Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2011/07/09
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
Image is of an event organized by Abalone Alliance, which closed shop in 1985, yet there is EXIF data for a camera made in 2008; photo then is likely a picture taken of an existing print and thus not originall "own work" Tabercil (talk) 02:44, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Opened in error - was intending to do a speedy delete as account was serial copyvio uploader Tabercil (talk) 02:49, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Personality right : private situation, without agreement from subject unaware of being photographied. It could cause prejudice. Even if that person is dead now (maybe Jimmy Salcedo, a famous colombian TV presentator) His heirs could still protect his memory in court. Lilyu (talk) 06:31, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: It's vandalism and defamation, actually. That image is all over the net in prankster websites. Darwin Ahoy! 10:05, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Personality right : private situation, without agreement from subject unaware of being photographied. It could cause prejudice. Even if that person is dead now (maybe Jimmy Salcedo, a famous colombian TV presentator) His heirs could still protect his memory in court. Lilyu (talk) 06:31, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: It's vandalism and defamation, actually. That image is all over the net in prankster websites. Darwin Ahoy! 10:05, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Personality right : private situation, without agreement from subject unaware of being photographied. It could cause prejudice. Even if that person is dead now (maybe Jimmy Salcedo, a famous colombian TV presentator) His heirs could still protect his memory in court. Lilyu (talk) 06:31, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: It's vandalism and defamation, actually. That image is all over the net in prankster websites. Darwin Ahoy! 10:05, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Copyright violation. --78.169.154.147 20:52, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- Renewing this DR because it wasn't decided in July. --JuTa 19:41, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, certainly not a screenshot of GPL'ed software. Rosenzweig τ 15:07, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
Falls outside the educational scope of Commons. We have enough pictures of penises already. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:51, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- I agree completely. Same holds for all other uploads by this user. MartinD (talk) 12:47, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per scope and equally the flickr review has not found the file. Others ahve been deleted Herby talk thyme 15:12, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Are those screenshots copyrighted, or they count as de minimis? Darwin Ahoy! 14:03, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy delete, image is bigger enough to distinguish very well all the copyvios in it Darwin Ahoy! 14:05, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Source is Google? Likely a copyvio then. P199 (talk) 14:14, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio ■ MMXX talk 14:25, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Cool photo, but, non-notable 80s band and still no permission granted for image use. ~ Missvain (talk) 04:27, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission for more than seven days. --ZooFari 01:28, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
Copyrights wrong. Mistake while uploading other files. Rodarcus (talk) 17:06, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Darwin Ahoy! 20:23, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. ■ MMXX talk 19:15, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - It was just used to create a vanity page on enwiki. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:42, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: no license Jcb (talk) 00:02, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
not used (so far), self promotion, therefore out of scope Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 21:19, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: no license Jcb (talk) 00:02, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
This image is at http://www.puntodincontro.com.mx/articoli/italianimessico15112007.htm since 15 novembre 2007. At myspace of the artist it is too: http://a3.l3-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/98/341ae36b62849f55696cb355310306c1/l.jpg →→ I doubt "own work". Saibo (Δ) 00:02, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Delete - see also the narror strip at the left edge. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 09:55, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 08:38, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
sorry, I doubt "own work". This looks like a edited scan of an image from the CD booklet - see here http://web.archive.org/web/20081120165411/http://www.iktius.com/ing/cd/unatromb.htm - same format, same clothing Saibo (Δ) 00:18, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Also here, a strange strip at the left edge. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 09:56, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 08:39, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
strong suspicion of copyvio based on user's history and picture's caracteristics Ezarateesteban 00:19, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 08:39, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
See here: Image copied from some book or newspaper, but not own work. Martin H. (talk) 01:29, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by User:Darwinius Mbdortmund (talk) 08:41, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
A logo for what I believe is a non-notable business. It's unused and non-educational. Out of scope. ~ Missvain (talk) 03:58, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: no categories , no source Mbdortmund (talk) 08:42, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Appears to be promotional material for "The Theory of Rings", not related to the mathematical theory, mind you. ~ Missvain (talk) 04:00, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by User:Matanya Mbdortmund (talk) 08:42, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Public domain status of this image is dubious. On the image description page, the uploader quotes someone from the police department as saying, "The photos are available under freedom of information, to the public". That's not the same thing as "public domain". UserB (talk) 04:02, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:13, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
No permission, un-used chart, possibly out of scope. ~ Missvain (talk) 04:09, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Matanya Mbdortmund (talk) 08:43, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Low quality image lacking description and tagged over 7 days ago for permission evidence and still unprovided. ~ Missvain (talk) 04:21, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Matanya Mbdortmund (talk) 08:44, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Portrait of the user, non-used, non-notable blogger. Self-promo perhaps. ~ Missvain (talk) 04:24, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Matanya Mbdortmund (talk) 08:44, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
DR to see if this can qualify as a simple logo Darwin Ahoy! 05:45, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:13, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
i dont want my page on here any more Russjen (talk) 06:06, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - not used. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 10:07, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: uploaders wish Mbdortmund (talk) 08:45, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
No evidence of free license on source pafe at http://www.beyondtheultimate.co/index.php/menu-types/mega-menu/ultras-1/jungle-ultra-images ELEKHHT 06:55, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:13, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
No evidence that author/copyright holder released it under free license. ELEKHHT 06:59, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:14, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
No evidence that http://www.peruverde.org/ would have released their logo under a free license ELEKHHT 07:03, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:14, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
No evidence that http://www.acca.org.pe/ would have released their logo under a free license ELEKHHT 07:04, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:14, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
No evidence that http://www.sernanp.gob.pe/sernanp/ would have re;leased their logo under a free license ELEKHHT 07:05, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:14, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Obvious copyright violation, listed as Creative Commons Nikthestoned (talk) 07:44, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:14, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Inferior duplicate of File:Laputa - Grandville.jpg Mikhail Ryazanov (talk) 08:39, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Keep The images are very different (probably not from the same exact source), and the one you requested to be deleted has higher pixel resolution. AnonMoos (talk) 02:15, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- They are from different copies of the same source. The higher pixel resolution of the "bad" image makes no sense, since it does not convey any additional details (in fact, it has even less details — for example, the "rays" in the sky are completely missing). — Mikhail Ryazanov (talk) 10:59, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:15, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Does not look like "own work", rather like a low resolution video still. Given this user's history of copyvios, that image is probably a copyvio too. Rosenzweig δ 09:22, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:15, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Unused, text-only banner (unknown purpose). Out of scope? ~ NVO (talk) 10:01, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:15, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Photograph of 2D posters (themselves composites of photographs of unknown origin - India? France? Both?). ~ NVO (talk) 10:04, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:16, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
This ins't realyPD-textlogo.The right part (the bloom) is a foto or a painting with IMHO more that Threshold of originality. JuTa (talk) 10:07, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:16, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Derivative of a photo of unknown origin (it is India and the depicted man, according to userpage, was born in 1904). Cannot presume PD ("The following works enter the public domain when 60 years have passed from 1 January of the calendar year following the year in which the work was published" - Commons:Licensing#India). ~ NVO (talk) 10:30, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:16, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
No information about the date of this photograph Darwin Ahoy! 10:53, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:16, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
No evidence to support the claim that this was taken by the US Air Force. The stated source does not say whether the photo was taken by the US Air Force, a Boeing employee, or a third-party photographer. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:07, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:18, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
personal image, out of project scope. ■ MMXX talk 12:34, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:18, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
No verifiable source and no reason to believe that this was first published in the United States. —LX (talk, contribs) 12:38, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
This also applies to the following files by the same uploader:
- File:Mexicofc2.jpg
- File:Oblatos.jpg
- File:Equipo+de+futbol.jpg
- File:1918 Irapuato.jpg
- File:Mexico fc.jpg
- File:Irapuato1911.jpg
- File:Pachuca-campeon.jpg
- File:Reaalirapua1911.gif
- File:Copa Eliminatoria.jpg ("Its first publication occurred prior to January 1, 1923." Date: 2011. Author: "Due to the age of the photo Author is unknown." Huh? That doesn't make any sense.)
- File:Espaaveracruzil6.jpg
- File:Iberiacord1915.jpg
- File:Sporting vera.jpg
- File:Nacional1920.jpg
- File:Clubunion1908.png
- File:Clubliceo.jpg
- File:Fibras Duras.jpg
- File:ADO 1916.jpg
- File:Atlan16.jpg
- File:Am1917.jpg
- File:America2.jpg
- File:Espana.jpg
- File:Espana 1911.jpg
- File:22austurias.jpg
- File:1905rebri.jpg
- File:1908Refroma.jpg
- File:1907British FC.jpg
- File:Velodromopuebla.jpg
- File:CF Pachuca 1905.PNG
—LX (talk, contribs) 12:55, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:20, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Badly out of focus, practically unusable. Alternatives in place, e.g. File:Shahbuz46.JPG. ~ NVO (talk) 12:46, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, too low quality to be usable. MKFI (talk) 10:32, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Mbdortmund (talk) 08:47, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Derivative of a non-free photograph (Azerbaijan: no FOP for practically anything). ~ NVO (talk) 12:50, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:20, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Derivative of a non-free photograph or painting (Azerbaijan: no FOP for practically anything). ~ NVO (talk) 12:51, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Mbdortmund (talk) 08:48, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Derivative of a free photographs (Azerbaijan: no FOP for practically anything). ~ NVO (talk) 12:51, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:20, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
And File:Shahbuz55.JPG. Derivative of a non-free photograph (Azerbaijan: no FOP for practically anything). ~ NVO (talk) 12:52, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:20, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Blurry, unusable - and practically duplicate of in-focus File:Shahbuz34.JPG. ~ NVO (talk) 12:56, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Mbdortmund (talk) 08:49, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
unused personal image, out of project scope. ■ MMXX talk 12:59, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Kept: in use on userpage Mbdortmund (talk) 08:50, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE and now unused. Just some unknown guy. Commons is not Facebook. Wknight94 talk 15:52, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted by Fastily. INeverCry 15:29, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Euro coins are copyrighted. 84.61.169.206 13:20, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:20, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Superseded by a better version, HYDRODYNAMICA,_Danielis_Bernoulli.png . Better version is not derived from this file at all. No attribution link is necessary. Ariadacapo (talk) 13:25, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:21, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
collage of free and nonfree elements DS (talk) 13:54, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- What are the non free elements you have detected?-- Darwin Ahoy! 14:33, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- The goofy thumb's-up cartoon at the bottom? DS (talk) 23:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, yes.. If the rest is a photo by the uploader, it could be cropped and kept, but if no other information is provided the whole image should be deleted indeed.-- Darwin Ahoy! 13:35, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
- The goofy thumb's-up cartoon at the bottom? DS (talk) 23:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:21, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Andy Wolfe is a Flight test photographer employed by Lockheed Martin.[1] He is not and was never a US federal employee. The US Navy and Air Force are only licensing his photographs for their use. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:081108-F-9999S-101.jpg for details. (added by User:Jappalang) Rosenzweig δ 13:55, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- LinkedIn is a social networking website and provides no reliable evidence of the credited (or any) Andy Wolfe's employment now or previously where it's relevant to this discussion. For that matter, United States federal employment is not the only process for an individual's works to fall under the federal government's public domain licensing provisions. Furthermore, I don't see any mention at the United States Air Force's specific page (http://www.afspc.af.mil/news/story.asp?storyID=123061917) stating that the images used are "only [licensed] for their use" and do not fall under the typical and expected public domain rules; the page featuring the photograph discussed only says that it's a "Photo by Andy Wolfe".
Privatephotographer (talk · contribs) in the deletion discussion for File:081108-F-9999S-101.jpg claims that "[i]mages that are Air Force photos have the photographers rank to indicate" discounts contractors and civilian personnel working for the Air Force and producing material for Public Affairs.
Air Force Instruction (AFI) 35-107 (Public Web Communications) paragraph 7.1.4 and AFI 51-303 (Intellectual Property--Patents, Patent Related Matters, Trademarks and Copyrights) paragraph 10 both express that substantive permission must be obtained to use copyrighted works and a need to do so must be established. It's also been my experience that .mil and .gov top-level domain sites expressly note or mention when non-public domain material is being presented (e.g. the NASA logo).
Lastly, has Mr. Wolfe or the US Air Force been contacted regarding this image? The manner to do so for the latter appears on this page.
Keep w/o actual evidence of non-standard USAF licensing or copyright infringement. — Fourthords | =/\= | 02:30, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
- LinkedIn's profile is not entered by multiple users (like Wikipedia), but by Andy Wolfe himself; it is reliable and pertinent here. The details are also corroborated by his profile on http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:BZyW7wtgx34J:www.aviationphotographers.org/portfolios/WolfeA/index.htm+andy+wolfe+lockheed&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=sg&source=www.google.com (International Society for Aviation Photography), which states:
Andy Wolfe is a professional photographer working in flight test for Lockheed Martin Aeronautics. He provides still and video support for various LM Aero programs at Edwards AFB as well as some other locations. After graduating from the University of Texas at Arlington with a degree in Photojournalism, he freelanced for various aviation publications while working in Procurement at Lockheed. Eventually he was able to couple his passion for Aviation Photography with his career at Lockheed and moved from Fort Worth to begin work in Multimedia at Edwards. He still calls Texas home but photographing Vipers and Raptors on a regular basis keeps him firmly planted in California.
- Furthermore, a search on Google with the terms "Andy Wolf" and Lockheed shows the military's prevalent use of photographs by this private individual, giving misleading credits as described in the DR for File:081108-F-9999S-101.jpg.
- Per Commons:Project scope/Evidence, it is Commons policy that the burden of proof lies on the uploader or other person arguing for the file to be retained to demonstrate that as far as can reasonably be determined:
- the file is in the public domain or is properly licensed, and
- that any required consent has been obtained.
- Per Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle, there is reasonable doubt that this photograph is in the public domain; it was taken by a private individual (this photograph is in the same category as File:081108-F-9999S-101.jpg). To repeat, the burden of proof lies on the uploader or other person arguing for the file to be retained. Jappalang (talk) 01:12, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:23, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
There is no evidence that the uploader is the professional artist who created this illustration, or a representative of the publisher. DS (talk) 14:38, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:23, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
COM:DW (Mask was designed 1955 by Mitzi Cunliffe (1918–2006)) - This does not look permanent as required by Commons:FOP#United_Kingdom. Saibo (Δ) 14:41, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:23, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
COM:DW (Mask was designed 1955 by Mitzi Cunliffe (1918–2006)) - This does not look permanent as required by Commons:FOP#United_Kingdom Saibo (Δ) 14:43, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:23, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. ■ MMXX talk 14:47, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
■ MMXX talk 14:49, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Mbdortmund (talk) 08:55, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:DW (Mask was designed 1955 by Mitzi Cunliffe (1918–2006)) - This does not look permanent or public as required by Commons:FOP#United_Kingdom. (On belaf of Saibo) — [ Tanvir | Talk ] 14:50, 9 July 2011 (UTC) (due to cascade protection) Thanks. --Saibo (Δ) 14:52, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:25, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Image was originally uploaded on en.wiki as a non-free image from www.ysr.in (since down) and deleted as inapplicable fair-use; was then uploaded again by the same user as "PD-Self" and subsequently transferred to Commons without knowledge of this history. SpacemanSpiff (talk) 14:50, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- I am the one who transfered, and did not know about this story. One can find data about deletion on en.WP here : [2]. I guess you can delete, sorry not to have seen this before. --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 11:50, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- I wouldn't have noticed it either if not for the fact I was looking to see if the image for the article could be improved and therefore looked at the deleted image. SpacemanSpiff (talk) 13:17, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
![[2]](https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Y._S._Rajasekhara_Reddy.jpg&action=edit){kind=link}
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:25, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Just text, out of scope. / Pieter Kuiper (talk) 15:17, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:25, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Personal image, out of project scope. ■ MMXX talk 15:31, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:25, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Possibly PD-old, signed by J.Jackson, uploaded with bogus license Darwin Ahoy! 15:55, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:25, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Probably PD-Old, uploaded with no source and bogus license Darwin Ahoy! 15:56, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:26, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Possibly PD-Old, uploaded here with bogus license and no source Darwin Ahoy! 15:57, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:26, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
It was tagged with copyvio and no permission but there is no evidence to justify neither of these tags. --ZooFari 16:49, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Kept: per nom Mbdortmund (talk) 08:58, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
COM:DW oil painting too closely based on a photo / man vergleiche (z.B. mittels tineye) mit http://entimg.msn.com/i/240/bondcar_240.jpg oder http://www.astonservicelondon.com/images/tl_Aston_Martin_DB5.jpg (das gleiche Foto gibt es auch noch an diversen anderen Stellen im Internet). Ich nehme an, dass hier eine Bearbeitung und keine Freie Benutzung vorliegt. Man vergleiche die exakt gleiche Perspektive, Schattenverlauf unter dem Auto, Reflexionen auf der Windschutzscheibe .... Saibo (Δ) 16:49, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:26, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
FOP in Japan doesn't cover sculptures. The sculptor, Sueo Kasagi (笠置季男), died in 1967 [3] and the copyright is still in effect. Yasu (talk) 16:52, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:26, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Was tagged with a "no source". It was uploaded in 2004 and we have 30 maps or more in Category:Passeriformes distribution maps so it this should be deleted then they should all go. MGA73 (talk) 16:55, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- It was actually tagged "derivative work no source". Magog the Ogre (talk) 17:10, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- Oh... --MGA73 (talk) 18:34, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:27, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Band logo of some non-notable band. Martin H. (talk) 17:21, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:27, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Personal picture, not in use anywhere. Out of scope. Martin H. (talk) 17:21, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:27, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Logo of some non-notable band. Mere spam, out of scope. --Martin H. (talk) 17:23, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:27, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned personal picture, not in use anywhere. Out of scope. For some reason the file information was removed one month after upload already, maybe the uploader tried to delete it. Martin H. (talk) 17:29, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Mbdortmund (talk) 09:00, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Some self-created(?) drawing with unclear educational use. Apparently not usefull, out of scope. Martin H. (talk) 17:30, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 09:00, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Some self-created(?) drawing with no educational use, out of scope. Martin H. (talk) 17:31, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Mbdortmund (talk) 09:01, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Some self-created(?) drawing with no educational use, out of scope. Martin H. (talk) 17:31, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Mbdortmund (talk) 09:01, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Clearly a cartoon image from an unnamed but almost certainly copyrighted source, and the uploader admits to photographing it. (added by User:Sitush) Rosenzweig δ 17:42, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:29, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
How old is this emblem (of a private university in the U.S.)? At any rate it's not "free software" as the license says. ~ NVO (talk) 17:52, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:30, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Scan of a photograph of a three-dimensional object, but there isn't enough evidence to show that the photograph is in the public domain or that the uploader took the photograph personally. In any case, there are many free photographs of higher quality in "Category:Dama d'Elx". — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 17:52, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- delete, no big deal, plenty of alternatives. NVO (talk) 16:38, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Mbdortmund (talk) 09:02, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
This and all other uploads from user:MNAirHead:
- File:Hitpatrollineup-tim.jpg
- File:Hitpatrollineup-michael.jpg
- File:Hitpatrol-lineup-andrew.jpg
- File:HitPatrolLineup-3.jpg
- File:HitPatrolLogo.gif (probably PD-Too-Simple)
All come from a site (of a probably non-notable band) which is "©2011 Hit Patrol - All Rights Reserved". I doubt that user:MNAirHead is indeed "I, the copyright holder...". ~ NVO (talk) 17:55, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Mbdortmund (talk) 09:03, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
promotion material for an unkonwn band? not used Avron (talk) 17:59, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 09:04, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
unused mix with questionable copyright. Avron (talk) 18:02, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:30, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
tagged "OTRS pending|month=October|day=28|year=2010" by the uploader - in addition I cannot see any reason why this should be a "government picture" Saibo (Δ) 18:08, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:30, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
private photo, not used Avron (talk) 18:19, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 09:05, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
unused banner, not usful for educational scope Avron (talk) 18:21, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 09:05, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
not used image of a name Avron (talk) 18:22, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 09:05, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
personal artwork? not used Avron (talk) 18:30, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:30, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
unused image-text Avron (talk) 18:33, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 09:06, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
unused personal artwork Avron (talk) 18:36, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 09:06, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. ■ MMXX talk 18:41, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Mbdortmund (talk) 09:06, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
personal poto? band? not used Avron (talk) 18:42, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Mbdortmund (talk) 09:07, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. ■ MMXX talk 18:43, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Mbdortmund (talk) 09:07, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 18:43, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:30, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 18:44, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Mbdortmund (talk) 09:08, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
unused user-logo Avron (talk) 18:46, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Mbdortmund (talk) 09:08, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
unused user-logo Avron (talk) 18:47, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Mbdortmund (talk) 09:08, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
unuesed user-logo Avron (talk) 18:48, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Mbdortmund (talk) 09:09, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
personal artwork? not used Avron (talk) 18:50, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Mbdortmund (talk) 09:09, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
personal artwork? not used Avron (talk) 18:51, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:31, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Unused image - out of project scope. ■ MMXX talk 18:54, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Mbdortmund (talk) 09:09, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
personal artwork, not used Avron (talk) 18:57, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Mbdortmund (talk) 09:10, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
personal artwork, not used Avron (talk) 18:58, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Mbdortmund (talk) 09:10, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 18:59, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Mbdortmund (talk) 09:11, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
On 14 February 2011, User:Cédric "Cid" uploaded a bunch of photographs from different auto races from around the world, all under {{Self}} tags. I could buy the story that in a year or two Cedric travelled from Lithuania to Taiwan to Abu Dhabi, but each photo in the group below was taken with a different camera. Fails duck test. delete:
- File:Abu Dhabi-16.jpg - Canon 1D
- File:FR-PTS Paris (6).jpg - Canon 40D
- File:TAIWAN Taroko Kartland (3).jpg - Olympus 8080
- File:LIT_Fun2Go_Vilnius_(3).JPG - Casio S-10
- File:Stade_de_france_panor..JPG - Nikon D2Х (although there's too many artefacts for a pro camera at ISO400 -??)
- File:FR_monaco_kart_cup_2010.JPG - Sony W80
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
These five files were taken with the same camera (Panasonic FZ18 - so says exif), in France, England, Singapore and Lithuania:
- File:SingaporeF12010.JPG, File:FRCircuitRoussillon0_(2).JPG, File:TecproROC2008.jpg, File:FR monaco kart cup 2009.3.JPG and File:Paulricard2009.JPG
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
From Cedric's contribution on fr-wiki (deleted, can't see but I've got the point from their talk page), he publicized http://www.tecpro.fr/ - a company selling those nice safety barriers shown in these pics. I presume that his uploads are company employees' shots, or their publicity agents' photos, but clearly not the work of a single person. NVO (talk) 18:59, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:32, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
personal artwork, not used Avron (talk) 19:01, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Mbdortmund (talk) 09:12, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
a screenshot, I doubt the uploader is the copyright-holder Avron (talk) 19:03, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 09:12, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
incorrect spelling of name, correct spelling at File:Carl Victor Weygandt (1921).png, identical file Roseohioresident (talk) 19:49, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: deleted by User:Rosenzweig Mbdortmund (talk) 09:13, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
unused private image - out of scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 19:56, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 09:13, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
unused private image - out of scope (misunderstanding of the commons) Cholo Aleman (talk) 20:01, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 09:13, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
correction: Category:Juris Laizāns Dark Eagle (talk) 20:01, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 09:14, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
unused private drawing - not really a good quality - out of scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 20:02, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 09:14, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
unused chalk drawing (sorry for my English) - not really useful for the commons - out of scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 20:04, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 09:14, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
unused private image - out of socpe Cholo Aleman (talk) 20:32, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 09:15, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
unused private drawing - out of scope (next time speedy deletion for this) Cholo Aleman (talk) 20:42, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 09:15, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Copyfraud. The original picture is avaiblable at http://imageshack.us/f/376/cabonoiteulllttcroppeqplo5.jpg/ .The photographer (and copyholder) is Cácio Murilo. The picture was blurred to hide the original watermark (and the copyright). Giro720 (talk) 20:52, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. It seems this uploader contributed nothing but deliberate copyright violations. —LX (talk, contribs) 09:03, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 09:15, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
No evidence that the uploader holds the copyright as pic is taken from a blog - also has incorrect permissions Chaosdruid (talk) 23:30, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:35, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Not a simple logo, but possibly PD-old? Darwin Ahoy! 05:04, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence of date of creation/author Ben.MQ (talk) 22:24, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
DR to check if this qualifies as a simple logo Darwin Ahoy! 11:41, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Ben.MQ (talk) 22:25, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
DR to check if this qualifies as a simple logo Darwin Ahoy! 14:00, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
Deleted. Ben.MQ (talk) 22:26, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
I uploaded the JPG version here, it's 6x smaller in size. Vinne2 (talk) 17:26, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: As unused duplicate Ben.MQ (talk) 22:28, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Replaced with Apple_logo_Think_Different_vectorized.svg - No longer linked on any wiki's JetBlast (talk) 17:40, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- Keep for the usual reasons, and also, the svg apple has a jagged contour. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 15:28, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- Keep, per Pieter Kuiper. Obelix (talk) 18:09, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Ben.MQ (talk) 06:46, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
No evidence that this image is in the public domain (publication date unknown, but if the image is of her as a judge, which is what it says, then it was taken after 1958, so another eight years for PD-India to be applicable). Also site license is incompatible with our terms. SpacemanSpiff (talk) 14:46, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- On this photo, the subject, born in 1905, certainly looks much younger than 54 years old, the age she would have when appointed to the high court. The photo probably dates from her term as a judge in the lower court (1937-1958). -- Asclepias (talk) 15:41, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- Interesting. I guessed the age to be 50s, but if it looks like it's an earlier photo then that's fine. SpacemanSpiff (talk) 16:19, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Kept: PD-India applies Alpertron (talk) 23:57, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
The logos below seem to be de minimis, but sending to DR just in case Darwin Ahoy! 11:05, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Kept: (by Jim) Jcb (talk) 15:43, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
DR to check if this qualifies as a simple logo Darwin Ahoy! 12:35, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- weak keep - I would say so. Simple shapes and text. And some simple shadows like you can do in every image editing program. The three circles are probably from the early 20th century. --Saibo (Δ) 21:19, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo Jcb (talk) 15:42, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Sending to DR to check if the logo is simple enough to not attract copyright Darwin Ahoy! 13:30, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- This should be moved to en.wiki and a proper rationale added as per below--Phagopsych (talk) 23:51, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
Summary -- Fair use in ŽFK Crvena Zvezda
[edit]
Though this image is subject to copyright, its use is covered by the U.S. fair use laws because:
- It illustrates an educational article about Red Star Belgrade.
- The image is used as the primary means of visual identification of the article topic.
- The image is low-resolution and unsuitable for production of counterfeit goods.
- The logo is not used in such a way that a reader would be confused into believing that the article is written or authorized by Red Star Belgrade.
- No uncopyrighted or freely copyrighted image of comparable educational value is available.
Licensing:
[edit]
--- It already appears as w:File:RedStarLogo.png and I do not think it is simple enough for public domain. The image is probably loaded separately onto dozens of projects. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:00, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:09, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Files of User:Vicer
[edit]- File:InternationalSign.jpg
- File:Caringbah Station.jpg
- File:Endeavour set train.jpg
- File:Kirrawee Station.jpg
- File:Gymea Station.jpg
- File:Mirandasign.jpg
- File:Photo-0160.jpg
- File:Photo-0180.jpg
- File:Mirandaplatform1.jpg
Reasons for deletion request: These photos are my own photos either uploaded to commons by myself or transferred from Wikipedia by someone else, and they are not of a high standard; most are blurry and can be replaced. These photos also do not feature in certain articles as they have been replaced by high quality photographs. I also need these deleted for privacy reasons. --Vicer (talk) 14:21, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: blurry, not in use Mbdortmund (talk) 08:54, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Brocken animated representations of methane
[edit]
All those "animated" representations of methane are brocken and strange: what we see is a kind of fragmented methane or whatsoever. As also unused, I propose deletion. --Yikrazuul (talk) 16:20, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- Delete unused, and I cannot find these animations educationally useful. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:28, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Mbdortmund (talk) 08:57, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Signatures uploaded by socks of Chaosname
[edit](edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Files nominated:
- File:Lukashenkosiganture2.jpg
- File:Georgepapandreousignature.jpg
- File:Lukashenkosignature.gif
- File:Håkanjuholtsignature.jpg
- File:Håkanjuholtsignature2.gif
These users, among others have been confirmed at ANI on en: to all be the same person:
- Chaosname (talk · contribs)
- Kids4Fun (talk · contribs)
- Freesaveliy (talk · contribs)
- Germanlight (talk · contribs)
Their uploads all make dubious claims of authorship. Obviously, the signatures are public domain in the US, but without an actual source, I don't think we can simply accept them as authentic. The user claims that he himself is the author which, of course, if that's the case then obviously they're not authentic. --UserB (talk) 21:35, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- In the terms of signatures for President Lukashenko, state laws and official decrees are public domain. So if we can find any such document online, we can crop and have a signature. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 02:54, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, obviously the signatures are public domain, but the issue is sourcing - we have no evidence of reason to believe that these signatures are authentic. For Lukashenko, the uploader claims to be the author. Maybe that means he just scribbled on a piece of paper and is trying to get it passed off here as a signature. This user has been vandalizing, socking, and uploading copyvio images over the course of five years and without an actual source, we have no reason to accept the images as authentic. --UserB (talk) 12:56, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
- That I understand, but just saying what sources we could find in order to get said signatures. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 19:44, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, obviously the signatures are public domain, but the issue is sourcing - we have no evidence of reason to believe that these signatures are authentic. For Lukashenko, the uploader claims to be the author. Maybe that means he just scribbled on a piece of paper and is trying to get it passed off here as a signature. This user has been vandalizing, socking, and uploading copyvio images over the course of five years and without an actual source, we have no reason to accept the images as authentic. --UserB (talk) 12:56, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:35, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
personal image, out of project scope. ■ MMXX talk 12:35, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Bencmq. ■ MMXX talk 22:12, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
