Commons:Administrators/Requests/Rillke

 Support = 36;  Oppose = 1;  Neutral = 0 - 97 Result. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Rillke

Vote

Rillke (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)

Scheduled to end: 18:00, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

I want to nominate Rillke for adminship on Commons. He has been here since June 2010 and has 11,103 edits. He is familiar with community through many discussions such as deletion requests, village pump... He also has good knowledge of licensing policy. I think he will keep doing well with adminship Hoangquan hientrang (talk) 11:02, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Deutsch: Ja, ich akzeptiere.

Oh ja, diese Entscheidung war wirklich schwierig. Nun wer bin ich?

Technisch bin ich sehr interessiert, bin aber leider kein Profi. Deshalb werden die Skripte, die ich schrieb oder -manchmal zutreffender- zusammenklebte, viel Wartung benötigen. Außerdem kommt die nächste Version von MediaWiki, 1.19 auch irgendwann, was gewiss zusätzlichen Wartungsaufwand bedeutend. Das will ich in Zukunft selbst erledigen.

English: Yes, I accept.

Oh. This decision took a while. So who am I?

I am a user interested in techniques but unfortunately not a professional. That's why the scripts I wrote will need a lot of maintenance in future and - as we know - when MediaWiki is updated, some tools terminate working properly, too. I don't intend going on bothering the few existent admins who dare to fulfill my edit-protected requests, instead, I'd like to do and test them myself. Don't be scared: With testing I mean looking for errors after deployment. I am also admin on test.wikipedia now. Therefore I have the possibility to check for potential bugs before.

Do you intend helping to reduce the deletion-backlog? - No. Sorry, there is enough work with the scripts and the interface-messages. In some very simple cases, I will continue making decisions or just close hoax-requests like I did in the past.

Français : Accepté.

Cette décision a pris du temps... Mais qui suis-je ?

Je suis une personne très intéressé en technique et qui parle français seulement au niveau élémentaire. Mais c'est une langue vraiment très beau.

J'ai besoin de ces droits afin d'attendre mes scripts.

-- RE rillke questions? 13:15, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Votes

•  Support as the nominator --Hoangquan hientrang (talk) 11:02, 29 August 2011 (UTC) You may revoke your vote if you want to. RE rillke questions? 20:44, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Yeay, at last. Thanks for all your work, Rillke! No doubts (especially if I look one subpage further below). --Saibo (Δ) 13:39, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Auf jeden Fall! Definitely positive! --Schwäbin (talk) 14:19, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support - Jcb (talk) 14:33, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Does a great job with license reviewer requests. Trusted user and contributing to project. No reservations on his nomination. Warfieldian ^(talk) 15:30, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support looks good enough to me. Thank you for your work. --AFBorchert (talk) 17:40, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support useful mostly - thanks for helping --Herby ^{talk thyme} 17:44, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support I'm glad you accepted the nomination.  ■ MMXX  ^talk 19:36, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Finally! Trijnstel (talk) 21:19, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --  Docu  at 03:14, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per tagging of File:Wikipic file information (Internet Explorer 8).png. --  Docu  at 22:27, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
  • and per templating users on User_talk:Magnus_Manske#Please_do_not_remove_problem_tags. --  Docu  at 22:50, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
  •  Comment: Magnus Manske and Rillke have now fixed the problem you cited by themselves amicably without any issues and Rillke did admit his mistake...which is what we expect in our Admins since everyone makes mistakes. I think this is a good sign that Rillke has an open mind. Cheers, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:08, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
    • We'd still expect them to be knowledgeable about what to tag if they decide to be active in that field. --  Docu  at 02:22, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
•  Support :-) Grand-Duc (talk) 03:46, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Hurray! I expect you won't be very visible as an admin - the tools will just make your excellent tech work easier. But if you do go into other admin areas, I'm sure your decision-making will be good. Rd232 (talk) 15:53, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Foroa (talk) 17:11, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support no-brainer, the user does great work in numerous different areas -- from script programming to deletion requests. --Trycatch (talk) 18:12, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support. Geagea (talk) 19:01, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support. (enough said by above voters) --Túrelio (talk) 20:50, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
• Support, per above. Good temperament and great experience. Ajraddatz (talk) 22:25, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:53, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support From what I've seen, a great contributor, likely to use the tools well; unlikely to destroy the wiki, even were that possible. --Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 07:35, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support. Nothing much to say, good luck! Rehman 09:52, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Finally!      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:34, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support A great contributor. So, why not support Rillke's RfA. But if you become an Admin, do try to mark some flickr images that need human review please. --Leoboudv (talk) 20:14, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Very helpful contributor (I thought you already were an sysop here). PierreSelim (talk) 07:08, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Neozoon (talk) 22:47, 31 October 2011 (UTC) I had a lot of interaction with Rillke, I trust him that he will use the additional buttons wisely
•  Support I had no negative experience with this user and he is known well to me. --ALE! ¿…? 15:35, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Per above. Uğurlar! --►Safir yüzüklü Cekli^mesaj 06:10, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
•  Support, certainly. Jafeluv (talk) 14:23, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Courcelles (talk) 17:40, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
•  Support per all above. Amada44  ^{talk to me} 20:04, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Funfood Funtalk 12:13, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Sure. Somehow, I have a feeling that our backlog in edit protected requests will be dramatically reduced ;-) Jean-Fred (talk) 15:12, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Everything has been said. --High Contrast (talk) 16:10, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Active contributor. And with the sysop flag, he'll help the project even better. --FalconL ^?! 17:38, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Why not? -FASTILY ^(TALK) 21:23, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Lot of experience and high acceptance --A.Ceta (talk) 08:53, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Glad to have you on board as admin. --99of9 (talk) 09:12, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Comments

• User:Hoangquan hientrang again nominated a User without any prior consultation. We should wait for an acceptance by the nominated user before we go any further. --High Contrast (talk) 11:11, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
  • In the meantime, he accepted. --  Docu  at 03:14, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
• User:Hoangquan hientrang has resigned from Commons now according to his wishes and asked to be indefinitely blocked. --Leoboudv (talk) 07:41, 30 October 2011 (UTC)