryme Yessiirrr.JPG
- File:Dr Cryme.JPG
,_Lukumanu_(left).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
deleted. INeverCry 00:29, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
false and abusive 180.194.28.142 05:55, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 18:47, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
copyrighted image (see watermark) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kikos (talk • contribs) 2014-03-24T18:44:19 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 19:03, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
If this installation is considered a work of art, then it is still in copyright. France regrettably has no freedom-of-panorama exemption for public works. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:19, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 19:00, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
"own work", stolen from http://lacomunidad.elpais.com/perfiles/2009/10/27/el-dr-rojas-se-presenta-como-catedratico-psiquiatria (2009) 91.65.69.84 08:52, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 18:58, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
If this installation is considered a work of art, then it is still in copyright. France regrettably has no freedom-of-panorama exemption for public works. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:20, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 19:02, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
COM:EDUSE: photo of an unremarkable floor and wall Rybec (talk) 19:41, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:50, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
No evidence the subject of the photo is also the copyright holder, presumably that is the photographer TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 23:22, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: permission required Krd 15:56, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
low quality image, no educational use (see com:scope) ireas (talk) 19:28, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:49, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
If this installation is considered a work of art, then it is still in copyright. And if it is located in France, which regrettably has no freedom-of-panorama exemption for public works, it needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:21, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 19:02, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Author claimed is in image. BaseSat (talk) 19:37, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:50, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Possible copyvio. Jespinos (talk) 21:23, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: permission required Krd 15:58, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Bad photo of whatever without description. Reclus (talk) 20:35, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:53, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
If this installation is considered a work of art, then it is still in copyright. France regrettably has no freedom-of-panorama exemption for public works. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:19, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 18:59, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Just a guy. Out of scope. Abiyoyo (talk) 09:10, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 18:59, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free sign for the toilets, not de minimis. Eleassar (t/p) 19:02, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:38, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope. Eleassar (t/p) 20:41, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:30, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
copyvio? Seems to be on the web since 2012 at least, http://www.aan-network.org/nsinfo/Katsina/home.png Atlasowa (talk) 16:44, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:41, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: modern architecture, not de minimis. Eleassar (t/p) 18:50, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:38, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I am charlyn khater and i do not wish my photo to be publicly shared anymore, due to privacy and personal matters ! thanks 82.198.21.20 18:44, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:39, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
"Alexander George Wilfhelm" seems to be nearly unknown to google. 91.65.69.84 12:47, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:45, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
blank, something is lost here, probably the content is in this file: File:ChIP-exo process.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bioneer1 (talk • contribs) 2014-03-27T16:31:04 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:30, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
"own work" without EXIF but with a watermark 91.65.69.84 16:04, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:43, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
unused user portrait 91.65.69.84 15:49, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:43, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Author claimed is in image. BaseSat (talk) 20:00, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:34, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative of the board, which would be copyrighted. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:22, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:45, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
unused user portrait 91.65.69.84 15:48, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:43, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Essentially raw text, hence out of scope if it's not useful to any project. It is not being used by any project. Would be helpful to have someone who could read it (I'm not sure whether it's Arabic, Farsi, Urdu or whatever) verify it's not a copyvio. Storkk (talk) 14:43, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:44, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
unused user püortrait 91.65.69.84 16:08, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:43, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
derivative per Category:Atomium. Hardly de minimis. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:06, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- This was a very fast nomination. I wil make a cropped version.Smiley.toerist (talk) 10:09, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- True, but a regular (aka slow) one, not a speedy. --Túrelio (talk) 10:10, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- File:Aanleg metrostation Heizel.cropped.jpg should be minimis enough.Smiley.toerist (talk) 10:23, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- Eventually; but lets hear a few opinions from other users about that. --Túrelio (talk) 10:27, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- File:Aanleg metrostation Heizel.cropped.jpg should be minimis enough.Smiley.toerist (talk) 10:23, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- True, but a regular (aka slow) one, not a speedy. --Túrelio (talk) 10:10, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Keep, for me it is De Minimis, I don't see why it would be "hardly" De Minimis, regarding other kept pictures. The subject is the metrostation and the Atomium is just a background element. It's a good idea to have made a cropped version, but as far as possible, it would be better to keep the original version. Jeriby (talk) 03:16, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: I don't think that this is de minimis. Is clearly used to demonstrate the atomium could have been excluded etc. Thanks for making the cropped version. Natuur12 (talk) 14:49, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:38, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete --Eleassar (t/p) 20:36, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:44, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Author claimed is in image. BaseSat (talk) 19:56, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:35, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
unused user portrait 91.65.69.84 11:50, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:46, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
copyvio! OMG, Disney... Atlasowa (talk) 18:16, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:40, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work /St1995 14:26, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:45, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Zazu-srb as no license. Well, there is a CC license. But this does not look like own work as stated. Its widely spread in the internet - compare i.e. this. JuTa 20:48, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:30, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Redundant: according to the source line, this is a PNG rendering of File:Coat_of_arms_of_New_Spain.svg. I took a quick look and I think it comes from an earlier revision. The Mediawiki software generates such PNGs as needed, so there is normally no need to upload them separately. If the old version of the SVG is better than the current one, the SVG could be reverted, or a split could be done so both versions are available (in the SVG format). Rybec (talk) 06:11, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:52, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
This watermarked video needs an OTRS ticket 91.65.69.84 08:58, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:51, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
If the ape figure is to be considered a work of art, then this image violates the copyright of the artist, as there is no freedom-of-panorama in the U.S. for such works. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:14, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:50, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Two SVGs of this symbol are available in Category:DIN 4844-2 warning signs (vector drawings). Fry1989 eh? 18:44, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:39, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Author claimed is in photo. BaseSat (talk) 19:56, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:35, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Author claimed is in photo. BaseSat (talk) 19:54, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:36, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Author claimed is in photo. BaseSat (talk) 19:51, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- Self Portrait
Authors can be in their own photos when they are self portraits. One way to achieve this is with the self timer built into a digital camera, as is the case with this photo. Frankcjones (talk) 23:56, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- True enough it may be a self-portrait but where did you place the cam with the self timer? It seems to be some café and usually they have no cam-holding devices on tables. --BaseSat (talk) 18:11, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Delete Private image which is not used on any Wikimedia project - very likely not useful for educational purposes. See also Commons:What Commons is not#Commons is not your personal free web host. --High Contrast (talk) 21:00, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:36, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
The image can be found at http://binnshot.com/gallery/gotham-magazine-september-2010-2. Jespinos (talk) 20:44, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:30, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Modern cluedo board would be copyrighted. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:22, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:45, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Modern stamp probably still under copyright. Licence is wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philafrenzy (talk • contribs) 2014-03-16T02:10:59 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:51, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Modern stamp probably still under copyright. Licence is wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philafrenzy (talk • contribs) 2014-03-16T02:16:07 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:51, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Modern stamp probably still under copyright. Licence is wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philafrenzy (talk • contribs) 2014-03-16T02:18:58 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:50, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
I find it hard to believe this resides as a free image on Commons, while at the same time, the SVG version (en:File:Family Guy Logo.svg) is hosted as a non-free image on the English Wikipedia. The logo is handlettered and as such, does meet the threshold of originality and is not PD-ineligible. — Edokter (talk) — 12:07, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: I believe that this is com:TOO Natuur12 (talk) 14:46, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
"Own work" for the photo of the painting, but maybe not for the painting itself. In the absence of a year of publication or creation, it can't be assumed that this is PD. This nomination applies equally to all works in Category:Émile Faynot.Rodhullandemu (talk) 23:23, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:28, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Low quality scan of diapositive. By now we have better images showing the same object: File:Göttingen Albani Orgel.jpg and File:Göttingen Albani Innenraum mit Orgel.jpg (deletion request added by uploader of the file). Dehio (talk) 21:53, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:29, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Author claimed is in image. BaseSat (talk) 19:59, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
I'm entirely sure I know what this means. Can you explain? Thanks. Gregatmu (talk) 21:09, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- It is you who is in the image and it's written that you is the author. How did you manage to make a photo of yourself? --BaseSat (talk) 18:08, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Permission from the photographer is missing Natuur12 (talk) 14:35, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Low quality image of an unknown person, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:42, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:40, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Is the monopoly board copyrightable? -mattbuck (Talk) 13:21, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:45, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Copyright content. (I took this photo, but now I realize it breaks the copyright rules of wikimedia) — Preceding unsigned comment added by EspartacoPalma (talk • contribs) 2014-03-21T21:40:52 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:49, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Copy of http://www.logarchism.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/divinatio5.gif Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:29, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:45, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Author claimed is in photo. BaseSat (talk) 19:45, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - That I am the person in this photograph does not prevent me from being the author of the photograph. Consider, for example, File:Sage Ross self-portrait, June 2012.jpg. Neelix (talk) 20:53, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- How did you manage to make it then? --BaseSat (talk) 18:07, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope anyway Natuur12 (talk) 14:37, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Derivative work: photo taken from a exhibition but their current usage is focused on the picture displayed as part of the exhibition Lugusto • ※ 16:57, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:40, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
No evidence this organization agreed to release under the given license; also I believe this image is stretching Commons:Threshold of originality TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 23:18, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:28, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
File:Le Président Nguyen Van Tam décore le drapeau de l'école d'E.O.R, boulevard Charner, Saigon, c. 1953.png
[edit]
This image is copied from eBay. It shows Vietnamese officials, but there is no proof that it was issued by Vietnamese authorities (it might be press photograph), so {{PD-VietnamGov}} does not fit. BrightRaven (talk) 16:56, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination {{PD-Vietnam}} should be OK. BrightRaven (talk) 17:09, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn Natuur12 (talk) 14:40, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Author claimed is in image. BaseSat (talk) 20:00, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Yes, that's correct; however, there are no copyright issues here and we use these images in the broader Wikipedia community to identify ourselves as Campus Ambassadors and so forth. See for example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Campus_Ambassadors/Ontario. The file should not be a candidate for deletion. Michael Dick 02:54, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- What's the difference where we use files? Rules are the same in spite of that. --BaseSat (talk) 18:06, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
- They are personal files used with a particular purpose and scope on user pages and project pages. Certainly in this particular case there are no issues regarding copyright and personality rights. I'm unclear what rules you're referring to otherwise. Please advise. Michael Dick 15:38, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Evidence from the photographer is missing. Please make him sent his concent to com:OTRS Natuur12 (talk) 14:34, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Not own work, invalid license. Krd 18:38, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:39, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Not used and superseded by File:Secteurs Marseille 1987.svg Superbenjamin (talk) 14:49, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:44, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
image is blurry, unidentifiable Thiotrix (talk) 14:04, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:45, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Low quality, low resolution, redundant to File:Mona Lisa, by Leonardo da Vinci, from C2RMF retouched.jpg ireas (talk) 11:45, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:46, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Author claimed is in image. BaseSat (talk) 20:11, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:31, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Meryl Streep (2071470089).jpg; other image is better quality Lady Lotus (talk) 12:46, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:45, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Not used and superseded by File:Secteurs Marseille 1982.svg Superbenjamin (talk) 14:49, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:44, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
This is a duplicate of File:Martens P4I4254 k.jpg but although a TIF is less sharp than the JPG, thus redundant. Previous speedy deletion request has been declined. ELEKHHT 22:31, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:29, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Le verseur de cette photo n’en est pas l'auteur => bruno_le_maire Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 18:25, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:39, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
There is no evidence that uploader is the copyright holder of the image. Jespinos (talk) 20:56, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:30, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Jane Colden drawing of leaves.png TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 23:12, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:28, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate of File:Jeff y Meryl Streep.jpg Lady Lotus (talk) 13:05, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:45, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Inferior duplicate of Rozeau_Dry_River._Boiling_mud._YORYM-TA0098.jpg. Uploader nomination PatHadley (talk) 11:32, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:46, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Low resolution and no valid EXIF. Unlikely to be own work. Jespinos (talk) 20:59, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:30, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Derivative work using covers from http://www.cesforma.org.br/revistas, a brazilian syndicate magazine Lugusto • ※ 17:24, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- More uploads from the same user also have issues, the most majority claimed as a self-made work (possible a false statment, but those may be ineligible to be copyrighted due to lack of threshold of originality) Lugusto • ※ 17:28, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:40, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
©G.A. Cooper. Courtesy of Smithsonian Institution, Any use of copyrighted images requires permission of the copyright holder. Nonenmac (talk) 12:22, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:45, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве, персона скончалась в 1979 году Dogad75 (talk) 08:40, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:51, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
The artist ist still alive, so the works are still protected. The picture seems to be taken indoors, and anyway the Norwegian FOP only applies for buildings. ireas (talk) 16:35, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- This is an image from a show of my work own at Trondheim Kunstforening. I am very much alive and I also have the rights to the image. Stein — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.247.186.85 (talk • contribs) 2014-03-27 16:40 (UTC)
- Moved from the talk page. --ireas (talk) 16:49, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Please send evidence of permission to com:OTRS Natuur12 (talk) 14:42, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
A better and more compact version is available as Syrniki6.jpg Off-shell (talk) 22:35, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:29, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: text file containing anonymous original research D.Lazard (talk) 11:40, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:46, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Author claimed is in photo. BaseSat (talk) 19:50, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:36, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Designer shown but not date of death. Probably copyright 70 years from death. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philafrenzy (talk • contribs) 2014-03-16T02:24:24 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:49, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Modern stamp probably still under copyright. Licence is wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philafrenzy (talk • contribs) 2014-03-16T02:06:54 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:49, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
I don't see any evidence that this was released as public domain. Press photo != public domain. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:37, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- When the image was uploaded in 2006 to en.wiki, the website of the Asian American Justice Center listed it as "Public Domain - Images are free to use." In the intervening 8 years, the Igasaki Bio page no longer exists, but it did at the time. If needed, I think I can get an email for the OTRS. Evrik (talk) 14:40, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- I just sent an email and tagged the image {{OTRS-pending}}. Evrik (talk) 14:49, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: For now. Please deal with this asap. Natuur12 (talk) 14:52, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Derivative work from Jornal do Brasil, a brazilian newspaper, edition dated as 1981-04-30 (per the watermark) Lugusto • ※ 18:48, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:39, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
redundant to File:PAYTOP.png which has the same resolution but is in a more suitable format (PNG) and has a transparent background Rybec (talk) 19:57, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:35, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Modern stamp probably still under copyright. Licence is wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philafrenzy (talk • contribs) 2014-03-16T02:06:37 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:47, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Author claimed is in photo. BaseSat (talk) 19:53, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:36, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Author claimed is in photo. BaseSat (talk) 19:55, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:36, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by File:Central Bank of Chile logo.png The Haz talk 20:01, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:33, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Outside the project scope of Wikimedia Commons; nonnotable entity or political party TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 22:46, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:29, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Underlying photo is copyrighted. FunkMonk (talk) 16:50, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:41, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Author claimed is in photo. BaseSat (talk) 19:51, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:36, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
He does not own this photo [[User:ARMcgrath|A.R.M.]] (talk) 01:54, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Natuur12: please have a look. --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 04:35, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete nonetheless. It's cross-wiki spam. Hiàn (talk) 03:04, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:41, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope, unknown what it is. Probably used for advertising. JurgenNL (talk) 10:24, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:47, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Inferior duplicate of Rabaka_YORYM-TA0081.jpg. Uploader nomination. PatHadley (talk) 11:28, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:47, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Highly unlikely to be the work of the uploader. Underlying lk (talk) 23:04, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:28, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Own Image Delete Hubie Fix (talk) 17:02, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:40, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
The copyright holder changed the license within two days of this upload; just after the review is passed. Considering the author is a professional photographer and this work is previously published at http://www.joeyl.com/favor-galleries/quick-selection/#!4021 as "all rights reserved"; the application of CC license on 500px may be a accidental mistake from him that he corrected later. He changed the license of almost all other works too. So I marked all other files at Category:Photographs by Joey Lawrence as "review failed". I think this too eligible for deletion per COM:PRP. Jee 06:00, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:52, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве, персона скончалась в 1979 году Dogad75 (talk) 08:39, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:51, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope, phone screenshot SamuelFreli (talk) 16:44, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:41, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nattynate04 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope (unused personal images); possible personality rights violation.
ireas (talk) 11:43, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:46, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Some uploads by RaphaelGarcez
[edit]- File:Missa 7º dia de Garrincha - Prof. Raphael Garcez.jpg
- File:Inauguracao barrashop2.jpg
- File:Inauguracao barrashop.jpg
- File:Notícia Riocentro.jpg
- File:Notícia Riocentro2.jpg
- File:Notícia Riocentro3.jpg
- File:Fim do SNI.jpg
derivative works from newspapers still subject to copyrights (circa 1980). --Lugusto • ※ 18:42, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:39, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Author claimed is in photo. BaseSat (talk) 19:49, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:37, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JOHN MURAT (talk · contribs)
[edit]This appears to be a work of the Supreme Court of the government of the Philippines. Per this document Section 176 Works of the Government: "prior approval...is...necessary for exploitation of such work for profit...[and the government agency] may...impose...royalties."
TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 23:08, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Motopark (talk) 01:07, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:28, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
a derivative work from the video game Half-Life ? 91.65.69.84 15:27, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:44, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
There is no evidence that uploader is the copyright holder of the images.
- File:With Directorr Shane Blacks , at IRON MAN 3.jpg
- File:Palm Springs International Film Festival.jpg
- File:With Omar Akram.jpg
- File:Lita Heller.jpg
- File:Charlotte Ross Hosts 'the Butterfly Gala' Benefiting Children's Hospital Los Angeles.jpg
- File:Palm Springs International Film Festival Awards Gala.jpg
- File:Headshot from Red carpet.jpg
- File:The Home Foundation charity event.jpg
Jespinos (talk) 20:13, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:31, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Author claimed is in image. BaseSat (talk) 20:05, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:33, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope and/or unused personal images.
Ubcule (talk) 23:00, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:28, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Low quality personal photo, unused, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:08, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- Now it’s in use on ruwiki, so it could be kept as a {{User page image}}. --ireas (talk) 16:22, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Per above Natuur12 (talk) 14:51, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Clue
[edit]Derivative work of the boards, likely not DM.
-mattbuck (Talk) 13:25, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:45, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Davidrojo28 (talk · contribs)
[edit]There is no evidence that uploader is the copyright holder of the images.
- File:Karensoto2.jpg
- File:Motatán Yenifeer Rojo.jpg
- File:Motatán Central Azucarero.jpg
- File:Iglesia Motatán.jpg
- File:MOTATAN tAPIAS.jpg
- File:Motatan 4.jpg
- File:Motatán.jpg
- File:Motatán Aguas termales.gif
- File:San Benito Motatán.JPG
- File:Motatan 3.jpg
- File:Motatan 2.jpg
- File:Motatan 1.jpg
Jespinos (talk) 20:52, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:30, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Replaced with cropped version with less personal details : File:Cropped WSET level 3.png Agne27 (talk) 21:14, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:30, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Unused logo, used for advertising JurgenNL (talk) 08:56, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:51, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Author claimed is in photo. BaseSat (talk) 20:09, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:32, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ConnorKearney97 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low resolutions and missing EXIF. The images are likely not own work.
- File:BHawke.jpg
- File:HawkePM.jpg
- File:Bob Hawke PM.jpg
- File:Abbott'13.jpg
- File:Abbott13.jpg
- File:Howard96.jpg
- File:JHoward'87.jpg
- File:PJKeating.jpg
- File:JWHoward.jpg
- File:KeatingPM.jpg
- File:Howard'87.jpg
- File:Howard'96.jpg
- File:Howard87.jpg
- File:TreasurerKeating.jpg
Jespinos (talk) 19:21, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:38, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Author claimed is in image. BaseSat (talk) 20:03, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete It is obvious that the subject is not the photographer. I see the photo is from 2006 and may have been "grandfathered", but this still does not negate that it has an obviousl incorrect author. russavia (talk) 20:47, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:33, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Are these files own works or derivative works ?
- File:Frogumm - Memories (Final Version).ogg
- File:UndeadConfrontation.ogg
- File:TheCanals.ogg
- File:RooftopEscape.ogg
- File:DarkRush.ogg
- File:AloneInTheWoods.ogg
- File:Lost Story Streets.jpg
- File:Lost Stories Logo.png
91.65.69.84 15:37, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:44, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
This user appears to have taken most of the photos from http://www.7yemen.com/vb/t42151.html which doesn't have a Commons-compatible copyright license.
TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 22:55, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:29, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
The images appear to be magazine pages.
- File:TatianaShakhnes 4.jpg
- File:TatianaShakhnes 5.jpg
- File:TatianaShakhnes 3.jpg
- File:TatianaShakhnes 2.jpg
- File:TatianaShakhnes 1.jpg
Jespinos (talk) 21:29, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:30, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Low resolution and missing EXIF. Unlikely to be own work. Jespinos (talk) 21:47, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:29, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Již nechci zveřejnovat tuto fotografii Gigid (talk) 18:28, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:40, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
escudo desatualizado. Escudonovofortaleza.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.141.196.170 (talk • contribs) 2014-03-18T13:31:04 (UTC)
Kept: Outdating is not a reason for deletion in this case. Older logos of sports club are still of historical interest. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 05:11, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
escudo desatualizado. Escudo desatualizado — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.141.196.170 (talk • contribs) 2014-03-18T13:29:57 (UTC)
Kept: Outdating is not a reason for deletion in this case. Older logos of sports club are still of historical interest. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 05:11, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Adolph Friedländer
[edit]The description says this is the work of Adolph Friedländer and was published in 1905 or 1906. According to en:Adolph Friedländer, Adolph Friedländer died in 1904 and his printing business was taken over by his two sons, who both died in 1953. Because this was published after the death of the father, it may be the work of the sons. Their deaths were less than 70 years ago, so {{PD-old}} does not apply to their work.
Rybec (talk) 15:50, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- Carl Krone married Ida in 1902, she succeeded with her lion-show in 1904, her dress shows the fashion about 1900. So why should this be the work of the Friedländer sons? The given source (unfortunately a printed book...;-) tells you better. --Felistoria (talk) 18:37, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep It COULD be that the mars people have settled on earth and made this photo. Proof the contrary! --FrobenChristoph (talk) 20:13, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: We have a source saying that this is Adolph's work. Unless we get some more evidence to indicate that this is incorrect there is no good reason to doubt this claim. Just the fact that this was published 1 or 2 years after his death is not enough. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 05:23, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal image (?) not in use on a user page. Out of project scope. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 05:15, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторсте, на сайте http://www.sobor.by/page/Tatyana_Dashkevich_vistupit_s_avtorskoy_programmoy_Slovo_mama_dorogoe написано, что источник фото - сайт interfax.by, на котором информация не распространяется под свободными лицензиями Dogad75 (talk) 15:58, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Image on linked website is cropped and might very well be derived from this one. No reason to doubt the uploader's own work claim. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 05:27, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation with [3] ([4]) 195.50.31.213 06:56, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
![[4]](http://sobor.by/images/2011/04-10-36-58-4-1big.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep per previous DR. You provided the exact the same link as the reasoning in the previous DR, without providing new information. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:11, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- I guess the source is [5]. --195.50.31.213 17:34, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
_________
- Housekeeping image was kept. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:22, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by IxK85 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Incorrect licence - image cannot be PD-UK-Gov as taken in 1982 Maybe a mistake by uploader? Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 13:39, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree per source website: This item is available to share and reuse under the terms of the IWM Non Commercial Licence. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 05:14, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
copyright violation accoradind to National Portrait Gallery Rcbutcher (talk) 08:05, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep There is no named photographer, only Bassano Ltd. Unless there is verifiable evidence available of a named photographer, this appears to have been public domain from 2007. --Fæ (talk) 12:28, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- Question - what evidence is there from the NPG that this is a copyvio? Have that made some specific claim that this image is a copyvio? Or is this just another blanket claim "All images that are any part of the NPG corpus are the NPG's copyright"? Andy Dingley (talk) 13:03, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- Wikimedia is currently talking to the NPG about relaxing their copyright claims, with a review coming in April. It has been recommended that in the meantime we cease uploading their copyright-claimed material as a sign of good faith. That's why I asked for my own 2 recent uploads to be deleted. I agree that these blanket claims of copyright are spurious but better to negotiate than confront. Rcbutcher (talk) 01:42, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: In scope, in use. WMF policy is that simple reproductions of PD works do not constitute a new work and are not copyrighted. While I agree with not starting a mass upload of NPG files while negotiations are ongoing I don't think we should delete all files we already have, especially not if they are in use. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 05:09, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
not PD-HK-PR, copyright shizhao (talk) 01:02, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep According to Hong Kong Law Section 58 in Chapter 528 (Copyright Ordinance)," The Public record, means the records of any nature or description which have been made, received or acquired in the course of proceedings of the Legislative Council, judicial proceedings or executive transaction[...]". This graphic is captured from the Commission of Inquiry into the Collision Vessels near Lamma Island on 1 October 2012 report. It is a "semi-judicial proceedings" and executive used for the HK government department(such as Marine Department) to review the policy of marine. I believe that this fulfils the Ordinance requirement.--HKM (talk) 02:20, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: No reason given why the licensingtag is incorrect Natuur12 (talk) 18:39, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
not PD-HK-PR, copyright shizhao (talk) 01:00, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep According to Hong Kong Law Section 58 in Chapter 528 (Copyright Ordinance)," The Public record, means the records of any nature or description which have been made, received or acquired in the course of proceedings of the Legislative Council, judicial proceedings or executive transaction[...]". This graphic is captured from the a revised development plan about the Kai Tak Development proposal for guiding others government department in the development.It should be seen as executive transaction.--HKM (talk) 02:25, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: No reason given why the licensingtag is incorrect Natuur12 (talk) 18:39, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
this picture belongs to me, I am charlyn tony khater and I do not want it to be shared with others for matters of privacy 82.198.21.20 16:48, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept, the photo is big and has camera data, so probably own work as claimed. This is made in apparently public place and the subject is posing, so consent is not needed here. Taivo (talk) 13:33, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
this is my private photo and due to personal issues and privacy i do not wish for it to be publicly shared anymore ! 82.198.21.20 18:42, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- A better rationale for deletion would be "Unused personal photo, out of scope." Storkk (talk) 16:05, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: The question is whether this person is notable and the photo should be kept to illustrate an article about her. From looking at her personal web site I think this is not the case. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 05:32, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:40, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
not PD-HK-PR, copyright shizhao (talk) 00:58, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep According to Hong Kong Law Section 58 in Chapter 528 (Copyright Ordinance)," The Public record, means the records of any nature or description which have been made, received or acquired in the course of proceedings of the Legislative Council, judicial proceedings or executive transaction[...]". This graphic is captured from the Commission of Inquiry into the Collision Vessels near Lamma Island on 1 October 2012 report. It is a "semi-judicial proceedings" and executive used for the HK government department(such as Marine Department) to review the policy of marine. I believe that this fulfils the Ordinance requirement.--HKM (talk) 02:20, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: No reason given why the licensingtag is incorrect Natuur12 (talk) 18:39, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
not PD-HK-PR, copyright shizhao (talk) 01:01, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep According to Hong Kong Law Section 58 in Chapter 528 (Copyright Ordinance)," The Public record, means the records of any nature or description which have been made, received or acquired in the course of proceedings of the Legislative Council, judicial proceedings or executive transaction[...]". This graphic is captured from the Commission of Inquiry into the Collision Vessels near Lamma Island on 1 October 2012 report. It is a "semi-judicial proceedings" and executive used for the HK government department(such as Marine Department) to review the policy of marine. I believe that this fulfils the Ordinance requirement.--HKM (talk) 02:20, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: No reason given why the licensingtag is incorrect Natuur12 (talk) 18:39, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Author claimed is in image. BaseSat (talk) 19:44, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Comment camera position is quite low - a tripod & self-timer may have been used, but it would be good to get clarity or permission from photographer if this was not the case. Storkk (talk) 12:55, 3 April 2014 (UTC)- This is my mistake. The author is Daniel Simanek (same as File:OrangeMikeAtCampusTraining.jpg). I'll update the description. Protonk (talk) 13:00, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: File needs an OTRS-ticket. No evidence of permission Natuur12 (talk) 18:41, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Author claimed is in image. BaseSat (talk) 20:10, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- BaseSat Hello, yes, this is a picture of me. Can you please link to a discussion which says why this could be a problem? Thanks. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:20, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- @63.116.201.2: Was it you who actually made the image? --BaseSat (talk) 20:17, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- BaseSat Yes, I made the picture. I assert that the copyright has never been owned by anyone other than me. If you show me a more clear tag for this then I will apply it to my picture. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:20, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- @Bluerasberry: Could you explain how did you manage to make it? Both of your hands seems to be in the picture. --BaseSat (talk) 20:24, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- +1 russavia (talk) 20:38, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- Russavia BaseSat It was work for hire at my direction with money having exchanged hands before execution of the work. Please both of you suggest the appropriate template to indicate this, or otherwise tell me that I am mistaken about the assignment of copyright. I am not a lawyer and copyright is confusing. Blue Rasberry (talk) 21:45, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- +1 russavia (talk) 20:38, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- @Bluerasberry: Could you explain how did you manage to make it? Both of your hands seems to be in the picture. --BaseSat (talk) 20:24, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- BaseSat Yes, I made the picture. I assert that the copyright has never been owned by anyone other than me. If you show me a more clear tag for this then I will apply it to my picture. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:20, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- @63.116.201.2: Was it you who actually made the image? --BaseSat (talk) 20:17, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- CommentPlease see OTRS for an easy way to get this issue solved. Your photographer merely emails (follow their directions!) and the file can be restored. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:43, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep This discussion was opened without a valid reason IMHO, and Commons allows users to upload pictures of themselves given certain conditions. Fitoschido (talk) 20:30, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- IMO, that's an argument relating to COM:SCOPE, and has nothing to do with the copyright status of the image, which is what was being objected to. Looks like this will get cleared up, however. Storkk (talk) 16:10, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Despite being in use, the uploader says it was taken by another and OTRS was not received despite extra time being allowed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:42, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- Uploader send an ticket to OTRS claiming that he is the copyrightholder. No reason not to believe him so I restored the file based on this ticket. Natuur12 (talk) 15:42, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
karl dou mdu kou lu ga 41.102.236.158 21:52, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy keep – This is an invalid request. The nominator has only entered to gibberish for a rationale. And there is no possible reason for for this file to be deleted. Senator2029 ➔ “Talk” 10:57, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:09, 17 May 2016 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
_Stephan_Schesch_und_Tomi_Ungerer.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Stephan_Schesch_und_Tomi_Ungerer.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COPYVIO Tomi Ungerer est un artiste toujours bien vivant Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 10:56, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
_Stephan_Schesch_und_Tomi_Ungerer.jpg){kind=link}
- La description de l'image dit que ce dessin a été effectué par un enfant d'après Tomi Ungerer, pas par Ungerer lui-même ( dont ce n'est pas le style ). L'intérêt artistique du fichier est donc quasi nul, mais il ne constitue pas une infraction au droit d'auteur. --Edelseider (talk) 14:39, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- Voir ce dessin de style approchant [6] Le trait me semble bien net pour une main d’enfant. Je peux me tromper, mais l’enfant a très bien pu décalquer ce dessin d’après une image du film.. --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 15:48, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- Il faut dire que nous ne connaissons pas l'âge de l'enfant en question. Cinq ans ? Huit ans ? Douze ans ? A dix ans, certains enfants doués ont déjà le trait très sûr. Comme je le disais, l'intérêt du fichier ne me saute pas aux yeux, je ne suis donc pas opposé à une suppression, mais je n'ai pas non plus de raison de douter de la bonne foi de la personne qui a versé le fichier. --Edelseider (talk) 08:06, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- Je me contente de signaler un problème potentiel, ensuite la communauté décide. Mais ce dessin peut aussi constituer un plagiat… --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 09:01, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- Il faut dire que nous ne connaissons pas l'âge de l'enfant en question. Cinq ans ? Huit ans ? Douze ans ? A dix ans, certains enfants doués ont déjà le trait très sûr. Comme je le disais, l'intérêt du fichier ne me saute pas aux yeux, je ne suis donc pas opposé à une suppression, mais je n'ai pas non plus de raison de douter de la bonne foi de la personne qui a versé le fichier. --Edelseider (talk) 08:06, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- Voir ce dessin de style approchant [6] Le trait me semble bien net pour une main d’enfant. Je peux me tromper, mais l’enfant a très bien pu décalquer ce dessin d’après une image du film.. --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 15:48, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- Si c'est un dessin créé par un enfant, je ne vois pas exactement comment ça pourraît "être utilisé dans un but éducatif" (voir COM:SCOPE). Storkk (talk) 15:37, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Storkk's argument was compelling. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:41, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
_Stephan_Schesch_und_Tomi_Ungerer.jpg){kind=link}
Trudno ocenić, czy zawierał zastrzeżenie praw autorskich. 83.24.244.224 09:15, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
- Pierwsza publikacja była jeszcze pod rządami starego prawa autorskiego, bez zastrzeżenia, więc PD-PRL. Julo (talk) 22:40, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
- Keep
According to art. 3 of the Polish copyright law of March 29, 1926 and Art. 2 of the Polish copyright law of July 10, 1952, all photographs by Polish photographers (or published for the first time in Poland or simultaneously in Poland and abroad) published without a clear copyright notice before the law was changed on May 23, 1994 are assumed public domain.
This "copyright notice" should be made clearly visible on the photograph itself (usually in the form of fine print near the the lower edge of the photograph). This rule is clearly stated both in art. 3 of the 1926 Law:
Prawo autorskie do utworów fotograficznych lub otrzymanych w podobny do fotografji sposób istnieje pod warunkiem, że zastrzeżenie wyraźnie uwidoczniono na odbitkach.
and in Art. 2 of the 1952 Law:
Utwór, wykonany sposobem fotograficznym lub do fotografii podobnym, jest przedmiotem prawa autorskiego, jeżeli na utworze uwidoczniono wyraźnie zastrzeżenie prawa autorskiego.
An exemple of such copyright notice ("Reprodukcja zastrzega się"): http://www.imagic.pl/files/5466/Arek/poczt%20zam%20(16).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
Barry Kent (talk) 21:15, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Per above. We rather don't assume that for example copyright notice was removed afterwards, in later publications/digitalization. Masur (talk) 18:58, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
There is a suggestion that the picture was first published with copyright notice (Polska: sierpień 1980 - sierpień 1989, wyd. Editions-Spotkania, 1990, p. 222) as claimed by OTRS query [7] so the PD-Polish clause does not work in this case. Polimerek (talk) 15:31, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- It is a pity, but if this is truth - we should delete the picture. Julo (talk) 02:52, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- Please provide a public, transparent proof of the said copyright notice; i.e. publicly visible scan or transcript of correspondence. From what was written here I do not understand how the copyright note was attached to the photo and made public. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 08:27, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- It seems that the person who wrote E-mail on OTRS was not right. There are Polish Wikipedians, who have the mentioned book and they claim that there is no copyright note regarding this picture. On the other hand - now, we have no proof that this picutre was published before 1994 without copyright notice and in fact it is good enough reason to delete this file. So, if you know any publication of this photo before 1994 without copyright note - please provide it... Bear in mind that there are many similar pictures taken by other photographers from the same place at the same time - so check twice if it is exactly this one. Polimerek (talk) 14:18, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- One of the wikipedians has just sent to OTRS scan of the book "Polska: sierpień 1980 - sierpień 1989", which proves that there was no any copyright notice on it. So, we have a proof that it was published before 1994 without copyright note... Polimerek (talk) 18:16, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- For the record, the aforementioned discussion is at [8]. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 02:26, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- Actually, the person who sent first E-mail on OTRS still claims that he has a proof of copyright, although it is not yet provided. Let's wait for few days for this, and if the proof won't be persuasive I would suggest to finally close this discussion. Polimerek (talk) 11:11, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- Can you also please make sure to link the OTRS tickets here that contain the book scan showing there is no copyright notice? The link to Facebook only takes me to the pl.wikipedia group page and not to a discussion. ALso note that Facebook is not the appropriate place to archive proof of copyright/PD when it comes to Commons images. Thanks, --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 05:19, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- OTRS ticket has the book scan, however the person who claimed copyright has just sent yesterday a picture of the copy of the photo with author copyright stamp. Actually, he has sent a picture of the copy of the photo + a photo of reverse of the copy with copyright stamp. There is no date on copyright stamp, nor author signature. It is possible to take any other photo of similar size and take picutre of it reverse with the stamp. It is of course also possible that someone put the stamp on the reverse of the picture right now, especially that this person already lied about copyright of the album. Anyway, the situation is unclear and may end up in the court. We cannot assure that there is no copyrighted copy of this picture. So, I personally am puzzled. Should I point the claimed person to WMF to tell him to send DMCA? Or we are about to delete this file? Polimerek (talk) 09:02, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- I oppose deletion on such flimsy grounds; this is the photo agency equivalent of patent trolling. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 07:04, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- OTRS ticket has the book scan, however the person who claimed copyright has just sent yesterday a picture of the copy of the photo with author copyright stamp. Actually, he has sent a picture of the copy of the photo + a photo of reverse of the copy with copyright stamp. There is no date on copyright stamp, nor author signature. It is possible to take any other photo of similar size and take picutre of it reverse with the stamp. It is of course also possible that someone put the stamp on the reverse of the picture right now, especially that this person already lied about copyright of the album. Anyway, the situation is unclear and may end up in the court. We cannot assure that there is no copyrighted copy of this picture. So, I personally am puzzled. Should I point the claimed person to WMF to tell him to send DMCA? Or we are about to delete this file? Polimerek (talk) 09:02, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- It seems that the person who wrote E-mail on OTRS was not right. There are Polish Wikipedians, who have the mentioned book and they claim that there is no copyright note regarding this picture. On the other hand - now, we have no proof that this picutre was published before 1994 without copyright notice and in fact it is good enough reason to delete this file. So, if you know any publication of this photo before 1994 without copyright note - please provide it... Bear in mind that there are many similar pictures taken by other photographers from the same place at the same time - so check twice if it is exactly this one. Polimerek (talk) 14:18, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- Please provide a public, transparent proof of the said copyright notice; i.e. publicly visible scan or transcript of correspondence. From what was written here I do not understand how the copyright note was attached to the photo and made public. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 08:27, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- I think it is highly unlikely that an acclaimed photographer as Erazm Ciolek did not publish this photo with a (c)notice attached. It is safe to assume that, if published before the book was published, there was a (c) notice attached. Either way, IMHO it is not safe to keep this file on Commons. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:15, 15 April 2014 (UTC)--Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:15, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
- And your familiarity with Polish photographers practices of 1970s and 1980s is based on what, if I may ask? Because I think it is very likely that it was not customary to publish photos with (c)notice attached. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 05:14, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- I disagree. In my opinion this is yet to be proved that this photo had been published before this book was published. As far as I know Mr Ciołek took more pictures of that event. Also, holding a copy of Polska: sierpień 1980–sierpień 1989/August 1980–August 1989 by Erazm Ciołek (1990) in my hand I do not feel comfortable at all that this person has already lied to us once claiming that it was published with copyright notice here. It was not. Boston9 (talk) 20:09, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming this file as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host it on Commons -FASTILY 19:01, 30 April 2014 (UTC)