Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/06/02
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Freedom of Panorama does not apply in Norway Themightyquill (talk) 00:05, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- According to the file information page, it says that this was finished in 1947, which was after Vigeland's death. I assume that this means that the fountain remains unfree in USA until the end of 2042. --Stefan4 (talk) 08:47, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nom and as part of image cleanup russavia (talk) 09:46, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Freedom of Panorama does not apply in Norway Themightyquill (talk) 00:05, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nom and as part of image cleanup russavia (talk) 09:46, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- Undeleted after expiration of copyright term. De728631 (talk) 23:29, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Freedom of Panorama does not apply in Norway Themightyquill (talk) 00:06, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nom and as part of image cleanup russavia (talk) 09:46, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- Undeleted after expiration of copyright term. De728631 (talk) 23:40, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Freedom of Panorama does not apply in Norway Themightyquill (talk) 00:07, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting per nom and as part of image cleanup russavia (talk) 09:46, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- Undeleted after expiration of copyright term. De728631 (talk) 23:39, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
There is no original source link for this image to determine its copyright status on the flickr account Leoboudv (talk) 05:23, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- My bad, the link listed is bugged. It was supposed to be this one (already fixed):
- And the flickr link is this one (which is already accesible from the info available in the image page whose link has been posted above): http://www.flickr.com/photos/24899877@N00/126959157/
- Thus, this image is just a crop of that other image (whose copyright tag explicitly states that such a thing is allowed). Impru20 (talk) 10:24, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Kept: source added; therefore fixed McZusatz (talk) 13:23, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Quisiera que se borre sólo la primer versión del archivo, dado que accidentalmente no pixelicé una parte en donde aparece mi número de DNI ¿podría ser? Ojota (talk) 02:01, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Done, old version (with incomplete pixilization of identity) deleted from visible history per Uploader request. -- Infrogmation (talk) 20:09, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
I think I am wrong about licensce. Examine the website for licence.please. Badbuu1000 (talk) 07:11, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, copyrighted Dragon Ball character -- Infrogmation (talk) 20:15, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krizzz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Clearly invalid license
Converted by me from speedy to DR, as deletion of an image uploaded in 2005 merits a bit more discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:28, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- Removing the deletion request for this. We have a OTRS pending for this. Sarah (talk) 17:28, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Kept for now per OTRS pending Sarah (talk) 17:28, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
File:GEORGIA, Kingdom. T’amar. Queen Regnant, 1184-1213. Æ Fals (26mm, 6.65 g, 3h). Dated Year 420 of the Paschal cycle (AD 1200).jpg
[edit]This file was initially tagged by Insider as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: photo of 3D object|source=http://www.cngcoins.com/Coin.aspx?CoinID=163335 Geagea (talk) 14:24, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Keep. OTRS permission given. Geagea (talk) 14:25, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Kept. I'm sorry. I didn't see the permission. --Insider (talk) 14:32, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
a lot of images used for this collage have been deleted as copyvios (mostly because no fop in cambodia). I am afraid this collage should be deleted as well. Isderion (talk) 15:59, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted. A collage using non-free images cannot be free licensed. -- Infrogmation (talk) 20:23, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Twitter bird is copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 18:07, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted 20:29, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Twitter bird is copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 18:08, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, false license. -- Infrogmation (talk) 20:28, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
It is not a picture of Britney Spears, and it is actually a picture of myself. I uploaded the file to put on Britney's page, but the page is semi-protected. Please delete it, sorry for misusing your services, and it won't happen again. Twerkforbieber69 (talk) 18:31, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted; prompt request of uploader. -- Infrogmation (talk) 20:31, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
to clarify its status, as the uploader repeatly added an OTRS tag without bing an OTRS-member. Is this a valid OTRS-ticket? JuTa 23:22, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- You`d better request somebody of Commons OTRS volunteers about this ticket then disturb me with such destructive activity. --A1 (talk) 23:30, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- And it seems that is not first time Ju is vandalising OTRS-information. See here. --A1 (talk) 23:36, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- There is permission from singer and musician, composer is Rakhmaninov as I see, but I do not know who is the author of lyrics. Please provide this info.
Ukr: Додайте інформацію про композитора, автора слів, виконавців. Я вам писав учора в обговоренні приклад.--Anatoliy (talk) 23:42, 2 June 2013 (UTC)- Have a look here --A1 (talk) 23:51, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- There is permission from singer and musician, composer is Rakhmaninov as I see, but I do not know who is the author of lyrics. Please provide this info.
Kept: All permissions are given. Next time provide full information about authors. Anatoliy (talk) 23:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- A1, you should not add OTRS templates to images when you are not an OTRS volounteer, because the volounteers and only them can check and decide if a ticket is valid or not. The same applied for File:Сон.oggtheora.ogv too. --JuTa 23:59, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Do not be so petty, there is no differences who places OTRS, the only significant thing is being the OTRS-permission correct. In case if you doubt about some particular OTRS you are to ask OTRS administrators but not to delete.--A1 (talk) 07:49, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
It's a derivative work of the copyrighted logo by a non-government organization. Unlikely to be own work. Evil Russian (talk) 08:46, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio Darwin Ahoy! 21:28, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Yo iba a contribuir a subirlo al wiki de gabriela spanic y por error la subi a imagenes recientes Kily! (talk) 04:48, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: no license at all. JuTa 04:37, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Low quality genitalia. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:고등학생의 발기된 성기2.jpg. --Puzzlet Chung (talk) 04:49, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PORN – Kwj2772 (msg) 22:09, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
duplicita již existujícího souboru I.Sáček, senior (talk) 20:15, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: no license at all JuTa 21:35, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
nenašel jsem informace o autorovi I.Sáček, senior (talk) 20:16, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: no license at all JuTa 21:34, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Derivative work of the copyrighted artwork Donald Duck. Stefan4 (talk) 08:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Derivative work of the copyrighted artwork Donald Duck. Stefan4 (talk) 08:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- Looks like this was missed with Commons:Deletion requests/File:"Come On Fellows^ The U.S.O's for the U.S.A." - NARA - 514069.jpg. Carl Lindberg (talk) 19:09, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Derivative of non free content. Dschwen (talk) 03:27, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Zima 2010 01 16 0502u.JPG, same foto, different file, my mistake I.Sáček, senior (talk) 14:49, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
It is not painted by Goble, Warwick. But it is painted by Nandlal Bose. So it not covered under PD-India. I you want to reference see the book. Badbuu1000 (talk) 10:31, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
no description, of of scope (one of 5 contributions of this user) Pibwl (talk) 23:55, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
obvious copyvio DHN (talk) 23:47, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy. - Norbert Nagel (talk) 16:13, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
False PD rationale. Not ineligible for copyright protection; contains original authorship. It seems unlikely that the uploader, who has been blocked multiple times for uploading copyright violations, is the author as claimed. —LX (talk, contribs) 08:41, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy. - Norbert Nagel (talk) 15:25, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Image is clearly a photoshop of [1]. The source image is released under a CC-BY-NC license (not free enough). The author of the original image is given as "David Remsen" (not user:Philcha's name) and the copyright date is 1995. UserB (talk) 12:19, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Textbook scan, likely copyright violation Wizardman 02:35, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
PD-Art does not apply because this is 3D work of art A333 (talk) 16:29, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- I forgot that it doesn't apply to 3D art. Delete it. --Jonund (talk) 17:52, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Image appears to be taken from http://www.keyobs.be/fr/ebonino/html/nama.html (direct image link). UserB (talk) 12:21, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Derivative work of the copyrighted artwork Donald Duck. Stefan4 (talk) 08:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:53, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy. - Norbert Nagel (talk) 16:24, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy. - Norbert Nagel (talk) 16:17, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy. - Norbert Nagel (talk) 16:21, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
imho non-free content respectively advertisements, Roland 18:09, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
nonfree logo DHN (talk) 23:49, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Textbook scan, copyright violation Wizardman 16:23, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Source "Canal SBT" (http://www.sbt.com.br) is not a Commons alike site, nor even a public domain. Yanguas (talk) 03:38, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Appears to be the seal/logo of a school; not uploader created. (ESkog)(Talk) 22:28, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Seal/logo of a school; not uploader created. (ESkog)(Talk) 22:31, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
seal/logo of a school; not uploader created. (ESkog)(Talk) 22:32, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
seal/logo of a school; not uploader created. (ESkog)(Talk) 22:31, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Appears to be the seal/logo of a school; not uploader created. (ESkog)(Talk) 22:30, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Bad quality image of domesticated animal. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Delete Blurred poor quality image of common house cat; inferior in illustrative quality to many other images on Commons with no evident compensating importance nor uniqueness. -- Infrogmation (talk) 20:20, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Incorrect enantiomer (compare to File:Lamivudine.svg, which matches the manufacturer's product insert) DMacks (talk) 02:33, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Freedom of Panorama does not apply in Norway Themightyquill (talk) 00:10, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy. - Norbert Nagel (talk) 15:46, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Same problem with File:Genova-IMG 3385.JPG. --Túrelio (talk) 09:46, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, per nom. --Túrelio (talk) 09:41, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Looks like a hedcut with no release from the creator TCO (talk) 16:48, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- Apologies, but the transfer from the original (on Spanish Wiki?) makes it hard to see the provenance. And this sure looks like a WSJ hedcut or the like. I don't think we can take credit for it. (For that matter, there probably is an issue of the original photo that the hedcut was based on.) Apologies in advance if I am missing something. I would love to keep the image if possible. Just don't get how it is legit though.TCO (talk) 16:51, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy. - Norbert Nagel (talk) 16:38, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy. - Norbert Nagel (talk) 16:41, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Non-free in home country (South Africa) until 50 years after death of the author, which is 2017. Consequently non-free in the US until 95 years after publication (2032). Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:48, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content. Martin H. (talk) 21:27, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Image is of web-resolution and does not cite a source. No indication that uploader is copyright owner. This could, theoretically, be a derivative work, but nothing in Category:Juanes could have been the source. Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:47, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Possible copyvio. {{Own}} claim is doubtful. This image was used here in 2009. This image was used here in 2010. Takabeg (talk) 11:24, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
very small photo, is it of any use? Mjrmtg (talk) 00:00, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
The image appears to be a scaled down version of one at http://www.trilobites.info/species4.html (direct image URL). [2] proves that the source website had the image in 2005 and the author there unambiguously claims authorship. UserB (talk) 15:52, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
The artwork of Ryōhei Koiso (1903 – 1988) is still copyrighted. Takabeg (talk) 02:26, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Low quality (have higher-res png and also svg in Category:Lamivudine and not the correct stereoisomer (compare to File:Lamivudine.svg, which matches the manufacturer's product insert) DMacks (talk) 02:29, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Incorrect enantiomer (compare to File:Lamivudine.svg, which matches the manufacturer's product insert); unused, and that svg has long been noted as a higher-quality replacement anyway DMacks (talk) 02:30, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
This was one of my first transfers to commons and back then I was transferring all stuff tagged as public domain. This photo appears with the same resolution @ http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Geography/Europe/Greece/The-Greek-Islands/Crete/Historic-Buildings/Venetian-Fortress-Irakleio/Lion-of-St-Mark-Detail/Lion-of-St-Mark-Detail-1.html and it is tagged as copyrighted out there. During my years of administratorship on Romanian Wikipedia, I deleted dozens of Ugo's images tagged with PD but actually copied from the internet, and I have no reason to beleive this one makes an exception. An additional check is however needed to verify the image status. // Gikü said done Sunday, 2 June 2013 18:11 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Personal image, out of scope Pleclown (talk) 08:26, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Copyvio. Soviet composer Boris Mokrousov died in 1968. Soviet poet Aleksey Surkov died in 1983. Takabeg (talk) 10:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
NC not allowed McZusatz (talk) 13:30, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- https://secure.flickr.com/photos/loub_gerhard/8825199332/ --McZusatz (talk) 13:31, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Unused crop, replaced by File:Meyer's Ornament Dreischneuß.png Perhelion (talk) 02:23, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Unused crop, replaced by File:Meyer's Ornament Sechsschneuß.png Perhelion (talk) 02:21, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Unused crop, replaced by File:Meyer's Ornament Vierschneuß.png Perhelion (talk) 02:24, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Unused crop, replaced by File:Meyer's Ornament Vierschneuß2.png Perhelion (talk) 02:26, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Unused crop, replaced by File:Meyer's Ornament Zweischneuß.png Perhelion (talk) 02:25, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:51, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Looks like a typical product promotional image - many matches with web images and far bigger sizes - https://www.google.co.uk/search?newwindow=1&safe=off&sa=N&hl=en&q=micromax+mobile+a70&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSZxplCxCo1NgEGgQIAAgDDAsQsIynCBo8CjoIARIUpQb7BvoGlAaNBooGhwbHB9MHxgcaIJ-Y4m7DL55V63tbg_1vMm3TPBZJlmJiTarR2m3l6gJZ7DAsQjq7-CBoKCggIARIEnZCYRAw&ei=U5-rUZCxMoOVO9LbgdAB&ved=0CCoQ2A4oAQ&biw=1196&bih=762#facrc=_&imgrc=wQ75mQACfP9FaM%3A%3BdgHzu3csMDPDpM%3Bhttps%253A%252F%252Fehip-news.s3.amazonaws.com%252Fuploads%252Fpost%252Fcimage%252F2012%252F12%252F11%252F102%252FMicromaxA70.png%3Bhttps%253A%252F%252Fwww.ehipnews.com%252Fposts%252Fmicromax-the-most-popular-smartphone-and-tablet-brand-in-india%3B320%3B409 - sizes up to 1000x1000 pixels and certainly cannot be derrived from the commons image. Ronhjones (Talk) 19:42, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted artwork: no freedom of panorama in Italy 178.10.107.62 12:33, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Commons:FOP#Italy.--Wdwd (talk) 13:14, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
http://spongebob.wikia.com/wiki/File:Doug_Lawrence.jpg has no authorship information nor source information, so it can't really be trusted as being a source for us russavia (talk) 15:02, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
CD cover. Copyvio ? Pleclown (talk) 08:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy. - Norbert Nagel (talk) 16:27, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy. - Norbert Nagel (talk) 16:30, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy. - Norbert Nagel (talk) 15:54, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy. - Norbert Nagel (talk) 16:33, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The University of California, Berkeley is not a part of the US Federal Government. This also affects File:Species on earth.jpg. —LX (talk, contribs) 14:12, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete This is not a 100% clear cut case as works of the state of California are public domain - see {{PD-CAGov}} and en:Wikipedia:Public_domain_status_of_official_government_works#Template:PD-CAGov. I don't think, though, that this rule applies to public universities in California - a lot of times, universities are independent agencies (analogous to the US Postal Service) and so California's public domain law wouldn't apply. --UserB (talk) 18:53, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
no description, generic children, out of scope Pibwl (talk) 23:54, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Seal of a city with more than PD-ineligible work; unlikely uploader created. (ESkog)(Talk) 22:24, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Freedom of Panorama does not apply in Norway Themightyquill (talk) 00:11, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
copyrighted material? Only contribution of this user, unused. Pibwl (talk) 22:32, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Several errors:
- The artists were not employed by the US government but by Walt Disney Productions, so {{PD-USGov}} is not a valid licence template for this file.
- This is a derivative work of the copyrighted character Donald Duck. Stefan4 (talk) 08:54, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
No need for hand-drawn rendition, when we have File:Phosphoric-acid-2D-dimensions.png DMacks (talk) 11:29, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Low quality; have a ton of Category:Phosphoric acid DMacks (talk) 11:25, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted material? Pibwl (talk) 21:52, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
I believe this is fair use and not legally available under a free license. Trijnsteltalk 18:24, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- Note that Prince Nikola of Yugoslavia lived from 1928 until 1954 so it can't be in the public domain either. Trijnsteltalk 18:25, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
no description, of of scope (one of 5 contributions of this user) Pibwl (talk) 23:55, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
no description, of of scope (one of 5 contributions of this user) Pibwl (talk) 23:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
no description, of of scope (one of 5 contributions of this user) Pibwl (talk) 23:55, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
COM:TOYS Stefan4 (talk) 17:46, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
commons is not a family album - only contribution of this user, unused. Pibwl (talk) 22:25, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Low quality, not sure what the scope or use would be. Wizardman 02:33, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
blurred, no info, no category, unused Pibwl (talk) 22:02, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
blurred, no possible use, unidentified object Pibwl (talk) 22:16, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
blurred, no possible use, uidentified Pibwl (talk) 22:16, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, no description, no category, unused Pibwl (talk) 22:01, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
blurred, no possible use Pibwl (talk) 22:04, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
blurred, no possible use Pibwl (talk) 22:04, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
blurred, no possible use Pibwl (talk) 22:05, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
some generic river, no info, not used Pibwl (talk) 22:05, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
blurred, no use Pibwl (talk) 22:06, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Maybe a SVG bug? The logo on http://www.grupo-sm.com looks different. Leyo 11:41, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy. - Norbert Nagel (talk) 15:57, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy. - Norbert Nagel (talk) 16:02, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Funny, but out of COM:SCOPE and some doubts about the authorship by the uploader. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:01, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
obvious nonfree image DHN (talk) 23:48, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Dmitri Shostakovich died in 1975. Probably this performance was made by the uploader, but the music is still copyrighted. Takabeg (talk) 11:35, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
copyrighted material? Not used in any article Pibwl (talk) 21:54, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
what's the use of this photo? No info, no category. Pibwl (talk) 22:10, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
{{Self}} claim is doubtful. Takabeg (talk) 11:10, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Derivative of a temporarily shown artwork. No evidence on permission by the original author. A.Savin 11:05, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Freedom of Panorama does not apply in Norway Themightyquill (talk) 00:09, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
- Restored per UDR - Jcb (talk) 22:29, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Freedom of Panorama does not apply in Norway Themightyquill (talk) 00:06, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
- Restored per UDR - Jcb (talk) 22:29, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Image is from this 2005 blog entry - http://lancelet.blogspot.com/2005/12/species-is-as-species-does-part-ii.html (archive.org link proving the image was there first) UserB (talk) 12:26, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content. Martin H. (talk) 17:10, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Derivative of a painting by an artist who died in 2012. No details on permision by the author or heirs. A.Savin 10:14, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Freedom of Panorama does not apply in Norway Themightyquill (talk) 00:08, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [3]. Yann (talk) 18:33, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Freedom of Panorama does not apply in Norway Themightyquill (talk) 00:06, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
- Undeleted after expiration of copyright term. De728631 (talk) 23:36, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Freedom of Panorama does not apply in Norway Themightyquill (talk) 00:06, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
- Undeleted after expiration of copyright term. De728631 (talk) 23:35, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Freedom of Panorama does not apply in Norway Themightyquill (talk) 00:08, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- Gustav Vigeland, the sole author of the sculptures, died 12 March 1943 - Quistnix (talk) 06:12, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- ...which means they would become Public Domain in Norway in January 2014. As for the US, it would be much longer. - Themightyquill (talk) 18:06, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
obvious nonfree image DHN (talk) 23:48, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
out of project scope MoiraMoira (talk) 16:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - it's not holiday album (one of user's only two contributions) Pibwl (talk) 22:49, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Text-only document, some homepage text, out of project score Motopark (talk) 14:46, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
copyrighted material? Unused Pibwl (talk) 22:33, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
some generic road, no info, no use Pibwl (talk) 22:03, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Suspected Flickr laundering, as the Flickr gallery contains three images circulating elsewhere on the web, with no indication that the uploader owns the copyright. DAJF (talk) 10:37, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Part of a copyright advertising poster. No indication of permission to reuse by the original author. DAJF (talk) 13:46, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:11, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Copyrighted material? Pibwl (talk) 22:23, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
looks like copyrighted material Pibwl (talk) 00:00, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
too small to be of any use, unused in articles, without clear description Pibwl (talk) 22:48, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
has some watermark, only contribution of this user, unused Pibwl (talk) 22:41, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope Liliana-60 (talk) 20:05, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope Liliana-60 (talk) 20:05, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
out of scope Liliana-60 (talk) 19:52, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
another penis Pibwl (talk) 22:14, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, not unique or high quality here. -- Cirt (talk) 20:39, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete it's small (less than 1 megapixel), and so badly out of focus that it's already blurry. 217.88.173.203 05:22, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Not clear what is its copyright status and what it's supposed to be, not used in any article. Pibwl (talk) 21:55, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:41, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:L. Golikov street memory board
[edit]Derivative work of Soviet relief created after 1945. No FoP in Russia.
A.Savin 11:00, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Seibu Railway
[edit]copyrighted logo of a company. The logo passes threshold of originality. The logo consists of two different coloured (blue and light blue) rings that cross each other and a green leaf-like original shape positioned above the rings.
- File:New seibu logo.jpg
- File:Seibu railways NEWlogo.jpg
- File:SeibuRailway logo.svg
- File:SeibuRailway mark.svg
Nightingale (talk) 00:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep The SVGs, delete the JPEGs. The logo is too simple, PD-textlogo and PD-shape apply. Fry1989 eh? 20:40, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- Disagree The logo does not "only consists of simple geometric shapes and/or text," It shows originality in how shapes are positioned in the logo and how each element is coloured in the logo. Whether file is svg or jpg is not relevant in this discussion. IMO, only text part of the logo, 西武鉄道, may qualify as PD-textlogo but not entire image of File:SeibuRailway logo.svg.--Nightingale (talk) 00:25, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
- Any idiot can link two circles together, there is nothing special about that. All that's left is the leaf, which by itself also isn't complicated enough. There's nothing copyrighted here. Fry1989 eh? 00:33, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
CommentFor your information there is a brief description how the logo was designed.- http://www.seibu-group.co.jp/railways/company/profile/vision.html
社名左側のマークは、西武グループの「西」の文字がモチーフ。2つの輪は、人と人、地域と地域、都市と自然など、さまざまなものが出会い、交わり、つながる姿を表しています。マーク全体が果実のように見えるデザインは、その交流によって生まれる「実り」、「地域・社会の発展」を表しています。若葉を思わせる上部のグリーンは「自然との調和」を、落ち着いたブルーは「信頼」「安全・安心」、明るいブルーは「新しいことへの挑戦」をイメージしています。
- My translation as follows;
The logo is a motif of "西" of 西武グループ, Seibu Group.(note: this is a quite common way of logo designing in Japan where Kanji or Hiragana characters derived from company name are used to deform in order to create logos; deformation is in general author's creative design process.) Two rings entangled each other represent conceptually form of encounter, exchange and connection of people, local communities, and urban and countryside. The logo as a whole was designed so that it looks like a fruit. The logo represents "fruits" of such interchange and development of the local community and society. The colour of green young leaf on upper part of the logo is an image of harmony with nature;the calm dark blue is an image of trust and safety/peace of mind; the light blue is an image of a challenge to something new.
- Taking the way of choosing of colours and of positioning three shapes two of which entangle each other into account, this logo is the product of author's creativity based on the understanding of the concept. Therefore this logo passes threshold of originality. IMO, we should respect the Seibu's copyright.--Nightingale (talk) 04:49, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
- If they had a copyright, yes we should respect it. But this is TOO SIMPLE for copyright. Look at the olympic rings, that's 5 circles looped together and it's considered too simple for copyright. This is only 2, it's too simple. You failed to provide proof that a copyright has been granted, all you have given is an opinion piece on the design itself, it mentions nothing of the copyright status. Fry1989 eh? 17:00, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
- Taking the way of choosing of colours and of positioning three shapes two of which entangle each other into account, this logo is the product of author's creativity based on the understanding of the concept. Therefore this logo passes threshold of originality. IMO, we should respect the Seibu's copyright.--Nightingale (talk) 04:49, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep They only consist of simple shapes and text. I think they do not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection. Also I think they are not protected under Japanese Copyright Act. I think they are not artistic works and they are not crafts of artistic value (bijutsukougeihin). 日本の著作権法において著作物とされるのは「文芸、学術、美術又は音楽の範囲に属するもの」（2条1項1号）です。当該マークは、もっぱら鑑賞を目的として作られていて実用性を有しないような作品ではありませんから、いわゆる「純粋美術」ではないと言えます。実用品に美術あるいは美術上の感覚・技法を応用したような「応用美術」については、美術工芸品（2条2項）であれば認められるところですが、当該マークは美術工芸品ではありません。判例では、この他の応用美術について「応用美術一般に著作権法による保護が及ぶものとまで解することはできない」などとしつつも、「実用性の面を離れてもなお一つの完結した美術作品として美的鑑賞の対象となりうる」「専ら美の表現を追求して制作されたものと認められ、絵画、彫刻等の純粋美術と同視しうる」「実用性や機能性とは別に、独立して美的鑑賞の対象となるだけの美術性を有するに至っているため、一定の美的感覚を備えた一般人を基準に、純粋美術と同視し得る程度の美的創作性を具備している」ようなものは保護対象となるべきとしています。しかし、当該マークは単純な図形の組み合わせであり、単体で独立して純粋美術と同視しうるような美的鑑賞の対象物となるとは思えず、美術の著作物に当たらないと考えます。--Mugu-shisai (talk) 15:35, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
- (explain in English for the case of Japan) Copyright Act of Japan protect production which falls within the literary, scientific, artistic or musical domain (Article 2, paragraph (1), item (i).). In this Act, "Artistic work" is interpreted as fine art in general. A work of crafts of artistic value is the applied art, but it is included in the "Artistic work" by Article 2, paragraph (2) exceptionally. According to court precedents, other applied art is not protected all, but applied art with aesthetic value similar to the fine art is protected. But this mark consists of too simple shapes and text. This mark does not seem that there is aesthetic value like fine art. So this mark may be subject to trademark laws, but would not be subject to copyright law.--Mugu-shisai (talk) 14:52, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Per Fry1989 and Mugu-shisai. I believe this is below the threshold of originality, comparable to the Olympic symbol precedent cited in COM:TOO#Japan. whym (talk) 05:46, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Looks like collection of promo/fan/hiostorical photos, not own work.
- File:Mi ex me tiene ganas, Venevisión, 2012.1.jpg
- File:Jonathan y Yelena4.jpg
- File:Voltea Pa Que Te Enamores 1.jpg
- File:Yelena y Jonathan2.jpg
- File:Sol de Tentación2.jpg
- File:Amalia Pérez y Jonathan.jpg
- File:Voltea pa que te enamores2.jpg
- File:La bella durmiente y el príncipe valiente.jpg
- File:Emily Montenegro.jpg
- File:Jonathan y Sophia.jpg
- File:Jonathan, Patricia Schwarzgruber y Sophia.jpg
- File:Juliet y Jonathan.jpg
- File:Libres como el viento, RCTV, 2009.jpg
- File:La Cuaima, RCTV, 2003.jpg
- File:Mi ex me tiene ganas, Venevisión, 2012.jpg
- File:Mis 3 Hermanas, RCTV 2000.jpg
- File:Jonathan y Yelena.jpg
- File:La Dama de Rosa.jpg
- File:Jonathan Montenegro niño1.jpg
- File:Menudo.jpg
- File:Jonathan Montenegro niño.jpg
- File:Jonathan Dama de Rosa.jpg
- File:JonathanMontenegro.jpg
- File:Jeannette, Carlos y Jonathan Dama de Rosa.jpg
- File:Jonathan y Patricia boda.jpg
- File:Jonathan-Fiesta del fin del mundo.jpg
- File:Jonathan y Jennifer Rodríguez.jpg
- File:Jonathan y Daniela Bascope.jpg
- File:Menudo1.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Can COM:DM be applied in this? Ralgis (talk) 04:59, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- The picture was taken by me at a supermarket and illustrates the anti-smoking campaign held in Uruguay
- --fedaro (talk) 19:03, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
- Fedaro, I'm not discussing your authorship but the legal reason to consider this campaign trivial enough to consider that the consent of the copyright owner is not required. More can be read at Commons:De minimis and Commons:Derivative works. --Ralgis (talk) 00:09, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW Alan (talk) 11:17, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Motopark as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-J4Amdd-btgc/USDkaF24toI/AAAAAAAAAQU/gZCf6eg9NE4/s320/378100_300137920026047_29983634_n.jpg
Converted by me to DR, as image was posted in 2008 to http://olinto-buitrago-curriculum-vitae.blogspot.de/2008_11_01_archive.html, a page which may be associated to the uploader. Needs OTRS-permission. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:22, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Marked with {{No permission since}} Alan (talk) 11:20, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Marcus Qwertyus as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: free does not equal public domain
Converted by me from speedy to DR, as deletion of an image uploaded in 2007 merits a bit more discussion, if it's not a blatant copyvio. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:39, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Kept: There is reasonable doubt, uploaded since 6 years Alan (talk) 11:22, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Not entirely sure I see the purpose to this image. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:51, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete --Isderion (talk) 16:32, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, not certain what usage could be applied here. -- Cirt (talk) 20:40, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep I thought it was quite funny (translation: "Semen is the tears of a penis in love", and on the paper it says "I miss you"). Some humorous images are in scope, such as Category:Comic cartoons; why isn't this one? Handcuffed (talk) 21:28, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - outside of project scope. There is no forseeable educational use for this photo. --UserB (talk) 22:22, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted per majority of comments. Re the contrary vote that found it amusing: note also very poor photo quality. -- Infrogmation (talk) 03:05, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Tiven2240 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: As per COM:NUDE Not a copyright violation, but a low-quality PENIS pic that we could stand to delete. Storkk (talk) 13:25, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
- Also File:Labios menores.jpg for the same reason, also tagged by Tiven2240 as a copyvio citing COM:NUDE. Storkk (talk) 13:28, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:01, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
duplicita Colour in the Flower Garden110.jpg I.Sáček, senior (talk) 20:53, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: File:Colour in the Flower Garden110.jpg Alan (talk) 11:27, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Colorized and background cleaned version from this. There is no licence for this work! Ras67 (talk) 21:11, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:28, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
out of COM:SCOPE INeverCry 22:24, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PS Alan (talk) 11:29, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
{{Delete |reason= This is not an approved phot.... please delete this image from the Wiki database. Thx. |subpage=Commons:Deletion requests/File:Blake.jpg |day=2 |month=June |year=2013 }} — Preceding unsigned comment added by BlakeAproducer (talk • contribs) 2013-06-02T23:42:45 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PS Alan (talk) 11:30, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
It is a poor recreation of the original, intended for tourist sale. The original is much more elaborate, and can be seen here: http://digitaltmuseum.no/things/osebergteppet/NF/NF.07558-001 Narssarssuaq (talk) 00:33, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
It is a poor recreation of the original, intended for tourist sale. The original is much more elaborate, and can be seen here: http://digitaltmuseum.no/things/osebergteppet/NF/NF.07558-001 Narssarssuaq (talk) 00:34, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
The text is public domain, but what about the image? The only thing we know is that it was published in 1932. Even if we assume the artist died by 1945 (a sadly quite probable fact for a Polish Jew), it's still not out of copyright in Poland. And we can't really assume that. (Assume no US copyright formalities, it would be out of copyright if and only if it were out of copyright in Poland in 1996 = author died before 1946.) Prosfilaes (talk) 04:29, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:01, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Because the image shown in the article is based on the old Aquacell battery branding. The have updated their brand identity and the batteries look completely different at this moment. 210.6.53.25 04:30, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:01, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Wizardman as duplicate (dup) and the most recent rationale was: licate|File:Agriculture33.jpg. Not an exact duplicate, however, the replacement file does look significantly better. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:03, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:01, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Wizardman as duplicate (dup) and the most recent rationale was: licate|File:Agriculture33.jpg. Not exact duplicate, through are same image. One has larger amount of whitespace, which seems unrequired. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:05, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:01, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Not informative name. I am going to re-upload with better name Garrondo (talk) 10:53, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
It is unclear whether the uploader thinks that this is in the public domain.
The performance and sound recording come from Youtube and there is no evidence that the copyright on the performance or that the copyright on the sound recording have expired.
Youtube credits the song to Kim Ch'an-ho (lyrics) and Yi Kyo-suk (music). This page mentions some Yi Kyo-suk, born in 1924 and still alive as of 2007, who held various music-related positions within the South Korean Navy, so that is likely the right person. There seems to be a high possibility that this is a work for hire, but it seems that the copyright template requires that this was published more than 50 years before 1996 (for it to be in the public domain in the United States) or 50 years before 2013 (for it to be in the public domain in South Korea). From what I can see, the composer joined the South Korean Navy in 1949, so it seems unlikely that the song was composed before 1946, thereby making it copyrighted at least in the United States. Stefan4 (talk) 11:02, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:01, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
File is moved to similar filename 
MatthiasDD (talk) 15:35, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by BaldBoris as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.copa2014.gov.br/pt-br/galeria/maracana-detalhes-abril2013 KTo288 (talk) 20:09, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- Comment copyright disclaimer at bootom of the English version of the source website states All content on this site are published under the, Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 3.0 Brasil, do we take this at face value, that all text pictures, logos and designs etc have been released under cc?--KTo288 (talk) 20:16, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- For images, apparently yes. Regarding logos etc. apparently not, as it is quite doubtful that Fifa will give away copyrights on their logos for World Cup and/or Confederation Cup (see bottom of http://www.copa2014.gov.br/pt-br/galeria/maracana-detalhes-abril2013). Especially in this case the license is "exaggerating"... Well, saying this, I remember of Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2013/03#www.copa2014.gov.br where I contacted a news agency (MoWA Sports) with photos credited with "Mowa Sports" published at copa2014.gov.br (like this recent example). The answer from Mowa was: "The cited agreement doesn´t exist. (...) Any other use is not covered and must be negotiated case by case with us". As I already said at Village pump: "As I understand, copa2014.gov.br seems to be a customer of MoWA but is abusing contract and/or licensing conditions. The whole thing seems to be buggy. At copa2014.gov.br we have a mixture of works by copa2014.gov.br and "other sources (...)"... Gunnex (talk) 20:49, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
All Maracana pictures from http://www.copa2014.gov.br/ are available under Creative Commons 3.0 and are work of photographers from state and federal government agencies. Gabriel arisi (talk) 01:43, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion JuTa 20:48, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Slick as duplicate (dup) and the most recent rationale was: File:Young_female_with_peanuts_in_Gambia.jpg Didym (talk) 21:11, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:01, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
I just moved this to Commons, but then I noticed something strange. It says that it was taken by "Ben Lewes W." but the uploader's user name is Frances76 which looks like a real name and is different. The uploader has uploaded lots of other photos taken using the same camera model telling that the "Photo [was] taken by Frances76". Not sure what this is supposed to mean. Stefan4 (talk) 21:39, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
duplicita s 18.7.04 Komín 025.jpg I.Sáček, senior (talk) 22:38, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:01, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Closed discussions from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Cloud Gate
|
|---|
|
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No COM:FOP in the US for sculptures.
russavia (talk) 09:52, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Without OTRS permission after 9 days Alan (talk) 11:25, 11 June 2013 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No COM:FOP in the US for sculptures.
russavia (talk) 16:25, 19 March 2014 (UTC) Deleted -FASTILY 07:40, 26 March 2014 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
As per this decision.
-- Tuválkin ✉ 09:09, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted some, kept some. For File:The Bean and McCormick Tribune Plaza.jpg, since it's being used to illustrate the plaza, it would be a better to crop out The Bean rather than deleting the whole thing. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:11, 22 August 2014 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Obviously, it's time for another Cloud Gate DR. I've tried to be as generous as I felt was reasonable about only including the images that violate the copyright in this sculpture. For context, en:Cloud Gate is a public sculpture erected in 2006 in McCormick Park in Chicago. It is not only copyrighted (with no FOP for sculpture in the US), but the City of Chicago has licensed it from the artist, and requires permission for any commercial use of photographs (which is incompatible with Commons). I've tried to weed out the ones where either the Bean is a de minimis aspect of an image of the park itself, or where it's shape is not visible and it's only 'a mirrored object'. Most of these are simply not okay.
Reventtalk 12:21, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 22 December 2016 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Regular cleaning of this category of new uploads of images that depict too much of this copyrighted work of art. - Reventtalk 22:04, 28 May 2017 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:22, 3 June 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No COM:FOP for sculpture in the US, as per Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Cloud Gate and the above.
— Jeff G. ツ 04:07, 2 November 2017 (UTC) In File:The Bean and McCormick Tribune Plaza.jpg, the bean is de minimis, image hardly even has the bean in the photo. The sculpture is not even visible in File:Tented cloud gate.jpg. File:Cloud gate construction.jpg is simply a photo of a construction site, the sculpture had yet to be erected. It is inarguably de minimis in File:2005-10-13 2880x1920 chicago above millennium park.jpg. It is also minimus in File:Millennium park,chicago.JPG. It is hardly even visible in File:Millenium Park (7391867314).jpg. Seems to be de minimus in File:Bean from Kemper Tower (14958184744).jpg. Also, hardly the primary focal point of the image File:Chicago Bean.jpg. Not at all included in the image File:Cloud gate, Chicago skyline.jpg, as far as I can tell (not sure why it is in this category). Certainly not included in the image File:2008TIBE Day5 Hall1 ThemeSquare On the Road with Cloud Gate.jpg (should not be in this category at all). Not the primary focal point of the image File:The Bean - Millennium Park - panoramio.jpg. Some of these certainly should be spared, and the category itself should not be deleted. SecretName101 (talk) 04:13, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
The deletion of File:2005-10-13 2880x1920 chicago above millennium park.jpg would be particularly catastrophic, and utterly unnecessary. This is a valuable (and widely-used) image, in which the sculpture inarguably is de minimus. SecretName101 (talk) 04:28, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: most per nom. 'kept some due to de minimis or similar. --JuTa 09:47, 13 December 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
still copyrighted, noting here so that it may be undeleted someday Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:54, 25 January 2019 (UTC) Deleted: speedily deleted as copyvios. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:54, 25 January 2019 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Copyrighted work, no freedom of panorama for public art in the US.
— Rhododendrites talk | 16:43, 26 March 2020 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:25, 14 May 2020 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No FOP for sculpture in the US, and per Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Cloud Gate and the above.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:35, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Some of them can be cropped or have the work of art blurred out of them, and still be useful. I deleted the obvious cases, though.-- Darwin Ahoy! 16:39, 3 April 2021 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Another set of derivative work copyvios: of a sculpture protected by copyright by its living artist w:Anish Kapoor. Previously these were categorized under Category:Millennium Park so they got undetected. See [8] and [9] for the basis of nomination for these perhaps last non-trivial images of the copyrighted sculpture. There is no freedom of panorama for all copyrighted artworks in the United States, see COM:FOP US. US de minimis is sharper (COM:DM United States), as it uses "triviality" concept instead of "incidental".
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:43, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Still another set of derivative work copyright violations. No FOP of any sort for copyrighted public works in the U.S. except architecture, and sculptor Anish Kapoor does not allow free culture (commercial) reuses of visual appearances of "his" artwork! See also above nominations. American de minimis uses triviality concept instead of incidental/accessory concept like those in Europe or much of Asia.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:53, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Cleaned up the nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:24, 5 October 2021 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
There is no freedom of panorama for copyrighted public art in the United States, and none of the nominated images show the sculpture in a trivial manner (U.S. de minimis is too narrower than European ones). This sculpture has been the subject of a copyright lawsuit by its living sculptor, Anish Kapoor, against a commercial user, NRA. See also the following resources regarding Kapoor's lawsuit against NRA: Artnet, The Guardian, and BBC.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:41, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted all but one per DM. — Racconish 💬 15:04, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Several new files have been added that populate this category. I'm also tagging several older files that haven't been discussed before to gather consensus on whether they should be kept on de minimis grounds. At issue is that these files depict Cloud Gate, a copyrighted sculpture permanently installed in the US where there is no freedom of panorama for public art. Quoting an earlier successful deletion request, "this sculpture has been the subject of a copyright lawsuit by its living sculptor, Anish Kapoor, against a commercial user, NRA. See also the following resources regarding Kapoor's lawsuit against NRA: Artnet, The Guardian, and BBC." IMO the litigousness of the copyright holder should not affect our consistent application of standards around copyright law but it's been brought up before so I suppose it's worth bringing up again. First, there is one photo that is entirely of Cloud Gate for which a de minimis rationale would not apply: Second, there are several photos in which Cloud Gate appears at a distince within the larger context of the setting. A de minimis arguement could be made for these, and we have kept two files in the past (File:2005-10-13 2880x1920 chicago above millennium park.jpg and File:Millennium park,chicago.JPG) on these grounds. However, in both of those cases Cloud Gate is a significantly smaller and less focal portion of the image.
Third, several photos depict a portion of Cloud Gate up close, often with the inclusion of other elements in the foreground or background. Do these files qualify as de minimis inclusion of the copyrighted work? Consider this file which had most of Cloud Gate coropped out to focus on the background elements instead.
Finally, one photo is simply a selfie taken by way of the mirrored surface of Cloud Gate. This might be argued to be entirely a photo of the sculpture, or to be a completely de minimis usage. In either case, I'm nominating it here for consensus: Any of these files that aren't deleted (or that are partially cropped and saved) can be added to Category:Incidental views of the Cloud Gate. Thanks! Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 17:37, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - kept one. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:58, 7 June 2024 (UTC) |
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
._Dated_Year_420_of_the_Paschal_cycle_(AD_1200).jpg){kind=link}
![20 File:"Come On Fellows^ The U.S.O's for the U.S.A." - NARA - 514069-2011-07-12.png](#File:"Come_On_Fellows^_The_U.S.O's_for_the_U.S.A."_-_NARA_-_514069-2011-07-12.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
._Dated_Year_420_of_the_Paschal_cycle_(AD_1200).jpg){kind=link}
._Dated_Year_420_of_the_Paschal_cycle_(AD_1200).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(4131954934).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(4865734246).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_at_night_2.jpg){kind=link}
_at_night.jpg){kind=link}
,_downtown_Chicago.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(302020237).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_at_night_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_at_night.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_downtown_Chicago.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(302020237).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(9179489717).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(9179490139).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(9179492567).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(9179493853).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(9179495047).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(9179495495).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(9181703314).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(9181706070).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(11004162135).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(11004164355).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(11004257826).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(11004321464).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(11004322814).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(11004323314).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Millennium_Park,_Chicago,_Illinois_(11004382903).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Chicago_1_26_18_(26388865178).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Chicago_1_26_18_(39343630775).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Chicago,_IL.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Flickr_-_jmcmichael.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio_(1).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio_(4).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio_(5).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(222198161).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(222198196).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(222198236).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Millenium_Park_(35549620631).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Millenium_Park_(35549628831).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Millenium_Park_(35549635591).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Millenium_Park_(35640530046).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Millenium_Park_(35679751185).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(222198259).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(222198289).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Millenium_Park_(34839034874).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Millenium_Park_(34839040474).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Millenium_Park_(35549651301).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Flickr_-_vanz.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(222198126).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(222198144).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(801715).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Files in Category:Cloud Gate 14
[edit]- File:Miniature Bean (28865844563)~3.jpg
- File:The Bean, Millennium Park, Chicago, Illinois (28865844563)~4.jpg
~3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
~4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama for sculpture in the US, and per Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Cloud Gate and the above. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 03:39, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, many similar earlier listings. COM:DW. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:46, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Freedom of Panorama does not apply in Norway Themightyquill (talk) 00:09, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep – it's a photo of a park, not of copyrighted artworks. Regards, Kjetil_r 15:41, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- Comment: I guess you could claim de minimis here, but it might be a hard case to make, since Category:Frogner Park is full of photos that aren't made up mostly of sculptures. - Themightyquill (talk) 18:05, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- Any photos in Category:Frogner Park that have sculptures as their main subject should of couse be deleted (and undeleted on 2014-01-01, when Vigeland's works fall into the public domain!). However: I don't see how that's relevant when we are discussing this particular photo.
- I do see that File:Frogner Park in Oslo (edit) is sort of a gray area, but when I uploaded it, I used it as in a "green spaces in Oslo" section in the generic Oslo article, ment to illustrate a major park, and not the sculptures in it. I would have used it in the article even if the big monolith in the background wasn't there. Kjetil_r 21:43, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- It seems to me that a lot of this photo is made up of sculptures, fountain and monolith, and it's clearly centred on the monolith. I'm not really qualified to judge if de minimis would be acceptable here. As for deleting in 2014, that's also debatable, since they won't be PD in the United States for a long time after that, unfortunately. =( - Themightyquill (talk) 19:32, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep – Overview of the park. - Mr. Hill (talk) 22:02, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no FOP in Norway. The fountain + statue appear to be on of the subjects of the photo, making it a derivative of non-free content which is prohibited on Commons FASTILY 07:22, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Restored per UDR - Jcb (talk) 22:22, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
- As well as duplicate: File:TURNER TURNPIKE.png
Logo copyrighted by the Oklahoma Turnpike Authority. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 00:42, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Too simple for copyright in the US. Fry1989 eh? 03:04, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Kept: pd-simple FASTILY 07:20, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
SVG version available (see here): exact duplicate file, same size. — TintoMeches, 17:30, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 07:22, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
no proof or indication of when/if it was published INeverCry 18:44, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - This is a copyright violation. The file uses an improper licence. There is no mention of author of the photo's name on the source and the work is copyrighted.--Farhikht (talk) 21:10, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 07:22, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 21:43, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep It's not out of project scope, it's a public person that his Wikipedia article hasn't been created yet. The photo is own work, besides this person is a notable journalist of the Dominican Republic.--Inefable001 (talk) 21:57, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: speedied as spam FASTILY 07:23, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
it is a fake. This picture does not designate any dinosaur track, but simply a modern track of some animal. Tatoute (talk) 12:06, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
- Keep, in use. You can use {{Fact disputed}} and express your concerns on the talk page of the image. –Tryphon☂ 06:58, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
- Keep , in case rename it. But have in mind that paleontology advances also using moder analogies, if this is an actual track (but you should wonder about some perfect fossils track founds around in the world), so this photos can be used as actual (if it is actual) example to explain what are the fossils tracks and how are formed and what you can tell from those (see mud cracks, relative position or feet, depth of each foorprint in teh groound, etc, etc ...) if you are an expert of this field.--Bramfab (talk) 09:21, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
- Nominator should ask the original uploader, Philca, where he got the photo from. FunkMonk (talk) 01:11, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- The prints are quite similar to these in the American Museum of Natural History: http://www.flickr.com/photos/criminalintent/4022626282/in/photostream/ FunkMonk (talk) 16:33, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
Image is cropped from http://sigep.cprm.gov.br/sitio026/sitio026.htm (direct image link) UserB (talk) 12:25, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- Seems the upload info was fraudulent then. FunkMonk (talk) 06:12, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Copyvio -FASTILY 07:22, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Marcus Qwertyus as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: County works are not ordinarily published as public domain
Converted by me from speedy to DR, as deletion of older uploads merits some discussion. However, in this case I support deletion as the at-upload-statement "This work was produced by Alamance County Government and is public domain" seems not to be based on fact, as a county gov. is not US-Federal Gov and as the ToU for Alamance County gov website[11] clearly claims copyright for all works on their website. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:47, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Not Federal work as copyright tag claims; no indication of free licensed status for any other reason. -- 20:18, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: unclear copyright status FASTILY 08:18, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
keine Rechte, mit neuem Bild ersetzt Hokemo TV 08:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep, war zuerst (28. Mai 2013) mit "Own work" gekennzeichnet und zeigt mehr Details als File:Bildstock2.JPG.--MatthiasDD (talk) 21:24, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Kept: apparently ok FASTILY 08:18, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Изображение в файле не соответствует действительности, даёт ошибочную информакцию. Правильное изображение использжовано, например, в English-версии Wiki. 93.80.39.49 09:54, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Uncorrect image / information. See English wiki for correct one. 93.80.39.49 09:59, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- Please provide details and links or this will be speedy closed. --Denniss (talk) 12:20, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Kept: no reason given to delete FASTILY 08:17, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Marcus Qwertyus as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Incorrect license. You didn't take the photo.
Converted by me from speedy to DR, as deletion of an image uploaded in 2008 merits a discussion. Personally, I find the rationale by the uploader "Photo of me (Steven Fruitsmaak) taken by a nurse at my instructions and my request with a camera I gave her, and for which I asked her permission to use it without restrictions for any purpose." credible and overall acceptable. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:33, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- Agree: it's not because I told here to take my picture with these and these settings, what should be in the image and what not etc., that clicking the button made her the creator of the work, she was just following instructions. Even then, she gave permission so it could be changed from self-PD to PD. Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 17:24, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 19:30, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope flag maps (part 2)
[edit]- File:Flag map of Australia (Australian Colonial Flag).png
- File:Flag Map of Australia (Eureka Flag).png
- File:Flag-map of Australia (civil ensign).svg
- File:Flag-map of Austria (state ensigns).svg
- File:Flag-map of Colombia (civil ensigns).svg
- File:Flag map of Greater Carolina (South Carolina).png
- File:Flag map of Greater Virginia.png
- File:Flag map of Massachusetts (Naval Flag).png
- File:Flag map of Massachusetts (1980-1971).png
- File:Flag-map of Samoa-USA.svg
- File:Flag Map of Korea (North Korea).png
- File:Flag map of Korea (Workers Party of Korea).png
- File:Flag-map of North Korea (Workers' Party of Korea).svg
- File:Flag map of North Korea (democratic).png
- File:Flag Map of North Korea (Soviet Civil Authority) 1946-1948.png
- File:Flag map of Namibia (SWAPO).png
- File:Flag map of South Africa (South African Communist Party).png
- File:Flag map of Italy (National Fascist Party).png
- File:Flag map of the World (Communist).png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1946-1948.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
These flag maps are out of scope for the project. Fry1989 eh? 00:38, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- Well, File:Flag Map of North Korea (Soviet Civil Authority) 1946-1948.png is within the project's scope, as it represents the real period in the history of the country. Elmor (talk) 04:17, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
- Historically accurate doesn't automatically mean scope. Does it have a reasonable expectation of use? That is part of the equation for me. Fry1989 eh? 04:25, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
- Well, it can easily be used as a stub icon for articles related to this period, or in order to show the borders of North Korea just after division (which is important since they are diffent from current ones). Elmor (talk) 14:39, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
- Historically accurate doesn't automatically mean scope. Does it have a reasonable expectation of use? That is part of the equation for me. Fry1989 eh? 04:25, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
- Strongly Keep File:Flag-map of Australia (civil ensign).svg, since the red flag was more often used than the blue flag for several decades...
- Keep File:Flag-map of North Korea (Workers' Party of Korea).svg -- seems to accurately depict the current situation in a similar way to File:Flag Map of Spain (Falangist).png
- File:Flag map of Greater Virginia.png -- keep if the seal existed in 1863 (so that the image would be historically accurate), otherwise delete...
- Delete File:Flag map of Greater Carolina (South Carolina).png -- doesn't seem to make too much sense..
- Delete File:Flag map of South Africa (South African Communist Party).png -- seems rather strange and not useful...
- Don't know or don't care about most of the rest... AnonMoos (talk) 07:20, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Political parties, ensigns, and terrorist group flags are all out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 17:03, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
- The Australian red ensign was the de facto Australian military flag on land and alternate national flag during crucial periods of Australia's history, and it wasn't until 1953 that blue was fully officially definitively decided on in opposition to red. If you want to get rid of an ensign flag map, then nominate for deletion the U.S. Yacht flag map which I mentioned before, but the Australian red ensign does not seem to me to be low-hanging fruit. And I don't know how "terrorism" is relevant to my remarks... AnonMoos (talk) 21:08, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
- Because the Commonwealth Government was the only body authorised to fly the blue ensign until the 50s, it was still the legal national flag. Terrorism is relevant because in my previous DR I nominated a flag map of Uganda with the Lord's Resistance Army, and I'll probably be nominating similar flags. It's obvious that I am grouping the flags of political parties, terrorist groups, & naval ensigns together as out of the main focus of the flag maps project. Fry1989 eh? 21:12, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
- Before the 1960s, some Australians were probably under the impression that their flag was red, and it still has strong associations with Australia's military history, so I don't think it's useful to delete File:Flag-map of Australia (civil ensign).svg . And I didn't say anything at all about the Uganda one last time or this time, so I'm not sure why you're cudgelling me with it now... AnonMoos (talk) 21:19, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
- I'm NOT! I just told you that I am grouping three types of flags together as one thing. For me, Political flags, terrorist flags, and ensigns are all the same thing! It has nothing to do with you, it has to do with me grouping them together which is why I list the three together. Fry1989 eh? 21:22, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
- I misunderstood, but the red flag of Australia has a historical status which is far beyond that of a naval ensign, and where a political party has monolithic control over a country (as in Franco's Spain or North Korea today) a flag map does not seem inappropriate. For a historical flag map which is in actual current use on Wikipedia articles, see File:Flag-map of historic Palestine.svg... -- AnonMoos (talk) 14:11, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
- Please provide a reason, or your vote is quite frankly irrelevant. Fry1989 eh? 03:19, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Kept two without any clear consensus to delete, rest deleted FASTILY 19:30, 17 June 2013 (UTC)