Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2008/08/13
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
This is another upload via Petrovsky18 which are copyright violations of photos stolen from airliners.net Russavia (talk) 00:53, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete nom appears to be correct - delete unless further info/verification can be provided by uploader. Cirt (talk) 04:39, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. I'm going to go ahead and treat this as a copyvio--the deleted image page on en-wiki notes that the image is "copyright Andreas Heilmann", and a huge number of the images they've uploaded on en-wiki have been deleted as possibly unfree. --jonny-mt 14:46, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
This is a morphed photo of movie poster for Rock on. The correct poster is "Rock on poster.jpg" at wikipedia. "Rawk on.jpg" is not needed on commons as it is pure vandalism. Gprince007 (talk) 07:10, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted as vandalism/copyrighted derivative work. --jonny-mt 14:49, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
This image was taken from http://www.lagoons.ae/ (click on "Media Centre," then "Construction of ...," then select the first image. Nothing on the website states that the image is under the GFDL or the CC 3.0. I think it is evident that the image is a copyright violation. LoverOfDubai (talk|contributions) 22:42, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
image has been requested for deletion. I will upload it again with a copyright at some stage-Apprentice23 (talk) 07:35, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. In the future you can request speedy deletion using the {{Copyvio}} tag. --jonny-mt 14:50, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Copyvio of http://img.gkblogger.com/blog/imgdb/000/000/162/573_2.jpg Chris Down (talk) 09:11, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. In the future, you can use {{Copyvio}} for cases like these. --jonny-mt 14:52, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. Túrelio (talk) 13:21, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image has been speedy-deleted by me after it was used as attack image in an personal attack article on :en. --Túrelio (talk) 13:29, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio: Out of project scope: Ued as attack image on en:Nathan Ritchie
Wrong licence is copyrightes Arno.Ho (talk) 19:22, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
kept, uploader vandalised the description and license-information himself. --Ra'ike T C 22:39, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Wrong licence is copyrightes Arno.Ho (talk) 19:23, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
kept, uploader vandalised the description and license-information himself. --Ra'ike T C 22:35, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Wrong licence is copyrightes Arno.Ho (talk) 19:25, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
kept, uploader vandalised the description and license-information himself --Ra'ike T C 21:38, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Wrong licence is copyrightes Arno.Ho (talk) 19:25, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
kept, uploader vandalised the description and license-information himself --Ra'ike T C 21:38, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Propably no approval of publication by portrayed person who is insulted in the description Axolotl Nr. 733 (talk) 20:32, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- What is the meaning of "Es una guarra"? --Túrelio (talk) 20:49, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- O.k., I looked into the dictionary, and speedied it as an attack image. --Túrelio (talk) 21:06, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- It was meant to be a nomination for speedy deletion, but apparently it didn't work quite the way I expected to do... --Axolotl Nr. 733 (talk) 21:14, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- O.k., I looked into the dictionary, and speedied it as an attack image. --Túrelio (talk) 21:06, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio: Out of project scope: As of uploaders own image description an attack image; depicted seems to be underage.
Wrong licence is copyrightes Arno.Ho (talk) 12:53, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
kept, uploader vandalised the description and license-information himself. --Ra'ike T C 10:28, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Wrong licence is copyrightes Arno.Ho (talk) 14:09, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
kept, uploader vandalised the description and license-information himself. --Ra'ike T C 23:58, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Wrong licence is copyrightes Arno.Ho (talk) 14:39, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
kept, uploader vandalised the description and license-information himself. --Ra'ike T C 22:59, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Wrong licence is copyrightes 84.165.94.172 15:45, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
kept, uploader vandalised the description and license-information himself. See also the other edits by that user and the other deletion requests that were closed by Ra'ike --Isderion (talk) 00:11, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Wrong licence is copyrightes Arno.Ho (talk) 15:50, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
kept, uploader vandalised the description and license-information himself. --Ra'ike T C 22:56, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Wrong licence is copyrightes Arno.Ho (talk) 17:11, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
kept, uploader vandalised the description and license-information himself. --Ra'ike T C 22:54, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
This is a duplicate of the image 'lehigh valley hospital.1.jpg" Roy.bland (talk) 17:35, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
{{dupe}}d - please use this template in the future. Will be deleted when universally replaced. — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 03:09, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Wrong licence is copyrightes Arno.Ho (talk) 17:41, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
kept, uploader vandalised the description and license-information himself. --Ra'ike T C 22:52, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
personal vanity gallery file not in Commons Scope --WayneRay (talk) 18:14, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted by User:Zzyzx11 on 05:58, 14 August 2008. --Kimse (talk) 06:43, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
copy violation, see http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2008/08/09/world/20080809-GEORGIA_2.html. Image is (c) Ghetty Images Matthiasb (talk) 18:24, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - Speedy Delete as obvious copyvio. Cirt (talk) 01:18, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 03:02, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Wrong licence is copyrightes Arno.Ho (talk) 19:19, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
kept, uploader vandalised the description and license-information himself. --Ra'ike T C 22:45, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Wrong licence is copyrightes Arno.Ho (talk) 19:20, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
kept, uploader vandalised the description and license-information himself. --Ra'ike T C 22:43, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Composite of (presumably) copyrighted images, copyright still belongs to original owners Ytoyoda (talk) 22:57, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted by Polarlys: copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing
This is a photo of a recent advertising campaign - the creator surely can't have the right to release copyright for the poster. --69.86.55.20 18:20, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete as copyvio. Pruneautalk 17:21, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Uploader doesn't own copyright here. --Leoboudv (talk) 05:39, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Uploader requested speedy deletion to boot. --jonny-mt 14:31, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
I want to create a category for the Caption comic convention and it may be better to do that with the name Category:Caption comic convention. I don't know if you have speedy deletion on Commons but at Wikipedia I could delete this as user requested, so if that applies do so. Thanks and apologies. Hiding (talk) 16:36, 13 August 2008 (UTC) --Hiding (talk) 18:17, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Rocket000(talk) 02:30, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
Image contains an incorrect chemical structure and has resided in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams without objection for more than a month Edgar181 (talk) 18:04, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - Delete, not worthwhile retaining this image due to inaccuracies. Cirt (talk) 01:15, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
I don't think that having a bromine that is a bit small is enough of a reason for deletion when there is no alternative version of this image (or is there?) --Itub (talk) 12:00, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
- The purpose of a space-filling model is to depict the volume and shape of a molecule in three-dimensional space, so if an atom is improperly sized, the model does not accurately depict the the volume and shape. Though the bromine atom is not terribly inaccurate in this case, I have gone ahead and created a corrected image at Image:Bromodragonfly3D.png. Edgar181 (talk) 12:45, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, if there is a substitute I have no objection. Note that even if the volumes were not all correct, at least the figure could have been useful to get an idea of the shape of the molecule (although I prefer stick models for that...) --Itub (talk) 13:15, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 03:07, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Photo by Heinrich Hoffmann (1885-1957). Thuresson (talk) 02:22, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - Thuresson (talk · contribs) is right, the image is improperly tagged as public domain and does not belong on this project (unless further info can be provided explicitly about this image's status). Cirt (talk) 04:42, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Well, as far as the law that governs this site goes, they are public domain, but one set of laws ain't good enough for Commons, so delete. Rocket000(talk) 11:10, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Anonymous101 talk 16:48, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Licence not applicable as the photo clearly is licenced as all rights reserved. Email has been sent to the photographer enquiring as to whether they ever licenced it under cc-by-2.0, am awaiting a reply, but until such time as that occurs, I feel it is better to pre-empt the response to show that we don't stand for any copyright violation Russavia (talk) 10:33, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete agree w/ Russavia (talk · contribs) - delete unless further info is provided by uploader. Cirt (talk) 01:08, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Anonymous101 talk 16:50, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
The artist died in 1963 and cannot have uploaded it here. http://www.finchleygallery.com/the-artist.htm Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:28, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Note: I should have done a mass deletion on this and the two subsequent. Sorry! I didn't realize it was possible. I believe the uploader is quite likely the owner of the website which also hosts these images. Given that the website is apparently a tribute by the descendants of the artist, it may be that they own the copyright to these images. But the uploading rationale is not plausible and needs to be addressed. These images are not public domain, as the artist died in 1963. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:33, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete unless further info and verification/permission is provided by the uploader. Cirt (talk) 01:11, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Anonymous101 talk 16:51, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
The artist died in 1963 and cannot have uploaded it here. http://www.finchleygallery.com/the-artist.htm Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:29, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete unless further info and verification/permission is provided by the uploader. Cirt (talk) 01:11, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Anonymous101 talk 16:51, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
The artist died in 1963 and cannot have uploaded it here. http://www.finchleygallery.com/the-artist.htm Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:30, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete unless further info and verification/permission is provided by the uploader. Cirt (talk) 01:11, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Anonymous101 talk 16:51, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Picture is "Photo courtesy Lockheed-Martin" and thus not taken by employee of US Gov and thus not PD schlendrian •λ• 12:36, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Not PD. Pruneautalk 17:01, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Anonymous101 talk 16:52, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Although ugly, the troll statue is subject to copyright, presumably by Disney. --Sandstein (talk) 13:51, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- I'm afraid you're right because of no FOP in Norway. Uploaded from en:wiki with wrong GFDL license, and should be deleted. Julo (talk) 14:53, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. The sculpture is in the USA, not Norway (the Norway pavilion at Epcot, Walt Disney World Resort, Orlando, Florida). No FOP in the USA, so delete. Pruneautalk 17:07, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Anonymous101 talk 16:52, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama for statues in USA. Who is sculptor? When he/she died? EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - Delete, per EugeneZelenko (talk · contribs) - that is, unless further info is provided on the sculptor. Cirt (talk) 01:14, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Statue was dedicated in 1983. Lupo 07:45, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Stewart statue.jpg is of the same statue, and should be added to this request. --dave pape (talk) 01:49, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Anonymous101 talk 16:52, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
and other uploads by End3er (talk · contribs): small resolution different cameras, scans, most likely taken from Web. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Taken from [1], copyvio. Pruneautalk 17:03, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Anonymous101 talk 16:53, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
created new one --122.164.40.77 18:05, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted by Spacebirdy: Off-Topic: Please see Commons inclusion policy
collage, usage of at least two unfree photos, see http://www.biochem.wisc.edu/faculty/adler/cv.aspx Polarlys (talk) 22:38, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
The collage was made by me User:Kohlasz. Both photos are modified compared to the original ones - see colours etc. Over these facts in both cases I have the agreements for the useage of these items in public, scientific media for free. The other photos belong to the non copyright requested group of images due to the time of their publication. Kohlasz (talk) 16:40, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
The renewal of the agreement has arrived some minutes before. Please tell me the address to be posted. Kohlasz (talk) 17:09, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
- Please read Commons:Licensing. „Usage in public scientific media“ isn’t enough, we still have no proper source (who is the artist) and of course no permission. Please provide proper sources for all works used in this collage. --Polarlys (talk) 23:06, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Code·is·poetry 17:38, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
Composite of copyrighted images, uploader does not own the rights Ytoyoda (talk) 22:58, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Rebuttal - Brett has never played for the Chicago Bears, so obviously I created it myself. I made it when I thought they would trade him within the division. —Preceding unsigned comment added by KenGriffeyJr17 (talk • contribs) 12:49, August 15, 2008 (UTC)
- As far as copyright is concerned, you did not create the image yourself - you modified a pre-existing copyrighted image to create a derivative work, so the copyright still belongs to the original photographer(s). Ytoyoda (talk) 20:06, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Kimse (talk) 21:53, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
License not credible. --diego_pmc (talk) 10:46, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- are you blind, there is a permission from photographer below the image DingirXul (talk) 16:06, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Comment: Verification on this permission should be provided to OTRS by the uploader. Cirt (talk) 01:09, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
- image was uploaded two years ago, at that time there was no OTRS DingirXul (talk) 12:22, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
- Two years ago there was OTRS. This image can be speedy if you ask me (screenshot) Sterkebaktalk 13:59, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Martin H. (talk) 18:15, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
no source 76.175.162.28 05:42, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 22:39, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
Duplicate (except for size) of Image:Mort_du_fossoyeur.jpg Marnanel (talk) 18:09, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep Not exact duplicate. Different lighting. -Nard the Bard 21:32, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&diff=13527984&oldid=13212543){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&diff=13529946&oldid=13212587){kind=link}
supposedly "not an object of copyright", w/o explanation 206.170.102.210 17:01, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete {{PD-GE-exempt}} doesn't apply to photographs. Pruneautalk 17:15, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep First of all the author is unknown and the photo is taken during the soviet period in which case there are no copyright restriction available anywhere regarding that photo. This is just another try by Russian users to delete Georgia related photos. The reason is inadequate for deletion and I dont see any solid arguments for it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iberieli (talk • contribs) 18:35, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
- Regarding copyright for Soviet-era works, you may wish to study the arguments in en:Template talk:PD-USSR and Template talk:PD-Soviet. Your assumption regarding the anonymous user with the American IP address do not seem to fit in with their editing patterns, either. —LX (talk, contribs) 06:32, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Martin H. (talk) 20:30, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
source=copyrighted website Mangostar (talk) 18:36, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Martin H. (talk) 20:31, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
I think it's a derivative work of Led Zeppelin's album cover, maybe they're not copyrightable though. Don't know. Peregrine Fisher (talk) 00:25, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
was kept before. no new arguments --ALE! ¿…? 22:33, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
User:Carpenters13's uploads
[edit]
the images were originaly used in a parody article on en. They all looke like they were taken from the web.Geni (talk) 00:27, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Obvious copyvios. — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 03:10, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
SVG I made is broken and I don't know how to fix it 790 (talk) 13:05, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
K! Closed. Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 01:15, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Probably faulty and misleading data. A user on de.WP emailed me about several problems with this map I created, most of them with the trustworthiness of the data source I used, but also systematic errors I made when allocating city districts from the source to the map. So this work of mine is like to be faulty and misleading, and I'd prefer to have it deleted. 790 (talk) 14:34, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete I see no issue with deleting per rationale provided above by 790 (talk · contribs). Cirt (talk) 01:13, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Comment: Why is this being discussed here? If the original uploader wants to delete an image he/she made, he/she should have just asked an Admin to delete it. --Leoboudv (talk) 05:37, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. User request granted. (Unused) Rocket000(talk) 11:16, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
manipulated photograph, not an actual single photo file not in Commons Scope --WayneRay (talk) 19:29, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Kept. It is in use, nevertheless MichaelMaggs (talk) 21:22, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Derivative work of a model placed indoors (so Swedish freedom of panorama does not apply). Needs permission from the creator(s) of the model to stay. This also applies to Image:Birka Modell 2008b.jpg and Image:Birka Modell 2008c.jpg. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:25, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Freedom of panorama does not apply indoors. Pruneautalk 17:20, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 21:21, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Work of artistic craftsmanship, but NOT permamently situated in a public space (only put up for a short period in the Winter) ViperSnake151 (talk) 23:01, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:FOP#Canada. Pruneautalk 17:18, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 21:21, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Invalid license, copyright holder has not provided image for use under GPL. 64.46.10.146 07:46, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- You're right, it's not GPL, but it's very likely it's freely licensed.[2] Rocket000(talk) 11:13, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Kept, BSD-stylish license according to the web page. Kameraad Pjotr 20:34, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
if author ist unknown, the picture is PD in 2034 years or later Emkaer (talk) 10:15, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Has it not expired in 2004 ? (Anonymous-EU) --A1B2C3D4 (talk) 09:40, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
- Another thing - bestowed and handed over to the public together with the remainder of his papers by his widow - that means it is PD
- von Rheinbaben's widow can't donate to the public domain a copyright she didn't own. --dave pape (talk) 00:46, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
- Still, unknown - 2004. But who says she did not own it ? --78.3.71.74 14:36, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
- That no one says it is not a proof that she owned it. 83.199.20.61 12:39, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
- Still, unknown - 2004. But who says she did not own it ? --78.3.71.74 14:36, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
- von Rheinbaben's widow can't donate to the public domain a copyright she didn't own. --dave pape (talk) 00:46, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Kept, PD (bestowed and handed over to the public). Kameraad Pjotr 20:31, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
is a collage with at least two unfree photos, one from http://www.biochem.wisc.edu/faculty/adler/cv.aspx Omphalos (talk) 23:20, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Uploader is trying to get permission. (OTRS) Kameraad Pjotr 19:05, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
- So who is the photographer of picture number 7 and the painter of picture number 6? --Polarlys (talk) 14:02, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted, per Polarlys. Kameraad Pjotr 20:25, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
is a collage with at least two unfree photos, one from http://www.biochem.wisc.edu/faculty/adler/cv.aspx Omphalos (talk) 23:23, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
The collage was made by me User:Kohlasz. Both photos are modified compared to the original ones - see colours etc. Over these facts in both cases I have the agreements for the useage of these items in public, scientific media for free. The other photos belong to the non copyright requested group of images due to the time of their publication. Kohlasz (talk) 16:43, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
The renewal of the agreement has arrived some minutes before. Please tell me the address to be posted. Kohlasz (talk) 17:12, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted, see Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Chtxhistory.png. Kameraad Pjotr 20:29, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
is a collage with at least two unfree photos, one from http://www.biochem.wisc.edu/faculty/adler/cv.aspx Omphalos (talk) 23:37, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
The collage was made by me User:Kohlasz. Both photos are modified compared to the original ones - see colours etc. Over these facts in both cases I have the agreements for the useage of these items in public, scientific media for free. The other photos belong to the non copyright requested group of images due to the time of their publication. Kohlasz (talk) 16:44, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
The renewal of the agreement has arrived some minutes before. Please tell me the address to be posted.Kohlasz (talk) 17:11, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
- Forward the permission for usage in your collages to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. In this mail, you should mention all the files containing the pictures permitted for usage in your collage. After that, the GDFL-status of the collages should be confirmed. Greetings -- Omphalos (talk) 13:53, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted, see Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Chtxhistory.png. Kameraad Pjotr 20:29, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Buzz Aldrin's Race into Space
[edit]Screenshots, gameplay, artwork
[edit]- File:SplashScreen.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:BARISSplashScreen.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:BARIS TheCape.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:BARIS Baikonour.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:BARIS CDNewscast.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:BARIS R&D.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:BARIS MissionPlanning.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:BARIS Recruitment.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:BARIS LaunchPad.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:R&D Sov.gif (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:R&D US.gif (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Original source indeterminate clip art
[edit]- File:BadRocket.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:GeminiCapsule.gif (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:JupiterCapsule.gif (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:KvartetCapsule.gif (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Lapot.gif (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:SoyuzCapsule.gif (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:VoskhodCapsule.gif (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:XMS-2.gif (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:RIS Gemini.gif (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:RIS Apollo.gif (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:RIS Jupiter.gif (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:RIS Kvartet.gif (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:RIS Lapot.gif (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:RIS Soyuz.gif (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:RIS Voskhod.gif (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:RIS XMS-2.gif (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
I suspect that the above images listed by Lordpeyre (talk · contribs) are all copyvios. Here is my evidence:
- The same or similar images had been previously uploaded to English Wikipedia as "Fair Use" and were subsequently deleted (see Peyre's user talk at English WP) before they were uploaded here.
- The images state they are from the open-source project "Raceintospace". However, the artwork depicted here is from the original game released by Interplay.
- Those images of spacecraft and the explosion may be copyvios regardless, as it cannot be determined what the original source of this imagery is (e.g., the space capsules might be from NASA or the CIA, but may be derived from a mockup made by a non-government agency). The point is we can't tell.
Thanks! Mendaliv (talk) 09:10, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
This discussion seemingly will never end. Mendaliv, your evidence seemingly convincing, but it's off base here. I originally uploaded images from BARIS. I explained repeatedly that the game's copyright has reverted to its original designers and that they gave me explicit written permission to post them, but the images started being deleted anyway. Finally I captured screenshots from the open-source port "Raceintospace" instead, at the original programmer's suggestion, and now, predictably it seems, I'm being challenged on them again.
If you'd like to establish where the artwork is originally from, you could ask the original programmer, Michael McCarty. In fact he answered this very question just today: http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=2131111&forum_id=438959/&abmode=1
Excuse me if I seem a little testy about this issue, but I've explained repeatedly and am still being challenged on it.
71.128.152.202 04:36, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Oh wait, I see it's you that Michael was responding to. Ok, so I see you're already doing your homework (my fault for not checking before copy & pasting). Hopefully he can answer any questions you have on this. 71.128.152.202 04:50, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
- Okay, then. That confirms that a large portion of those images are probably free use. Per Mr. McCarty's comment on SourceForge, Image:SplashScreen.jpg and Image:BARISSplashScreen.jpg are probably not free-use, at least in part due to Mr. Aldrin's signature. I would like to suggest however that the artwork of things such as space capsules and screenshots of video sequences of rockets exploding, etc, may be public domain (product of NASA) or protected by other copyright (product of news agencies of that era). The fact that Strategic Visions used that artwork in the old BARIS is meaningless as they may well have paid a licensing fee to use it. IANAL, so I'd like to hear comment from someone more experienced in researching licensing issues such as these. I'm going to ask for participation from Mr. McCarty in this discussion over on SourceForge. Mendaliv (talk) 14:34, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
- Also, the thing is, you still could have used the copyrighted imagery from BARIS just fine on Wikipedia, provided you'd followed the rules for posting "fair-use" images. It looks like you hadn't provided a properly detailed Fair-use rationale on those images that were deleted, which is why they were deleted. Mendaliv (talk) 14:47, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Thanks Mendaliv. I can see where some of the concern is coming from, then. Sorting out the details of photo upload on WP and WC it a little complicated, and trying to figure out how to indicate the licensing for this was a nightmare, since it's sort of nonstandard. Hashing this all out is probably a good idea; if some or all of the images should be deleted, I'll be happy to do so. 165.107.9.47 19:04, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
The Images of the gameplay posted by Peyre were taken from the Open Source version of the game. The graphics imagery are identical to the DOS game. All the game sources and images that I had ownership of have been released as Open Source under the GPL and anyone is free to use them.
The original Interplay image with Buzz Aldrin is something we're not using in the Open Source version because Mr Aldrin's name was licensed by Interplay for the version they released. I believe that the screenshot with Mr Aldrin can be used when referencing the original game in the same way the Quake box cover is used on it's wiki page.
Quoting from there: "id Software has released no such images into the public domain, and a replacement image could not be created that would adequately provide the same information The image is being used for no purpose other than to identify the subject of the article The use of this image neither detracts from the game nor inhibits its salability in any way"
-Michael McCarty
- Yeah, the concern isn't so much whether we can or can't use it; it's whether it's really free-use. The BARIS splash with the "Buzz Aldrin" signature can still be used on Wikipedia, but it'll have to be deleted from Commons. Commons only permits images that are available under a free-use license (GPL/GDFL, Creative Commons, Public Domain), while Wikipedia is a bit more liberal. The problem with Peyre/Lordpeyre's images on Wikipedia had been apparently that they lacked any Fair-use Rationale. Peyre/Lordpeyre, if you want to contact me on Wikipedia (same username), I can help you out with those details of fair-use imagery. Mendaliv (talk) 22:09, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Okay, considering all I've seen here, I'm withdrawing my nomination. Mendaliv (talk) 00:13, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
- Nomination withdrawn, images kept. odder 10:51, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Isamu Noguchi sculptures without FOP
[edit]Isamu Noguchi's works are still copyrighted. These photos were taken in the U.S., where there is no freedom of panorama for sculptures, or in Japan, where sculpture FOP is noncommercial-only.
- Image:East Coast 089.jpg - Mountainville, NY [3]
- I have no idea whether the title of the image is the same as the title of the sculpture. The sculpture is only partly visible. Nature is prevailing. So keep it.--Gerardus (talk) 09:06, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Noguchi Franklin.png - Philadelphia
- Image:Noguchi Moerenuma Park 2.jpg - Sapporo (the sculpture is a relatively small part of the photo, but the title and description indicate it as the primary subject)
- I strongly believe (?) that the whole Moerenuma Park is a kind of Environmental art object and not only the sculpture. Would that mean that it is impossible to see an image of the Park on Commons? --Gerardus (talk) 09:11, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
- If you mean something like Spiral Jetty, then that's possible, unless "park design" is more properly classified as architecture than sculpture (I have no opinion on that). --dave pape (talk) 13:20, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
- It's neither architecture nor a piece of art. It's a new kind of art, whidely spread since a number of years in parks, squares and memorial areas. "Park design" is not an adequate description anymore.--Gerardus (talk) 06:21, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- If you mean something like Spiral Jetty, then that's possible, unless "park design" is more properly classified as architecture than sculpture (I have no opinion on that). --dave pape (talk) 13:20, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:NoguchiBlackSlideMantraInside.jpg - Sapporo
- Image:NoguchiBlackSlideMantraOutside.jpg - Sapporo
- Image:NoguchiMoerenumaPark.jpg - Sapporo
- Image:Volunteer Park Space Needle view.jpg - Seattle
- Image:Volunteer Park reservoir statue.jpg - Seattle
--dave pape (talk) 18:14, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - agree with Davepape (talk · contribs), not appropriate for inclusion on this project. Cirt (talk) 01:17, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete You're right, my two photos included. rootology (T) 03:05, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
- <
>> -- Chris 73 (talk) 18:01, 15 August 2008 (UTC)-- Chris 73 (talk) 17:59, 15 August 2008 (UTC) Keep Please clarify if the missing freedom of panorama also applies to Japan. I may change my vote after that. Until then, please keep the Sapporo pictures. Thanks <- See COM:FOP#Japan. --dave pape (talk) 20:21, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Most unfortunate -- Chris 73 (talk) 07:03, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
- See COM:FOP#Japan. --dave pape (talk) 20:21, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Closing as delete. Most unfortunate indeed. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:39, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- Additional cross-wiki DR can be found at en:Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2008 November 17#Noguchi statues over the artworks by the same artist. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:07, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Image of a logo of an Israel Defense Forces corps; no evidence of a free license, and certainly the copyright holder is not User:Alonnardi. Under 'source' it says 'published to the public', which does not indicate a free license. -- Ynhockey (talk) 15:06, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. No evidence that this would be a free image has been provided. Ilmari Karonen (talk) 17:03, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
This image is for free use". See this site: http://www.aka.idf.il/main/rabanut/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alonnardi (talk • contribs)