Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2006/10/30

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 30th, 2006
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(category without sense, since all pictures at commons are "views") W!B: 03:38, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

?? inclusion fails: Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Views of Austria --W!B: 23:31, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Category:Views of Austria and in general Category:Views do not make sense to me. --Jarekt (talk) 17:56, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: old + this category structure is widespread now. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:28, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is a mirror-inverted image (orig. Image: Image:Angela_Merkel_Joh.jpg) and therefore a counterfeit, it is also redundant because of the original image BilderMax 17:28, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion request is frivolous and comes close to trolling. There is absolute no reason to delete this image. An image turned the right way (to the text) is very useful, also it is cut to better fit in info boxes. This image is thus better suited for Wikipedia articles than the original. Ninder 04:56, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Except that this is what serious newspapers would consider a fake image; they wouldn't use it for reporting, and neither should Wikipedia for articles. PDD 10:21, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. A human face is not symmetric, so a mirrored portrait photo does not exactly represent the person. This would be okay for art purposes, for an encyclopaedia it is not. Btw, calling this deletion request frivolous and close to trolling comes close to trolling. --Magadan 15:27, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Civility is required not just recommended. Be polite people. --Cat out 01:49, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per arguments. / Fred Chess 17:02, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]