Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2012/05/13
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Looks like a screenshot/capture from TV. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:00, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation Polarlys (talk) 19:01, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
File:1267818311 42667650 2-busco-hombre-de-19-a-45-anos-con-pene-grande-y-grueso-que-me-quiera-penetrar--Torreon-1267818311.jpg
[edit]
Absolutely no scope for this, terrible photo. Fry1989 eh? 04:59, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 21:26, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
copyvio of http://www.flickr.com/photos/matildashushari/6325683796/in/photostream Holyoke, mass (talk) 17:47, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 21:22, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
copyvio of http://www.flickr.com/photos/matildashushari/6325696484/in/photostream Holyoke, mass (talk) 17:49, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Delete Motopark (talk) 18:28, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 21:22, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
unused, useless, no encyclopedic value, no category, etc Frédéric (talk) 18:45, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 21:24, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Two reason. First, I created a new pic [1].Second, this file also my work. Brat Ural (talk) 20:04, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cdk_activation.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 18:50, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
No OTRS Rambalac (talk) 13:38, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 14:47, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation: http://www.bromleytimes.co.uk/polopoly_fs/bmpwk41stacey_53_1_679365!image/3658499509.jpg_gen/derivatives/landscape_225/3658499509.jpg ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 15:14, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 14:46, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
This file have a problem, in the page link not shown optimized the new version of the file. Kovox90 (talk) 23:56, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: The file is not free. It meets the threshold of originality, so can only be used under fair use on local projects. russavia (talk) 08:42, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely that this photograph is the picasa user's own work: The same image appears for instance here or in a higher resolution here. High Contrast (talk) 00:18, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: a case of flickrwashing russavia (talk) 08:43, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
It is unclear whose image this is. The same uploader put the image on the enwiki stating it was: "Photo by Warren Andres, Fair Use" yet here it is claimed as "own work", and there is no evidence the uploader is the same person. A userpage statement or an OTRS email would be preferred. Ww2censor (talk) 03:23, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
- I have deleted the en-wiki version at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mac_Arnold_4-28-2012_035.jpg because of invalid fair use. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:25, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Hello,
I am Warren Andres, aka, Stansun. I took the photograph of Mac Arnold that was uploaded to Wiki. I an inexperianced user and I welcome any assistance that can help me improve on this situation.
- previous paragraph put in by Stansun, so since it does not duplicate other images on the web, I think we can keep the image here. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:37, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Kept: am keeping this, but will be applying the OTRS permission template to the file, so that this can be recorded on file for future reference. russavia (talk) 08:47, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
This was created after 1954 ("early 1960s") so PD-Australia doesn't apply in this instance. And the uploader hasn't provided a statement that it was created by a government worker (in which case it would be free if created prior to taken prior to 1969-05-01). Thus this image may be under copyright. Magog the Ogre (talk) 04:38, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Australian photos taken in 1946 or later are unfree in the United States. This appears to be unfree in Australia too. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:07, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nomination russavia (talk) 08:46, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Emblema FDJ.svg. If the name or the rendition is an issue, the file can be renamed or updated, but we don't need two. Fry1989 eh? 04:41, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Another case of this not being an exact duplicate. The PNG has a black border around it. Whether this border is part of the emblem or not, it is not known, but as they are clearly different files we keep both and let users decide which one to use. russavia (talk) 08:50, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
No use, no need. There is an SVG of the logo, it only had one form and whatever that form is can be applied to the SVG if it is incorrect. Fry1989 eh? 00:53, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Keep Per previous closure. I would like to point out that the border is not rectangular, and thus cannot be added with HTML where needed. Sinnamon (talk) 03:07, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
- The previous closure had no basis, Russavia was treating this like it was a content dispute issue when it wasn't. We have an SVG of this logo, if the border is part of the logo, we can add that to the SVG. If anything about the SVG is wrong, all that can be changed and corrected. There's no reason to keep a PNG copy with no use and the only difference being a tiny black border. It doesn't belong here. Fry1989 eh? 03:51, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Both sides of the argument have some merit. Normally this type of raster duplicate should be deleted as we have a better vector version. However, as Sinnamon points out, in this case the border cannot quickly be added back - at least by an intending user who has no knowledge of vector graphics. In my judgement this is a narrow 'keep'. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:24, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copied non-free work of art (cropped from File:Iron Maiden in Bercy 1.jpg). Mathonius (talk) 06:25, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: as per nomination russavia (talk) 08:51, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of project scope - unknown girl. Art-top (talk) 06:29, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
- And also:
- File:2008 Beijing Auto Show * Cute Fiesta Girl2.jpg
- File:2008 Beijing Auto Show Cute Fiesta Girl10.jpg
- File:2008 Beijing Auto Show Cute Fiesta Girl11.jpg
- File:2008 Beijing Auto Show Cute Fiesta Girl12.jpg
- File:2008 Beijing Auto Show Cute Fiesta Girl13.jpg
- File:2008 Beijing Auto Show Cute Fiesta Girl14.jpg
- File:2008 Beijing Auto Show Cute Fiesta Girl15.jpg
- File:2008 Beijing Auto Show Cute Fiesta Girl16.jpg
- File:2008 Beijing Auto Show Cute Fiesta Girl17.jpg
- File:2008 Beijing Auto Show Cute Fiesta Girl3.jpg
- File:2008 Beijing Auto Show Cute Fiesta Girl4.jpg
- File:2008 Beijing Auto Show Cute Fiesta Girl5.jpg
- File:2008 Beijing Auto Show Cute Fiesta Girl6.jpg
- File:2008 Beijing Auto Show Cute Fiesta Girl7.jpg
- File:2008 Beijing Auto Show Cute Fiesta Girl8 (1).jpg
- File:2008 Beijing Auto Show Cute Fiesta Girl8.jpg
- --Art-top (talk) 06:34, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- The excessive use of female models at car shows in general – and at the Beijing Auto Show in particular – has received a fair amount of attention in recent years. I've read reports from frustrated journalists who were unable to get a photo of the cars they were writing about without a girl crawling all over the vehicle. In 2012, the phenomenon even attracted stern criticism from the Chinese government (Businessweek; video starts automatically). Maybe we don't need all of these photos, but as an example of a notable marketing ploy that's surely reached its expiration date, at least a few should be kept. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:50, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Comment. There is Category:Promotional models. --AVRS (talk) 11:29, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
- Comment. If it’s that auto show, it needs a category and maybe some files to start it with. --AVRS (talk) 11:22, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
- Keep They were and still are listed as free on flickr. While there may be social objections to their inclusion, they are still within scope as promotional models, examples of car promotion, and examples of women. Commons isn't for influencing social change against legal practices we might find morally objectionable. MBisanz talk 16:08, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
- Keep per above. The subject is not just a girl, but a girl in context of the autoshow. --Trycatch (talk) 20:29, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Keep all of them as this shows how female models are used in autoshows, and in this particular autoshow this is extensebly covered by international press. Tm (talk) 11:54, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Kept: As per the keep comments, photos are clearly in scope. We let users decide which to use. russavia (talk) 08:53, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Copied from http://www.imagefap.com/pictures/3320136/Marianne's-panties-can-you-imagine-her-wet-cunt-inside%3F Handcuffed (talk) 08:25, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
- Flickr account Slut Jennifer Ann for reposting should be included in our bad-source list. --Túrelio (talk) 09:50, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
- Not sure it it's necessary, considering there are few images there, and most of them seem to be fine. Handcuffed (talk) 23:03, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nomination. Consider including on bad source list at your discretion. russavia (talk) 08:57, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Copied from http://www.imagefap.com/pictures/3320136/Marianne's-panties-can-you-imagine-her-wet-cunt-inside%3F Handcuffed (talk) 08:25, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
- Flickr account Slut Jennifer Ann for reposting should be included in our bad-source list. --Túrelio (talk) 09:50, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
- Not sure it it's necessary, considering there are few images there, and most of them seem to be fine. Handcuffed (talk) 23:03, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nomination. Consider including on bad source list at your discretion. russavia (talk) 08:57, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Copied from http://www.imagefap.com/pictures/3320136/Marianne's-panties-can-you-imagine-her-wet-cunt-inside%3F Handcuffed (talk) 08:26, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
- The question is priority of publishing: WHEN was it added to the Flickr page? --Túrelio (talk) 13:30, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
- Is it in scope? Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 14:03, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
- As there are already 3 such copyvios, the Flickr account Slut Jennifer Ann for reposting should be included in our bad-source list. --Túrelio (talk) 09:52, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
- The Flickr ones have been uploaded more recently. I think it is in scope, because it is a fairly high quality photo of lingerie; however, it should be deleted on copyright grounds. Not sure it it's necessary to add the Flickr account to the bad sources list, considering there are few images there, and most of them seem to be fine. Handcuffed (talk) 23:07, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nomination. Consider including on bad source list at your discretion. russavia (talk) 08:57, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Redundant map duplicated at File:World Inflation rate 2007.PNG; this file is not in use and is unsourced. Data is different to the alternative version which is sourced. Betty Logan (talk) 10:51, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Being unsourced isn't grounds for deletion, and the two clearly use different scales. If the nominated file is a hoax, then it can be renominated, but we let our users decide what is correct, and can be used. russavia (talk) 09:08, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
No permission, EXIF states: "Copyright 2007 Michel Vuijlsteke. All rights reserved." Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:06, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, and it was uploaded by Michel Vuijlsteke under a creative commons licence, so keep. CodeCat (talk) 12:23, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
- Do we have any evidence that the uploader is indeed Michel Vuijlsteke? Ices2Csharp (talk) 15:23, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
- Do we have any evidence that any other of the thousands of images on commons were indeed uploaded by their owners? CodeCat (talk) 23:20, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
- That's completely irrevant in this DR. (I however did nominate thousands of other files for deletion.) Ices2Csharp (talk) 07:08, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
- It's no more irrelevant than, for example, me asking you to prove you're not a sockpuppet. This is the internet, it's anonymous, and a lot of people wouldn't even know how to prove they are who they say they are. I think it's a pointless question to ask if the Michel Vuijlsteke who uploaded it is the same Michel Vuijlsteke who added the EXIF information. It's all but impossible for anyone to prove that, probably including Michel himself if nobody believes who he is. CodeCat (talk) 21:06, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
- We do at least have OTRS. Ices2Csharp (talk) 07:06, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
- It's no more irrelevant than, for example, me asking you to prove you're not a sockpuppet. This is the internet, it's anonymous, and a lot of people wouldn't even know how to prove they are who they say they are. I think it's a pointless question to ask if the Michel Vuijlsteke who uploaded it is the same Michel Vuijlsteke who added the EXIF information. It's all but impossible for anyone to prove that, probably including Michel himself if nobody believes who he is. CodeCat (talk) 21:06, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
- That's completely irrevant in this DR. (I however did nominate thousands of other files for deletion.) Ices2Csharp (talk) 07:08, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
- Do we have any evidence that any other of the thousands of images on commons were indeed uploaded by their owners? CodeCat (talk) 23:20, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
- Do we have any evidence that the uploader is indeed Michel Vuijlsteke? Ices2Csharp (talk) 15:23, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Kept: As per codecat, the uploader can be the copyright holder. This is going to be OTRS'ed instead russavia (talk) 09:10, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
i would like to keep the pic for the article, but this licence is wrong. The given source is [[2]] who says, it's the band own label, but so the author of the pic is also not clear. Maybe the uploader can help with more information. AtelierMonpli (talk) 11:16, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: unclear copyright. COM:PRP applies russavia (talk) 09:12, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Flickr user Art es anna is not the photographer. This photo (and other on her flickr) is taken from elsewhere and reposted to flickr to report recent events. Martin H. (talk) 11:20, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio Morning Sunshine (talk) 08:24, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Flickr user Art es anna is not the photographer. This photo (and other on her flickr) is taken from elsewhere and reposted to flickr to report recent events. Martin H. (talk) 11:21, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
- I didn't know. The flickr provider (Art és Anna) was reliable to me, until now. Jordi Roqué (Discussió/Talk) 07:05, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio Morning Sunshine (talk) 08:24, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Flickr user Art es anna is not the photographer. This photo (and other on her flickr) is taken from elsewhere and reposted to flickr to report recent events. Photo was uploaded to flickr in June 2009, but used elsewhere in March 2009 already. Martin H. (talk) 11:30, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio Morning Sunshine (talk) 08:24, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
This is just a straight copy of File:World Inflation rate 2007.PNG that has not been updated to include any 2010 data. If editors want to present 2007 data they use the original 2007 file; this file is simply misleading and can serve no obvious purpose in its current form. Betty Logan (talk) 11:39, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Kept: The file is in use on several project. It is also significantly different from the linked file. Discuss on local projects, then come back for deletion if still needed. russavia (talk) 09:14, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
wrong licence, author not clear, see [[3]] AtelierMonpli (talk) 11:52, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Morning Sunshine (talk) 08:23, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Exact SVG available as Serbian Cross.svg {{SUBST:Colour|#C6363C|Kac}}{{SUBST:Colour|#0C4076|nep}}{{SUBST:Colour|##DCDCDC|cku}} 12:40, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nom russavia (talk) 09:26, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Exact SVG available as Serbian Cross.svg {{SUBST:Colour|#C6363C|Kac}}{{SUBST:Colour|#0C4076|nep}}{{SUBST:Colour|##DCDCDC|cku}} 12:41, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nom russavia (talk) 09:26, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
This pic pertains to which high court? Nearly all Indian states have a high court. Does it pertain to Pakistan. This file cannot be used till all details including usability of the pic are clarified. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 13:12, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Kept: not a valid reason for deletion. Contact the uploader, they might be able to provide more detail. russavia (talk) 09:28, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
This just appears to be name/address plate. Does it serve any academic value Hindustanilanguage (talk) 13:28, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Kept: In scope of plaques in France. No reason to delete, it may be of use somewhere, sometime russavia (talk) 09:29, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Text only document. Could be replaced with wiki-text. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Morning Sunshine (talk) 08:21, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope: no encyclopedic use thinkable High Contrast (talk) 17:35, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Morning Sunshine (talk) 08:20, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Used for explicit promo (Sin escape rock). Trijnsteltalk 22:00, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Motopark (talk) 12:11, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Morning Sunshine (talk) 08:21, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Not a photo taken by the flickr user. She took a photo from elsewhere and posted it to her flickr short after the death of Sebastià Salellas i Magret to honor him. Martin H. (talk) 11:09, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
p.s.: true photographer is attributed at http://www.pedresdegirona.com/salellas.htm or http://www.rogercasero.cat/2008/05/ti-salellas-post-destmac.html. --Martin H. (talk) 11:16, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
- ok, I didn't know. However, don't delete the file yet. I'm contacting the author, who may donate this picture and maybe more. I don't think this will be a problem as he was a personal friend of the lawyer. Another friend of him gave me already another image when I contacted him some weeks ago. Thanks. --Ferran Cornellà (talk) 13:16, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
- I didn't know, also. The flickr provider (Art és Anna) was reliable to me, until now. I do agree to let Ferran to make an attempt to get original author's permission. Jordi Roqué (Discussió/Talk) 07:03, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Please delete the file. Unfortunately I got a negative answer from its author, Pere Virgili. However, I'm still trying to convince him to give us other pictures. In case he finally agrees, I'll just upload them to Commons, let's see. --Ferran Cornellà (talk) 13:27, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: flickrwashing russavia (talk) 09:11, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
no obvious reason why the picture should be PD Liliana-60 (talk) 13:45, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
- Comment I sent a mail to the archive mentioned as source for more details. --Funfood ␌ 10:17, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PRP applies. This can likely be undelete in a decade russavia (talk) 11:46, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Very poor quality, unused and alternatives given. Yikrazuul (talk) 14:15, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nom russavia (talk) 11:45, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
deleted on German Wikipedia as copyvio. No obvious reason why this is public domain Liliana-60 (talk) 14:18, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PRP applies russavia (talk) 11:45, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
definitely not own work, no reason why this should be free Liliana-60 (talk) 14:31, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PRP applies russavia (talk) 11:45, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
definitely not own work, no reason why this should be free Liliana-60 (talk) 14:32, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PRP applies russavia (talk) 11:46, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
user confuses Commons with some social networking site, no project contribution, only uploads related to self-promotion Polarlys (talk) 15:25, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nomination. Self-promotion is frowned up without other contributions russavia (talk) 09:58, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
and File:Donjazzy.jpg. Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nomination russavia (talk) 11:23, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
The image is of low resolution and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 17:28, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PRP applies russavia (talk) 11:55, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Several images appear in this collage. The source and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient. High Contrast (talk) 17:35, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nom russavia (talk) 11:25, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Several images appear in this collage. The source and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient. High Contrast (talk) 17:35, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nom russavia (talk) 11:25, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
The image comes from en:wiki. But it was deleted there because it is a copyright violation. As a consequence this applies to this file on Commons, too. High Contrast (talk) 17:44, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nom russavia (talk) 11:25, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
most likely not own work, most likely not created by subject, most likely uploader not identical with subject, has already uploaded two stolen images from this actress Polarlys (talk) 18:59, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nom russavia (talk) 11:24, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
most likely not own work, most likely not created by subject, most likely uploader not identical with subject, has already uploaded two stolen images from this actress, photo by "chris_bot" Polarlys (talk) 18:59, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nom russavia (talk) 11:24, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Stickpen (talk) 19:04, 13 May 2012 (UTC) I misidentified this one sorry Stickpen (talk) 19:04, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request russavia (talk) 11:26, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Mistification. См. обсуждение удаления статьи "Эрик Эльц" из ру-вики. vlsergey (talk) 19:06, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: unused and out of scope russavia (talk) 11:26, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
by-nc-nd(see the end of the clip) is not allowed on Commons. 78.35.204.28 19:28, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nomination russavia (talk) 12:58, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
BY-NC-ND (see end of clip) is now allowed on Commons. 78.35.204.28 19:33, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nomination russavia (talk) 12:58, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
BY-NC-ND is not allowed. 78.35.204.28 19:35, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nomination russavia (talk) 12:58, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
The image is of low resolution and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 19:45, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PRP applies russavia (talk) 12:58, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
fantasy picture. SSB GT4 looks different. 79.224.225.171 21:40, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Kept: With a rename it may be in scope. No harm to keep this russavia (talk) 13:00, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Not sure if this one's free. Fry1989 eh? 21:49, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Kept: not original enough. PD-logo russavia (talk) 13:01, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
SVG at File:National Seal of Brazil.svg Fry1989 eh? 21:50, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nom russavia (talk) 13:02, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture, out of COM:PS Funfood ␌ 22:08, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nomination. COM:IDENT also applies russavia (talk) 11:20, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate of File:LOGO TV PERU 2012.png. Fry1989 eh? 22:09, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: as per nomination russavia (talk) 11:19, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Can't forsee any possible scope or use. Fry1989 eh? 22:11, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: likely out of scope russavia (talk) 11:20, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Buggy SVG; orphaned. Leyo 22:24, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nomination. Unusable as is russavia (talk) 11:22, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. COM:L#Venezuela claims that there is no copyright if "It is the text of laws, decrees, official regulations, public treaties, judicial decisions and other official acts. (Part 1, Chapter 1, Section 1, Article 4)" This isn't text, so I suppose it isn't covered by that rule. Stefan4 (talk) 22:26, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
- I took this picture; its of my own passport. Pretty sure I cleared it under public domain/gfdl or some other open license. ACtually, just rechecked and yes, I put it under the GFDL and the summary says its a scan of my passport, so what's so dubious about it? DamianFinol (talk) 03:01, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
- Unless you also drew the coat of arms on the passport, it is a derivative work of someone else's art. --Stefan4 (talk) 16:22, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: After checking {{PD-VenezuelaGov}} it does not appear that this is exempt from copyright in Venezuela. COM:PRP applying here russavia (talk) 13:05, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Incorrect figure (order of temperatures). In additions, it seems to be scanned from an encyclopedia. Leyo 22:49, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
- Delete If it's wrong, it's useless for its currently used purposes, so should be removed from transcluded articles, and then deletable as out-of-scope (having no realistic educational purpose). Likely original [4] (modulo conversion of filetype to png from original gif)? That site lists an older copyright date and all-rights-reserved. But I don't know enough German to search and read if there is an open-licensing release notice. DMacks (talk) 16:35, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PRP applies here russavia (talk) 11:18, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Photos uploaded by user Tyka17
[edit]
Today I found evidences that few photos uploaded by him were taken from web, these also are likely to be taken from other websites like facebook, cropped and uploaded under false self made claim --Oleola (talk) 00:35, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nom, COM:PRP applies russavia (talk) 08:44, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
There is no FOP in the United States, and the statue is the main subject Ben.MQ (talk) 09:05, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
- keep per [[previous discussion. There is no reason why the photo taken by the original up-loader cannot post their original work and release it per cc license. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 23:51, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep per previous discussion. "Copyrighted replica" is a rather bizarre legal theory. Smallbones (talk) 01:11, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Jcb (talk) 15:30, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Regretfully, this sculpture is technically "copyrighted" and/or falls under FOP in the US for public art. It was created after 1989[5] Sarah (talk) 01:21, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted as per nom. russavia (talk) 08:45, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Files of User:Floatspa
[edit]- File:FloatSPA isolation tank 3.jpg
- File:FloatSPA isolation tank 2.jpg
- File:FloatSPA isolation tank.jpg
There is no evidence of permission. We really require an OTRS ticket to verify the licence applied.
For the first image the highest resolution image I can find on this website credits the company for the image and one of the company's own webpages shows the image though at a lower resolution. An identical resolution of the third image is found here but I have not been able to find the second image on their website. Ww2censor (talk) 03:07, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 14:48, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Éverton CF (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Famam.jpg
- File:Multiuso.jpg
- File:Hospitalcruz.jpeg
- File:Extraparalela.jpg
- File:Hipersp.jpg
- File:Todo Dia.jpg
- File:Imagesufrb.jpg
- File:Imagesestadiocruz.jpg
- File:Imagescruz.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PRP applies russavia (talk) 11:22, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Éverton CF (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY (TALK) 03:01, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Morning Sunshine (talk) 08:20, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kelly Denis (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Kelly K Denis.jpg
- File:Kelly Denis.jpg
- File:Kellis Doing It live In Church.jpg
- File:Kelly With Holy Keane Amooti.JPG
- File:MY FB COVER.jpg
- File:Wasted Talent Cover.jpg
- File:Kellis.jpg
- File:Destiny-1.jpg
- File:Up Line.jpg
- File:Studio Mic.jpg
- File:System Room.jpg
- File:Kelly Denis Playing a Jitar.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely out of scope, and COM:PRP applies russavia (talk) 09:36, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kelly Denis (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotional images, out of scope
- File:Kelly Denis.jpg
- File:Destiny-1.png
- File:Destiny-1 (PatricknKelly).jpg
- File:White T-Shirt.png
- File:Oh Lord Single Cover.png
- File:Blue T-Shirt.png
- File:Kelly Denis Logo Black & White.png
- File:Kelly Denis Logo Red & Black.png
- File:Twitter Banner.jpg
- File:Kelly Denis Logo Icon.png
- File:Kelly Denis.png
- File:Tumblr Header.png
- File:Destiny-1-BORN NOW.ogg
- File:Destiny-1-Oh Lord - Destiny-1.ogg
- File:Kelly wikip.png
- File:Kelly Denis 2013.png
- File:Sseku Martin Live In Concert..jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Morning ☼ (talk) 10:08, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom --Herby talk thyme 11:37, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Out of scope, editor on a self promotional rampage. That editor has been indeffed on en WP. Timtrent (talk) 22:25, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kelly Denis (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Solely self promotional
- File:Kelly Denis-23.jpg
- File:Kelly Denis-22.jpg
- File:Kelly Denis-24.jpg
- File:Kelly Denis-21.JPG
- File:Kelly Denis-20.JPG
- File:Kelly Denis-19.JPG
- File:Kelly Denis-18.JPG
- File:Kelly Denis-16.JPG
- File:Kelly Denis-17.JPG
- File:Kelly Denis-15.JPG
- File:Kelly Denis-14.JPG
- File:Kelly Denis-13.JPG
- File:Kelly Denis-12.JPG
- File:Kelly Denis-11.JPG
- File:Kelly Denis-10.jpg
- File:Kelly Denis-9.jpg
- File:Kelly Denis-7.jpg
- File:Destiny-1 (PatricknKelly)-4.JPG
- File:Kelly Denis-6.jpg
- File:Kelly Denis-5.jpg
- File:Kelly Denis-3.png
- File:Kelly Denis-2.png
- File:Kelly Denis -1.png
-4.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Timtrent (talk) 22:27, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:32, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PRP applies russavia (talk) 09:53, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PRP applies russavia (talk) 09:53, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Аягөз Загиева (talk · contribs)
[edit]images from different sources (at least four different cameras), some with watermark from third-party, others from website
- File:Атырау.jpg
- File:Жайык мейрамханасы.jpg
- File:Жайык.jpg
- File:Конак уй.jpg – from http://eng.akimat-atyrau.kz/2010-06-04-11-01-54/54-2010-06-07-16-15-15.html
- File:Политехтың алды.jpg
- File:Махамбет-Исатай ескерткіші1.jpg
- File:Мариотт Атырауда.jpg
- File:Қазақстан қонақ үйі.jpg – from http://eng.akimat-atyrau.kz/2010-06-04-11-01-54/54-2010-06-07-16-15-15.html
- File:Жайық өзені.jpg – see watermark
- File:Банк.jpg
- File:Ақ-Жайық қонақ үйі.jpg
- File:Махамбет-Исатай ескерткіші.jpg – from http://eng.akimat-atyrau.kz/2010-06-04-11-01-54/54-2010-06-07-16-15-15.html
Polarlys (talk) 19:10, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nom. These could have been speedied russavia (talk) 11:41, 20 May 2012 (UTC)