Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/08/02

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 2nd, 2013
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very bad quality Renusharma9691 (talk) 09:03, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: cpviol, source=internet, no license JuTa 20:12, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Tbhotch as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Created to vandalism en.wiki No link provided. Out of scope here. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom + grabbed (derivated) from internet via http://www.flickr.com/photos/34330226@N02/4066235841/ (2009). Gunnex (talk) 21:01, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: copyvio DW Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:23, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified people and not within the project scope. Alan Liefting (talk) 05:44, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not sure why not in my cleanup category, but will delete this as per nom and as part of cleanup russavia (talk) 07:54, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified people and not within the project scope. Alan Liefting (talk) 05:45, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not sure why not in my cleanup category, but will delete this as per nom and as part of cleanup russavia (talk) 07:54, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified people and not within the project scope. Alan Liefting (talk) 05:46, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not sure why not in my cleanup category, but will delete this as per nom and as part of cleanup russavia (talk) 07:55, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified people and not within the project scope. Alan Liefting (talk) 05:46, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not sure why not in my cleanup category, but will delete this as per nom and as part of cleanup russavia (talk) 07:55, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified people and not within the project scope. Alan Liefting (talk) 05:47, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not sure why not in my cleanup category, but will delete this as per nom and as part of cleanup russavia (talk) 07:55, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified people and not within the project scope. Alan Liefting (talk) 05:48, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not sure why not in my cleanup category, but will delete this as per nom and as part of cleanup russavia (talk) 07:55, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified people and not within the project scope. Alan Liefting (talk) 05:48, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not sure why not in my cleanup category, but will delete this as per nom and as part of cleanup russavia (talk) 07:55, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not within project scope Alan Liefting (talk) 06:13, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not sure why not in my cleanup category, but will delete this as per nom and as part of cleanup russavia (talk) 07:55, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source/license and author information of two images used in this collage (= File:Casinomardel.jpg + File:Faro mardel.jpg) is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. Gunnex (talk) 07:08, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted in the meantime by Ezarate (copyright violation). Gunnex (talk) 21:58, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not taken by user Mattythewhite (talk) 17:17, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: speedydeleted: Copyright violation Steinsplitter (talk) 17:30, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not taken by user Mattythewhite (talk) 17:19, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: speedydeleted: Copyright violation Steinsplitter (talk) 17:34, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not taken by user Mattythewhite (talk) 17:27, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted as a copyvio.Flickrworker (talk) 20:42, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: deleted by January Steinsplitter (talk) 17:32, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not taken by user Mattythewhite (talk) 17:32, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted as a copyvio.Flickrworker (talk) 20:41, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: deleted by January Steinsplitter (talk) 17:31, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image could be an edited version of this http://www.flickr.com/photos/riotur/8267749070/in/photostream/. All rights reserved. The reason i think it's an edited version is the picture has the same angle and the same positioning. It looks very blurry as if someone has zoomed right in and cropped the left from the original and comes up in a google search of the image that is on commons. Flickrworker (talk) 18:22, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: DW of copyprotected media. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:50, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same display as this http://www.flickr.com/photos/riotur/8266677085/in/photostream/. Image on commons looks to have been heavily edited and looks like a reverse of this copyrighted image. Flickrworker (talk) 18:25, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: DW of unfree media Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:49, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not taken by user Mattythewhite (talk) 17:19, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Copyvio. INeverCry 20:59, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sieht nicht nach Aufnahme mit Selbstauslöser aus. Daher kann das kaum ein eigenes Werk sein. Johnny Controletti (talk) 08:42, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Speedily deleted per nomination and ticket:2013080710007807 according to which this upload has been accidental. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:35, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to multiple sources (including Avard Fairbanks' personal papers and this BigRapids.org webpage), this statue of W. N. Ferris was created in 1984 on the occasion of Ferris State's centennial and thus is not in the public domain. Due to US copyright law, freely-licensed images of it cannot be made and it must be deleted from Commons. As the photographer and uploader, please accept my apologies for not catching this copyright violation earlier. Michael Barera (talk) 03:21, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded in 03.2008 by Planmdq who "suffered" recently some copyvios from historic uploads of 2008. Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, but exif available. Nevertheless, per http://focodigitalblog.blogspot.de/ (Google cache) previously published in 28.10.2004 (this covers also the exif date) = http://membres.lycos.fr/paulynatu/fotos/catedralmdq.jpg (404). http://focodigitalblog.blogspot.de was configured in 2004 to be a fotoblog made by friends and a "Paul" (who most likley has taken the image) seems to be one of the members. Gunnex (talk) 07:48, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising NigelSoft (talk) 08:07, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising NigelSoft (talk) 08:07, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising NigelSoft (talk) 08:07, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising NigelSoft (talk) 08:08, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising NigelSoft (talk) 08:08, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising NigelSoft (talk) 08:08, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising NigelSoft (talk) 08:08, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising NigelSoft (talk) 08:08, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source/license and author information of every image used in this collage (File:BocaRiver.jpg + File:RiverBoca.jpg, see history) is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. Gunnex (talk) 08:08, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising NigelSoft (talk) 08:08, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising NigelSoft (talk) 08:08, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising NigelSoft (talk) 08:08, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising NigelSoft (talk) 08:08, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising NigelSoft (talk) 08:08, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded in 04.2007. Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Per http://msn.mediotiempo.com/futbol/internacional/noticias/2007/03/20/reves-para-barras-bravas-de-boca-juniors and http://euro.mediotiempo.com/media/2007/03/20/reves-para-barras-bravas-de-boca-juniors.jpg previously circulating since 03.2007 (see also file path, even in lower res, ©2012 Medio Tiempo S.A. de C.V. Derechos reservados.) and apparently credited with (see below on that link) with "foto: Mexsport". Gunnex (talk) 08:19, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image −ebraminiotalk 08:37, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photograph of a painting of undocumented authorship, evidently modern, unlikely to be old enough for PD-old. False source/authorship declaration (original upload of the photograph was by en:User:Eupator on en-wp, but authorship of the painting was never disclosed). Fut.Perf. 08:46, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mysterious: Uploaded in 02.2012 by Byproair with exif Sony DSC-W15, 11:07, 15. Nov. 2011 but per identical traffic movement (cars & persons), dirt on the lens (water drops?) etc. most likely derivated (cropped & arranged horizontally) from http://www.panoramio.com/photo/61596131 (2011, © Alle Rechte vorbehalten von pablobarrabas, high res version) with exif Canon PowerShot SX130 IS and 12.09.2011, 16:04:54. Overlayed in Photoshop confirms IMHO the suspicion but a second opinion would be appreciated. Gunnex (talk) 09:00, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image −ebraminiotalk 09:20, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image −ebraminiotalk 09:29, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not an official municipal coat of arms, and therefore not PD. Suojärvi had no official coat of arms when it was part of Finland, and this was designed afterwards when Suojärvi had already been annexed to the USSR. [1][2] According to fi.wp the coat of arms was designed by Viktor Mustikainen (who died in 1999), so it's still under copyright under Finnish law. Jafeluv (talk) 09:52, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional poster, COM:SCOPE −ebraminiotalk 09:58, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not an official municipal coat of arms, and the design is therefore not covered by {{PD-Coa-Finland}}. As a 1968 work, it's also not old enough to be PD by age. Jafeluv (talk) 10:10, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork of Roy Lichtenstein (1923-1997), doesn't fall under Freedom of Panorama or public domain CennoxX (talk) 10:18, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If the sculpture is considered to be a work of art, this image is a derivative work of it. The authors (Antti Huovinen & pupils of Merimasku School) all still living, so not in Public Domain yet. FOP in Finland for buildings only. Apalsola tc 10:23, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was never an official municipal coat of arms and therefore does not fall under {{PD-Coa-Finland}}. The coat of arms was designed in 1991 [3] and is still under copyright. Jafeluv (talk) 10:42, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't noticed that restriction, thanks by the advice. Delete!, bye, --Elisardojm (talk) 10:47, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks to be taken from AFP (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-12892601) Stemoc (talk) 11:02, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was never an official coat of arms, and it's therefore not covered by {{PD-Coa-Finland}}. The design is also not old enough to be PD by age. Jafeluv (talk) 11:43, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was never an official coat of arms of the municipality, so it doesn't fall under {{PD-Coa-Finland}}. It was designed specifically for Heinjoki-Säätiö (Heinjoki Foundation), founded 1948 [4][5]. The design is not old enough to be PD by age. Jafeluv (talk) 11:59, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal resume. non-educational/encyclopedic content −ebraminiotalk 12:23, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image broken, please reupload McZusatz (talk) 12:55, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional poster and possibly copyright violation −ebraminiotalk 13:07, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It has been replaced by a nicer svg version. cffk (talk) 13:19, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It has been replaced by a nicer svg version. cffk (talk) 13:19, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It has been replaced by a nicer svg version. cffk (talk) 13:20, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It has been replaced by a nicer svg version. cffk (talk) 13:20, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It has been replaced by a nicer svg version. cffk (talk) 13:20, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It has been replaced by a nicer svg version. cffk (talk) 13:20, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked, and is only being used for vandalism Mattythewhite (talk) 14:35, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Currently 15 copies of same painting at Category:La Mort de Marat (Jacques-Louis David), this file has no differences that would justify an additional copy Deanlaw (talk) 15:20, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional manual, out of project scopeebraminiotalk 15:39, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution image without EXIF published before http://johinanews.net/jonews/cat3/45135.html http://johinanews.net/upload/a250481906176c6b2e4298c573798c7d.jpegebraminiotalk 15:43, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The flower is completely out of focus so not sure whether the image is in Scope Sreejith K (talk) 16:16, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The flower is out of focus, so not sure whether the image is in Scope Sreejith K (talk) 16:19, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative image Sreejith K (talk) 16:22, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative image Sreejith K (talk) 16:23, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative image Sreejith K (talk) 16:23, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Completly blurred. Out of scope Sreejith K (talk) 16:23, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho very 'bad quality', no 'educational use' and not in use, as well for File:Bombay's attraction.jpg and File:Cc 264.jpg, i.e. imho "out of scope", Roland zh 18:11, 2 August 2013 (UTC) Roland zh 18:11, 2 August 2013 (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho very 'bad quality', no 'educational use' and not in use, as well for File:Bombay's attraction.jpg and File:Cc 264.jpg, i.e. imho "out of scope", Roland zh 18:12, 2 August 2013 (UTC) Roland zh 18:12, 2 August 2013 (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho relatively 'bad quality', no 'educational use' and not in use, i.e. imho "out of scope", Roland zh 18:13, 2 August 2013 (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho relatively 'bad quality', no 'educational use' and not in use, i.e. imho "out of scope", Roland zh 18:13, 2 August 2013 (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho relatively 'bad quality', imho rather 'user page image' then 'personal adverisement' no 'educational use' and not in use, i.e. imho "out of scope", Roland zh 18:25, 2 August 2013 (UTC) Roland zh 18:25, 2 August 2013 (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Éric Pichon (né en 1963) is not in public domain. Copyright violation. 83.204.178.100 19:19, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image −ebraminiotalk 20:00, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Twitter bird is copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 20:05, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution image without EXIF, higher resolution http://cdn.alwafd.org/images/news/144261417dfsdghfd.jpgebraminiotalk 20:16, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The person that appears in the photo have asked it to me. So, respect! ;-) Stranyo (talk) 20:32, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jacques Roux (born in 1953) is not in public domain. Copyright violation. 90.44.68.117 21:20, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jacques Roux (born in 1953) is not in public domain. Copyright violation. 90.44.68.117 21:21, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jacques Roux (born in 1953) is not in public domain. Copyright violation. 90.44.68.117 21:20, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jacques Roux (born in 1953) is not in public domain. Copyright violation. 90.44.68.117 21:21, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File does not match source listed Roseohioresident (talk) 21:33, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced by a nicer svg version cffk (talk) 21:33, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced by a nicer svg version cffk (talk) 21:33, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, photo is from this source: http://www.governorsresidence.ohio.gov/residence/hollister.aspx Roseohioresident (talk) 21:35, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not particularly useful in any sort of way, and as its photographer and uploader I would like to ask the community to delete it. If the community disagrees with my desire to delete it, I will certainly accept that decision. Thank you. Michael Barera (talk) 21:36, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not particularly useful in any sort of way, and as its photographer and uploader I would like to ask the community to delete it. If the community disagrees with my desire to delete it, I will certainly accept that decision. Thank you. Michael Barera (talk) 21:36, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ebraminio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: University of Birjand logo, non free/copyright protected work Seems close to PD? Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:37, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete It is a novel and artistic work. I don't see it simpler than Commons:Deletion requests/File:Assassin's Creed Logo notext.svgebraminiotalk 00:29, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotion/Spam work out of project scopeebraminiotalk 21:46, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ebraminio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Book cover, copyright protected IMHO only simple graphics and text. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:53, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's not a copyvio, but it doesn't appear to have any useful in-scope use either. Not currently in use. Ubcule (talk) 22:45, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Decision to delete (or not) should also take into account fact that it seems to belong alongside other images at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ListFiles/CW2013 , though whether those are in-scope or not may also be asked! (Possibly uploaded for commercial benefit, but could have in-scope usage). Ubcule (talk) 22:58, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence this is the uploader's own work. See, e.g., http://journalstar.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/kay-orr-wants-deb-fischer-in-senate-race/article_0d4ba684-1ee9-575e-a273-3c8316040b61.html. Bbb23 (talk) 23:01, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Podría estar protegido por derechos de autor y no veo OTRS Nachosan (talk) 23:27, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, IMHO. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:27, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Description says image is from Corbis. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 01:31, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a professional (and copyrighted) image Adabow (talk) 03:04, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Fiwp Elokuun kuvitustalkoot 2013.svg Zache (talk) 05:41, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused duplicate. Jafeluv (talk) 07:07, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According file history th uploader believes th license {{PD-USGov}} applies. Is he correct? Is this image made by an employee on duty of an US federal agency? JuTa 05:58, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete/permission needed: {{PD-USgov}} excludes clearly "This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision". Per http://rcs.rushville.k12.in.us/: schools located in the county en:Rush County, Indiana. Without any further evidences (considering also "author = unknown"), out of scope of {{PD-USgov}}. Gunnex (talk) 21:17, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: "Support" from the Federal Government is not sufficient -- the photograper must be an actual employee. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:40, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails to meet the scope requirements, in the absence of any information as to context. Similar images are used elsewhere on the internet, so there may be a copyright problem with the components of this derived image or parody composition. (talk) 07:47, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image −ebraminiotalk 09:27, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Theman12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolution images or scanned/derivative work with no valid license, mostly unused and published before

ebraminiotalk 09:49, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mauro.45 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Considering a impressive 85kb user talk page full of notes regarding copyvios or otherwise deleted images + 2 blocks: IMHO untrusted user uploading a bunch of copyrighted material (small/inconsistent resolutions, missing exif) so these ones (per COM:PRP) can't be believed either.

Gunnex (talk) 10:34, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Found elsewhere on the net, not own work. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:30, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no addition value compared to the images in Category:Solid white images Brimz (talk) 10:52, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This needs to stay for the good working of my main page, Brimz-the-patroller. I already said: don't delete. It has the size of the Wikipedia logo, and that is important! Wolf Lambert (talk) 11:00, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
What is "my mainpage"? Commons is not to be used for personal webdesign. Why can't one of the images in Category:Solid white images be used? BR Brimz (talk) 11:03, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well, my main page design proposal for Wikipedia. I need a white square, that has the metrics of the Wikipedia logo for proper display. So do not delete. Wolf Lambert (talk) 21:00, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep; even in case it would not be of use for others, it's legitimate as userpageimage. I've tagged it accordingly. --Túrelio (talk) 13:23, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I canceled this DR. Ik had the presumption that images would be scalabe by the Wikimedia software and that it would be possible that the ratio could be altered. Today I learned that that is impossible. Therefore an image from Category:Solid white images cannot be used for the purpose Wolf would use it. My apologies for the inconvience. BR Brimz (talk) 17:04, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Please do not remove DR tags without actually closing the DR. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:42, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Azarakhsh.brick (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The user made a catalog/brochure of his company products (actually his username is indicating to a company). Most of images have code of the product names but I don't think others [and embedded images] also are free images and made by the company it self, for example this can be found here.

ebraminiotalk 11:00, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free information board, the chapel was thoroughly renovated and equipped with new frescos in the 1980s. Eleassar (t/p) 11:45, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Le fichier n'est pas à jour, je souhaiterai le remplacer Adrientp (talk) 11:53, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vous pouvez le remplacer même si la version actuelle n'est pas supprimée. darkweasel94 20:53, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:42, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Prabhu Prasad Tripathy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolution, missing/inconsistent metadata and the nature of the images.

LX (talk, contribs) 12:53, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hessa.k.soud (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Higher resolution of most of them can be find on Google Image or Tineye

ebraminiotalk 13:04, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not own work, can be found all over the net. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:48, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Banajkumar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolution, missing/inconsistent metadata and the nature of the images.

LX (talk, contribs) 13:25, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ولد ببال (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FCD (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:44, 25 November 2020 (UTC) These pictures are in my property, were given to me by the team photographer.[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:58, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lafacto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Looks like collection of advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collection of advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Angelevyn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violations. Martin H. (talk) 16:27, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Angelevyn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. Blatant copyvios. --Martin H. (talk) 19:04, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Angelevyn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Complex logos without proper sources. Some of the files were nominate for speedy deletion but Amitie 10g removed the speedy tags and added {{PD-Coa-Mexico}}. However, firstly I'm not sure this templates apply for school logos and for sport club logos, secondly there are no sources on the files and we can't verify they are "official" or not.

Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:16, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by Krd, per Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Angelevyn. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:58, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Xiornik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope/copyvios - this user is uploading huge tif "modified" versions of paintings - no correct attributions - often doesn't even link to the original work - no indications of license - also I don't see what value any of these big "modified" files has - only use is on userpage

INeverCry 16:04, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry about not attributing them properly - I modified the pages so that the original works would be displayed properlyXiornik


Deleted: Xiornik is not a notable artist. We do not keep works of art by non-notable artists, whether they are completely original, or , as thse are, based on old masters. Therefore all of these are out of scope. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:54, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by KostastozisT (talk · contribs)

As discussed at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Files recreated outside of process?, the user continues to upload out-of-scope files and recreating previously deleted out-of-scope content. Commons:What Commons is not#Commons is not your personal free web.

LX (talk, contribs) 07:15, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

All deleted except one, which might be in scope. Yann (talk) 12:54, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The last remaining image (File:Kostastozis-10.jpg) may be a copyvio. This high-res copy shows more inscriptions on the painting in the bottom left corner including a date of 1995. INeverCry 01:18, 27 February 2013 (UTC) [reply]
Also, the name given in the inscription begins with epsilon rather than kappa, so it doesn't match the uploader's name. INeverCry 01:48, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at this again, I guess these are 2 different copies of an old icon. File:Kostastozis-10.jpg seems to say "65" in the inscription which I would take to mean it was painted in 1965, as it looks a bit too bright and new to be 1865. I don't know if I buy the "own work" claim, but if it's a plain copy of a pd icon, or is old enough to be pd itself, it might be keepable. I think it'd be in scope as a religious icon. INeverCry 02:06, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: except one, as above. Yann (talk) 06:41, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KostastozisT (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, unused personal images.

Jespinos (talk) 20:34, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom and overly self-promotional Rybec (talk) 02:10, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete yet again of course. No different from the other two times, and the user remains unwilling or unable to respond to communication attempts. How many times are we going to have to do this before the uploader is blocked? LX (talk, contribs) 16:09, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:48, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KostastozisT (talk · contribs) and sockpuppet Kostastozis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Yet again, out-of-scope images with no educational purpose. While the images are technically in use on en:User:Kostastozis, en:User:KostastozisT and en:User:Kostastozi, in my opinion, this is not legitimately in use as intended by {{User page image}}, as the user page appears to be purely self-promotional and the user is not there to participate in the project.

LX (talk, contribs) 17:04, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PrezMittens (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP. Uploader PrezMittens was identified as a sock of a paid spammer via m:User:Rschen7754/Reports/Morning277. A paid spammer is someone who is doing PR/spam in Wikipedia articles and elsewhere. Doing this, the spammer normally receives material for spamming (text & images). So it is most unlikley that PrezMittens did pull the trigger on the digicam(s) for the following files. In other words: Permission needed from their respective copyright owners.

Additional info:

Gunnex (talk) 20:29, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete copyvio or likely copyvio, or incorrect licensing. --Rschen7754 20:38, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lousy quality 91.66.57.90 20:49, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Since we have several other images of this artist, this very badly blurred image can go. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:56, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MKDS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP. Uploader MKDS was identified as a sock of a paid spammer via m:User:Rschen7754/Reports/Morning277. A paid spammer is someone who is doing PR/spam in Wikipedia articles and elsewhere. Doing this, the spammer normally receives material for spamming (text & images). So it is most unlikley that MKDS did pull the trigger on the digicam(s) for the following files. In other words: Permission needed from their respective copyright owners. All files related to Omar Todd, deleted 5x in enwiki.

Additional info:


Gunnex (talk) 21:04, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The clock faces and the golden sphere with the dragon on top of the tower originate from 1978.[6] Eleassar (t/p) 21:25, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hardly protectable and even if then de minimis. --Denniss (talk) 08:27, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The dragon, the sphere arnd the clock faces are works of sculpture and industrial design, per {{PD-Slovenia}} not yet in the public domain. Per Commons:De minimis, they're very unlikely de minimis: "Copyrighted work X is a key part of the subject." -Eleassar (t/p) 10:33, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You only copied half of text from Commons:De_minimis#Guidelines (in full: "Copyrighted work X is a key part of the subject (eg it is the reason for taking the photo"); now your interpretation doesn't make sense. I would say it falls under "Copyrighted work X is identifiable and an unavoidable part of the image subject, but is not essential to the subject (blacking it out would not make the file useless)" and/or "Copyrighted work X is identifiable, but is a small part of a larger work, so that the larger work cannot easily be shown without showing X. X is a part of the larger work, and its inclusion is unavoidable. " - both under very likely DM. --Sporti (talk) 07:48, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: per COM:DM. INeverCry 00:50, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Melissa2508 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 16:17, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Melissa2508 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP. Uploader Melissa2508 was identified as a sock of a paid spammer via m:User:Rschen7754/Reports/Morning277. A paid spammer is someone who is doing PR/spam in Wikipedia articles and elsewhere. Doing this, the spammer normally receives material for spamming (text & images). So it is most unlikley that Melissa2508 did pull the trigger on the digicam(s) for the following files. In other words: Permission needed from their respective copyright owners. All files apparently related to Parts Models, deleted 1x in enwiki.

Additional info:


Gunnex (talk) 21:47, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: work by Josip Černivec (d. 1964). Eleassar (t/p) 21:47, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also File:Ljubljana (341) (3897631660).jpg, File:Ljubljana (340) (3896852543).jpg. --Eleassar (t/p) 21:50, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Brimz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: close to copyvio or just over it (F.O.P. ?) Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:00, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Don't see the problem here. If I copied that logo off google I would put it as a PD logo file and there would be no issues. This is someones photo and therefore should not be deleted unless it can be proven that the image is a copyvio as a whole. The image of the logo is not a copyvio. Flickrworker (talk) 23:12, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Covered by FOP in the Netherlands Lymantria (talk) 10:59, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Versace1608 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Multiple requests for deletion for music-related images uploaded by Versace1608 (talk · contribs). Desired outcome: That the actual copyright owner(s) would donate the media to the Commons through the WP:OTRS process. Barring that, anything that isn't clearly legal will have to be removed from the Commons until it is properly licensed. The entry for File: Flavour's Blessed Album Artwork.jpg dated 2013 June 3 in Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2013-06 and Versace1608's talk page (as of 00:01, 3 August 2013 (UTC)) suggests that this is not the first time that this contributor has made contributions without clearing copyright issues first.[reply]

Original reason for nomination entered in the script and which appears on the pages nominated for deletion: These are professional images. Most were in wide use for commercial purposes prior to being uploaded to the Commons. File:Iyanya at MTV Base Nigeria Top 10 Show.jpg and the lack of its use elsewhere on the Internet suggests that the uploader may indeed be the photographer, but it does not in any way suggest he is the copyright owner. I am requesting that the uploader have the copyright owner user Commons:OTRS to donate the materials to the Commons. Failing that, regrettably, the images must be deleted.


  • Copyright problem: Very likely a professional image. Widely used on the Internet in promotional/professional contexts prior to 15 July 2013. Need verified OTRS ticket.
  • Copyright problem: Album cover art, presumed copyright by artist or label
  • Copyright problem: Album cover art, presumed copyright by artist or label
  • Copyright problem: Watermarked "PHOTOGRAPHER ERIK ERXON (ERIKERXON.COM)" on the right-hand side. OTRS donation should either be from Mr. Erxon or should include clear evidence that he is not the copyright owner.
  • Copyright problem: According to this page dated March 4, 2013, the image is by TCD Photography. OTRS donation should be from them or should include clear evidence that they no longer control the copyright.

Other deletion request:

  • Category:Iyanya If, as a result of the above discussions, this category becomes empty, it should be speedy-deleted as an unused category.


Davidwr (talk) 23:57, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:00, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Versace1608 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small images without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 12:28, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • User:Yann nominated several images I uploaded to Commons. They need to undo their actions. Those images I uploaded are screenshots of YouTube videos that have been licensed under the Creative Creative Commons Attribution license. I don't understand the reason why they decided to nominate those images. Are they going to tell me that the YouTube channels that uploaded those videos are not authorized to do so? If this is what they're claiming, then they need to provide proof to validate what they're saying. Simply saying, "Small images without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works" isn't enough to validate deletion. When they say "unlikely to be own works", what exactly are they saying? I never claimed that the images above are my own works. Versace1608 (talk) 22:12, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: License review OK. --Yann (talk) 10:39, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]